Cox maze procedure

Summary

The Cox maze procedure, also known as maze procedure, is a type of heart surgery for atrial fibrillation.

Cox maze procedure
Other namesMaze procedure
ICD-9-CM37.33
[edit on Wikidata]

"Maze" refers to the series of incisions arranged in a maze-like pattern in the atria. Today, various methods of minimally invasive maze procedures, collectively named minimaze procedures, are used.

History edit

James Cox is an American cardiothoracic surgeon. Cox received his medical degree at University of Tennessee Medical Center and completed his training in both General and Cardiothoracic Surgery at Duke University Hospital. Cox and his associates at Duke, and later at Washington University School of Medicine developed the "maze" or "Cox maze" procedure, an "open-heart" cardiac surgery procedure intended to eliminate atrial fibrillation (AF).

Incidence of stroke in patients with AF who are anticoagulated is still around 2-5% per year. The first such procedure was performed by Dr. Cox at St. Louis' Barnes Hospital—now Barnes-Jewish Hospital—in 1987.[1]

The intention was to eliminate AF by using incisional scars to block abnormal electrical circuits (atrial macroreentry) that initiate and perpetuate the abnormal electrical waves of AF. This required an extensive series of full-thickness incisions through the walls of both atria, a median sternotomy (vertical incision through the sternum), and cardiopulmonary bypass (heart-lung machine; extracorporeal circulation). After the introduction of the initial procedure, a series of improvements were made, culminating in 1992 in the Cox maze III procedure, which is now considered to be the "gold standard" for effective surgical cure of AF. It was quite successful in eliminating AF but had drawbacks as well.[2] The Cox maze III is sometimes referred to as the "traditional maze", the "cut-and-sew maze", or simply the "maze."[citation needed] Damiano and colleagues have described a Cox-Maze IV procedure in 2002 in which they modified the Cox-Maze III technique using a combination of bipolar radiofrequency and cryothermal ablation lines.[3] Since then, the Cox-Maze IV procedure is the gold standard surgical treatment for AF with conversion to normal sinus rhythm and freedom from AF at 1 year postoperatively of 93%.[4][5]

During the past 10 years,[when?] several energy sources, such as unipolar radiofrequency, bipolar radiofrequency, microwave, laser, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and cryothermia, were incorporated into various devices in order to create some of the lesions of the Cox maze III procedure without actually cutting into the atrial walls. Microwave and laser therapy have both been withdrawn from the market, but the other devices continue to be utilized to treat AF surgically.[citation needed]

References edit

  1. ^ Cox J, Schuessler R, D'Agostino H, Stone C, Chang B, Cain M, Corr P, Boineau J (1991). "The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 101 (4): 569–83. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)36684-X. PMID 2008095.
  2. ^ Prasad S, Maniar H, Camillo C, Schuessler R, Boineau J, Sundt T, Cox J, Damiano R (2003). "The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 126 (6): 1822–8. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01287-X. PMID 14688693.
  3. ^ Robertson, JO; Saint, LL; Leidenfrost, JE; Damiano RJ, Jr (January 2014). "Illustrated techniques for performing the Cox-Maze IV procedure through a right mini-thoracotomy". Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 3 (1): 105–16. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.12.11. PMC 3904342. PMID 24516807.
  4. ^ Henn, MC; Lancaster, TS; Miller, JR; Sinn, LA; Schuessler, RB; Moon, MR; Melby, SJ; Maniar, HS; Damiano RJ, Jr (November 2015). "Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation". The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 150 (5): 1168–76, 1178.e1-2. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.102. PMC 4637220. PMID 26432719.
  5. ^ Sef, D; Trkulja, V; Raja, SG; Hooper, J; Turina, MI (30 August 2022). "Comparing mid-term outcomes of Cox-Maze procedure and pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation after concomitant mitral valve surgery: A systematic review". Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 37 (11): 3801–3810. doi:10.1111/jocs.16888. PMC 9804989. PMID 36040710. S2CID 251932594.