Results about L-functions are often stated more simply if the character is assumed to be primitive, although the results typically can be extended to imprimitive characters with minor complications.[2] This is because of the relationship between a imprimitive character and the primitive character which induces it:[3]
(Here, q is the modulus of χ.) An application of the Euler product gives a simple relationship between the corresponding L-functions:[4][5]
(This formula holds for all s, by analytic continuation, even though the Euler product is only valid when Re(s) > 1.) The formula shows that the L-function of χ is equal to the L-function of the primitive character which induces χ, multiplied by only a finite number of factors.[6]
As a special case, the L-function of the principal character modulo q can be expressed in terms of the Riemann zeta function:[7][8]
Functional equation
edit
Dirichlet L-functions satisfy a functional equation, which provides a way to analytically continue them throughout the complex plane. The functional equation relates the value of to the value of . Let χ be a primitive character modulo q, where q > 1. One way to express the functional equation is:[9]
It is a property of Gauss sums that |τ ( χ) | = q1/2, so |W ( χ) | = 1.[10][11]
Another way to state the functional equation is in terms of
The functional equation can be expressed as:[9][11]
The functional equation implies that (and ) are entire functions of s. (Again, this assumes that χ is primitive character modulo q with q > 1. If q = 1, then has a pole at s = 1.)[9][11]
Let χ be a primitive character modulo q, with q > 1.
There are no zeros of L(s, χ) with Re(s) > 1. For Re(s) < 0, there are zeros at certain negative integerss:
If χ(−1) = 1, the only zeros of L(s, χ) with Re(s) < 0 are simple zeros at −2, −4, −6, .... (There is also a zero at s = 0.) These correspond to the poles of .[12]
If χ(−1) = −1, then the only zeros of L(s, χ) with Re(s) < 0 are simple zeros at −1, −3, −5, .... These correspond to the poles of .[12]
The remaining zeros lie in the critical strip 0 ≤ Re(s) ≤ 1, and are called the non-trivial zeros. The non-trivial zeros are symmetrical about the critical line Re(s) = 1/2. That is, if then too, because of the functional equation. If χ is a real character, then the non-trivial zeros are also symmetrical about the real axis, but not if χ is a complex character. The generalized Riemann hypothesis is the conjecture that all the non-trivial zeros lie on the critical line Re(s) = 1/2.[9]
Up to the possible existence of a Siegel zero, zero-free regions including and beyond the line Re(s) = 1 similar to that of the Riemann zeta function are known to exist for all Dirichlet L-functions: for example, for χ a non-real character of modulus q, we have
The Dirichlet L-functions may be written as a linear combination of the Hurwitz zeta function at rational values. Fixing an integer k ≥ 1, the Dirichlet L-functions for characters modulo k are linear combinations, with constant coefficients, of the ζ(s,a) where a = r/k and r = 1, 2, ..., k. This means that the Hurwitz zeta function for rational a has analytic properties that are closely related to the Dirichlet L-functions. Specifically, let χ be a character modulo k. Then we can write its Dirichlet L-function as:[14]
^Montgomery, Hugh L. (1994). Ten lectures on the interface between analytic number theory and harmonic analysis. Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. Vol. 84. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. p. 163. ISBN 0-8218-0737-4. Zbl 0814.11001.
Apostol, Tom M. (1976), Introduction to analytic number theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, New York-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90163-3, MR 0434929, Zbl 0335.10001
Davenport, H. (2000). Multiplicative Number Theory (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN 0-387-95097-4.
Dirichlet, P. G. L. (1837). "Beweis des Satzes, dass jede unbegrenzte arithmetische Progression, deren erstes Glied und Differenz ganze Zahlen ohne gemeinschaftlichen Factor sind, unendlich viele Primzahlen enthält". Abhand. Ak. Wiss. Berlin. 48.
Ireland, Kenneth; Rosen, Michael (1990). A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.
Montgomery, Hugh L.; Vaughan, Robert C. (2006). Multiplicative number theory. I. Classical theory. Cambridge tracts in advanced mathematics. Vol. 97. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84903-6.
Iwaniec, Henryk; Kowalski, Emmanuel (2004). Analytic Number Theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. Vol. 53. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.