Edict of Thessalonica

Summary

The Edict of Thessalonica (also known as Cunctos populos), issued on 27 February AD 380 by three reigning Roman emperors, made the catholicism[note 1] of Nicene Christians in the Great Church the state church of the Roman Empire.[2][3][4] It condemned other Christian creeds such as Arianism as heresies of "foolish madmen," and authorized their punishment.[5]

This edict, addressed to the inhabitants of Constantinople whom Theodosius wished to pacify in order to make the city his imperial residence, constitutes the first known secular law which includes in its preamble a clear definition of what a Christian Roman ruler considers as religious orthodoxy, opening the way of repression against dissidents qualified as "heretics".

Quickly forgotten by its contemporaries, the Edict of Thessalonica was subsequently incorporated into Book XVI of the Theodosian Code. Historians have long interpreted the edict as the establishment of Nicene orthodoxy as state religion, an interpretation from which modern research has largely distanced itself since the end of the 20th century concerning the complex phenomenon that spans several decades. The Edict of Thessalonica nevertheless remains an important milestone towards the official Christianization of the Roman Empire.

BackgroundEdit

In 313 the emperor Constantine I, together with his eastern counterpart Licinius, issued the Edict of Milan, which granted religious toleration and freedom for persecuted Christians. By 325 Arianism, a school of christology which contended that Christ did not possess the divine essence of the Father but was rather a primordial creation and an entity subordinate to God, had become sufficiently widespread and controversial in Early Christianity that Constantine called the Council of Nicaea in an attempt to end the controversy by establishing an empire-wide, i.e., "ecumenical" orthodoxy. The council produced the original text of the Nicene Creed, which rejected the Arian confession and upheld that Christ is "true God" and "of one essence with the Father."[6]

However, the strife within the Church did not end with Nicaea, and the Nicene credal formulation remained contentious even among anti-Arian churchmen. Constantine, while urging tolerance, began to think that he had come down on the wrong side, and that the Nicenes—with their fervid, reciprocal persecution of Arians—were actually perpetuating strife within the Church. Constantine was not baptized until he was near death (337), choosing a bishop moderately sympathetic to Arius, Eusebius of Nicomedia, to perform the baptism.[6]

Constantine's son and successor in the eastern empire, Constantius II was partial to the Arian party, and even exiled pro-Nicene bishops. Constantius' successor Julian (later called "The Apostate" by Christian writers) was the only emperor after the conversion of Constantine to reject Christianity, attempting to fragment the Church and erode its influence by encouraging a revival of religious diversity, calling himself a "Hellene" and supporting forms of Hellenistic religion. He championed the traditional religious cultus of Rome as well as Judaism, and furthermore declared toleration for all the various unorthodox Christian sects and schismatic movements. Julian's successor Jovian, a Christian, reigned for only eight months and never entered the city of Constantinople. He was succeeded in the east by Valens, an Arian.[6]

By 379, when Valens was succeeded by Theodosius I, Arianism was widespread in the eastern half of the Empire, while the west had remained steadfastly Nicene. Theodosius, who had been born in Hispania, was himself a Nicene Christian and very devout. In August, his western counterpart Gratian promoted persecution of heretics in the west.[6]

ContentEdit

The Edict of Thessalonica was jointly issued by Theodosius I, emperor of the East, Gratian, emperor of the West, and Gratian's junior co-ruler Valentinian II, on 27 February 380.[4] The edict came after Theodosius had been baptized by the bishop Ascholius of Thessalonica upon suffering a severe illness in that city.[7]

IMPPP. GR(ATI)ANUS, VAL(ENTINI)ANUS ET THE(O)D(OSIUS) AAA. EDICTUM AD POPULUM VRB(IS) CONSTANTINOP(OLITANAE).

Cunctos populos, quos clementiae nostrae regit temperamentum, in tali volumus religione versari, quam divinum Petrum apostolum tradidisse Romanis religio usque ad nunc ab ipso insinuata declarat quamque pontificem Damasum sequi claret et Petrum Aleksandriae episcopum virum apostolicae sanctitatis, hoc est, ut secundum apostolicam disciplinam evangelicamque doctrinam patris et filii et spiritus sancti unam deitatem sub pari maiestate et sub pia trinitate credamus. Hanc legem sequentes Christianorum catholicorum nomen iubemus amplecti, reliquos vero dementes vesanosque iudicantes haeretici dogmatis infamiam sustinere ‘nec conciliabula eorum ecclesiarum nomen accipere’, divina primum vindicta, post etiam motus nostri, quem ex caelesti arbitro sumpserimus, ultione plectendos.

DAT. III Kal. Mar. THESSAL(ONICAE) GR(ATI)ANO A. V ET THEOD(OSIO) A. I CONSS.

EMPERORS GRATIAN, VALENTINIAN AND THEODOSIUS AUGUSTI. EDICT TO THE PEOPLE OF CONSTANTINOPLE.
It is our desire that all the various nations which are subject to our Clemency and Moderation, should continue to profess that religion which was delivered to the Romans by the divine Apostle Peter, as it has been preserved by faithful tradition, and which is now professed by the Pontiff Damasus and by Peter, Bishop of Alexandria, a man of apostolic holiness. According to the apostolic teaching and the doctrine of the Gospel, let us believe in the one deity of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, in equal majesty and in a holy Trinity. We order the followers of this law to embrace the name of Catholic Christians; but as for the others, since, in our judgment they are foolish madmen, we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of heretics, and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches. They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the divine condemnation and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of Heaven we shall decide to inflict.
GIVEN IN THESSALONICA ON THE THIRD DAY FROM THE CALENDS OF MARCH, DURING THE FIFTH CONSULATE OF GRATIAN AUGUSTUS AND FIRST OF THEODOSIUS AUGUSTUS[8]

— Codex Theodosianus, xvi.1.2

ImportanceEdit

The edict was followed in 381 by the First Council of Constantinople, which affirmed the Nicene Symbolum and gave final form to the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.[9]

The edict was issued under the influence of Ascholius, and thus of Pope Damasus I, who had appointed him. It re-affirmed a single expression of the Apostolic Faith as legitimate in the Roman Empire, "catholic" (that is, universal)[10][11] and "orthodox" (that is, correct in teaching).[12]

The Nicene Creed states: "We believe in one God, the Father Almighty ... And in one Lord Jesus Christ." It declares Jesus Christ be "consubstantial (homo-ousios) with the Father," which may be interpreted as numerical or as qualitative sameness (See Homoousion). The creed adds that we also believe in the Holy Spirit but does not say that the Holy Spirit is homo-ousios with the Father. The Edict of Thessalonica goes much further and declares "the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit" to be "one deity ... in equal majesty and in a holy Trinity."

Enforcement of the EdictEdit

If Theodosius prescribed that the edict be read to the people of the capital,[13] it did not seem to have received any immediate or concrete application in Constantinople to the point that one could wonder if it had ever been published insofar[14] as there was no official method at the time allowing communication to the population.[15] Moreover, the edict only describes vague sanctions against offenders, of a symbolic nature, evoking "divine condemnation" and "ignominy", without these threats being accompanied by any specific provision, not even that of chasing heretics from their places of worship.[16] As such, the edict appears to have had no immediate effect.[13]

After a few campaigns against the barbarian troops, Theodosius returned in September 380 to Thessaloniki where he fell seriously ill to the point that people feared for his life.[17] Healed, he was baptized by the local Nicene bishop Ascholius, probably around October,[18] then he went to Constantinople to make his solemn entry on November 24.[17] The implementation of the edict took place only when Theodosius joined the prestigious city which he needed to make his capital in order to consolidate his still fragile hold on the territories of Valens.[19]

Barely two days after his arrival, faced with his refusal to publicly confess the creed of Nicea,[20] Theodosius deposes the popular Acacian bishop of the city, Demophilus, whom he drives out of the walls of the city and replaces with Gregory of Nazianzus[21] not without having had to rely on his troops to curb popular discontent.[22] He then placed members of the Nicaean party — still a minority in Constantinople — in key positions in the clergy,[23] entrusting them with all the churches in the capital[24] and withdrawing their places of worship from the dissidents of Arian allegiance to whom he wasted no time in suppressing freedom of assembly.[23]

Radically settling the problems of the Church of Constantinople in this way, and probably advised in this direction by his Western entourage,[25] Theodosius sought, rather than adherence to a profession of faith, to attach the loyalty of the Nicene clergy to his personality and his regime[19] in order to maintain a certain stability in his capital, necessary to ensure an imperial residence there.[25] He nevertheless tolerated Demophilus and his supporters continuing to practice their worship outside the city — probably more out of political prudence than out of a spirit of doctrinal tolerance[26] — which the Acacian bishop continued to do for nearly twenty years without worrying.[27]

A few months later, on January 10, 381, Theodosius promulgates a rescript in Constantinople,[28] addressed to the praetorian prefect of Illyricum Eutropius, whose provisions apply more harshly to heretics throughout the region — at least in its cities[23] — echo the problems debated in the East and, referring this time explicitly to the Nicene creed, are much more drastic than those of the previous Theodosian edict:[29] heretics — like the explicitly named Photinians, Arians and Eunomians[30] — are to be expelled from the cities and their churches entrusted to elements who profess the Nicene faith.[31]

After the edict in February 380, Theodosius spent a great deal of energy trying to suppress all non-Nicene forms of Christianity, especially Arianism, and in establishing Nicene orthodoxy throughout his realm:[32]

In January of the following year (381), another edict forbade the heretics to settle in the cities.[9][33]

In the same year, after the reformulation of the Nicene doctrine by the Council of Constantinople ... the procouncil of Asia was ordered to deliver all churches to these bishops 'who profess that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are one majesty and virtue'.[34][35]

In 383, the Emperor ordered the various non-Nicene sects (Arians, Anomoeans, Macedonians, and Novatians) to submit written creeds to him, which he prayerfully reviewed and then burned, save for that of the Novatians, who also supported Nicene Christianity. The other sects lost the right to meet, ordain priests, or spread their beliefs.[36]

The execution of Priscillian and his followers may be cited as typical of the treatment of heretics conditions in that time. In 384, Priscillian was condemned by the synod of Bordeaux, found guilty of magic in a secular court, and put to death by the sword with a number of his followers.[37][38]

Theodosius forbade heretics to reside within Constantinople, and in 392 and 394 confiscated their places of worship.[39]

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ The Edict is the first which definitely introduces catholic orthodoxy as the established religion of the Roman State. It marks the end of the fourth-century religious controversy on the Trinity, occasioned by Arianism and calling forth definitions of orthodox dogma by the First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381). Acknowledgment of the true doctrine of the Trinity is made the test of State recognition. The citation of the Roman See as the yardstick of correct belief is significant; bracketing of the name of the Patriarch of Alexandria with that of the Pope was due to the Egyptian See's stalwart defence of the Trinitarian position, particularly under Athanasius of Alexandria. The last sentence of the Edict indicates that the Emperors contemplate the use of physical force in the service of orthodoxy; this is the first recorded instance of such a departure.[1]

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Church and State Through the Centuries Ed. Ehler and Morrall
  2. ^ World Encyclopaedia of Interfaith Studies: World religions. Jnanada Prakashan. 2009. ISBN 978-81-7139-280-3. In the most common sense, "mainstream" refers to Nicene Christianity, or rather the traditions which continue to claim adherence to the Nicene Creed.
  3. ^ Pahner p. 378
  4. ^ a b Ehler, Sidney Zdeneck; Morrall, John B (1967). Church and State Through the Centuries: A Collection of Historic Documents with Commentaries. p. 6-7. ISBN 9780819601896. Archived from the original on 2016-05-15. Retrieved 2016-09-28. This Edict is the first which definitely introduces Catholic orthodoxy as the established religion of the Roman world. [...] Acknowledgment of the true doctrine of the Trinity is made the test of State recognition.
  5. ^ "The Edict of Thessalonica | History Today". www.historytoday.com. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
  6. ^ a b c d Williams & Friell, (1994) pp. 46–53
  7. ^ "Ἀχόλιος ἢ Ἀσχόλιος ἐπίσκοπος Θεσσαλονίκης". Ιερά Μητρόπολη Θεσσαλονίκης. Archived from the original on 2016-09-24. Retrieved 2016-09-23.
  8. ^ Codex Theodosianus XVI.1.2
  9. ^ a b Boyd (1905), p. 45
  10. ^ "Catholic". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  11. ^ (cf. Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon)
  12. ^ orthodox. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. Dictionary definition (accessed: March 03, 2008).
  13. ^ a b Charles Pietri, , dans Jean-Marie Mayeur, Charles Pietri, Luce Pietri, André Vauchez et Marc Venard (dirs.), , vol. 2 : Naissance d'une chrétienté (250-430), Desclée, 1995 (ISBN 2-7189-0632-4), p. 387.
  14. ^ Pierre Maraval, Paris, Arthème Fayard, 2009, p. 108
  15. ^ R. Malcolm Errington, , The University of North Carolina Press, 2006, p. 217
  16. ^ Maraval 2009, p. 108
  17. ^ a b Claire Sotinel, , Belin, coll. « Mondes anciens », 2019, p. 410
  18. ^ Maraval 2009, p. 107.
  19. ^ a b Mark Hebblewhite, , Routledge, 2020, p. PT83.
  20. ^ Victoria Escribano Paño, , dans Jean-Noël Guinot et François Richard (éds.), , Cerf, 2008 (ISBN 978-2-204-08661-5), p. 396.
  21. ^ Marie-Françoise Baslez, , Paris/impr. en Italie, Tallandier, 2019, p. 243.
  22. ^ Victoria Escribano Paño, , dans Jean-Noël Guinot et François Richard (éds.), , Cerf, 2008 (ISBN 978-2-204-08661-5), p. 397.
  23. ^ a b c Hebblewhite 2020, p. PT83.
  24. ^ Maraval 2009, p. 113.
  25. ^ a b Errington 2006, p. 218.
  26. ^ Maraval 2009, p. 113.
  27. ^ Neil B. McLynn, Ambrose of Milan : Church and Court in a Christian Capital, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2014, 406 p.
  28. ^ Codex Theodosianus, XVI, 5, 6.
  29. ^ Maraval 2009, p. 115.
  30. ^ Stefan Rebenich, , Routledge, 2002, 211 p, p. 21.
  31. ^ Piet Hein Hupsch, The Glory of the Spirit in Gregory of Nyssa’s Adversus Macedonianos : Commentary and Systematic-Theological Synthesis, BRILL, 2020, 424 p. (ISBN 978-90-04-42228-5), p. 33.
  32. ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Theodosius I" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  33. ^ "Boyd, William, The Ecclesiastical Edicts of the Theodosian Code". From Daniel to Revelation. Retrieved 2021-09-24.
  34. ^ Boyd, William Kenneth (1905), The Ecclesiastical Edicts of the Theodosian Code, Columbia University Press, p45-46
  35. ^ Richard Rubenstein, When Jesus Became God, 1999, p. 223
  36. ^ Boyd (1905), p. 47
  37. ^ Boyd, p60-61
  38. ^ "The Edict of Thessalonica | History Today". www.historytoday.com. Retrieved 2021-09-25.
  39. ^ Boyd (1905), p. 50

BibliographyEdit

  • Boyd, William Kenneth (1905). The Ecclesiastical Edicts of the Theodosian Code. Columbia University Press.
  • Ehler, Sidney Zdeneck; Morrall, John B (1967). Church and State Through the Centuries: A Collection of Historic Documents with Commentaries. ISBN 9780819601896.
  • Ferguson, Everett; McHugh, Michael P.; Norris, Frederick W. (1999). Encyclopedia of Early Christianity. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-8153-3319-6.
  • Williams, Stephen; Friell, Gerard (1994). Theodosius: The Empire at Bay. B.T. Batsford Ltd. ISBN 0-300-06173-0.