Here we use the definition of constructible étale sheaves from the book by Freitag and Kiehl referenced below. In what follows in this subsection, all sheaves ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}$  on schemes ${\displaystyle X}$  are étale sheaves unless otherwise noted.

A sheaf ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}$  is called constructible if ${\displaystyle X}$  can be written as a finite union of locally closed subschemes ${\displaystyle i_{Y}:Y\to X}$  such that for each subscheme ${\displaystyle Y}$  of the covering, the sheaf ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}|_{Y}=i_{Y}^{\ast }{\mathcal {F}}}$  is a finite locally constant sheaf. In particular, this means for each subscheme ${\displaystyle Y}$  appearing in the finite covering, there is an étale covering ${\displaystyle \lbrace U_{i}\to Y\mid i\in I\rbrace }$  such that for all étale subschemes in the cover of ${\displaystyle Y}$ , the sheaf ${\displaystyle (i_{Y})^{\ast }{\mathcal {F}}|_{U_{i}}}$  is constant and represented by a finite set.

This definition allows us to derive, from Noetherian induction and the fact that an étale sheaf is constant if and only if its restriction from ${\displaystyle X}$  to ${\displaystyle X_{\text{red}}}$  is constant as well, where ${\displaystyle X_{\text{red}}}$  is the reduction of the scheme ${\displaystyle X}$ . It then follows that a representable étale sheaf ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}$  is itself constructible.

Of particular interest to the theory of constructible étale sheaves is the case in which one works with constructible étale sheaves of Abelian groups. The remarkable result is that constructible étale sheaves of Abelian groups are precisely the Noetherian objects in the category of all torsion étale sheaves (cf. Proposition I.4.8 of Freitag-Kiehl).

Most examples of constructible sheaves come from intersection cohomology sheaves or from the derived pushforward of a local system on a family of topological spaces parameterized by a base space.

Derived Pushforward on P¹ edit

One nice set of examples of constructible sheaves come from the derived pushforward (with or without compact support) of a local system on ${\displaystyle U=\mathbb {P} ^{1}-\{0,1,\infty \}}$ . Since any loop around ${\displaystyle \infty }$  is homotopic to a loop around ${\displaystyle 0,1}$  we only have to describe the monodromy around ${\displaystyle 0}$  and ${\displaystyle 1}$ . For example, we can set the monodromy operators to be

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}T_{0}={\begin{bmatrix}1&k\\0&1\end{bmatrix}},\quad &T_{1}={\begin{bmatrix}1&l\\0&1\end{bmatrix}}\end{aligned}}}$ 

where the stalks of our local system ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}}$  are isomorphic to ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ^{\oplus 2}}$ . Then, if we take the derived pushforward ${\displaystyle \mathbf {R} j_{*}}$  or ${\displaystyle \mathbf {R} j_{!}}$  of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}}$  for ${\displaystyle j:U\to \mathbb {P} ^{1}}$  we get a constructible sheaf where the stalks at the points ${\displaystyle 0,1,\infty }$  compute the cohomology of the local systems restricted to a neighborhood of them in ${\displaystyle U}$ .

Weierstrass Family of Elliptic Curves edit

For example, consider the family of degenerating elliptic curves

${\displaystyle y^{2}-x(x-1)(x-t)}$ 

over ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$ . At ${\displaystyle t=0,1}$  this family of curves degenerates into a nodal curve. If we denote this family by ${\displaystyle \pi :X\to \mathbb {C} }$  then

${\displaystyle \mathbf {R} ^{0}\pi _{*}({\underline {\mathbb {Q} }}_{X})\cong \mathbf {R} ^{2}\pi _{*}({\underline {\mathbb {Q} }}_{X})\cong {\underline {\mathbb {Q} }}_{\mathbb {C} }}$ 

and

${\displaystyle \mathbf {R} ^{1}\pi _{*}({\underline {\mathbb {Q} }}_{X})\cong {\mathcal {L}}_{\mathbb {C} -\{0,1\}}\oplus {\underline {\mathbb {Q} }}_{\{0,1\}}}$ 

where the stalks of the local system ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}_{\mathbb {C} -\{0,1\}}}$  are isomorphic to ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ^{2}}$ . This local monodromy around of this local system around ${\displaystyle 0,1}$  can be computed using the Picard–Lefschetz formula

Seminar Notes edit

• Gunningham, Sam; Hughes, Richard, Topics in D-Modules (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-09-21

References edit

• Artin, Michael; Grothendieck, Alexandre; Verdier, Jean-Louis, eds. (1972). Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie - 1963-64 - Théorie des topos et cohomologie étale des schémas - (SGA 4) - vol. 3 (PDF). Lecture Notes in Mathematics (in French). Vol. 305. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. vi+640. doi:10.1007/BFb0070714. ISBN 978-3-540-06118-2. MR 0354654.
• Dimca, Alexandru (2004), Sheaves in topology, Universitext, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-20665-1, MR 2050072
• Freitag, Eberhard; Kiehl, Reinhardt (1988), Etale Cohomology and the Weil Conjecture, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), vol. 13, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02541-3, ISBN 3-540-12175-7, MR 0926276