KNOWPIA
WELCOME TO KNOWPIA

In topology, a topological space is called a **compactly generated space** or **k-space** if its topology is determined by compact spaces in a manner made precise below. There is in fact no commonly agreed upon definition for such spaces, as different authors use variations of the definition that are not exactly equivalent to each other. Also some authors include some separation axiom (like Hausdorff space or weak Hausdorff space) in the definition of one or both terms, and others don't.

In the simplest definition, a *compactly generated space* is a space that is coherent with the family of its compact subspaces, meaning that for every set is open in if and only if is open in for every compact subspace Other definitions use a family of continuous maps from compact spaces to and declare to be compactly generated if its topology coincides with the final topology with respect to this family of maps. And other variations of the definition replace compact spaces with compact Hausdorff spaces.

Compactly generated spaces were developed to remedy some of the shortcomings of the category of topological spaces. In particular, under some of the definitions, they form a cartesian closed category while still containing the typical spaces of interest, which makes them convenient for use in algebraic topology.

Let be a topological space, where is the topology, that is, the collection of all open sets in

There are multiple (non-equivalent) definitions of *compactly generated space* or *k-space* in the literature. These definitions share a common structure, starting with a suitably specified family of continuous maps from some compact spaces to The various definitions differ in their choice of the family as detailed below.

The final topology on with respect to the family is called the **k-ification** of Since all the functions in were continuous into the k-ification of is finer than (or equal to) the original topology . The open sets in the k-ification are called the **k-open sets** in they are the sets such that is open in for every in Similarly, the **k-closed sets** in are the closed sets in its k-ification, with a corresponding characterization. In the space every open set is k-open and every closed set is k-closed. The space together with the new topology is usually denoted ^{[1]}

The space is called **compactly generated** or a **k-space** (with respect to the family ) if its topology is determined by all maps in , in the sense that the topology on is equal to its k-ification; equivalently, if every k-open set is open in or if every k-closed set is closed in or in short, if

As for the different choices for the family , one can take all the inclusions maps from certain subspaces of for example all compact subspaces, or all compact Hausdorff subspaces. This corresponds to choosing a set of subspaces of The space is then *compactly generated* exactly when its topology is coherent with that family of subspaces; namely, a set is open (resp. closed) in exactly when the intersection is open (resp. closed) in for every Another choice is to take the family of all continuous maps from arbitrary spaces of a certain type into for example all such maps from arbitrary compact spaces, or from arbitrary compact Hausdorff spaces.

These different choices for the family of continuous maps into lead to different definitions of *compactly generated space*. Additionally, some authors require to satisfy a separation axiom (like Hausdorff or weak Hausdorff) as part of the definition, while others don't. The definitions in this article will not comprise any such separation axiom.

As an additional general note, a sufficient condition that can be useful to show that a space is compactly generated (with respect to ) is to find a subfamily such that is compactly generated with respect to For coherent spaces, that corresponds to showing that the space is coherent with a subfamily of the family of subspaces. For example, this provides one way to show that locally compact spaces are compactly generated.

Below are some of the more commonly used definitions in more detail, in increasing order of specificity.

For Hausdorff spaces, all three definitions are equivalent. So the terminology **compactly generated Hausdorff space** is unambiguous and refers to a compactly generated space (in any of the definitions) that is also Hausdorff.

Informally, a space whose topology is determined by its compact subspaces, or equivalently in this case, by all continuous maps from arbitrary compact spaces.

A topological space is called **compactly-generated** or a **k-space** if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:^{[2]}^{[3]}^{[4]}

- (1) The topology on is coherent with the family of its compact subspaces; namely, it satisfies the property:
- a set is open (resp. closed) in exactly when the intersection is open (resp. closed) in for every compact subspace

- (2) The topology on coincides with the final topology with respect to the family of all continuous maps from all compact spaces
- (3) is a quotient space of a topological sum of compact spaces.
- (4) is a quotient space of a weakly locally compact space.

As explained in the final topology article, condition (2) is well-defined, even though the family of continuous maps from arbitrary compact spaces is not a set but a proper class.

The equivalence between conditions (1) and (2) follows from the fact that every inclusion from a subspace is a continuous map; and on the other hand, every continuous map from a compact space has a compact image and thus factors through the inclusion of the compact subspace into

Informally, a space whose topology is determined by all continuous maps from arbitrary compact Hausdorff spaces.

A topological space is called **compactly-generated** or a **k-space** if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:^{[5]}^{[6]}^{[7]}

- (1) The topology on coincides with the final topology with respect to the family of all continuous maps from all compact Hausdorff spaces In other words, it satisfies the condition:
- a set is open (resp. closed) in exactly when is open (resp. closed) in for every compact Hausdorff space and every continuous map

- (2) is a quotient space of a topological sum of compact Hausdorff spaces.
- (3) is a quotient space of a locally compact Hausdorff space.

Every space satisfying Definition 2 also satisfies Definition 1. The converse is not true. For example, the one-point compactification of the Arens-Fort space is compact and hence satisfies Definition 1, but it does not satisfies Definition 2.

Definition 2 is the one more commonly used in algebraic topology. This definition is often paired with the weak Hausdorff property to form the category CGWH of compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces.

Informally, a space whose topology is determined by its compact Hausdorff subspaces.

A topological space is called **compactly-generated** or a **k-space** if its topology is coherent with the family of its compact Hausdorff subspaces; namely, it satisfies the property:

- a set is open (resp. closed) in exactly when the intersection is open (resp. closed) in for every compact Hausdorff subspace

Every space satisfying Definition 3 also satisfies Definition 2. The converse is not true. For example, the Sierpiński space with topology does not satisfy Definition 3, because its compact Hausdorff subspaces are the singletons and , and the coherent topology they induce would be the discrete topology instead. On the other hand, it satisfies Definition 2 because it is homeomorphic to the quotient space of the compact interval obtained by identifying all the points in

By itself, Definition 3 is not quite as useful as the other two definitions as it lacks some of the properties implied by the others. For example, every quotient space of a space satisfying Definition 1 or Definition 2 is a space of the same kind. But that does not hold for Definition 3.

However, for weak Hausdorff spaces Definitions 2 and 3 are equivalent.^{[8]} Thus the category CGWH can also be defined by pairing the weak Hausdorff property with Definition 3, which may be easier to state and work with than Definition 2.

Compactly generated spaces were originally called **k-spaces**, after the German word *kompakt*. They were studied by Hurewicz, and can be found in General Topology by Kelley, Topology by Dugundji, Rational Homotopy Theory by Félix, Halperin, and Thomas.

The motivation for their deeper study came in the 1960s from well known deficiencies of the usual category of topological spaces. This fails to be a cartesian closed category, the usual cartesian product of identification maps is not always an identification map, and the usual product of CW-complexes need not be a CW-complex.^{[9]} By contrast, the category of simplicial sets had many convenient properties, including being cartesian closed. The history of the study of repairing this situation is given in the article on the *n*Lab on convenient categories of spaces.

The first suggestion (1962) to remedy this situation was to restrict oneself to the full subcategory of compactly generated Hausdorff spaces, which is in fact cartesian closed. These ideas extend on the de Vries duality theorem. A definition of the exponential object is given below. Another suggestion (1964) was to consider the usual Hausdorff spaces but use functions continuous on compact subsets.

These ideas generalize to the non-Hausdorff case;^{[10]} i.e. with a different definition of compactly generated spaces. This is useful since identification spaces of Hausdorff spaces need not be Hausdorff.^{[11]}

In modern-day algebraic topology, this property is most commonly coupled with the weak Hausdorff property, so that one works in the category CGWH of compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces.

As explained in the Definitions section, there is no universally accepted definition in the literature for compactly generated spaces; but Definitions 1, 2, 3 from that section are some of the more commonly used. In order to express results in a more concise way, this section will make use of the abbreviations **CG-1**, **CG-2**, **CG-3** to denote each of the three definitions unambiguously. This is summarized in the table below (see the Definitions section for other equivalent conditions for each).

Abbreviation | Meaning summary |
---|---|

CG-1 | Topology coherent with family of its compact subspaces |

CG-2 | Topology same as final topology with respect to continuous maps from arbitrary compact Hausdorff spaces |

CG-3 | Topology coherent with family of its compact Hausdorff subspaces |

For Hausdorff spaces the properties CG-1, CG-2, CG-3 are equivalent. Such spaces can be called *compactly generated Hausdorff* without ambiguity.

Every CG-3 space is CG-2 and every CG-2 space is CG-1. The converse implications do not hold in general, as shown by some of the examples below.

For weak Hausdorff spaces the properties CG-2 and CG-3 are equivalent.^{[8]}

Sequential spaces are CG-2.^{[12]} This includes first countable spaces, Alexandrov-discrete spaces, finite spaces.

Every CG-3 space is a T_{1} space (because given a singleton its intersection with every compact Hausdorff subspace is the empty set or a single point, which is closed in hence the singleton is closed in ). Finite T_{1} spaces have the discrete topology. So among the finite spaces, which are all CG-2, the CG-3 spaces are the ones with the discrete topology. Any finite non-discrete space, like the Sierpiński space, is an example of CG-2 space that is not CG-3.

Compact spaces and weakly locally compact spaces are CG-1, but not necessarily CG-2 (see examples below).

Compactly generated Hausdorff spaces include the Hausdorff version of the various classes of spaces mentioned above as CG-1 or CG-2, namely Hausdorff sequential spaces, Hausdorff first countable spaces, locally compact Hausdorff spaces, etc. In particular, metric spaces and topological manifolds are compactly generated. CW complexes are also Hausdorff compactly generated.

To provide examples of spaces that are not compactly generated, it is useful to examine *anticompact*^{[13]} spaces, that is, spaces whose compact subspaces are all finite. If a space is anticompact and T_{1}, every compact subspace of has the discrete topology and the corresponding k-ification of is the discrete topology. Therefore, any anticompact T_{1} non-discrete space is not CG-1. Examples include:

- The cocountable topology on an uncountable space.
- The one-point Lindelöfication of an uncountable discrete space (also called Fortissimo space).
- The Arens-Fort space.
- The Appert space.
- The "Single ultrafilter topology".
^{[14]}

Other examples of (Hausdorff) spaces that are not compactly generated include:

- The product of uncountably many copies of (each with the usual Euclidean topology).
^{[15]} - The product of uncountably many copies of (each with the discrete topology).

For examples of spaces that are CG-1 and not CG-2, one can start with any space that is not CG-1 (for example the Arens-Fort space or an uncountable product of copies of ) and let be the one-point compactification of The space is compact, hence CG-1. But it is not CG-2 because open subspaces inherit the CG-2 property and is an open subspace of that is not CG-2.

(See the Examples section for the meaning of the abbreviations CG-1, CG-2, CG-3.)

Subspaces of a compactly generated space are not compactly generated in general, even in the Hausdorff case. For example, the ordinal space where is the first uncountable ordinal is compact Hausdorff, hence compactly generated. Its subspace with all limit ordinals except removed is isomorphic to the Fortissimo space, which is not compactly generated (as mentioned in the Examples section, it is anticompact and non-discrete).^{[16]} Another example is the Arens space,^{[17]}^{[18]} which is sequential Hausdorff, hence compactly generated. It contains as a subspace the Arens-Fort space, which is not compactly generated.

In a CG-1 space, every closed set is CG-1. The same does not hold for open sets. For instance, as shown in the Examples section, there are many spaces that are not CG-1, but they are open in their one-point compactification, which is CG-1.

In a CG-2 space every closed set is CG-2; and so is every open set (because there is a quotient map for some locally compact Hausdorff space and for an open set the restriction of to is also a quotient map on a locally compact Hausdorff space). The same is true more generally for every locally closed set, that is, the intersection of an open set and a closed set.^{[19]}

In a CG-3 space, every closed set is CG-3.

The disjoint union of a family of topological spaces is CG-1 if and only if each space is CG-1. The corresponding statements also hold for CG-2^{[20]}^{[21]} and CG-3.

A quotient space of a CG-1 space is CG-1.^{[22]} In particular, every quotient space of a weakly locally compact space is CG-1. Conversely, every CG-1 space is the quotient space of a weakly locally compact space, which can be taken as the disjoint union of the compact subspaces of ^{[22]}

A quotient space of a CG-2 space is CG-2.^{[23]} In particular, every quotient space of a locally compact Hausdorff space is CG-2. Conversely, every CG-2 space is the quotient space of a locally compact Hausdorff space.^{[24]}^{[25]}

A quotient space of a CG-3 space is not CG-3 in general. In fact, every CG-2 space is a quotient space of a CG-3 space (namely, some locally compact Hausdorff space); but there are CG-2 spaces that are not CG-3. For a concrete example, the Sierpiński space is not CG-3, but is homeomorphic to the quotient of the compact interval obtained by identifying to a point.

More generally, any final topology on a set induced by a family of functions from CG-1 spaces is also CG-1. And the same holds for CG-2. This follows by combining the results above for disjoint unions and quotient spaces, together with the behavior of final topologies under composition of functions.

A wedge sum of CG-1 spaces is CG-1. The same holds for CG-2. This is also an application of the results above for disjoint unions and quotient spaces.

The product of two compactly generated spaces need not be compactly generated, even if both spaces are Hausdorff and sequential. For example, the space with the subspace topology from the real line is first countable; the space with the quotient topology from the real line with the positive integers identified to a point is sequential. Both spaces are compactly generated Hausdorff, but their product is not compactly generated.^{[26]}

However, in some cases the product of two compactly generated spaces is compactly generated:

- The product of two first countable spaces is first countable, hence CG-2.
- The product of a CG-1 space and a locally compact space is CG-1.
^{[27]}(Here,*locally compact*is in the sense of condition (3) in the corresponding article, namely each point has a local base of compact neighborhoods.) - The product of a CG-2 space and a locally compact Hausdorff space is CG-2.
^{[28]}^{[29]}

When working in a category of compactly generated spaces (like all CG-1 spaces or all CG-2 spaces), the usual product topology on is not compactly generated in general, so cannot serve as a categorical product. But its k-ification does belong to the expected category and is the categorical product.^{[30]}^{[31]}

The continuous functions on compactly generated spaces are those that behave well on compact subsets. More precisely, let be a function from a topological space to another and suppose the domain is compactly generated according to one of the definitions in this article. Since compactly generated spaces are defined in terms of a final topology, one can express the continuity of in terms of the continuity of the composition of with the various maps in the family used to define the final topology. The specifics are as follows.

If is CG-1, the function is continuous if and only if the restriction is continuous for each compact ^{[32]}

If is CG-2, the function is continuous if and only if the composition is continuous for each compact Hausdorff space and continuous map ^{[33]}

If is CG-3, the function is continuous if and only if the restriction is continuous for each compact Hausdorff

For topological spaces and let denote the space of all continuous maps from to topologized by the compact-open topology. If is CG-1, the path components in are precisely the homotopy equivalence classes.^{[34]}

Given any topological space we can define a possibly finer topology on that is compactly generated, sometimes called the **k-ification** of the topology. Let denote the family of compact subsets of We define the new topology on by declaring a subset to be closed if and only if is closed in for each index Denote this new space by One can show that the compact subsets of and coincide, and the induced topologies on compact subsets are the same. It follows that is compactly generated. If was compactly generated to start with then Otherwise the topology on is strictly finer than (i.e., there are more open sets).

This construction is functorial. We denote the full subcategory of with objects the compactly generated spaces, and the full subcategory of with objects the Hausdorff spaces. The functor from to that takes to is right adjoint to the inclusion functor

The exponential object in is given by where is the space of continuous maps from to with the compact-open topology.

These ideas can be generalized to the non-Hausdorff case.^{[10]} This is useful since identification spaces of Hausdorff spaces need not be Hausdorff.

- Compact-open topology
- Countably generated space – topological space in which the topology is determined by its countable subsets
- Finitely generated space – topological space in which the intersection of any family of open sets is open
- K-space (functional analysis)

**^**Strickland 2009, Definition 1.1.**^**Lawson, J.; Madison, B. (1974). "Quotients of k-semigroups".*Semigroup Forum*.**9**: 1–18. doi:10.1007/BF02194829.**^**Willard 2004, Definition 43.8.**^**Munkres 2000, p. 283.**^**Brown 2006, p. 182.**^**Strickland 2009.**^**compactly generated topological space at the*n*Lab- ^
^{a}^{b}Strickland 2009, Lemma 1.4(c). **^**Hatcher, Allen (2001).*Algebraic Topology*(PDF). (*See the Appendix*)- ^
^{a}^{b}Brown 2006, section 5.9. **^**Booth, Peter; Tillotson, J. (1980). "Monoidal closed, Cartesian closed and convenient categories of topological spaces" (PDF).*Pacific Journal of Mathematics*.**88**(1): 35–53. doi:10.2140/pjm.1980.88.35.**^**Strickland 2009, Proposition 1.6.**^**Bankston, Paul (1979). "The total negation of a topological property".*Illinois Journal of Mathematics*.**23**(2): 241–252. doi:10.1215/ijm/1256048236.**^**Steen & Seebach 1995, Example 114, p. 136.**^**Willard 2004, Problem 43H(2).**^**Lamartin 1977, p. 8.**^**Engelking 1989, Example 1.6.19.**^**Ma, Dan (19 August 2010). "A note about the Arens' space".**^**Lamartin 1977, Proposition 1.8.**^**Strickland 2009, Proposition 2.2.**^**Rezk 2018, Proposition 3.4(3).- ^
^{a}^{b}Lawson & Madison 1974, p. 3. **^**Brown 2006, 5.9.1 (Corollary 2).**^**Brown 2006, Proposition 5.9.1.**^**Lamartin 1977, Proposition 1.7.**^**Engelking 1989, Example 3.3.29.**^**Lawson & Madison 1974, Proposition 1.2.**^**Strickland 2009, Proposition 2.6.**^**Rezk 2018, Proposition 7.5.**^**Lamartin 1977, Proposition 1.11.**^**Rezk 2018, section 3.5.**^**Willard 2004, Theorem 43.10.**^**Strickland 2009, Proposition 1.11.**^**Willard 2004, Problem 43J(1).

- Brown, Ronald (2006),
*Topology and Groupoids*, Booksurge, ISBN 1-4196-2722-8 - Engelking, Ryszard (1989).
*General Topology*. Heldermann Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 3-88538-006-4. - Lamartin, W. F. (1977),
*On the foundations of k-group theory*, Warszawa: Instytut Matematyczny Polskiej Akademi Nauk - Mac Lane, Saunders (1998).
*Categories for the Working Mathematician*. Graduate Texts in Mathematics**5**(2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98403-8. - May, J. Peter (1999).
*A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology*(PDF). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-51183-9. - Munkres, James R. (2000).
*Topology*(Second ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. ISBN 978-0-13-181629-9. OCLC 42683260. - Rezk, Charles (2018). "Compactly generated spaces" (PDF).
- Steen, Lynn Arthur; Seebach, J. Arthur Jr. (1995) [1978].
*Counterexamples in Topology*(Dover reprint of 1978 ed.). Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-486-68735-3. MR 0507446. - Strickland, Neil P. (2009). "The category of CGWH spaces" (PDF).
- Willard, Stephen (2004) [1970].
*General Topology*. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-43479-7. OCLC 115240.