C/1989 X1 (Austin)


C/1989 X1 (Austin)
Comet Austin develops an ion tail (Eso9004a).jpg
The comet on February 24, 1990, by La Silla Observatory, ESO
Discovered byRodney Austin
Discovery date6 December 1989
1990 V, 1989c1
Orbital characteristics A
Perihelion0.3497735 AU
Last perihelion9 April 1990

C/1989 X1 (Austin) (old-style designations 1990 V and 1989c1) was a comet discovered by New Zealand amateur Rodney R. D. Austin on December 6, 1989. The comet at discovery was predicted to become easily visible by naked eye in spring 1990, however it failed to become that bright.


Rodney Austin discovered the comet on December 6, 1989 through an 8-inch Schmidt–Newtonian telescope, and it was his third comet discovery.[1] By the time of its discovery, it was already obvious that it must be a large object, as the comet was still more than 350 million kilometres (2.42 AU) from the Sun and yet it was so bright that it was seen as an 11th magnitude object (that is, 1/100 as bright as what can be perceived with the unaided eye).[2]

More observations were soon made, establishing the comet's orbit, and it was found that it would pass through its perihelion (the point of its orbit where it is closest to the Sun) on 9 April 1990 at a distance of about 53 million kilometres, inside the orbit of Mercury, the planet closest to the Sun, and it would come within 38 million kilometres of the Earth on May 25. The orbit indicated that after 20 April 1990 it could be seen in the northern hemisphere low above the NW horizon, just after sunset, and even better above the NE horizon, shortly before sunrise, and it was expected to develop an easily observable tail which would be a grand celestial view.[2] Its high eccentricity, above 1, indicated that it was a dynamically new object from the Oort cloud.[1]

The comet was at 83 degrees elongation from the Sun at discovery and nearly circumpolar for the southern hemisphere. The comet slowly moved northwards and passed the equator on March 21, 1990, however its elongation from the Sun, around 25 degrees, meant it was difficult to observe. After perihelion, the comet would start to move gradually away from the Sun and at the time of the closest approach to Earth would be 100 degrees away from the Sun, at the constellation of Aquila and moving southward.[1]

A long ion tail was observed on late February 1990.[2] However, as the comet approached to perihelium the rate of brightening started to slow when it was 1.56 to 1.27 AU away from the Sun and although activity increased again in April, the comet ended up about 6 magnitudes dimmer than expected at maximum brightness, being dimmer than magnitude 2, with most obervators reporting a maximum brightness between +4 and +6. The comet was visible with naked eye between May 5 and May 25, 1990, before fading below naked eye visibility.[1]

Scientific results


A jet observed by NTT on February 9, 1990.

The spectrum of the comet upon discovery showed the presence of hydroxyl emission and continuum from the dust, however the presence of dust was noted to be unusually low. The spectrum also revealed the presence of gases like cyanide, CO2+, and diatomic carbon.[3] Further observations of the spectrum of the comet revealed the presence of the forbidden oxygen line (1128 Å) and the absence of features attributed to helium, argon and diatomic nitrogen.[4]

The millimetre spectrum of the comet, by the radiotelescope of IRAM, showed the presence of hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde, hydrogen sulphide and methanol, and was the first time the latter two were observed in the spectrum of a comet.[5]

Infrared and radio observations

The comet was imaged in infrared by the COBE satellite on May 6, 1990 and revealed the presence of a dust tail 6 degrees long at 12 and 25 micrometres. The tail exhibited complex structure that was attributed to the variations of the dust production rate of the comet, which was estimated to be 510+510
kg/s. It was estimated that the nucleus of the comet was covered mainly by particles measuring 20 micrometers in diameter.[6] The comet was also observed by the Golden Gopher infrared camera with 8 to 12 micrometer filters, the first time this camera was used to observe a comet. The images didn't show the presence of jets or shells and the coma appeared slightly elongated. It was estimated by these observations that the comet lost about a tonne of material every second on May 6, and fell to 570 kilos per second on May 12.[7]

Observations of the comet with polarimeter revealed the presence of jets and shells, common characteristics of a comet. It was also observed that the dust particles of the comet had higher albedo than usual.[8] Other photopolarimetric observations estimated the size of the main dust particles to be 0.1 to 0.5 μm. The cyanide and diatomic carbon had polarisation close to the predicted one, but the triatomic carbon had lower polarisation than the predicted one.[9]

On May 13, 1990, as the tail of comet Austin passed in front of the quasar 3C 441, it enhanced the scintillations in radio waves.[10]


  1. ^ a b c d Machholz, Don E. (April 1994). "Comet Austin 1989c1: what went wrong?". The Strolling Astronomer. 37 (4): 171–176. Bibcode:1994JALPO..37..171M.
  2. ^ a b c "ESO - eso9004 - Comet Austin Develops a Long Tail". ESO. Retrieved 2010-01-11.
  3. ^ "Comet Austin". archive.stsci.edu. 8 April 1998.
  4. ^ GREEN, J. C.; CASH, W.; COOK, T. A.; STERN, S. A. (25 January 1991). "The Spectrum of Comet Austin from 910 to 1180 A". Science. 251 (4992): 408–410. doi:10.1126/science.251.4992.408. PMID 17775104. S2CID 27583710.
  5. ^ Bockelée-Morvan, Dominique; Colom, Pierre; Crovisier, Jacques; Despois, Didier; Paubert, Gabriel (March 1991). "Microwave detection of hydrogen sulphide and methanol in comet Austin (1989c1)". Nature. 350 (6316): 318–320. Bibcode:1991Natur.350..318B. doi:10.1038/350318a0. S2CID 4335844.
  6. ^ Lisse, C. M.; Freudenreich, H. T.; Hauser, M. G.; Kelsall, T.; Moseley, S. H.; Reach, W. T.; Silverberg, R. F. (September 1994). "Infrared observations of Comet Austin (1990 V) by the COBE/Diffuse Infrared Background Experiment". The Astrophysical Journal. 432: L71. Bibcode:1994ApJ...432L..71L. doi:10.1086/187514.
  7. ^ Fomenkova, M.N.; Jones, B.; Piña, R.K.; Puetter, R.C.; McFadden, L.A.; Abney, F.; Gehrz, R.D. (December 1993). "Thermal-Infrared High-Resolution Imaging of Comet Austin". Icarus. 106 (2): 489–498. Bibcode:1993Icar..106..489F. doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1187.
  8. ^ Eaton, N.; Scarrott, S. M.; Gledhill, T. M. (15 September 1992). "Polarization studies of comet Austin". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 258 (2): 384–386. doi:10.1093/mnras/258.2.384.
  9. ^ Joshi, U. C.; Sen, A. K.; Deshpande, M. R.; Chauhan, J. S. (September 1992). "Photopolarimetric studies of comet Austin". Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy. 13 (3): 267–277. Bibcode:1992JApA...13..267J. doi:10.1007/BF02702294. S2CID 119723641.
  10. ^ Janardhan, P; Alurkar, SK; Bobra, AD; Slee, OB (1991). "Enhanced Radio Source Scintillation due to Comet Austin (1989c1)". Australian Journal of Physics. 44 (5): 565. Bibcode:1991AuJPh..44..565J. doi:10.1071/PH910565.

External links

  • C/1989 X1 at the JPL Small-Body Database Edit this at Wikidata
    • Close approach · Discovery · Ephemeris · Orbit diagram · Orbital elements · Physical parameters
  • Comet Austin 1989c1: What went wrong?