BREAKING NEWS
Cloud Server Hosting For Online Businesses
Inexpensive SEO Services
Benefits of Wanting to play Free Online Slot machines
Belgian economic miracle

Summary

The Belgian economic miracle (French: Le miracle belge, Dutch: Het belgische wonder, literally "The Belgian Miracle") was a period of rapid economic growth in Belgium after World War II, principally between 1945 and 1948. It was characterised by parallel trends of rising employment and real wages and low inflation, leading to improvements in living standards.[1] It formed part of the period of rapid post-war economic expansion in Western Europe in the late 1940s and 1950s but preceded many other "economic miracles" and was notably shorter in duration. The term itself has been criticised in relation to its possible contribution to the growing obsolescence of Belgian heavy industry in the 1950s and 1960s and emergence of deindustrialisation.

Economic miracle edit

 
Modern-day view of a former coal mine at Frameries in Hainaut Province. Coal mining was one of the industries which drove Belgium's economic miracle

During World War II, Belgium had been occupied by Nazi Germany and had seen a deterioration in its gross domestic product through war damage and the economic policies pursued by the occupiers, despite the efforts of Alexandre Galopin and the Committee of Secretaries-General who attempted to preserve Belgium's industrial capacity through a policy of limited compromise with the German occupation authorities.

From 1945, however, demand for Belgium's traditional industries (steel and coal, textiles, and railway machinery in particular) grew across Europe, boosting the recovery of the Belgian economy.[2] In comparison with neighbouring countries, whose industries had been heavily damaged by fighting, the comparatively intact Belgian industrial base was able to restore its capacity to respond to the rise in demand.[3] In 1946, the government announced its intention to increase production in Belgium's important coal mining industries by inaugurating a "Battle for Coal" (Bataille du charbon). At the end of 1947, Belgium became the first former belligerent in Europe to reach its pre-war level of industrial output.[4]

The economic miracle was also greatly facilitated by the monetary policy of Camille Gutt whose "Plan Gutt", begun in October 1944, reduced the money supply which had grown hugely during the occupation. The effect of the policy, which reduced the amount of circulating currency by two-thirds, was to limit inflation sharply and facilitate a general rise in living standards.[4]

Living conditions for Belgian workers improved rapidly during the economic miracle. Historically, Belgium's urban workers had been paid less and lived in poorer conditions than those in comparable countries, even while the Belgian economy grew rapidly during the Industrial Revolution.[5] This began to change during the economic wonder. In 1944, shortly after the Liberation, the Belgian government of Achille Van Acker introduced a series of social security reforms which began the rise in living standards. Labour shortages and demands for higher production, especially in coal mining, led to rising wages. By 1947 the wages of coal miners in the Borinage were 40 percent higher than they had been in 1938.[6] Birthrates also rose.

The economic miracle also demonstrated the national labour shortage, especially in coal sector. The Belgian government attempted to recruit labour abroad. It briefly employed 64,000 German prisoners of war as coal miners. In 1946, the Belgian government created a guest worker programme in Italy which led to the first significant wave of immigration into Belgium.[7]

Criticism edit

Some historians have criticised the use of the term economic miracle to describe the period. According to historian Martin Conway, the term is "singularly inappropriate" to describe Belgian economic recovery during the period because "growth rates, salaries, and levels of investment lagged substantially behind, and production costs significantly above, those of Belgium's competitor economies".[8] Government policy focused on monetary stability rather than on investment.[9] Taken by surprise by the speed of the country's economic recovery, the Belgian government claimed little of the Marshall Aid that was being used by its competitors to develop new industries.[10] By 1953, Belgium's industrial production was 11 percent higher than its 1929 output, compared with a 70 percent difference in other Western European countries.[5] The result was that Belgian heavy industry faced an "acute structural crisis" in the 1950s as Belgian industrial exports became uncompetitive. This led to the start of the deindustrialisation of Wallonia and the start of regional economic divergence between Wallonia and Flanders which would become visible during the general strike of winter 1960–61.[8]

The study of the period was important in the formation of the economic thought of the economist Alexandre Lamfalussy, who wrote on the subject in the early 1960s.[11]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Van der Wee & Verbreyt 2009, p. 459.
  2. ^ Maes 2009, pp. 5–6.
  3. ^ Van den Wijngaert & Dujardin 2005, p. 149.
  4. ^ a b Van den Wijngaert & Dujardin 2005, p. 150.
  5. ^ a b Cliff 1961.
  6. ^ Milward 2000, p. 51.
  7. ^ Milward 2000, pp. 51–2.
  8. ^ a b Conway 2012, p. 375.
  9. ^ Maes 2009, p. 6.
  10. ^ Van den Wijngaert & Dujardin 2005, p. 156.
  11. ^ Maes 2009, pp. 1–5.

Bibliography edit

  • Conway, Martin (2012). The Sorrows of Belgium: Liberation and Political Reconstruction, 1944-1947. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-969434-1.
  • Cliff, Tony (Spring 1961). "Belgium: Strike to Revolution?". International Socialism. 1 (4): 10–7. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  • Maes, Ivo (April 2009). "The young Lamfalussy : an empirical and policy-oriented growth theorist" (PDF). National Bank of Belgium Working Paper (163).
  • Milward, Alan S. (2000). The European Rescue of the Nation-State (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-21628-1.
  • Van der Wee, Herman; Verbreyt, Monique (2009). A Small Nation in the Turmoil of the Second World War: Money, Finance and Occupation. Belgium, its enemies, its friends, 1939-1945 (Rev. ed.). Leuven: Leuven University Press. ISBN 978-90-5867-759-4.
  • Van den Wijngaert, Mark; Dujardin, Vincent (2005). "La Belgique sans Roi (1940-1950)". Nouvelle Histoire de Belgique. Vol. II: 1905-1950. Brussels: Éd. Complexe. ISBN 2-8048-0078-4.

Further reading edit

  • Eichengreen, Barry J. (1995). "'Belgian Miracle' To Slow Growth: The Impact of the Marshall Plan and the European Payments Union". Europe's Post-War Recovery. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 271–291. ISBN 0-521-48279-8.
  • Cassiers, Isabelle (April 1994). "Belgium's Postwar Growth and The Catch-up Hypothesis". European Economic Review. 38 (3–4): 899–911. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(94)90126-0.
  • Cassiers, Isabelle; et al. (1996). "Economic growth in postwar Belgium". In Crafts, Nicholas; Toniolo, Gianni (eds.). Economic Growth in Europe since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521499644.
  • Coppieters, Guy (2021). De Belgische Kolenslag 1944-1951 : het mirakel dat er geen was. Brussels: Algemeen Rijksarchief. ISBN 9789463911849.
  • Mommen, André (1994). The Belgian Economy in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-01936-2.
  • Leboutte, René; Puissant, Jean; Scuto, Denis (1998). Un Siècle d'histoire industrielle (1873-1973) : Belgique, Luxembourg, Pays-Bas : industrialisation et sociétés. Paris: SEDES. pp. 195–241. ISBN 9782718190563.

By using this platform, you agree to the Terms of Use ©2020 Knowpia