BREAKING NEWS
Cloud Server Hosting For Online Businesses
Inexpensive SEO Services
Benefits of Wanting to play Free Online Slot machines
Battle of Ulundi

Summary

The Battle of Ulundi took place at the Zulu capital of Ulundi (Zulu: oNdini) on 4 July 1879 and was the last major battle of the Anglo-Zulu War. The British army broke the military power of the Zulu nation by defeating the main Zulu army and immediately afterwards capturing and burning the royal kraal of oNdini.

Battle of Ulundi
Battle of kwaNodwengu
Battle of oCwecweni[1]
Part of Anglo-Zulu War

The Burning of oNdini
Date4 July 1879
Location
Ulundi, South Africa
Result

British victory

  • End of the Anglo-Zulu War
Belligerents
British Empire Zulu Kingdom
Commanders and leaders
Lord Chelmsford Ziwedu kaMpande[2]
Strength
4,200 British[a]
1,000 Africans
2 Gatling Guns
10 cannons		 12,000–15,000 [b]
Casualties and losses
13–18 killed[3]
69–89 wounded[c]		 473 killed[d]
1,000+ wounded[e]

Prelude edit

 
Photograph of Cetshwayo, c. 1875

After the decisive Zulu victory at the battle of Isandlwana in January over Chelmsford's main column and the consequent defeat of the first invasion of Zululand, the British launched a new invasion of Zululand. In April 1879 despite recent battles at Kambula and Gingindlovu which had resulted in serious losses for the Zulus, the British were back at their starting point. News of the defeat at Isandlwana had hit Britain hard. In response, a flood of reinforcements had arrived in Natal with which Chelmsford prepared a second invasion of Zululand. Lord Chelmsford was aware by mid June that Sir Garnet Wolseley had superseded his command of the British forces. Chelmsford was ordered by Her Majesty's Government to "...submit and subordinate your plans to his control."[4] Chelmsford ignored this and various peace offers from Cetshwayo[5] in order to strike while the Zulu were still recovering from their defeats and to attempt to regain his reputation before Wolseley could remove him from command of the army.[6] Cetshwayo's translator, Cornelius Vijn, a Dutch trader he had imprisoned at the start of the war, informed Chelmsford through the peace offers of gathering Zulu forces.[7]

For his renewed offensive Chelmsford's overall strength was increased to 25,000.[8][f] However, the very size of the force overwhelmed the supply and transport capacity of Natal and Chelmsford would have to utilize a number of troops that could be sustained in the field.[8] In the event, for his main column, he fielded two cavalry regiments, five batteries of artillery and 12 infantry battalions, amounting to 1,000 regular cavalry, 9,000 regular infantry and a further 7,000 men with 24 guns, including the first ever British Army Gatling gun battery.[9]The lumbering supply train consisted of 600 wagons, 8,000 oxen and 1,000 mules. The structure of the force was reorganised; Colonel Evelyn Wood's No. 4 column became the flying column, Colonel Charles Pearson was relieved of command by Major General Henry Crealock and his No.1 column became the 1st Division and Major General Newdigate was given command of the new 2nd Division, accompanied by Lord Chelmsford himself.

Invasion edit

All through April and May there was much to and fro manoeuvring by the British, particularly with supply and transport.[10] Eventually, on 3 June, the main thrust of the second invasion began its slow advance on Ulundi.[11] The 1st Division was to advance along the coast belt supporting 2nd Division, which with Wood's flying column, an independent unit, was to march on Ulundi from Rorke's Drift and Kambula. Still hoping for an end to hostilities, King Cetshwayo refrained from attacking the extended and vulnerable supply lines, consequently the British advance was unopposed.[12] As the force advanced Cetshwayo dispatched envoys from Ulundi to the British. These envoys reached Chelmsford on 4 June with the message that Cetshwayo wished to know what terms would be acceptable to cease hostilities. Chelmsford sent a Zulu-speaking Dutch trader back with their terms in writing.

 
Lord Chelmsford

On the evening of 6 June jittery British troops and artillery in laager at Fort Newdigate opened fire on an arriving piquet company of Royal Engineers commanded by Lieutenant John Chard of Rorke's Drift fame, killing two horses and wounding one.[13] By the 16th the slow advance was quickened by the news that Wolseley was on his way to Natal to take command.[14] On the 17th a depot named 'Fort Marshall' was established - not far from Isandlhwana. On 28 June Chelmsford's column was a mere 17 miles away from Ulundi and had established the supply depots of 'Fort Newdigate', 'Fort Napoleon' and 'Port Durnford' when Sir Garnet Wolseley arrived in Cape Town. Wolseley had cabled Chelmsford ordering him not to undertake any serious actions on the 23rd but the message was only received through a galloper on this day. Chelmsford had no intention of letting Wolseley stop him from making a last effort to restore his reputation and did not reply. A second message was sent on 30 June reading:

"Concentrate your force immediately and keep it concentrated. Undertake no serious operations with detached bodies of troops. Acknowledge receipt of this message at once and flash back your latest moves. I am astonished at not hearing from you"

Wolseley, straining to assert command over Chelmsford, tried to join 1st Division, lagging along the coast behind the main advance. A final message was sent to Chelmsford explaining that he would be joining 1st Division, and that their location was where Chelmsford should retreat if he was compelled. High seas prevented Wolseley landing at Port Durnford and he had to take the road. At the very time Wolseley was riding north from Durban, Chelmsford was preparing to engage the enemy. Wolseley's efforts to reach the front had been in vain.

 
Field Marshal Lord Wolseley

On the same day the first cable was received, Cetshwayo's representatives again appeared. A previous reply to Chelmsford's demands had apparently not reached the British force, but now these envoys bore some of what the British commander had demanded – oxen, a promise of guns and a gift of elephant tusks. The peace was rejected as the terms had not been fully met and Chelmsford turned the envoys away without accepting the elephant tusks and informed them that the advance would only be delayed one day to allow the Zulus to surrender one regiment of their army. The redcoats were now visible from the Royal Kraal and a dismayed Cetshwayo was desperate to end the hostilities. With the invading enemy in sight, he knew no Zulu regiment would surrender so Cetshwayo sent a further hundred white oxen from his own herd along with Prince Napoleon's sword, which the Zulu had taken 1 June 1879 in the skirmish in which the Prince had been killed. The Zulu umCijo regiment, guarding the approaches to the White Umfolozi River where the British were camped, refused to let the oxen pass, deeming it a useless gesture, seeing as it was impossible to meet all Chelmsford's demands - fighting was inevitable.[15] The irate telegram from Wolseley issued on 30 June now reached Chelmsford, and with only five miles between him and a redemptive victory, it was ignored.

The British 2nd Division order of battle was:

1st Brigade edit

Commanding Officer; Colonel Richard Glyn.

2nd Brigade edit

Commanding Officer: Colonel William Collingwood.

Cavalry Brigade edit

Commanding Officer: Major General Frederick Marshall.

Flying Column edit

Commanding Officer: Brigadier General Sir Evelyn Wood.

Accompanied by Royal Engineers, Royal Artillery, Army Service Corps, 2nd Battalion Natal Native Contingent, Army Medical Department, and Natal Native Pioneer Corps.

Battle edit

 
A British map of the battle

On 3 July, with negotiations having broken down, Colonel Buller led a cavalry force across the river to reconnoitre the ground beyond. A party of Zulus were seen herding goats near the Mbilane stream and troopers moved to round them up. On a hunch, Buller bellowed an order for them to stop and prepare to fire from the saddle. His instinct proved right, for 3,000 Zulus rose from the long grass at that moment and fired a fusillade, before charging forth. Three troopers were shot dead and Buller ordered his men to retire. As they dashed back to the river, Baker's Horse who had been scouting further across, took up position and gave covering fire for the river crossing. Their crossing in turn was covered by the Transvaal Rangers on the opposite bank. This incident had placed the entire reconnaissance in grave danger, but Buller's alertness and leadership saved them from annihilation. Chelmsford was now convinced the Zulus wanted to fight and replied to Wolseley's third message, informing him that he would indeed retreat to 1st Division if the need arose, and that he would be attacking the Zulus the next day.

That evening Chelmsford issued his orders. The British, having learned a bitter lesson at Isandlwana, would take no chances meeting the Zulu army in the open with their normal line of battle such as the 'Thin Red Line' like that employed at Balaclava. Their advance would begin at first light, prior to forming his infantry into a large hollow square,[16] with mounted troops covering the sides and rear. Neither wagon laagers nor trenches would be used, to convince both the Zulus and critics that a British square could "beat them fairly in the open".[17]

At 6 a.m. Buller led out an advance guard of mounted troops and South African irregulars, which after Buller had secured an upper drift (river crossing at a ford), was followed by the infantry, led by the experienced Flying Column battalions. By 7:30 a.m. the column had cleared the rough ground on the other side of the riverbank and their square (in reality a rectangular shape) was formed. At 8:45 a.m.the Zulu engaged the cavalry on the right and left which slowly retired and passed into the square. The leading face was made up of five companies of the 80th Regiment in four ranks, with two Gatling guns in the centres, two 9-pounders on the left flank and two 7-pounders on the right. The 90th Light Infantry with four companies of the 94th Regiment made up the left face with two more 7-pounders. On the right face were the 1st Battalion of the 13th Light Infantry, four companies of the 58th Regiment, two 7-pounders and two 9-pounders. The rear face was composed of two companies of the 94th Regiment, two companies of the 2nd Battalion of the 21st Regiment (Royal Scots Fusiliers). Within the square were headquarters staff, No. 5 Company of the Royal Engineers led by Lieutenant Chard, the 2nd Native Natal Contingent, fifty wagons and carts with reserve ammunition and hospital wagons. Buller's horsemen protected the front and both flanks of the square. A rearguard of two squadrons of the 17th Lancers and a troop of Natal Native Horse followed.

Battalions with Regimental Colours now uncased them; the band of the 13th Light Infantry struck up and the 5,317-man strong 'living laager' began its measured advance across the plain. No Zulus in any numbers had been sighted by 8 a.m., so the Frontier Light Horse were sent forth to provoke the enemy. As they rode across the Mbilane stream, the entire Zulu in Gobamkhosi regiment rose out of the grass in front of them, followed by regiment after regiment rising up all around them. The Zulu Army under the command of umNtwana Ziwedu kaMpande - around 12,000 to 15,000 strong, now stood in a horseshoe shape encircling the north, east and southern sides of the square. A Zulu reserve force was also poised to complete the circle. The Zulu ranks stood hammering the ground with their feet and drumming their shields with their assegais. They were made up of both veterans and novices with varying degrees of confidence. The mounted troops by the stream opened fire from the saddle in an attempt to trigger a premature charge before wheeling back to gallop through the gaps made in the infantry lines for them. As the cavalry cleared their front at about 9 a.m., the four ranks of the infantry with the front two kneeling, opened fire at 2,000 yards into the advancing Zulu ranks. The pace of the advance quickened and the range closed between the British lines and the Zulus. The British were ready and the Zulu troops faced concentrated fire. Zulu regiments had to charge forward directly into massed rifle fire, non-stop fire from the Gatling guns and the artillery firing canister shot at point-blank range.

 
The 17th Lancers charge the Zulus (illustration)

Charges were made by the Zulus, in an attempt to get within close range, but they could not prevail against the British fire. There were a number of casualties within the square to Zulu marksmen, but the British firing did not waver and no warrior was able to get within 30 yards of the British ranks. The Zulu reserve force now rose and charged against the south-west corner of the square. Nine-pounders tore great chunks out of this body while the infantry opened fire. The speed of the charge made it seem as if the Zulu reserves would get close enough to engage in hand-to-hand combat but no warrior reached the British ranks. Chelmsford ordered the cavalry to mount, and the 17th Lancers, 1st King's Dragoon Guards, colonial cavalry, Native Horse and 2nd Natal Native Contingent charged the now fleeing Zulus. The Zulus fled towards the high ground with cavalry at their heels and shells falling ahead of them. The Lancers were checked at the Mbilane stream by the fire of a concealed party of Zulus, causing several casualties to the cavalrymen before they overcame the resistance. The pursuit continued until not a live Zulu remained on the Mahlabatini plain, with members of the Natal Native Horse, Natal Native Contingent and Wood's Irregulars killing the Zulu wounded, in revenge for similar Zulu actions at Isandlwana.

Aftermath edit

 
Sir Garnet Wolseley's camp at Ulundi

After half an hour of concentrated fire from the artillery, the Gatling Guns and thousands of British riflemen, the Zulu military power was broken. British casualties were ten killed and eighty-seven wounded, while nearly five hundred Zulu dead were counted around the square;[18] another 1,000 or more were wounded. Chelmsford ordered the Royal Kraal of Ulundi to be burnt – the capital of Zululand burned for days. Chelmsford turned over command to Wolseley on 15 July at the fort at St. Paul's, leaving for home on the 17th. Chelmsford had partially salvaged[19] his reputation and received a Knight Grand Cross of Bath, largely because of Ulundi; however, he was severely criticized by the Horse Guards investigation[20] and he would never serve in the field again.[21]

Cetshwayo had been sheltered in a village since 3 July and fled upon hearing news of the defeat at Ulundi. The British forces were dispersed around Zululand in the hunt for Cetshwayo, burning numerous kraals in a vain attempt to get his Zulu subjects to surrender him over along with fighting the final small battle to defeat the remaining hostile Zulu battalions.[22] Cetshwayo was finally captured on 28 August by soldiers under Wolseley's command at a kraal in the middle of the Ngome forest. He was exiled to Cape Town, where he would remain for three years. Wolseley, having replaced both Chelmsford and Bartle Frere, swiftly divided up Zululand into thirteen districts, the First Partition of Zululand, installing pro-British chiefs in each district.[23] In January 1883, shortly before his death in 1884, Cetshwayo was restored to the throne of a reduced central Zululand in the Second Partition of Zululand.[24][25][26] Cetshwayo was the last king of the Zulus to be officially recognized as such by the British.[27] He was succeeded by his son Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo, who ruled until his surrender to the British in 1888 and exile to the island of Saint Helena, although he was still recognized by the Zulus as king until his death in 1913.[28]

See also edit

References edit

Notes edit

  1. ^   Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Zululand". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. gives 5,200
  2. ^   Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Zululand". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. gives 12,000 to 15,000
  3. ^ Knight 2005, p. 59 gives 13 killed 69 wounded. Colenso 1880, p. 448 gives 18 killed, 85 wounded
  4. ^ Hall 1978 quotes the London Standard reporting 473 counted dead
  5. ^ The report "The Battle of Ulundi". New York Times. 25 July 1879. states 1,500 Zulu casualties.   Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Zululand". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. gives 1,500 casualties
  6. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 396 gives British strength in April as 22,545.

Citations edit

  1. ^ Laband 2009, pp. 292–294, page 293, Ulundi, Battle of (1879).
  2. ^ Laband 2009, pp. 5–6, Anglo-Zulu War (1879).
  3. ^ Knight 2005, p. 59.
  4. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 455.
  5. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 456.
  6. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 461: , "... everyone understood that he would try and end the war before he was superseded ... that 'poor Lord Chelmsford' might get a chance, win a battle ...".
  7. ^ Macdonald 1933, p. 55.
  8. ^ a b Morris 1998, p. 498.
  9. ^ Chivers 2011, p. 62.
  10. ^ Morris 1998, pp. 506–507.
  11. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 440a: "the correspondent of the Times wrote: "We are wandering towards Ulundi much as the Children of Israel wandered towards Canaan ... " '
  12. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 441.
  13. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 439.
  14. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 440b: " ... acted as the "spur to the head" which expedited Lord Chelmsford's movements."
  15. ^ Colenso 1880, p. 449.
  16. ^ Hall 1979.
  17. ^ "South Africa Holiday: Battle of Ulundi - 1879 (information for British Tourists in South Africa)". southafricaholiday.org.uk. n.d. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  18. ^ Hall 1978.
  19. ^ Lock & Quantrill 2015, p. 283.
  20. ^ Lock & Quantrill 2015, Ch.9.
  21. ^ Gump 1996, p. 99.
  22. ^ Gump 1996, pp. 99–100.
  23. ^ Laband 2009, pp. 319-320, Zululand, 1st Partition of (1879).
  24. ^ Laband 2009, pp. 320-321, Zululand, 2nd Partition of (1882).
  25. ^ Weltig 2008, pp. 58–69.
  26. ^ Gump 1996, p. 105.
  27. ^ "The Missing Chapter | King Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo, London, c. 1890/1900". Archived from the original on 12 January 2020.
  28. ^ Greaves 2013, p. 189.

Sources edit

  • Chivers, C. J. (2011). The Gun. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-7173-8.
  • Colenso, Frances E. (1880). History of the Zulu War and Its Origin. Assisted by Edward Durnford. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Greaves, Adrian (2013). The Tribe that Washed its Spears: The Zulu's at War. Pen and Sword. ISBN 978-1-84884-841-2.
  • Gump, James O. (1996). The Dust Rose Like Smoke: The Subjugation of the Zulu and the Sioux. Bison Books. ISBN 0-8032-7059-3.
  • Hall, D.D (December 1978). "Artillery in the Zulu War 1879". Military History Journal. 4 (4). South African Military History Society. ISSN 0026-4016.
  • Hall, D.D (June 1979). "Squares in the Zulu War 1879". Military History Journal. 4 (5). South African Military History Society. ISSN 0026-4016.
  • Knight, Ian (2005). British Fortifications in Zululand 1879. Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-829-8.
  • Laband, John (2009). Historical Dictionary of the Zulu Wars (PDF). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6300-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 May 2018.
  • Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2015). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the cover-up. Frontline Books. ISBN 978-1-4738-7684-2.
  • Macdonald, William (1933). The Romance of the Golden Rand: Being the Romantic Story of the Life and Work of the Pioneers of the Witwatersrand--the World's Greatest Goldfields. Cassell, limited.
  • Morris, Donald R. (1998). The Washing of the Spears: The Rise And Fall of the Zulu Nation. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-80866-1.
  • Weltig, Matthew Scott (2008). The Aftermath of the Anglo-Zulu War. Twenty-First Century Books. ISBN 978-0-8225-7599-3.

Further reading edit

  • Barthorp, Michael (2002). The Zulu War: Isandhlwana to Ulundi. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-304-36270-0.
  • Brookes, Edgar H; Webb, Colin de B. (1965). A History of Natal. University of Natal Press. ISBN 0-86980-579-7.
  • David, Saul (February 2009). "The Forgotten Battles of the Zulu War". BBC History Magazine. Vol. 10, no. 2. pp. 26–33.
  • David, Saul (2005). Zulu, The Heroism and Tragedy of the Zulu War of 1879. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-101569-1.
  • Laband, John; Knight, Ian (1996). The Anglo-Zulu War. Stroud: Sutton. ISBN 0-86985-829-7.
  • Laband, John (2009). "Introduction". Historical Dictionary of the Zulu Wars (PDF). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. pp. xli–liv. ISBN 978-0-8108-6300-2.
  • Martineau, John (1895). The life and correspondence of the Sir Bartle Frere. John Murray.
  • Knight, Ian (2003). The Anglo-Zulu War. Osprey. ISBN 1-84176-612-7.
  • Raugh, Harold E. Jr. (2011). Anglo-Zulu War 1879: A Selected Bibliography. Scarecrow PressPress. ISBN 978-0-8108-7227-1.
  • Thompson, Paul Singer (2006). Black soldiers of the queen: the Natal native contingent in the Anglo-Zulu War. University of Alabama Press. ISBN 0-8173-5368-2.
  • Spiers, Edward M. (2006). The Scottish Soldier and Empire, 1854–1902. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-2354-9.

External links edit

  • http://www.britishbattles.com/zulu-war/ulundi.htm
  • http://www.rorkesdriftvc.com/ulundi/
  • http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_ulundi.html
  • Travellers Impressions

28°18′40″S 31°25′35″E / 28.311091°S 31.426317°E / -28.311091; 31.426317 (Battle of Ulundi)

By using this platform, you agree to the Terms of Use ©2020 Knowpia