Kőnig's lemma states that ${\displaystyle \aleph _{0}}$ -Aronszajn trees do not exist.

The existence of Aronszajn trees (${\displaystyle =\aleph _{1}}$ -Aronszajn trees) was proven by Nachman Aronszajn, and implies that the analogue of Kőnig's lemma does not hold for uncountable trees.

The existence of ${\displaystyle \aleph _{2}}$ -Aronszajn trees is undecidable in ZFC: more precisely, the continuum hypothesis implies the existence of an ${\displaystyle \aleph _{2}}$ -Aronszajn tree, and Mitchell and Silver showed that it is consistent (relative to the existence of a weakly compact cardinal) that no ${\displaystyle \aleph _{2}}$ -Aronszajn trees exist.

Jensen proved that V = L implies that there is a κ-Aronszajn tree (in fact a κ-Suslin tree) for every infinite successor cardinal κ.

Cummings & Foreman (1998) showed (using a large cardinal axiom) that it is consistent that no ${\displaystyle \aleph _{n}}$ -Aronszajn trees exist for any finite n other than 1.

If κ is weakly compact then no κ-Aronszajn trees exist. Conversely, if κ is inaccessible and no κ-Aronszajn trees exist, then κ is weakly compact.

An Aronszajn tree is called special if there is a function f from the tree to the rationals so that f(x) < f(y) whenever x < y. Martin's axiom MA(${\displaystyle \aleph _{1}}$ ) implies that all Aronszajn trees are special, a proposition sometimes abbreviated by EATS. The stronger proper forcing axiom implies the stronger statement that for any two Aronszajn trees there is a club set of levels such that the restrictions of the trees to this set of levels are isomorphic, which says that in some sense any two Aronszajn trees are essentially isomorphic (Abraham & Shelah 1985). On the other hand, it is consistent that non-special Aronszajn trees exist, and this is also consistent with the generalized continuum hypothesis plus Suslin's hypothesis (Schlindwein 1994).

A special Aronszajn tree can be constructed as follows.

The elements of the tree are certain well-ordered sets of rational numbers with supremum that is rational or −∞. If x and y are two of these sets then we define x ≤ y (in the tree order) to mean that x is an initial segment of the ordered set y. For each countable ordinal α we write U_α for the elements of the tree of level α, so that the elements of U_α are certain sets of rationals with order type α. The special Aronszajn tree T is the union of the sets U_α for all countable α.

We construct the countable levels U_α by transfinite induction on α as follows starting with the empty set as U₀:

• If α + 1 is a successor then U_α+1 consists of all extensions of a sequence x in U_α by a rational greater than sup x. U_α + 1 is countable as it consists of countably many extensions of each of the countably many elements in U_α.
• If α is a limit then let T_α be the tree of all points of level less than α. For each x in T_α and for each rational number q greater than sup x, choose a level α branch of T_α containing x with supremum q. Then U_α consists of these branches. U_α is countable as it consists of countably many branches for each of the countably many elements in T_α.

The function f(x) = sup x is rational or −∞, and has the property that if x < y then f(x) < f(y). Any branch in T is countable as f maps branches injectively to −∞ and the rationals. T is uncountable as it has a non-empty level U_α for each countable ordinal α which make up the first uncountable ordinal. This proves that T is a special Aronszajn tree.

This construction can be used to construct κ-Aronszajn trees whenever κ is a successor of a regular cardinal and the generalized continuum hypothesis holds, by replacing the rational numbers by a more general η set.

• Kurepa tree
• Aronszajn line

• Abraham, Uri; Shelah, Saharon (1985), "Isomorphism types of Aronszajn trees", Israel Journal of Mathematics, 50: 75–113, doi:10.1007/BF02761119
• Cummings, James; Foreman, Matthew (1998), "The tree property", Advances in Mathematics, 133 (1): 1–32, doi:10.1006/aima.1997.1680, MR 1492784
• Kunen, Kenneth (2011), Set theory, Studies in Logic, vol. 34, London: College Publications, ISBN 978-1-84890-050-9, Zbl 1262.03001
• Kurepa, G. (1935), "Ensembles ordonnés et ramifiés", Publ. math. Univ. Belgrade, 4: 1–138, JFM 61.0980.01, Zbl 0014.39401
• Schlindwein, Chaz (1994), "Consistency of Suslin's Hypothesis, A Nonspecial Aronszajn Tree, and GCH", Journal of Symbolic Logic, 59 (1), The Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 59, No. 1: 1–29, doi:10.2307/2275246, JSTOR 2275246
• Schlindwein, Ch. (2001) [1994], "Aronszajn tree", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
• Schlindwein, Chaz (1989), "Special non-special ${\displaystyle \aleph _{1}}$ -trees", Set Theory and its Applications, 1401: 160–166, doi:10.1007/BFb0097338
• Todorčević, S. (1984), "Trees and linearly ordered sets", Handbook of set-theoretic topology, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 235–293, MR 0776625

• PlanetMath