This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jews and Judaism sidebar template. |
|
Judaism Template‑class | |||||||
|
Previous discussions:
Land of Israel was added by me.--HIZKIAH (User • Talk) 15:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
How is renewal judaism a den.? Isn't it just another hasidic den.? And shouldn't Dor Daim be included? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.206.248.147 (talk) 13:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
I propose adding a link to the criticism page. Back in December, the Mormonism, Buddhism, and Islam templates all had links to their specific criticism page, however Islam removed their citing this template as precedent. Ironically, someone wanted to include the Criticism of Christianity link on the Christianity template, and cited those as precedent. If this is going to be a matter of "Well the Jews don't have the link, so why should we" or "The Mormons have the link, so should the Muslims" etc, we should decided as a whole whether links to these criticism pages are appropriate for the parent religion templates. I believe that all religion templates should have a link to the parent criticism page (if one exists), and that is what I am proposing here. What do we think?-Andrew c 00:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Two unrelated topics:
I have removed both for now, thus saving 2 lines. ←Humus sapiens ну? 01:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Since Jewish political movements are very recent historical phenomenon, and Jewish history and persecution are very old, I'm moving Jewish political movements to the end. Yehoishophot Oliver 15:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Do we really need all those languages? They certainly seem less relevant than the other sections.
I think the bottom two lines of the languages section could easily come off. Is there anyone who objects to this? --Eliyak T·C 21:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone else see it? And why on Earth does it show up? It's so annoying. Lockesdonkey (talk) 04:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Is the mention of China necessary in the 'Population (Historical)' section? It isn't historically an established religion just as it is in say India or Iran etc. It’s just not something that’s been relatively recent, and the alleged 'history' is still rather dubious according to many sources, I think it should be removed from the list. Smarred Wolet (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Check out the template here, why are the images scaled non-uniformly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fixman (talk • contribs) 16:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
I've put together a version which makes use of {{Navbox with collapsible groups}} to considerably shrink the template's footprint. Here it is (code is at User:Eliyak/work/jew):
One great feature is that a section can be automatically focused. For example, {{User:Eliyak/work/jew|principles}} produces:
User:Eliyak/work/jew | User:Eliyak/work/jew |
--Eliyak T·C 17:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Lack of comments means I am moving ahead with the change. If it proves unpopular, it can always be reverted. --Eliyak T·C 01:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it really neccessary for a menorah to be used in the template. For one, Hanukkah is a very unimportant holiday in Judaism, and most would not celebrate it if not for its proximity to Christmas. Secondly, A picture of a Torah would do the job much better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.203.128 (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)