KNOWPIA
WELCOME TO KNOWPIA

In mathematics, a **composition** of an integer *n* is a way of writing *n* as the sum of a sequence of (strictly) positive integers. Two sequences that differ in the order of their terms define different compositions of their sum, while they are considered to define the same integer partition of that number. Every integer has finitely many distinct compositions. Negative numbers do not have any compositions, but 0 has one composition, the empty sequence. Each positive integer *n* has 2^{n−1} distinct compositions.

A **weak composition** of an integer *n* is similar to a composition of *n*, but allowing terms of the sequence to be zero: it is a way of writing *n* as the sum of a sequence of non-negative integers. As a consequence every positive integer admits infinitely many weak compositions (if their length is not bounded). Adding a number of terms 0 to the *end* of a weak composition is usually not considered to define a different weak composition; in other words, weak compositions are assumed to be implicitly extended indefinitely by terms 0.

To further generalize, an ** A-restricted composition** of an integer

The sixteen compositions of 5 are:

- 5
- 4 + 1
- 3 + 2
- 3 + 1 + 1
- 2 + 3
- 2 + 2 + 1
- 2 + 1 + 2
- 2 + 1 + 1 + 1
- 1 + 4
- 1 + 3 + 1
- 1 + 2 + 2
- 1 + 2 + 1 + 1
- 1 + 1 + 3
- 1 + 1 + 2 + 1
- 1 + 1 + 1 + 2
- 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1.

Compare this with the seven partitions of 5:

- 5
- 4 + 1
- 3 + 2
- 3 + 1 + 1
- 2 + 2 + 1
- 2 + 1 + 1 + 1
- 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1.

It is possible to put constraints on the parts of the compositions. For example the five compositions of 5 into distinct terms are:

- 5
- 4 + 1
- 3 + 2
- 2 + 3
- 1 + 4.

Compare this with the three partitions of 5 into distinct terms:

- 5
- 4 + 1
- 3 + 2.

Conventionally the empty composition is counted as the sole composition of 0, and there are no compositions of negative integers.
There are 2^{n−1} compositions of *n* ≥ 1; here is a proof:

Placing either a plus sign or a comma in each of the *n* − 1 boxes of the array

produces a unique composition of *n*. Conversely, every composition of *n* determines an assignment of pluses and commas. Since there are *n* − 1 binary choices, the result follows. The same argument shows that the number of compositions of *n* into exactly *k* parts (a ** k-composition**) is given by the binomial coefficient . Note that by summing over all possible numbers of parts we recover 2

For weak compositions, the number is , since each *k*-composition of *n* + *k* corresponds to a weak one of *n* by the rule

It follows from this formula that the number of weak compositions of *n* into exactly *k* parts equals the number of weak compositions of *k* − 1 into exactly *n* + 1 parts.

For *A*-restricted compositions, the number of compositions of *n* into exactly *k* parts is given by the extended binomial (or polynomial) coefficient , where the square brackets indicate the extraction of the coefficient of in the polynomial that follows it.^{[2]}

The dimension of the vector space of homogeneous polynomial of degree *d* in *n* variables over the field *K* is the number of weak compositions of *d* into *n* parts. In fact, a basis for the space is given by the set of monomials such that . Since the exponents are allowed to be zero, then the number of such monomials is exactly the number of weak compositions of *d*.

**^**Heubach, Silvia; Mansour, Toufik (2004). "Compositions of n with parts in a set".*Congressus Numerantium*.**168**: 33–51. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.484.5148.**^**Eger, Steffen (2013). "Restricted weighted integer compositions and extended binomial coefficients" (PDF).*Journal of Integer Sequences*.**16**.

- Partition and composition calculator