Summary
User talk:Harizotoh9/archive
Attack semantics edit
Following Nihonjoe's closure link in Talk:2017_Westminster_attack#Use_of_the_noun_"attack"_to_describe_the_event, I was reading Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)/Archive_56#Use_of_the_word_"attack"_in_various_article_titles and noticed you mentioned July 11:
- it's only ever articles covering domestic Islamic terrorism that brings about these sorts of accusations of bias. Note the articles above. Never domestic far right, Marxist, or foreign Islamic terrorism
Subsequently, I was involved in an August discussion about an issue which falls outside of domestic Islamic terrorism at Talk:2017_Charlottesville_attack#Requested_move_12_August_2017.
Do you know how I might go about re-opening this village pump discussion? Regardless of whatever bias User:Alfred Nemours had (apparently a sockpuppet) I think this is a good discussion to have.
I'd always assumed WP:BLPCRIME protections were actually enforced and that any article titled "attack" already had a criminal conviction, but beginning with Fields' case where I happened to read about an alleged attack still undergoing a trial process, I began to realize that this and then other cases mentioned at vehicle-ramming attack have this problem of deferring to WP:COMMONNAME to call something an "attack" instead of deferring to BLP:CRIME and using neutral vocabulary to describe it as a suspected crime prior to a criminal conviction.
So far I was nominating for moves individually for recent cases where I notice people are still alive and still unconvicted, but now I'm wondering if we could just have a collective discussion like this on it somewhere. ScratchMarshall (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inuitinua. Since you had some involvement with the Inuitinua redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Stoicism has been completed. The article was in very good shape, so there was little needing to be done.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for removing Gargoyles (TV series) from the list of depictions in the Boudica article. She is not actually depicted in the series. A "gargoyle beast" (gargoyles with animal intelligence and dog-like bodies) in the series is simply named after her. The character profile is here: https://www.gargwiki.net/Boudicca
Nobody noticed that a series partially set in the 10th and 11th century AD is unlikely to feature 1st-century AD characters? Dimadick (talk) 19:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghoul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.—SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 13:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
For some reason I can't find it anywhere. I only got one scan about Dante and Lucia and some interviews about Bingo Morihashi and the staff in general. What I think something about the franchise is lacking is creation information about Vergil's alterego Nelo Angelo and what was Capcom's attempt to use him in DMC4SE. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Somehow, a Youtube vid had a download link for the entire interviews so I managed to get more creation info, most notably for the new created article Lady (Devil May Cry).Tintor2 (talk) 16:45, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 | Hello, Harizotoh9. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Super Mario Bros. 3 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! AmericanAir88 (talk) 20:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
First off, thanks for adding the sources because for the most part it's an improvement. I wanted to ask a couple things though.
TarkusABtalk 12:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ninja Gaiden (NES video game) is completed.
Please let me know if yo have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
On 14 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ben Judd, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American video game producer Ben Judd is fluent in the Japanese Kansai dialect? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ben Judd), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on gathering sources for Japanese retro games. Much appreciated! Here is a kitten.
TarkusABtalk 02:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Cocoron, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hitro talk 11:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I noticed you reorganized the article The King of Fighters '99 and wanted to know for a reason. I don't wanna argue or anything but it just seemed weird to put the sales in the release section of game considering how the manual of style or FA tends to organize sales. Also, do you think the Battle de Paradise information could be moved to gameplay since it's a console gameplay similar to the edit and challenge modes from XI. Since this is a GAN, I want to know your opinion about it. Nevertheless, thanks for the editing. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Made a brief rearrange in regards to how the game can be connected to another KOF game. By the way, once this article is reviewed, can you check the review alongside? I don't consider myself an expert. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Most articles include as many Japanese review scores as they can for completeness, as we should aim to get as much of an international perspective, and to balance between retrospective and contemporary reviews. But most of the time we just have the numbers, but even with just the score it still has a lot of value. If you check, most GA or FA articles will include the Famitsu review scores. Examples: Parasite_Eve_(video_game), Super Mario World, Clock_Tower_(1995_video_game), Sweet_Home_(video_game), etc.
Later on, we should try to expand to include the actual content of the reviews. People have just started scanning old Weekly Famitsu pages, and we have maybe 20 of them scanned.
As for checking the review, I'm no expert and I'm pretty hazy on a lot of the details of GA or FA guidelines. Harizotoh9 (talk) 00:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dear Harizotoh9! Can you make an article about video game Cosmo Warrior Zero in PlayStation? Thank you! —-178.66.103.183 (talk) 19:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Harizotoh9. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Thanks for creating Hoshi Wo Miru Hito.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.
Thanks for starting this article with translating the sourced information from Japanese Wikipedia and providing attribution on the talk page. One small suggestion for future articles I have would be to include an infobox. Other than that looks good so far.
To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 07:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
I actually own the Nostalgic Famicom Perfect Guide, so I was able to just read the book directly, so those sections weren't really translation. Also, I'm uncertain about how to format refs for some of the books. Nostalgic Perfect Guide is all English loan words spelled out in Japanese, so it's easy to translate. For the other JP books, they are proper Japanese words, so I just left them written in Japanese. Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:53, 11 December 2018 (UTC) An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demon's Crest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joypad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 15:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hermie Hopperhead: Scrap Panic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sony Computer Entertainment Japan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Did you mean to restore the notability template here? In your edit summary you mentioned third-party sources, but I didn't remove the {{BLP primary sources}} tag, just the notability one. Are you arguing that an h-index of 40 and all the rest doesn't mean WP:PROF? Guettarda (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Harold, I'm your Friendly Neighborhood SpiderKid. Please keep the Archie Comics Mega Man it would mean a lot to me. If you have another article in mind to use this image please, use it for that if you don't. Please keep it on the Mega Man (character) article. Until then please find use for it. Thanks. SWING OUT! TheSpiderKid (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Sorry if i'm bothering you but i need help with this question. How i can use this #IABot to archive links? Thanks! Roberth Martinez (talk) 00:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Cheers for editing Dragon Ball Super: Broly. Could you explain why there is need for archived citation? I believe those are outdated and useless. I might be wrong as I am still a rookie. Thanks in advance. Hi Harizotoh,
I sent this message to Ravensfire and wanted to send the same to you. I would like to work in good faith on this article, if you do not have the time then I would prefer to work with those who do have time.
I find it troubling that information that is relevant and reliably sourced (i.e. perjury conviction; major media companies admitting to doctoring videos of Jung; and other) are not being added to the page because in the opinion of a few editors that it paints the subject in a more positive light.
Additionally, several sources are currently being used with information that was later retracted by media companies, as well as sources that are sensational/not reliable.
I understand the subject matter sensitive, but that is why I believe it is important to get it right. How do you propose we address these concerns on the page? My thought is that we should delete all controversial or improperly sourced material until information can be properly vetted.
I would like to work with you in good faith on these issues, any help would be much appreciated.
If not, perhaps there are other admins that would be able to assist.
GIOScali (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Well, I removed the Myths and realities section, let's see what happens. I've had problems with the editor elsewhere. Doug Weller talk 14:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! :) I remembered the work you put into Boxer's Road, and I see that you seem to have some knowledge of Japanese games in general. You may be aware that I am working my way through Next Generation magazine, which I am sure you are aware seems to have covered Japanese games more than any other US publication did. So it is not uncommon for me to find games that appear to have few or no reviews in other English sources. I have created more than a few such articles, and I was wondering if you could take a look at them? Another problem I have encountered is that it is not always easy to tell if an article already exists for the game under another name (although in several cases I was able to create a redirect instead of starting a new article when I found this to be the case) so some of them may need to be merged into a duplicate article for the same game. However, I do prefer not to merge articles about games in a series to the series page if we can find enough sources to build the article. Would you mind taking a look to see what you can do with these? Thanks! BOZ (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I started by looking at the first four issues of Next Gen, and will go through the rest before long:
@BOZ: That's a maybe. I expanded the Boxer Road page since I'm such a fan of New Corp, and especially their game The Adventure of Little Ralph. Now, if sufficient information can't be found, then it might be better to redirect to the series page, or a list or something. Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, when you add persons to the Deaths in 2019 page, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 08:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
I appreciate your efforts in addressing notability issues within the video game space. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 06:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Secret of Evermore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victor Lucas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Successive, increased tagging of a page that is undergoing AfD could be seen as trying to influence the outcome. Mattsephton (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC) For the other source, check 90's Saturn mags. The only other source I can think of is Gameside and their Shooting Gameside series. Have you heard of them? I think they were a Japanese gaming magazine, and after the magazine closed they released compilation series of based on genre, with like 12 volumes of "Shooting Gamside" which focused on "stg" or shmups. Harizotoh9 (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:50, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Would you like to collaborate and bring an article on an obscure Japanese game to GA status? Cotton: Fantastic Night Dreams might be a good choice since it's getting re-released and will get some attention. I think there might be enough sources to get it there. I'm open to suggestions though. What do you think? TarkusABtalk 19:54, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cotton: Fantastic Night Dreams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CVG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Secret of Evermore has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the FA process.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
That's excellent news, thank you. Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:51, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
I've been holding myself back on saying something for a while, but I feel this problem is growing and something needs to be said.
The video game review table is supposed to be supplemental to the text. It is not supposed to be a collection of every review score known. As the template guideline reads: "Every single-site review source should be used within the reception section. The reviews table supports the text. It is not to replicate the function of external review aggregators." This guideline is based on the "Wikipedia is not..." guideline Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.
I've noticed a lot of your edits have been adding scores to these tables, without any supplemental text. While it's not so much a problem on underdeveloped articles, it is a concern on high quality articles that are written better, like Good/Featured articles. I think such efforts, while amicable, would be better spent on a website like Sega Retro or NEC Retro. I'm going to go back soon and start to undo some of these changes that were done on those high quality articles. TarkusABtalk 12:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
I actually do believe it IS a 100% scam, but it exists and gets coverage and appears in works of fiction too. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 08:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Btw, there is just no corresponding Russian Wikipedia article anymore, but I think they just decided to delete it perhaps based on Russian-language sources against it. Here, I've got rather various "systemas" like [1] (that one fat midget dude, and he had his own ridiculous article too: [2]) redirected into a single andvvery short article. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 08:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Harizotoh9,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Harizotoh9,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Harizotoh9,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 21:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
edit
Did you mean to sign with just a timestamp? Meters (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nostalgia 1907, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
On 17 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Faith Alupo, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC) The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willow (Capcom arcade game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Run and gun.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Per MOS:OVERLINK countries such as Spain ([3]) should not be linked. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 05:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi Harizotoh9, you are probably already aware of this, but I'd like to make sure that these notices have been added to your talk page (per WP:AWARE).
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Feel free to remove this message especially if you already knew, and sorry for the inconvenience.
Best regards, Hey there, I'm hoping you can help me with something since you seem smart with how archive.org work. I recently uploaded a couple Neo Geo magazines to archive.org, my first uploads: Neo Geo World Vol 1 and Neo Geo All Catalog. (Did not scan them myself, they were shared on a neo geo forum) I have two questions:
Thank you TarkusABtalk/contrib 03:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 3. For many Japanese magazines and books they will have to be made to read right to left.
Harizotoh9 (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey there. I've been meaning to patch up NamCollection for some time now, and I'm having trouble finding any reviews for it. You seem really good at finding obscure sources, so maybe you could take a crack at it? Right now its notability is very shakey and I'm skeptical if it's even notable enough to have an article. Thanks! Namcokid47 17:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Franzese, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nexstar and Vanity Fair.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I'm aware of these policies. His name is Dale Emanuel Wilson. "Dalauan Sparrow" is a fake online name he uses. Similarly, there's no citation for "Dalauan Sparrow" either. Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
That name is used in all of his social media accounts. It is not in question. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 20:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
His birth name is Dale Emanuel Wilson and "Dalauan Sparrow" is a fake name he uses online because he doesn't want his real name out there. Yes, I'm aware he uses it on all his social media, but it's not his real name. I'm in the gaming scene so I've been following this guy for years. The fact that there's no reliable sources that cover his actual birth name suggests he isn't notable enough at all. The page should probably be sent to WP:AFD. He's only notable for one event (WP:ONEEVENT), which is being banned from Evo. The rest are trivial mentions. This should be covered in a few sentences in the history of evo article.Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
If you're aware of our policies and you also think he's not notable, then why do you keep adding his full name all over Wikipedia? WP:BLPPRIVACY is clear that we don't do that, and BLP applies everywhere on the site. Woodroar (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Harizotoh9,
When you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/TFD/CFD/etc.), you need to leave an accurate edit summary stating this. For instance, should an editor remove your PROD tag from LowTierGod, we need to be able to see that it had already been PROD'd once and we see that by looking at edit summaries. Also, any time you tag a page, you must post a notice on the talk page of the page creator. If you make use of Twinkle, the program will do this automatically for you once you set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator" so this makes it easy. I recommend using it if you think you'll do more tagging of pages for deletion. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Most of this is copyvio, plucked from here - Alison ❤ 02:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Dear Harizotoh9, thanks for archiving all the links on the webpage. I have a problem now, though, as IABot has messed with the different archived versions of Environment Canada webpage, ranging from June 29 to July 3, and has substituted them with two versions only. This is going to be corrected, though be more careful while using the bot next time. Thank you. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for adding that source to Michael Franzese. However, why the removal of the $3 million - that info is supported in an AP source in the body. Would you also mind reverting the IP who edited before you? Thanks, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
What's wrong? The Dallas Observer article says: " and their ovens are hand-built in Venice.". Is it wrong to characterize the ovens as Venice made? Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Huh? You don't copy text on Wikipeida. Text is copyrighted but facts are not. Is it factually inaccurate? The order doesn't matter.
Also, multiple articles and Franzese himself keep talking about "15 million" in restitution, not 15+ 3 = 18. My guess is that the 3 million is bundled in the 14.7 the other sources talk about, thus its' double counting. Harizotoh9 (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much for deleting the information people had written about my discoveries for no reason at all !
Can you explain me in which world giving sourced evidence that the developers were initially intented to add more playable characters is not a relevant point ?
Your life must be very sad to spend your time roaming on wikis just to delete content from other contributors and to ruin the work of players.
KlebsTAQ (talk) 04:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
All information needs to be sourced and that information was not. No original research is allowed and the kind of over detail is the sort of thing that appears on fan wikis. Wikipedia is for general audiences, and should treat topics in an encyclopedic manner, not the way a fan would. WP:RS, WP:NOR, WP:FANCRUFT. Harizotoh9 (talk) 07:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
You changed the text I added to add a dangling modifier. I wrote:
The remaining stones were dismantled by authorities later in the day with a backhoe. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) reported the demolition was done for for safety reasons.
which you changed to:
The remaining stones were dismantled by authorities later in the day with a backhoe for safety reasons according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.
I tried to put it in one sentence but the problem is that it is unclear. Is it according to the GBI that it was done for safety reasons? Or that it was demolished with a backhoe? Or that it was demolished at all. The least awkward way to word it to be unambiguous is to use two sentences. Shorter is not always better. Note that if you read, for example, the New York Times article it puts "for safety reasons" in quotes (presumably because they don't have other sources to verify that) but says it was demolished without quotes.
Also note that the GBI uses the word "demolished" not "dismantled". something that's been dismantled might possibly be re-assembled; something that's been demolished generally can't be (see https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/demolish vs https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dismantle). Looking at photos of the demolition, demolished does seem more accurate.
Can you please restore the text to unambiguous wording?
--- Vroo (talk) 08:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hellnight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starburst.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
You reverted my edit clarifying the statement that the guidestones were demolished for "safety reasons." I wrote "I cannot find any independent reporting of this as fact" and you responded saying "The source of reporting is reuters." True and not my point. Yes, Reuters did report it and as responsible journalists they said this was what the GBI said. They did not independently vet this as fact nor did they cite any other sources to substantiate it.
As the text is now it has a dangling phrase in it: "The remaining stones were dismantled by authorities for safety reasons later in the day with a backhoe, according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation." It is impossible to understand what part of the sentence before the comma is "according to the GBI." Is it that it was dismantled by authorities, that it was done for safety reasons, or that it was done with a backhoe? The reader can't tell. That's why I split it into two sentences.
Here's a rewording that fixes that.
According to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, the remaining stones were dismantled by authorities for safety reasons later with a backhoe in the day.
Do you have any objections to my making this edit? I don't want an edit war. Vroo (talk) 07:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 23:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC) An automated process has detected that when you recently edited African Queens (docu-series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Russell.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC) You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of military aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
The Toronto Sun is a permissible source, per the ongoing discussion at WP:RSN. Cheers! BD2412 T 20:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 2 May 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2, 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks for the nomination. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
