Cellular homology

Summary

In mathematics, cellular homology in algebraic topology is a homology theory for the category of CW-complexes. It agrees with singular homology, and can provide an effective means of computing homology modules.

Definition edit

If   is a CW-complex with n-skeleton  , the cellular-homology modules are defined as the homology groups Hi of the cellular chain complex

 

where   is taken to be the empty set.

The group

 

is free abelian, with generators that can be identified with the  -cells of  . Let   be an  -cell of  , and let   be the attaching map. Then consider the composition

 

where the first map identifies   with   via the characteristic map   of  , the object   is an  -cell of X, the third map   is the quotient map that collapses   to a point (thus wrapping   into a sphere  ), and the last map identifies   with   via the characteristic map   of  .

The boundary map

 

is then given by the formula

 

where   is the degree of   and the sum is taken over all  -cells of  , considered as generators of  .

Examples edit

The following examples illustrate why computations done with cellular homology are often more efficient than those calculated by using singular homology alone.

The n-sphere edit

The n-dimensional sphere Sn admits a CW structure with two cells, one 0-cell and one n-cell. Here the n-cell is attached by the constant mapping from   to 0-cell. Since the generators of the cellular chain groups   can be identified with the k-cells of Sn, we have that   for   and is otherwise trivial.

Hence for  , the resulting chain complex is

 

but then as all the boundary maps are either to or from trivial groups, they must all be zero, meaning that the cellular homology groups are equal to

 

When  , it is possible to verify that the boundary map   is zero, meaning the above formula holds for all positive  .

Genus g surface edit

Cellular homology can also be used to calculate the homology of the genus g surface  . The fundamental polygon of   is a  -gon which gives   a CW-structure with one 2-cell,   1-cells, and one 0-cell. The 2-cell is attached along the boundary of the  -gon, which contains every 1-cell twice, once forwards and once backwards. This means the attaching map is zero, since the forwards and backwards directions of each 1-cell cancel out. Similarly, the attaching map for each 1-cell is also zero, since it is the constant mapping from   to the 0-cell. Therefore, the resulting chain complex is

 

where all the boundary maps are zero. Therefore, this means the cellular homology of the genus g surface is given by

 

Similarly, one can construct the genus g surface with a crosscap attached as a CW complex with 1 0-cell, g 1-cells, and 1 2-cell. Its homology groups are

 

Torus edit

The n-torus   can be constructed as the CW complex with 1 0-cell, n 1-cells, ..., and 1 n-cell. The chain complex is

 
and all the boundary maps are zero. This can be understood by explicitly constructing the cases for  , then see the pattern.

Thus,   .

Complex projective space edit

If   has no adjacent-dimensional cells, (so if it has n-cells, it has no (n-1)-cells and (n+1)-cells), then   is the free abelian group generated by its n-cells, for each  .

The complex projective space   is obtained by gluing together a 0-cell, a 2-cell, ..., and a (2n)-cell, thus   for  , and zero otherwise.

Real projective space edit

The real projective space   admits a CW-structure with one  -cell   for all  . The attaching map for these  -cells is given by the 2-fold covering map  . (Observe that the  -skeleton   for all  .) Note that in this case,   for all  .

To compute the boundary map

 

we must find the degree of the map

 

Now, note that  , and for each point  , we have that   consists of two points, one in each connected component (open hemisphere) of  . Thus, in order to find the degree of the map  , it is sufficient to find the local degrees of   on each of these open hemispheres. For ease of notation, we let   and   denote the connected components of  . Then   and   are homeomorphisms, and  , where   is the antipodal map. Now, the degree of the antipodal map on   is  . Hence, without loss of generality, we have that the local degree of   on   is   and the local degree of   on   is  . Adding the local degrees, we have that

 

The boundary map   is then given by  .

We thus have that the CW-structure on   gives rise to the following chain complex:

 

where   if   is even and   if   is odd. Hence, the cellular homology groups for   are the following:

 

Other properties edit

One sees from the cellular chain complex that the  -skeleton determines all lower-dimensional homology modules:

 

for  .

An important consequence of this cellular perspective is that if a CW-complex has no cells in consecutive dimensions, then all of its homology modules are free. For example, the complex projective space   has a cell structure with one cell in each even dimension; it follows that for  ,

 

and

 

Generalization edit

The Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence is the analogous method of computing the (co)homology of a CW-complex, for an arbitrary extraordinary (co)homology theory.

Euler characteristic edit

For a cellular complex  , let   be its  -th skeleton, and   be the number of  -cells, i.e., the rank of the free module  . The Euler characteristic of   is then defined by

 

The Euler characteristic is a homotopy invariant. In fact, in terms of the Betti numbers of  ,

 

This can be justified as follows. Consider the long exact sequence of relative homology for the triple  :

 

Chasing exactness through the sequence gives

 

The same calculation applies to the triples  ,  , etc. By induction,

 

References edit

  • Albrecht Dold: Lectures on Algebraic Topology, Springer ISBN 3-540-58660-1.
  • Allen Hatcher: Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press ISBN 978-0-521-79540-1. A free electronic version is available on the author's homepage.