Summary
The 2019 Uruguayan constitutional referendum, officially referred to as the referendum for constitutional reform on security matters (Spanish: plebiscito de reforma constitucional en materia de seguridad), took place alongside general election of that year, on 27 October 2019, to ask the electorate whether a constitutional reform in public security should be approved. The proposed amendments to the Constitution would create a national guard, forbid early release for some serious crimes, introduce life sentences for crimes of rape, sexual abuse or homicide of minors as well as aggravated homicide of adults, and allow the police to conduct night raids.[1][2] The referendum resulted in 46.8% of the votes cast in favor of amending the Constitution; however, not reaching the necessary 50%, the amendment was not approved, being rejected by 53.7% of the votes.[3]
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Do you vote YES on the Constitutional Reform project that encourages the law to regulate night searches by judicial order; that those who were sentenced for certain crimes must serve the sentences in their entirety; establishes the penalty of permanent reclusion before the commission of certain serious crimes that may be reviewed by the Supreme Court after 30 years of imprisonment and creates the National Guard with powers and duties of public security? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Campaign edit
Following a call by Senator Jorge Larrañaga, a movement to collect signatures was organized under the slogan "Vivir sin Miedo"(Spanish for "Living without fear"), with the aim of making changes to the public security legislation. Finally, enough people signed the proposal and the Electoral Court validated it. The most notable aspects of the proposed reform are summarized below:[4]
- Creation of a National Guard (military) with members of the Armed Forces,
- Compliance with sentences (prohibition of early release for certain serious crimes),
- Reviewable life sentence
- Night raids (currently, the Uruguayan Constitution only allows daytime raids even with a court order).
The proposal was very controversial.[5] The validation of the referendum was a few months before the presidential primaries were held — in which its promoter, Jorge Larrañaga, barely received 78,450 votes and was third in the National Party.[6] Because of this, many candidates strongly objected to the initiative. Furthermore, the Institute of Human Rights came to question the validity of the initiative itself.[7]
Responses edit
None of the 11 candidates for President supported the proposed constitutional reform.[8] The ruling party, the leftist Broad Front, as well as Popular Unity and the Workers' Party rejected the reform. In the rest of the political spectrum, the candidates Luis Lacalle Pou, Guido Manini Ríos and Ernesto Talvi spoke out against the proposal, but they let their supporters free to act.[9][10]
Simultaneously, a group was formed to carry out a counter-campaign, called: "Articulación Nacional No a la Reforma" (Spanish for: "National Articulation No to the Reform").[11] With the slogan "No a la reforma, el miedo no es la forma" (Spanish for: "No to reform, fear is not the way)", they urged a deeper analysis of reality, and the true roots of insecurity, appealing to education, rehabilitation and prevention instead of violence, fear or repression.[11] On October 22, 2019, an act against the constitutional reform was held on 18 de Julio Avenue.[12] In the last week of the campaign, Former President Julio María Sanguinetti announced that he would vote in favor of the reform and stated that "it is a personal decision and does not represent the thinking of the Colorado Party."[13] The then President, Tabaré Vázquez said that he was against the proposal, stating "I trust the intelligence of the Uruguayan people."[14] After these statements, the possibility that Vázquez had violated the Constitution when pronouncing on this issue was discussed.[15]
Results edit
Voters participating in the general elections had the opportunity to take a ballot in favour of the proposed amendment, and attach it to their ballots in their envelopes, or not to do so. Only the presence (or not) of the "yes" ballot was recorded as a vote being cast, with no invalid votes possible.
Although legally binding, in order to be considered valid, the proposal must receive an absolute majority of votes in its favour, and be supported by at least 35% of registered voters (turnout). The measure failed, receiving the necessary quorum but not a majority of votes in favour. The total number of registered voters used to calculate the referendum turnout rate differed slightly from that of registered voters for the elections held on the same day, as some foreign nationals with a significant period of residency were able to vote in elections, but not in referendums.
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 1,139,433 | 46.83 |
 Against |
1,293,931 | 53.17 |
| Total | 2,433,364 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,699,463 | 90.14 |
| Source: Corte Electoral | ||
By constituency edit
| Constituency | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| % | % | |
| Artigas | 60.9 | 39.1 |
| Canelones | 43.7 | 56.3 |
| Cerro Largo | 54.2 | 45.8 |
| Colonia | 48.8 | 51.2 |
| Durazno | 57.7 | 42.3 |
| Flores | 57.3 | 42.7 |
| Florida | 52.3 | 47.7 |
| Lavalleja | 60.7 | 39.3 |
| Maldonado | 55.2 | 44.8 |
| Montevideo | 38.8 | 61.2 |
| Paysandú | 50.7 | 49.3 |
| Rio Negro | 52.0 | 48.0 |
| Rivera | 62.0 | 38.0 |
| Rocha | 50.7 | 49.3 |
| Salto | 53.7 | 46.3 |
| San Jose | 49.7 | 50.3 |
| Soriano | 49.6 | 50.4 |
| Tacuarembó | 56.4 | 43.6 |
| Treinta y Tres | 57.4 | 42.6 |
| Total | 46.8 | 53.2 |
| Source: El País | ||
References edit
- ^ ¿Qué implica la reforma constitucional de Larrañaga? El Observador, 25 February 2019
- ^ ""Vivir sin miedo": la otra papeleta de las elecciones uruguayas". France 24. 2019-10-26. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ diaria, la (2019-10-27). "La reforma constitucional Vivir sin Miedo fue rechazada". la diaria (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ Observador, El. "¿Qué implica la reforma constitucional de Larrañaga?". El Observador. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ Canal. "Aumenta la polémica por "Vivir sin Miedo"". www.telenoche.com.uy (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ ElPais (July 2019). "Vea todos los resultados de las elecciones internas 2019". Diario EL PAIS Uruguay (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ "Larrañaga rechazó el pronunciamiento del Instituto de Derechos Humanos que cuestiona la validez de la iniciativa de la reforma constitucional". Teledoce.com (in Spanish). 18 June 2019. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ AM, Radio Montecarlo CX20-930. "El Presidente Tabaré Vázquez criticó la reforma "Vivir sin miedo" que se votará el domingo conjuntamente con las elecciones nacionales". Radio Montecarlo CX20-930 AM (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Observador, El. "Talvi da "libertad de acción" para apoyar reforma de Vivir sin miedo". El Observador. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ "Manini insiste en no votar "Vivir sin miedo": afirmó que no cumplirá con las expectativas". Montevideo Portal (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ a b Observador, El. "Cuáles son los principales argumentos del "No a la reforma"". El Observador. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ ElPais (22 October 2019). ""No a la reforma": marcha en rechazo a "Vivir sin miedo" recorrió 18 de Julio". Diario EL PAIS Uruguay (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ Observador, El. "Sanguinetti votará a favor de la reforma "Vivir sin miedo" que impulsa Larrañaga". El Observador. Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ ElPais (23 October 2019). "Vázquez a horas de las elecciones: "Confío en la inteligencia del pueblo uruguayo"". Diario EL PAIS Uruguay (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.
- ^ ElPais (25 October 2019). "Acusan al presidente Vázquez de violar la Constitución al final de la campaña electoral". Diario EL PAIS Uruguay (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-12-23.