Achilles_number Knowpia

An Achilles number is a number that is powerful but not a perfect power.^[1] A positive integer $n$ is a powerful number if, for every prime factor $p$ of $n$ , $p 2$ is also a divisor. In other words, every prime factor appears at least squared in the factorization. All Achilles numbers are powerful. However, not all powerful numbers are Achilles numbers: only those that cannot be represented as $m k$ , where $m$ and $k$ are positive integers greater than 1.

Achilles numbers were named by Henry Bottomley after Achilles, a hero of the Trojan war, who was also powerful but imperfect. Strong Achilles numbers are Achilles numbers whose Euler totients are also Achilles numbers; the smallest are 500 and 864.^[2]

Sequence of Achilles numbers edit

A number $n = p 1 a 1 p 2 a 2 \dots p k a k$ is powerful if $min(a 1, a 2, \dots, a k) \geq 2$ . If in addition $gcd (a 1, a 2, \dots, a k) = 1$ the number is an Achilles number.

The Achilles numbers up to 5000 are:

72, 108, 200, 288, 392, 432, 500, 648, 675, 800, 864, 968, 972, 1125, 1152, 1323, 1352, 1372, 1568, 1800, 1944, 2000, 2312, 2592, 2700, 2888, 3087, 3200, 3267, 3456, 3528, 3872, 3888, 4000, 4232, 4500, 4563, 4608, 5000 (sequence A052486 in the OEIS).

The smallest pair of consecutive Achilles numbers is:^[3]

5425069447 = 7³ × 41² × 97²

5425069448 = 2³ × 26041²

Examples edit

As an example, 108 is a powerful number. Its prime factorization is 2² · 3³, and thus its prime factors are 2 and 3. Both 2² = 4 and 3² = 9 are divisors of 108. However, 108 cannot be represented as $m k$ , where $m$ and $k$ are positive integers greater than 1, so 108 is an Achilles number.

The integer 360 is not an Achilles number because it is not powerful. One of its prime factors is 5 but 360 is not divisible by 5² = 25.

Finally, 784 is not an Achilles number. It is a powerful number, because not only are 2 and 7 its only prime factors, but also 2² = 4 and 7² = 49 are divisors of it. It is a perfect power: