Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy
Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles
Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge
Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified
In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled
Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
Humour: Letters from the editors
Comix: Layout issue
Single page
Front page
About
Subscribe
Suggestions
Archives
The Signpost: 17 January 2017edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
Interview: What is it like to edit Wikipedia when you're blind?
In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
Recent research: Female Wikipedians aren't more likely to edit women biographies; Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks and Seasons Greetings
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy New Year and happy flying!
JTF17A (talk) 00:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
711321Reply
Happy New Year, Bzuk!
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bzuk, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year!edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for the greetings and the help many years ago. I have been MIA for awhile but did some minor editing today and saw your greetings. Much success and blessings in 2018. Pheasantpete (talk) 11:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Happy Pongal, Makar Sankranti, Lohri and Bihu to you!
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending! — Ssven2Looking at you, kid 10:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 8 – 15 January 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 8 – 15 January 2018
Metadata on the Marchedit
From the days of hard-copy liner notes on music albums, metadata have stood outside a piece or file, while adding to understanding of where it comes from, and some of what needs to be appreciated about its content. In the GLAM sector, the accumulation of accurate metadata for objects is key to the mission of an institution, and its presentation in cataloguing.
Today Wikipedia turns 17, with worlds still to conquer. Zooming out from the individual GLAM object to the ontology in which it is set, one such world becomes apparent: GLAMs use custom ontologies, and those introduce massive incompatibilities. From a recent article by sadads, we quote the observation that "vocabularies needed for many collections, topics and intellectual spaces defy the expectations of the larger professional communities." A job for the encyclopedist, certainly. But the data-minded Wikimedian has the advantages of Wikidata, starting with its multilingual data, and facility with aliases. The controlled vocabulary — sometimes referred to as a "thesaurus" as term of art — simplifies search: if a "spade" must be called that, rather than "shovel", it is easier to find all spade references. That control comes at a cost.
Case studies in that article show what can lie ahead. The schema crosswalk, in jargon, is a potential answer to the GLAM Babel of proliferating and expanding vocabularies. Even if you have no interest in Wikidata as such, simply vocabularies V and W, if both V and W are matched to Wikidata, then a "crosswalk" arises from term v in V to w in W, whenever v and w both match to the same item d in Wikidata.
For metadata mobility, match to Wikidata. It's apparently that simple: infrastructure requirements have turned out, so far, to be challenges that can be met.
Linksedit
1lib1ref campaign starts today, see m:The Wikipedia Library/1Lib1Ref: also #1lib1ref introductory video by Felix Nartey
Funders should mandate open citations, article 9 January 2018 in Nature by David Shotton
From snowflake to avalanche: Possibilities of using free citation data in libraries, translation from the German original of Annette Klein, Mannheim University Library
Why Mickey Mouse’s 1998 copyright extension probably won't happen again: Copyrights from the 1920s will start expiring next year if Congress doesn't act, Timothy B. Lee, 8 January 2018, Arstechnica
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: Communication is key
In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
Humour: Why don't we have an article about _________?
Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Belated best wishes for a happy 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
== BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Late Holiday greetings..
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hope you had a great holiday season, and a wonderful New Year.
Thanks for your yearly support and well wishing :D You help make Wikipedia great!
Prost!
Darkskynet (talk) 21:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Ameliaearhartthefinalfl.jpg listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ameliaearhartthefinalfl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 05:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Op-ed: Do editors have the right to be forgotten?
Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
Recent research: Automated Q&A from Wikipedia articles; Who succeeds in talk page discussions?
Blog: New monthly dataset shows where people fall into Wikipedia rabbit holes
Interview: Interview with The Rambling Man, Wikipedia's top contributor of Featured Lists
Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
Humour: You really are in Wonderland
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018
m:Grants:Project/ScienceSource is the new ContentMine proposal: please take a look.
Wikidata as Hubedit
One way of looking at Wikidata relates it to the semantic web concept, around for about as long as Wikipedia, and realised in dozens of distributed Web institutions. It sees Wikidata as supplying central, encyclopedic coverage of linked structured data, and looks ahead to greater support for "federated queries" that draw together information from all parts of the emerging network of websites.
Another perspective might be likened to a photographic negative of that one: Wikidata as an already-functioning Web hub. Over half of its properties are identifiers on other websites. These are Wikidata's "external links", to use Wikipedia terminology: one type for the DOI of a publication, another for the VIAF page of an author, with thousands more such. Wikidata links out to sites that are not nominally part of the semantic web, effectively drawing them into a larger system. The crosswalk possibilities of the systematic construction of these links was covered in Issue 8.
Wikipedia:External links speaks of them as kept "minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article." Here Wikidata finds more of a function. On viaf.org one can type a VIAF author identifier into the search box, and find the author page. The Wikidata Resolver tool, these days including Open Street Map, Scholia etc., allows this kind of lookup. The hub tool by maxlath takes a major step further, allowing both lookup and crosswalk to be encoded in a single URL.
Linksedit
What galleries, libraries, archives, and museums can teach us about multimedia metadata on Wikimedia Commons, Wikimedia Foundation blogpost, 29 January 2018, by Jonathan Morgan and Sandra Fauconnier
m:The Wikipedia Library/1Lib1Ref/Connect, 2018 institutional participation in the #1lib1ref campaign
Newspeak House queries, created at 3 February 2018 event in London led by Magnus Manske
Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative, Wikipedia Signpost special report 5 February 2018, by JenOttowa
What is the Last Question?, 5 February 2018
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Ralph Richardson and Merle Oberon.jpg listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ralph Richardson and Merle Oberon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 06:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Ralph Richardson and Merle Oberon.jpg listed for discussionedit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ralph Richardson and Merle Oberon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Jane Marsh Beveridge.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Jane Marsh Beveridge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Orenda logo.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Orenda logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Mysterious Pilot.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Mysterious Pilot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Gudrun Bjerring Parker 01.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Gudrun Bjerring Parker 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018
Milestone for mix'n'matchedit
Around the time in February when Wikidata clicked past item Q50000000, another milestone was reached: the mix'n'match tool uploaded its 1000th dataset. Concisely defined by its author, Magnus Manske, it works "to match entries in external catalogs to Wikidata". The total number of entries is now well into eight figures, and more are constantly being added: a couple of new catalogs each day is normal.
Since the end of 2013, mix'n'match has gradually come to play a significant part in adding statements to Wikidata. Particularly in areas with the flavour of digital humanities, but datasets can of course be about practically anything. There is a catalog on skyscrapers, and two on spiders.
These days mix'n'match can be used in numerous modes, from the relaxed gamified click through a catalog looking for matches, with prompts, to the fantastically useful and often demanding search across all catalogs. I'll type that again: you can search 1000+ datasets from the simple box at the top right. The drop-down menu top left offers "creation candidates", Magnus's personal favourite. m:Mix'n'match/Manual for more.
For the Wikidatan, a key point is that these matches, however carried out, add statements to Wikidata if, and naturally only if, there is a Wikidata property associated with the catalog. For everyone, however, the hands-on experience of deciding of what is a good match is an education, in a scholarly area, biographical catalogs being particularly fraught. Underpinning recent rapid progress is an open infrastructure for scraping and uploading.
Wikipedia goes 3D allowing users to upload .STLs for digital reference, Beau Jackson for 3dprintingindustry.com, February 22 2018
WikiCite report (video)
Formal publication and announcement of ISBN citation dataset, see Twitter post, February 23 2018
Plotting the Course Through Charted Waters, workshop on data visualization literacy from Mikhail Popov, Wikimedia Foundation
Using Wikidata to build an authority list of Holocaust-era ghettos, Nancy Cooey, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, February 12 2018
Why Should You Learn SPARQL? Wikidata! Mark Longair, blogpost November 29 2017
Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query language?, George Anadiotis for Big on Data, March 5 2018
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Screen Shot Air Cadets.png listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screen Shot Air Cadets.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 03:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Op-ed: Death knell for The Signpost?
News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
In the media: The media on Wikipedia's workings: the good and not-so-good
Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:The Sky Hawk.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:The Sky Hawk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians
Review essay: K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Red Baron
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 11 – 9 April 2018
edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 11 – 9 April 2018
The 100 Skins of the Onionedit
Open Citations Month, with its eminently guessable hashtag, is upon us. We should be utterly grateful that in the past 12 months, so much data on which papers cite which other papers has been made open, and that Wikidata is playing its part in hosting it as "cites" statements. At the time of writing, there are 15.3M Wikidata items that can do that.
Pulling back to look at open access papers in the large, though, there is is less reason for celebration. Access in theory does not yet equate to practical access. A recent LSE IMPACT blogpost puts that issue down to "heterogeneity". A useful euphemism to save us from thinking that the whole concept doesn't fall into the realm of the oxymoron.
Some home truths: aggregation is not content management, if it falls short on reusability. The PDF file format is wedded to how humans read documents, not how machines ingest them. The salami-slicer is our friend in the current downloading of open access papers, but for a better metaphor, think about skinning an onion, laboriously, 100 times with diminishing returns. There are of the order of 100 major publisher sites hosting open access papers, and the predominant offer there is still a PDF.
From the discoverability angle, Wikidata's bibliographic resources combined with the SPARQL query are superior in principle, by far, to existing keyword searches run over papers. Open access content should be managed into consistent HTML, something that is currently strenuous. The good news, such as it is, would be that much of it is already in XML. The organisational problem of removing further skins from the onion, with sensible prioritisation, is certainly not insuperable. The CORE group (the bloggers in the LSE posting) has some answers, but actually not all that is needed for the text and data mining purposes they highlight. The long tail, or in other words the onion heart when it has become fiddly beyond patience to skin, does call for a pis aller. But the real knack is to do more between the XML and the heart.
Linksedit
Crossref as a new source of citation data: A comparison with Web of Science and Scopus, CWTS blogpost 17 January 2018, Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy Sugimoto
Citations with identifiers in Wikipedia, figshare dataset
Making women more visible online—with Wikidata tools!, Wikimedia blogpost 29 March 2018 by Sandra Fauconnier
Village pump discussion, Turn on mapframe? We’re ready if you are reaches conclusions
The Power of the Wikimedia Movement beyond Wikimedia, Forbes 28 March 2018, Michael Bernick
Tracing stolen bitcoin, blogpost 26 March 2018 by Ross J. Anderson
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
News and notes: Photo of Kim Jong-un. Stephen Hawking death tops hits on many Wikipedias.
In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
Opinion: Guideline for Organization Notability revised
Op-ed: World War II Myth-making and Wikipedia
Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
Discussion report: The future of portals
Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
Blog: Why the world reads Wikipedia
Humour: Our Favorite Places to Whine About Stuff
Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Gallery: A look at some famous and not as well-known border tripoints
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Irene Craigmile Bolam article: please check what happens there
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Bzuk, hope you are doing well!
I would like to attract your attention to the article "Irene Craigmile Bolam": as I remember both of us contributed several times into editing it.
During the last period some person using the name "Gibsononian" repeatedly replaces the text of the article with conspiracy fantasies
of the conspiracy theorist Tod Swindell. I think this is a deliberate campaign of misinformation of the readers and serious abuse of Wikipedia,
that demand some proper reaction.
Kind regards - Alex V Mandel (talk) 15:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:The Shock.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:The Shock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
Op-ed: Has the wind gone out of the AdminShip's sails?
Opinion: Integrating my many lives on Wikipedia
WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
In the media: Wikipedia in Turkish politics; COI politics in Wikipedia; most cited work
Traffic report: We love our superheroes
Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
Blog: Why I write about women on Wikipedia
Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
Humour: Play with your food
Gallery: Wine not?
From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 12 – 28 May 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 12 – 28 May 2018
ScienceSource fundededit
The Wikimedia Foundation announced full funding of the ScienceSource grant proposal from ContentMine on May 18. See the ScienceSource Twitter announcement and 60 second video.
A medical canon?
The proposal includes downloading 30,000 open access papers, aiming (roughly speaking) to create a baseline for medical referencing on Wikipedia. It leaves open the question of how these are to be chosen.
The basic criteria of WP:MEDRS include a concentration on secondary literature. Attention has to be given to the long tail of diseases that receive less current research. The MEDRS guideline supposes that edge cases will have to be handled, and the premature exclusion of publications that would be in those marginal positions would reduce the value of the collection. Prophylaxis misses the point that gate-keeping will be done by an algorithm.
Two well-known but rather different areas where such considerations apply are tropical diseases and alternative medicine. There are also a number of potential downloading troubles, and these were mentioned in Issue 11. There is likely to be a gap, even with the guideline, between conditions taken to be necessary but not sufficient, and conditions sufficient but not necessary, for candidate papers to be included. With around 10,000 recognised medical conditions in standard lists, being comprehensive is demanding. With all of these aspects of the task, ScienceSource will seek community help.
Ordia tool, a basic search interface for Wikidata lexemes and forms
OpenRefine tool 3.0, May update allows wrangling of tabular information into Wikidata
d:Wikidata:WikiProject British Politicians pushes ahead with data modelling and imports
#1Lib1Ref Returns for a Second Time in 2018, IFLA blogpost 25 May 2018, second chance this year to participate in referencing Wikipedia
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. ScienceSource pages will be announced there, and in this mass message.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fate is the Hunter.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for uploading File:Fate is the Hunter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Fate is the Hunter.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Fate is the Hunter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jet Pilot3.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for uploading File:Jet Pilot3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 13 – 29 May 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 13 – 29 May 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Respecting MEDRS
Facto Post enters its second year, with a Cambridge Blue (OK, Aquamarine) background, a new logo, but no Cambridge blues. On-topic for the ScienceSource project is a project page here. It contains some case studies on how the WP:MEDRS guideline, for the referencing of articles at all related to human health, is applied in typical discussions.
Close to home also, a template, called {{medrs}} for short, is used to express dissatisfaction with particular references. Technology can help with patrolling, and this Petscan query finds over 450 articles where there is at least one use of the template. Of course the template is merely suggesting there is a possible issue with the reliability of a reference. Deciding the truth of the allegation is another matter.
This maintenance issue is one example of where ScienceSource aims to help. Where the reference is to a scientific paper, its type of algorithm could give a pass/fail opinion on such references. It could assist patrollers of medical articles, therefore, with the templated references and more generally. There may be more to proper referencing than that, indeed: context, quite what the statement supported by the reference expresses, prominence and weight. For that kind of consideration, case studies can help. But an algorithm might help to clear the backlog.
Links
World Cup scorers bubble chart, by the league in which they play, query run on Wikidata
Timeline of discoveries of natural satellites in the solar system, query run on Wikidata
4800 Welsh portraits added to Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata, National Library of Wales blogpost 27 June 2018, by Jason.nlw
The "deaditors" of Wikipedia, Hay Kranen blogpost, 15 June 2018
Six dimensions of open access, polemical tweet, 17 June 2018
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editor: The Admin Ship is still barely afloat, while a Foundation project risks sinking
Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
Op-ed: What do admins do?
Opinion: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
Featured content: New promotions
Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
Traffic report: Endgame
Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
Blog: Wikipedia should be open for editors in Turkey
Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
Humour: Television plot lines
Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Digby 1.jpg listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Digby 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: This month's external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The oleo strut of the F.E.2's undercarriage is of course well known - and well referenced. Just two sources that come to mind are:
Hare, Paul R. The Royal Aircraft Factory. London: Putnam, 1990. ISBN 0-85177-843-7, pp.208-209.
Cheesman, E.F., ed. Fighter Aircraft of the 1914–1918 War. Letchworth, UK: Harleyford, 1960. pp. 44-45.
I have nonetheless run into a bit of conflict with someone with interests from "a later war" who disputes this - perhaps on the authority of works documenting more modern "oleo struts". I wonder if you could apply an impartial eye on this one? --Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 14 – 21 July 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 14 – 21 July 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Plugging the gaps – Wikimania report
Officially it is "bridging the gaps in knowledge", with Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town paying tribute to the southern African concept of ubuntu to implement it. Besides face-to-face interactions, Wikimedians do need their power sources.
Facto Post interviewed Jdforrester, who has attended every Wikimania, and now works as Senior Product Manager for the Wikimedia Foundation. His take on tackling the gaps in the Wikimedia movement is that "if we were an army, we could march in a column and close up all the gaps". In his view though, that is a faulty metaphor, and it leads to a completely false misunderstanding of the movement, its diversity and different aspirations, and the nature of the work as "fighting" to be done in the open sector. There are many fronts, and as an eventualist he feels the gaps experienced both by editors and by users of Wikimedia content are inevitable. He would like to see a greater emphasis on reuse of content, not simply its volume.
If that may not sound like radicalism, the Decolonizing the Internet conference here organized jointly with Whose Knowledge? can redress the picture. It comes with the claim to be "the first ever conference about centering marginalized knowledge online".
Links
ScienceSource focus list (shortcut WD:SSFL on Wikidata), project to tag a first-pass open access medical bibliography on Wikidata, and also overcome the systematic biases in the medical literature by curation.
Wikimedia Foundation and Kiwix partner to grow offline access to Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation blogpost 18 July 2018.
Wikipedia's upcoming Cape Town conference will tackle the issue of diversity, Jamie Matroos, 2 July 2018.
VideoWiki, a video version of Wikipedia.
Search Full-Text within 4M+ Books, by MEK, The Open Library Blog, 14 July 2018
More than 5,000 German scientists have published papers in pseudo-scientific journals, NDR, 19 July 2018.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editor: If only if
Op-ed: The last leg of the Admin Ship's current cruise
Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
News and notes: Another newspaper for Wikipedia; Wikimania 2018 ends; changes at NPR
In the media: Blackouts in Europe; Wikipedia and capitalists; WMF Jet Set
Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
Technology report: New bots, new prefs
Gallery: Independence days, national holidays, and football – all in July
Blog: Motivation of two editors
Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
Humour: It's all the same
Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
From the archives: The pending changes fiasco: how an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Bridges 1.jpg listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bridges 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at a classic US official history
Op-ed: TomStar81 on belated declarations of war in 1916–18
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Neglected diseases
To grasp the nettle, there are rare diseases, there are tropical diseases and then there are "neglected diseases". Evidently a rare enough disease is likely to be neglected, but neglected disease these days means a disease not rare, but tropical, and most often infectious or parasitic. Rare diseases as a group are dominated, in contrast, by genetic diseases.
A major aspect of neglect is found in tracking drug discovery. Orphan drugs are those developed to treat rare diseases (rare enough not to have market-driven research), but there is some overlap in practice with the WHO's neglected diseases, where snakebite, a "neglected public health issue", is on the list.
From an encyclopedic point of view, lack of research also may mean lack of high-quality references: the core medical literature differs from primary research, since it operates by aggregating trials. This bibliographic deficit clearly hinders Wikipedia's mission. The ScienceSource project is currently addressing this issue, on Wikidata. Its Wikidata focus list at WD:SSFL is trying to ensure that neglect does not turn into bias in its selection of science papers.
Links
Wikipedia, Wikidata, and citations, a census, August 2 2018, blogpost by Magnus Manske
The rise of Wikidata as a linked data source August 6, 2018, by Karen Smith-Yoshimura on OCLC Research blog
Where do Mayors Come From: Querying Wikidata with Python and SPARQL, August 1 2018, Parametric Thoughts blog
Newspapers On Wikipedia Update: Initial Wikidata Pass 9 August 2018, Mike Caulfield
Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Mike Thelwall, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, arxiv.org, submitted on 15 August 2018
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Jane Marsh Beveridge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Ferdinand Zecca.jpg listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ferdinand Zecca.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 08:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
Interview: 2018 Wikimedian of the Year, Farkhad Fatkullin
News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Special report: Wikimania 2018
Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
Gallery: Leapfrog, historic Thai cave, and a rhythmic beat
Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
Essay: Principle of Some Astonishment
From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Screen Shot 2017-03-29 at 10.57.27 AM.png
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for uploading File:Screen Shot 2017-03-29 at 10.57.27 AM.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
File:Screen shot Air Mail.png
File:Screen shot Flying Blind.png
File:Screen shot Forced Landing (film).png
File:Screen shot Power Dive.png
File:Screen shot Sky Bandits.png
File:Screen shot The Time Travelers.png
File:Screen shot Wings on her Shoulders.png
File:Screen shot Zero Hour!.png
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Men with Wings 02.jpgedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What is the correct status? You'd originally uploaded this as being both no-notice and Non-free use. It cannot be both!
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Men with Wings 02.jpgedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Judith-Crawley.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Judith-Crawley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Judith-Crawley.jpgedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Have your say!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 16 – 30 September 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 16 – 30 September 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
The science publishing landscape
In an ideal world ... no, bear with your editor for just a minute ... there would be a format for scientific publishing online that was as much a standard as SI units are for the content. Likewise cataloguing publications would not be onerous, because part of the process would be to generate uniform metadata. Without claiming it could be the mythical free lunch, it might be reasonably be argued that sandwiches can be packaged much alike and have barcodes, whatever the fillings.
The best on offer, to stretch the metaphor, is the meal kit option, in the form of XML. Where scientific papers are delivered as XML downloads, you get all the ingredients ready to cook. But have to prepare the actual meal of slow food yourself. See Scholarly HTML for a recent pass at heading off XML with HTML, in other words in the native language of the Web.
The argument from real life is a traditional mixture of frictional forces, vested interests, and the classic irony of the principle of unripe time. On the other hand, discoverability actually diminishes with the prolific progress of science publishing. No, it really doesn't scale. Wikimedia as movement can do something in such cases. We know from open access, we grok the Web, we have our own horse in the HTML race, we have Wikidata and WikiJournal, and we have the chops to act.
Links
ImageGrid SPARQL query for the Art+Feminism focus list on Wikidata. Run and then scroll ...
The TABernacle tool for Wikidata editing, by Magnus Manske, has been upgraded. Demo with the ScienceSource focus list and main subjects: with a WiDar login you can edit directly in the table cells.
Enslaved: People of the Historic Slave Trade, Michigan State University project for a linked open data platform. Quote: "Disambiguating and merging individuals across multiple datasets is nearly impossible given their current, siloed nature."
As the Linked Data for Production (LD4P) project finishes its initial two-year cycle and moves into LD4P2, a list of its BIBFRAME and other RDF tools.
Machine Learning with and for Semantic Web Knowledge Graphs, detailed slide pack by Heiko Paulheim, University of Mannheim.
In Europe, Scientists Need to Share Their Research for Free if They Want Government Funding, Futurism, by Kristin House, 5 September 2018.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editor: Is this the new normal?
News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
In the media: Knowledge under fire
Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
Traffic report: John McCain's death generates over 7 million hits, followed by historical low
Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
Gallery: A pat on the back
Blog: After a catastrophic fire at the National Museum of Brazil, a drive to preserve what knowledge remains
Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
Essay: Expressing thanks
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
Country Winners
Diversity winner
High quality contributors
Gender-gap fillers
Page improvers
Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies
Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!)
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Screen shot Desperate Journey.png listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screen shot Desperate Journey.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Better source request for File:Bellanca Senior Pacemaker.jpgedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
File:Bellanca Senior Pacemaker.jpg
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Lockheed Altair.2.jpg listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lockheed Altair.2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
Op-ed: Wikipedia's Strickland affair
News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Wikidata imaged
Around 2.7 million Wikidata items have an illustrative image. These files, you might say, are Wikimedia's stock images, and if the number is large, it is still only 5% or so of items that have one. All such images are taken from Wikimedia Commons, which has 50 million media files. One key issue is how to expand the stock.
Indeed, there is a tool. WD-FIST exploits the fact that each Wikipedia is differently illustrated, mostly with images from Commons but also with fair use images. An item that has sitelinks but no illustrative image can be tested to see if the linked wikis have a suitable one. This works well for a volunteer who wants to add images at a reasonable scale, and a small amount of SPARQL knowledge goes a long way in producing checklists.
It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons, of which P18 for the basic image is just one. WD-FIST prompts the user to add signatures, plaques, pictures of graves and so on. There are a couple of hundred monograms, mostly of historical figures, and this query allows you to view all of them. commons:Category:Monograms and its subcategories provide rich scope for adding more.
And so it is generally. The list of properties linking to Commons does contain a few that concern video and audio files, and rather more for maps. But it contains gems such as P3451 for "nighttime view". Over 1000 of those on Wikidata, but as for so much else, there could be yet more.
Go on. Today is Wikidata's birthday. An illustrative image is always an acceptable gift, so why not add one? You can follow these easy steps: (i) log in at https://tools.wmflabs.org/widar/, (ii) paste the Petscan ID 6263583 into https://tools.wmflabs.org/fist/wdfist/ and click run, and (iii) just add cake.
Links
Now Wikidata is six, Signpost Special Report
Find out how @TheContentMine are attempting to mine scientific and medical literature to improve the accuracy of Wikipedia., Wikimedia UK tweet and video ScienceSource and the Semantic Web
sciencesource-pmc-licenses tool by Oravrattas to extract Creative Commons license information from PubMed Central pages, created at the Cambridge Wikidata Workshop
Whizzy use of SPARQL to map the London Underground system, whizzed past on Twitter.
Wikidata birthday events mapped by SPARQL, too
d:Wikidata:Sixth Birthday/Message from dev team
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Happy Thanksgiving & Merry Christmas
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just wanted to wish the best blessings this holiday season. You helped me many years ago when I was new to editing. Unfortunately I have been MIA due to schedule and difficulty of maintaining all the wiki editing knowledge required. I hope you have the best season. Pheasantpete (talk) 04:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Bzuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
WikiCite issue
GLAM ♥ data — what is a gallery, library, archive or museum without a catalogue? It follows that Wikidata must love librarians. Bibliography supports students and researchers in any topic, but open and machine-readable bibliographic data even more so, outside the silo. Cue the WikiCite initiative, which was meeting in conference this week, in the Bay Area of California.
In fact there is a broad scope: "Open Knowledge Maps via SPARQL" and the "Sum of All Welsh Literature", identification of research outputs, Library.Link Network and Bibframe 2.0, OSCAR and LUCINDA (who they?), OCLC and Scholia, all these co-exist on the agenda. Certainly more library science is coming Wikidata's way. That poses the question about the other direction: is more Wikimedia technology advancing on libraries? Good point.
Wikimedians generally are not aware of the tech background that can be assumed, unless they are close to current training for librarians. A baseline definition is useful here: "bash, git and OpenRefine". Compare and contrast with pywikibot, GitHub and mix'n'match. Translation: scripting for automation, version control, data set matching and wrangling in the large, are on the agenda also for contemporary library work. Certainly there is some possible common ground here. Time to understand rather more about the motivations that operate in the library sector.
Links
Wikidata and Libraries: Facilitating Open Knowledge, book chapter by Mairelys Lemus-Rojas, metadata librarian and Lydia Pintscher, Wikidata Product Manager, from Leveraging Wikipedia: Connecting Communities of Knowledge (2018)
LD4P and WikiCite: Opportunities for collaboration, WikiCite 2018 program abstract, Christine Fernsebner Eslao of Harvard Library Information and Technical Services and Michelle Futornick, Linked Data for Production Program Manager at Stanford University
Shell Lessons for Librarians, Library Carpentry lesson
At-risk content on Flickr, blogpost 3 November 2018, Andrew Gray
Toward an Abstract Wikipedia, recent white paper by Wikidata founder Denny Vrandečić (Google)
Account creation is now open on the ScienceSource wiki, where you can see SPARQL visualisations of text mining.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editor: Time for a truce
Op-ed: Looking back, looking forward: A beginner's experience on Wikipedia
Special report: The Christmas wishlist
Opinion: The blogosphere migrates to Galaxy WMF
News and notes: Reviewer of the year, WikiCup winner, and the 2019 Wikimedia Summit
Reflections: Wikipedia, history, and the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day
In the media: Court-ordered article redaction, paid editing, and rock stars
Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
Arbitration report: A long break ends
Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
Gallery: Intersections
Recent research: Why do the most active Wikipedians burn out?; only 4% of students vandalize
Essay: No one cares about your garage band
Humour: The dark side of our favorite root vegetable
From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Screen shot Federal Fugitives.png listed for discussion
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screen shot Federal Fugitives.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 16:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Xmas
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
File:Screen shot Federal Fugitives.png listed for discussionedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screen shot Federal Fugitives.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Merry
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy Christmas!
Hello Bzuk,
Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that
Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?"
My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 08:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Hi Bzuk, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,
–Davey2010Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 14:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas !!!
edit
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy Holidays!edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy Holidays!
Hi, Bzuk! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 20:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Only 2 more sleeps!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
HappyHolidays!
Wishing you much joy & happiness now and every year!!
Merry Christmas - Happy Hanukkah‼️
When does New Year’s Day come before Christmas Day?
Every year!
What do you call a bankrupt Santa?
Saint Nickel-less.
🔔🎁⛄️🎅🏻Atsme✍🏻📧 02:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Seasonal Greetings!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Hello Bzuk, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing,
★Trekker (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.
Yo Ho Hoedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec18a}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
ϢereSpielChequers 09:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas to you!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Bzuk, Merry Christmas to you! :D I hope you are well, good sir! Acalamari 09:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Martinevans123 (Santa's Hard Brexit Grotto) ... sends you ...
... warmest seasonal wishes for ...... Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda.
Merry Christmas Baby... and hoping that you have a good New Year !!
The Signpost: 24 December 2018edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
Op-ed: Wikipedia not trumped by Trump appointee
Special report: The Signpost got 380,000+ views in 2018, sounds reasonable enough, right?
News and notes: Some wishes do come true
In the media: Political hijinks
Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
Blog: News from the WMF
Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
Essay: Requests for medication
From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Xmas
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
And thanks for a message which was not a complaint from someone! Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas!
editMerry Christmas everybody!!!
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Merry Christmasedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks very much for your message, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to yourself as well. Kosack (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Wishing a very happy Christmas for you Bzuk, and a happy new year! FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
A Shaker Christmas wish
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A Shaker Christmas wish
Give good gifts, one to another Peace, joy and comfort gladly bestow Harbor no ill 'gainst sister or brother Smooth life's journey as you onward go. Broad as the sunshine, free as the showers. So shed an influence blessing to prove; Give for the noblest of efforts your pow'rs; Blest and be blest, is the law of love.
Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Seasons Greetings
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Hello Bzuk, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing,
TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.
TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Seasons Greetings
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
dawnleelynn(talk) 19:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Season's Greetings
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello there! Shearonink (talk) wishes you & yours the very best of the season!
Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia, here's to hoping your holiday time is wonderful and that the New Year will be an improvement upon the old. CHEERS!
Share these holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Shearonink/Holiday}} ~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
Shearonink (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Happy Christmas and a Wonderful New Year
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy Christmas, a great New Year and congratulations on another year! My wife and I visited her rels in Leamington, Ontario (South of Detroit!) and her cousin in Verdun, Quebec on our North American Odyssey. I retired in September! First Christmas without looking forward to time off!Foofbun (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Happy Christmas!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy Canadian Christmas!
Seasons greetings and good tiding to you and your family! --Jules (Mrjulesd) 22:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Seasons Greetings
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hello Bzuk: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Adapted from {{Season's Greetings}}
CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
very merry Christmas
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bzuk, here's wishing you and yours a very merry Christmas and a great new year! --Lockley (talk) 05:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Hello Bzuk, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing,
Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:38, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.
Merry Christmas!!edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you Bzuk for your greeting! My best wishes for this holiday season. May your heart and the heart of those around you be filled with happiness during this special time. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Cheers
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Brandmeistertalk 07:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Wishing you and your family a joyous Christmas and a happy and prosperous New Year! Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, GSS (talk|c|em) 09:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas to you as well. Chris (talk) 15:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Season's greetings
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy Yuletide!
Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!)
— Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Hello Bzuk, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Chris Troutman (talk) 17:38, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.
Thanksedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Got your Christmas greetings, but not sure how I got on your list. I wondered if you'd meant to send them to Chris Troutman instead? He had sent me ditto, and I replied on his Talk page. The only aviation posts I can recall offhand that I've made (out of ten thousand+ in 12 years) were back in July about the recovery of a Tuskegee pilot's remains.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuskegee_Airmen&diff=852356051&oldid=851292001 Activist (talk) 06:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yuletide Greetings
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Bzuk, thanks for your sentiments. Hope you and yours had a Merry Christmas. May you all have a safe and prosperous 2019. Cheers!Koplimek (talk) 15:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Learning from Zotero
Zotero is free software for reference management by the Center for History and New Media: see Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero. It is also an active user community, and has broad-based language support.
Besides the handiness of Zotero's warehousing of personal citation collections, the Zotero translator underlies the citoid service, at work behind the VisualEditor. Metadata from Wikidata can be imported into Zotero; and in the other direction the zotkat tool from the University of Mannheim allows Zotero bibliographies to be exported to Wikidata, by item creation. With an extra feature to add statements, that route could lead to much development of the focus list (P5008) tagging on Wikidata, by WikiProjects.
There is also a large-scale encyclopedic dimension here. The construction of Zotero translators is one facet of Web scraping that has a strong community and open source basis. In that it resembles the less formal mix'n'match import community, and growing networks around other approaches that can integrate datasets into Wikidata, such as the use of OpenRefine.
Looking ahead, the thirtieth birthday of the World Wide Web falls in 2019, and yet the ambition to make webpages routinely readable by machines can still seem an ever-retreating mirage. Wikidata should not only be helping Wikimedia integrate its projects, an ongoing process represented by Structured Data on Commons and lexemes. It should also be acting as a catalyst to bring scraping in from the cold, with institutional strengths as well as resourceful code.
Links
Zotero Comes to Google Docs, Zotero blogpost by Dan Stillman, 19 October 2018.
Category:Wikipedians who use Zotero
T115158 Write a Zotero translator and document process for creating new Zotero translator and getting it live in production, long Phabricator thread 2015–17.
Zotero Translators, documentation from zotero.org.
Home page on GitHub for Zotero translator Javascript
Example translator, for Wikisource.
m:Structured Data on Commons/Newsletter/2018-12-07
Diversitech, the latest ContentMine grant application to the Wikimedia Foundation, is in its community review stage until January 2.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Happy New Year, Bzuk!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Bzuk, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! All the best!
--Rezy (talk | contribs) 03:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Yearedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bzuk,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 04:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Many Happy Returns!edit
Happy New Year, Bzuk!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bzuk, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Ceannlann gorm (talk) 22:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year, Bzuk!edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bzuk, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year, Bzuk!edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bzuk, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 00:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year!edit
Dear Bzuk, HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2019 will be a great year for you! Thank you for being my fellow Wikipedian! From a fellow editor, --Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
Gwin poeth sbeislyd i chi ...edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
... gan yr hen Gymro; rwy'n gobeithio eich bod wedi cael gwyliau Nadolig gwych ac rwy'n dymuno 2019 heddychlon i chi! That is Welsh and translates to: Spicy hot wine for you from the old Welshman; I hope you have had a great Christmas holiday and I wish you a peaceful 2019! Thank you for your excellent work on the 'pedia.
Sincerely, Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 12:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Happy New Year!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bzuk, Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours!North America1000 14:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
Best Wishes for success in 2019edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
With all my thanks, Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:55, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Invitation to join WikiProject Brandsedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Bzuk.
You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. North America1000 20:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer
Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes
Timeline: This month in World War I
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
belated...
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks Bill and belated wishes for the new year! Gwen Gale (talk) 04:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!
Hello Bzuk, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing,
Adityavagarwal (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.
The Signpost: 31 January 2019edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
In focus: The Collective Consciousness of Admin Userpages
News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
In the media: The Signpost's investigative story recognized, Wikipedia turns 18 and gets a birthday gift from Google, and more editors are recognized
Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
Gallery: Let us build a memorial fit for such pain and suffering
News from the WMF: News from WMF
Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
Essay: How
Humour: Village pump
From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Everything flows (and certainly data does)
Recently Jimmy Wales has made the point that computer home assistants take much of their data from Wikipedia, one way or another. So as well as getting Spotify to play Frosty the Snowman for you, they may be able to answer the question "is the Pope Catholic?" Possibly by asking for disambiguation (Coptic?).
Headlines about data breaches are now familiar, but the unannounced circulation of information raises other issues. One of those is Gresham's law stated as "bad data drives out good". Wikipedia and now Wikidata have been criticised on related grounds: what if their content, unattributed, is taken to have a higher standing than Wikimedians themselves would grant it? See Wikiquote on a misattribution to Bismarck for the usual quip about "law and sausages", and why one shouldn't watch them in the making.
Wikipedia has now turned 18, so should act like as adult, as well as being treated like one. The Web itself turns 30 some time between March and November this year, per Tim Berners-Lee. If the Knowledge Graph by Google exemplifies Heraclitean Web technology gaining authority, contra GIGO, Wikimedians still have a role in its critique. But not just with the teenage skill of detecting phoniness.
There is more to beating Gresham than exposing the factoid and urban myth, where WP:V does do a great job. Placeholders must be detected, and working with Wikidata is a good way to understand how having one statement as data can blind us to replacing it by a more accurate one. An example that is important to open access is that, firstly, the term itself needs considerable unpacking, because just being able to read material online is a poor relation of "open"; and secondly, trying to get Creative Commons license information into Wikidata shows up issues with classes of license (such as CC-BY) standing for the actual license in major repositories. Detailed investigation shows that "everything flows" exacerbates the issue. But Wikidata can solve it.
Links
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Day for 18th birthday celebrations
WMUK video page, with "fake news", Jimmy Wales, Wikidata and more (health warning for those with tune allergy)
Why Wikipedia’s Medical Content Is Superior, Stephen Harrison, 28 January 2019, Slate
Olivia Colman reveals struggle with Wikipedia over age, Naomi Gordon, 28 January 2019, harpersbazaar.com
Making Wikidata visible, Martin Poulter blogpost, 24 January 2019, Bodleian Digital Library
Inventory, Magnus Manske blogpost, 24 January 2019, on Wikidata tech support for an image donation by Cleveland Museum of Art
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Happy New Year! Late wishes
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Happy New Year
Thanks for your message and best wishes to you, too
Deamonpen (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Review essay: Nick-D on the Japanese battleship Mikasa
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
What is a systematic review?
Systematic reviews are basic building blocks of evidence-based medicine, surveys of existing literature devoted typically to a definite question that aim to bring out scientific conclusions. They are principled in a way Wikipedians can appreciate, taking a critical view of their sources.
Ben Goldacre in 2014 wrote (link below) "[...] : the "information architecture" of evidence based medicine (if you can tolerate such a phrase) is a chaotic, ad hoc, poorly connected ecosystem of legacy projects. In some respects the whole show is still run on paper, like it's the 19th century." Is there a Wikidatan in the house? Wouldn't some machine-readable content that is structured data help?
Most likely it would, but the arcana of systematic reviews and how they add value would still need formal handling. The PRISMA standard dates from 2009, with an update started in 2018. The concerns there include the corpus of papers used: how selected and filtered? Now that Wikidata has a 20.9 million item bibliography, one can at least pose questions. Each systematic review is a tagging opportunity for a bibliography. Could that tagging be reproduced by a query, in principle? Can it even be second-guessed by a query (i.e. simulated by a protocol which translates into SPARQL)? Homing in on the arcana, do the inclusion and filtering criteria translate into metadata? At some level they must, but are these metadata explicitly expressed in the articles themselves? The answer to that is surely "no" at this point, but can TDM find them? Again "no", right now. Automatic identification doesn't just happen.
Actually these questions lack originality. It should be noted though that WP:MEDRS, the reliable sources guideline used here for health information, hinges on the assumption that the usefully systematic reviews of biomedical literature can be recognised. Its nutshell summary, normally the part of a guideline with the highest density of common sense, allows literature reviews in general validity, but WP:MEDASSESS qualifies that indication heavily. Process wonkery about systematic reviews definitely has merit.
Links
Evidence-Based Practice: Appraise, resources page from Duke University Medical Library & Archives.
What should Cochrane do next?, Bad Science blogpost 5 November 2014, Ben Goldacre.
Cambridge (UK) Science Festival event, How do scientific discoveries become clinical medicine?, ScienceSource workshop for ContentMine 23 March 2019, with systematic review process diagram. Also on Eventbrite for tickets, taking place in Makespace, 16 Mill Lane.
PROSPERO database of PRISMA, for registration of systematic review protocols.
Process wonkery thread, wikien-l mailing list, September 2006.
Meta-Analysis, xkcd cartoon.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editors: Help wanted (still)
News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
In focus: Wikimedia affiliate organizations seek community participation in 2019 board election
Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
Traffic report: Binge-watching
Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
Gallery: Signed with pride
Recent research: Research finds signs of cultural diversity and recreational habits of readers
Essay: Optimist's guide to Wikipedia
From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
Humour: Pesky Pronouns
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Leonard Cheshire.jpgedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A tag has been placed on File:Leonard Cheshire.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Navy aviation safety and Australian war crimes trials
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
The term Applications Programming Interface or API is 50 years old, and refers to a type of software library as well as the interface to its use. While a compiler is what you need to get high-level code executed by a mainframe, an API out in the cloud somewhere offers a chance to perform operations on a remote server. For example, the multifarious bots active on Wikipedia have owners who exploit the MediaWiki API.
APIs (called RESTful) that allow for the GET HTTP request are fundamental for what could colloquially be called "moving data around the Web"; from which Wikidata benefits 24/7. So the fact that the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint at query.wikidata.org has a RESTful API means that, in lay terms, Wikidata content can be GOT from it. The programming involved, besides the SPARQL language, could be in Python, younger by a few months than the Web.
Magic words, such as occur in fantasy stories, are wishful (rather than RESTful) solutions to gaining access. You may need to be a linguist to enter Ali Baba's cave or the western door of Moria (French in the case of "Open Sesame", in fact, and Sindarin being the respective languages). Talking to an API requires a bigger toolkit, which first means you have to recognise the tools in terms of what they can do. On the way to the wikt:impactful or polymathic modern handling of facts, one must perhaps take only tactful notice of tech's endemic problem with documentation, and absorb the insightful point that the code in APIs does articulate the customary procedures now in place on the cloud for getting information. As Owl explained to Winnie-the-Pooh, it tells you The Thing to Do.
Links
Wikidata as a semantic framework for the Gene Wiki initiative, 2016 paper by Andrawaag and others, commenting inter alia on the role of the API on Wikidata
Working With Wikibase From Go, Digital Flapjack blogpost 26 November 2018, Michael Dales, developer for ScienceSource using golang, with a software engineer's view on Wikibase and the MediaWiki API
Dealing with the Rust, Magnus Manske blogpost 12 March 2019, on the Rust language and the MediaWiki API
mw:API:RecentChanges, mediawiki.org page on the API for access to "recent changes" on a wiki
wikitech:Analytics/AQS/Pageviews, wikitech.wikimedia.org for the Pageview API, giving Wikimedia traffic information
xkcd cartoon, API Guide
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the editors: Getting serious about humor
News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Peacemaker67, Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at three books focussing on the World Wars
Op-ed: Indy Beetle on the fall of Idi Amin
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Jane Marsh Beveridge.jpg
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Jane Marsh Beveridge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Three-view diagram for Pulqui I
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Bzuk, I noticed the great 3-view diagram you created for the Pulqui II wikiarticle. How did you do it? Would it be possible to create a similar one for the Pulqui I wikiarticle too? Thanks and regards, DPdH (talk) 02:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Completely clouded?
Talk of cloud computing draws a veil over hardware, but also, less obviously but more importantly, obscures such intellectual distinction as matters most in its use. Wikidata begins to allow tasks to be undertaken that were out of easy reach. The facility should not be taken as the real point.
Coming in from another angle, the "executive decision" is more glamorous; but the "administrative decision" should be admired for its command of facts. Think of the attitudes ad fontes, so prevalent here on Wikipedia as "can you give me a source for that?", and being prepared to deal with complicated analyses into specified subcases. Impatience expressed as a disdain for such pedantry is quite understandable, but neither dirty data nor false dichotomies are at all good to have around.
Issue 13 and Issue 21, respectively on WP:MEDRS and systematic reviews, talk about biomedical literature and computing tasks that would be of higher quality if they could be made more "administrative". For example, it is desirable that the decisions involved be consistent, explicable, and reproducible by non-experts from specified inputs.
What gets clouded out is not impossibly hard to understand. You do need to put together the insights of functional programming, which is a doctrinaire and purist but clearcut approach, with the practicality of office software. Loopless computation can be conceived of as a seamless forward march of spreadsheet columns, each determined by the content of previous ones. Very well: to do a backward audit, when now we are talking about Wikidata, we rely on integrity of data and its scrupulous sourcing: and clearcut case analyses. The MEDRS example forces attention on purge attempts such as Beall's list.
Links
Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2019-03-31/In focus#The_Wikipedia_SourceWatch by Headbomb.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Questionable1
d:Wikidata:ScienceSource project/Beall's list: Beall's list, final version, matched into Wikidata.
SPARQL query for Quackwatch: query to find items on Wikidata for articles subject to the Quackwatch blacklist of "Nonrecommended Periodicals", under "Journals (Fundamentally Flawed)".
SPARQL query to find retracted articles on Wikidata.
d:Wikidata:ScienceSource project/NCBI2wikidata dashboard, metadata for biomedical articles being built up, sourced from PubMed and PubMed Central.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
News and notes: An Action Packed April
In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
Technology report: A new special page, and other news
Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
From the archives: Portals revisited
Humour: Jimbo and Larry walk into a bar ...
Opinion: The gaps in our knowledge of our gaps
Interview: Katherine Maher marks 3 years as executive director
Community view: 2019 Wikimedia Summit gathers movement affiliate representatives to discuss movement strategy
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Murder on Flight 502.JPG
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Murder on Flight 502.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your Military History Newsletter
Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia's leadership and medical services in World War II and Peacemaker67 on Israel's targeted assassinations
Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the fate of the German fleet at Scapa Flow
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Back numbers are here.
Semantic Web and TDM – a ContentMine view
Two dozen issues, and this may be the last, a valediction at least for a while.
It's time for a two-year summation of ContentMine projects involving TDM (text and data mining).
Wikidata and now Structured Data on Commons represent the overlap of Wikimedia with the Semantic Web. This common ground is helping to convert an engineering concept into a movement. TDM generally has little enough connection with the Semantic Web, being instead in the orbit of machine learning which is no respecter of the semantic. Don't break a taboo by asking bots "and what do you mean by that?"
The ScienceSource project innovates in TDM, by storing its text mining results in a Wikibase site. It strives for compliance of its fact mining, on drug treatments of diseases, with an automated form of the relevant Wikipedia referencing guideline MEDRS. Where WikiFactMine set up an API for reuse of its results, ScienceSource has a SPARQL query service, with look-and-feel exactly that of Wikidata's at query.wikidata.org. It also now has a custom front end, and its content can be federated, in other words used in data mashups: it is one of over 50 sites that can federate with Wikidata.
The human factor comes to bear through the front end, which combines a link to the HTML version of a paper, text mining results organised in drug and disease columns, and a SPARQL display of nearby drug and disease terms. Much software to develop and explain, so little time! Rather than telling the tale, Facto Post brings you ScienceSource links, starting from the how-to video, lower right.
Links for participation
http://sciencesource-review.wmflabs.org/, review tool link in the left-hand sidebar at http://sciencesource.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page
The review tool requires a log in on sciencesource.wmflabs.org, and an OAuth permission (bottom of a review page) to operate. It can be used in simple and more advanced workflows. Examples of queries for the latter are at d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource project/Queries#SS_disease_list and d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource_project/Queries#NDF-RT issue.
Please be aware that this is a research project in development, and may have outages for planned maintenance. That will apply for the next few days, at least. The ScienceSource wiki main page carries information on practical matters. Email is not enabled on the wiki: use site mail here to Charles Matthews in case of difficulty, or if you need support. Further explanatory videos will be put into commons:Category:ContentMine videos.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Precious
Seven years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
... eight years now --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Disambiguation link notification for May 26
edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canal Zone (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul Phillips, John Tyrrell and John Hubbard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
File:CDHowe on cover of Time.jpg listed for discussion
edit