Template_talk:WikiProject_Bristol Knowpia

Bristol NA‑class

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
NA	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Usage edit

You can copy and paste the code below. {{Bristol |class = |importance = |photo = |map = |ibox = }} All arguments are optional, so to add the basic version of this template to an article talk page, type {{Bristol}} There are six arguments that can be specified. The first is class. The possible values for this are FA, A, GA, B, Start, Stub, NA, List and FL. The value should be assigned according to the guidelines on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Assessment FAQ.

The second is importance, which can be Top, High, Mid or Low. The use of these ratings is yet to be decided. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol for discussion on the subject.

The other four possible arguments all have the same possible values.

photo - whether or not the article needs a photo
map - whether or not the article needs a map
ibox - whether or not the article needs an infobox

The possible values of these arguments are:

yes - this information in included in the article
na - this information does not apply to this article
needs - this information is needed by the article
If no value is specified, then no information is displayed

Problem with template edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This template 'eats' any that follow it. See for example Talk:Coombe Dingle, and also try replacing the {{reqphoto|Bristol}} with any other template. I don't know how to unpick the conditional nightmare that is the template, but I hope perhaps the author can. (Incidentally, that {{reqphoto|Bristol}} needs to go from Talk:Coombe Dingle; I've left it there as an example for the time being). Splash - tk 16:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply I've reverted the template back to a previous working version. My attempt at being clever obviously didn't work! — Gasheadsteve ^{Talk to me} 16:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks; is a pity the template 'comes free with' so much gubbins in it. Still, since it never gets subst'ed onto talk pages, it's no big deal. Splash - tk 19:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Summary

Usage edit

Problem with template edit