BREAKING NEWS
Cloud Server Hosting For Online Businesses
Inexpensive SEO Services
Benefits of Wanting to play Free Online Slot machines
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986

Summary

The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 was a law pertaining to the War on Drugs passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by U.S. President Ronald Reagan. Among other things, it changed the system of federal supervised release from a rehabilitative system into a punitive system.[citation needed] The 1986 Act also prohibited controlled substance analogs. The bill enacted new mandatory minimum sentences for drugs, including marijuana.[1][2]

Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986
Great Seal of the United States
Other short titles
  • Alcohol and Drug Abuse Amendments of 1986
  • Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986
  • Federal Analog Act
Long titleAn Act to strengthen Federal efforts to encourage foreign cooperation in eradicating illicit drug crops and in halting international drug traffic, to improve enforcement of Federal drug laws and enhance interdiction of illicit drug shipments, to provide strong Federal leadership in establishing effective drug abuse prevention and education programs, to expand Federal support for drug abuse treatment and rehabilitation efforts, and for other purposes.
Enacted bythe 99th United States Congress
EffectiveOctober 27, 1986
Citations
Public law99-570
Statutes at Large100 Stat. 3207
Codification
Acts amendedAdministrative Procedure Act
Freedom of Information Act
Titles amended21 U.S.C.: Food and Drugs
U.S.C. sections amended
Legislative history
Major amendments
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988

History edit

 
President Ronald Reagan signs the Anti Drug Abuse Act of 1986 in the East Room. Charlie Rangel (far left) and Nancy Reagan look on.

The appearance of crack cocaine, the June 19, 1986, death of Len Bias (University of Maryland basketball star), the morning after he signed with the NBA champions Boston Celtics, and the June 27, 1986, death of Don Rogers (Cleveland Browns, 1985 Defensive Rookie of the Year) — both from cocaine use,[3] encouraged Speaker of the House of Representatives and Democratic congressman Tip O'Neill to mobilize the House Democratic leadership to assemble an omnibus anti-drug bill that became the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986.[4] The congressional interest and intense news coverage created a moral panic surrounding cocaine use, which had earlier been viewed in a more benign or even positive way,[5] that made enacting this legislation so important.[6] In September and October 1986, the House (with a Democratic majority) and the Senate (with a Republican majority) competed over which could propose the most severe laws in advance of the pivotal midterm election.[7]

Contents edit

Money Laundering Control Act edit

The Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 was enacted as Title I of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act.[8][9] This title criminalized money laundering for the first time in the United States.[9] It also amended the Bank Secrecy Act, the Change in Bank Control Act, and the Right to Financial Privacy Act[9]

Drug crimes edit

Along with the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the act substantially increased the number of drug offenses with mandatory minimum sentences.[10]

This act mandated a minimum sentence of 5 years without parole for possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine while it mandated the same for possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine. This 100:1 disparity was reduced to 18:1, when crack was increased to 28 grams (1 ounce) by the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.[citation needed]

The law also banned the operation of venues intended for use of illegal drugs, a provision known as the "Crackhouse Law". It was amended in the RAVE Act of 2003.[11]

Spending edit

The act authorized billions of dollars of spending, although substantially less was actually appropriated. Some of this was used to increase the substance abuse treatment federal block grant program,[12] although treatment providers were disappointed at the reduced appropriations following politicians' earlier promises and authorization.[7]

Other programs funded by the act included drug counseling and education programs,[9] AIDS research,[12] and international cooperation to limit drug production.[9]

The Act also included the Drug Free Schools and Communities Act, which required colleges to establish drug abuse education and prevention programs.[13]

Impact edit

The law led to an increase in average time imprisoned for drug crimes from 22 months to 33 months.[14]

Racial effect edit

The Anti-Drug Abuse Act created a significant disparity in the sentences imposed for crimes involving powder cocaine versus crack cocaine, with the ratio of 100 to 1. For example, a drug crime involving 5 grams of crack cocaine resulted in a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years in federal prison, while crimes involving 500 grams of powder cocaine received the same sentence.[15] After the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, the number of black people sent to federal prison skyrocketed from approximately 50 in 100,000 adults to approximately 250 in 100,000 adults.[16] During that same period of mass increase in black prison rates, there was almost no change in the number of white people incarcerated in federal prison.

This also led to an increased disparity in prison sentencing lengths between races: prior to the enactment of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, black people received sentences for drug-related crimes which were 11% longer than sentences received by whites who committed the same offense; this increased to 49% in the following years. This disparity led to major racial and class imbalances, where minorities faced far harsher punishments for the use and sale of virtually the same drug as their affluent, white counterparts.[17]

See also edit

Citations edit

  1. ^ Snitch: Drug Laws and Snitching – a Primer Archived 2015-10-23 at the Wayback Machine. Frontline (U.S. TV series). Public Broadcasting Service. The article also has a chart of mandatory minimum sentences for first time drug offenders.
  2. ^ Thirty Years of America's Drug War Archived 2011-02-24 at the Wayback Machine. Frontline (U.S. TV series).
  3. ^ Easley 2011.
  4. ^ "Pro/Con - Eric e. Sterling | Snitch | FRONTLINE | PBS". PBS. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  5. ^ Musto 2005, p. 11.
  6. ^ Reinarman and Levine, "Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice", Univ. of Cal. Press, 1997
  7. ^ a b Musto 2005, p. 12.
  8. ^ Richards 1998, p. 136.
  9. ^ a b c d e Pollard & Daly 2014, p. 16.19.
  10. ^ Reamer 2005, p. 134.
  11. ^ Erin Treacy, The Rave Act: A Specious Solution to the Serious Problem of Increased Ecstasy Distribution: Is It Unconstitutionally Overbroad, 28 Hastings COMM. & ENT. L.J. 229 (2005).
  12. ^ a b Landsberg 2004, p. 213.
  13. ^ Dowdall 2013, p. 128.
  14. ^ Shewan 2013, p. 89f.
  15. ^ "Oct. 27, 1986: Anti-Drug Abuse Act Creates Racially Biased 100 to 1 Crack/Powder Disparity". Equal Justice Incentive. Archived from the original on 26 May 2022. Retrieved 21 April 2022.
  16. ^ "Oct. 27, 1986: Anti-Drug Abuse Act Creates Racially Biased 100 to 1 Crack/Powder Disparity". Equal Justice Incentive. Archived from the original on 26 May 2022. Retrieved 21 April 2022.
  17. ^ "Reagan's National Drug Strategy". Omeka Beta Service. Archived from the original on 31 January 2022. Retrieved 21 April 2022.

References edit

  • Dowdall, G.W. (2013). College Drinking: Reframing a Social Problem / Changing the Culture. Stylus Publishing. ISBN 978-1-57922-815-6. Archived from the original on 15 March 2022. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  • Easley, Jonathan (19 June 2011). "The day the drug war really started". Salon.
  • Landsberg, B.K. (2004). Major Acts of Congress: A-E. Major Acts of Congress. Macmillan Reference USA. ISBN 978-0-02-865750-9. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Murakawa, N. (2014). The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America. Studies in Postwar American Political Development. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-938072-5. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Musto, David F. (2005). "Historical perspectives". In Lowinson, J.H. (ed.). Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook. Spiral Manual Series. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-0-7817-3474-5. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Pollard, A.M.; Daly, J.P. (2014). Banking Law in the United States – Fourth Edition. Juris Pub. ISBN 978-1-57823-361-8. Archived from the original on 15 March 2022. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  • Reamer, F.G. (2005). Heinous Crime: Cases, Causes, and Consequences. Columbia University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-0-231-50688-5.
  • Richards, J.R. (1998). Transnational Criminal Organizations, Cybercrime, and Money Laundering: A Handbook for Law Enforcement Officers, Auditors, and Financial Investigators. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4200-4872-8. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Shewan (2013). Drug Use in Prisons. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-134-43234-9. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.

Further reading edit

  • Abadinsky, H. (2013). Drug Use and Abuse: A Comprehensive Introduction. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-305-16164-1. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Belgrave, F.Z.; Allison, K.W. (2009). African American Psychology: From Africa to America. SAGE Publications. p. 95,391. ISBN 978-1-4129-6555-2. Archived from the original on 2022-09-14. Retrieved 2021-04-11.
  • Hinton, E. (2016). From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime. Harvard University Press. p. 317. ISBN 978-0-674-73723-5. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Isralowitz, R. (2004). Drug Use: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO's contemporary world issues. ABC-CLIO. p. 168-179. ISBN 978-1-57607-708-5.
  • King, D.S.; Smith, R.M. (2011). Still a House Divided: Race and Politics in Obama's America. Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative Perspectives. Princeton University Press. p. 217f,229. ISBN 978-1-4008-3976-6. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Leapley, Steven (February 9, 2014). "Analysis Of The Anti-Drug Abuse Act Of 1986". Palomar College. Archived from the original on September 14, 2022. Retrieved January 23, 2018.
  • Marcy, W.L. (2010). The Politics of Cocaine: How U. S. Foreign Policy Has Created a Thriving Drug Industry in Central and South America. Chicago Review Press, Incorporated. pp. 83–90, 134. ISBN 978-1-56976-561-6. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Marion, N.E.; Oliver, W.M. (2014). Drugs in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law [3 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-61069-596-1. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Pirog, M.A.; Good, E.M. (2012). Public Policy and Mental Health: Avenues for Prevention. Prevention Practice Kit. SAGE Publications. p. 25. ISBN 978-1-4833-0767-1. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Sandoval, L. (2013). "The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986: A Policy Analysis". California State University, Long Beach. Archived from the original on 2016-09-04. Retrieved 2018-01-23.
  • Stohr, M.; Walsh, A.; Hemmens, C. (2012). Corrections: A Text/Reader. SAGE Text/Reader Series in Criminology and Criminal Justice. SAGE Publications. p. 128,139. ISBN 978-1-4522-8992-2. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  • Weld, William F. (1987). Handbook on the Anti Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (PDF). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice / GPO. oai:quod.lib.umich.edu:MIU01-011327818. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-27. Retrieved 2018-01-23.

External links edit

  • Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (PDF/details) as amended in the GPO Statute Compilations collection

By using this platform, you agree to the Terms of Use ©2020 Knowpia