British Royalty Template‑class | |||||||
|
Should these ladies be sorted by their maiden names, rather than married names, or is it fine the way it is? Morhange (talk) 04:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Isn't Lady a title of nobility? Morhange (talk) 07:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
As Charles already proposed a year ago, I think we should sort these princesses under their birth names and titles. A quick look at the template would make people realise that there were titleless commoners who became princesses even in the 18th century and that there are still princesses today who are of noble birth. It would also provide a short description of their background: four of these women were Princesses of Greece, two were Princesses of Prussia, two were Princesses of Greece, two were daughters of earls and one was a daughter of duke. There were royal princesses, princely princesses, duchesses, a grand duchess, a countess, a baroness and even a margravine. Such a diversity can only be noticed if we sort them under their birth names and titles, just like we sorted British princesses by birth under their marital titles.
What do you think?
Surtsicna (talk) 23:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
If we're going to keep her in, then we need to rename this template to "Wives of British princes" or some such. DrKiernan (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)