Embedded emissions

Summary

One way of attributing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is to measure the embedded emissions of goods that are being consumed (also referred to as "embodied emissions", "embodied carbon emissions", or "embodied carbon"). This is different from the question of to what extent the policies of one country to reduce emissions affect emissions in other countries (the "spillover effect" and "carbon leakage" of an emissions reduction policy). The UNFCCC measures emissions according to production, rather than consumption.[1] Consequently, embedded emissions on imported goods are attributed to the exporting, rather than the importing, country. The question of whether to measure emissions on production instead of consumption is partly an issue of equity, i.e., who is responsible for emissions.[2]

The 37 Parties listed in Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol have agreed to legally binding emission reduction commitments. Under the UNFCCC accounting of emissions, their emission reduction commitments do not include emissions attributable to their imports.[3] In a briefing note, Wang and Watson (2007) asked the question, "who owns China's carbon emissions?".[4] In their study, they suggested that nearly a quarter of China's CO2 emissions might be a result of its production of goods for export, primarily to the US but also to Europe. Based on this, they suggested that international negotiations based on within country emissions (i.e., emissions measured by production) may be "[missing] the point".

Recent research confirms that, in 2004, 23% of global emissions were embedded in goods traded internationally, mostly flowing from China and other developing countries, such as Russia and South Africa, to the U.S., Europe and Japan. These states are included in a group of ten, as well as the Middle East, that make up 71% of the total difference in regional emissions. In Western Europe the difference in the import and export of emissions is particularly pronounced, with imported emissions making up 20-50% of consumed emissions. The majority of the emissions transferred between these states is contained in the trade of machinery, electronics, chemicals, rubber and plastics.[5]

Research by the Carbon Trust in 2011 revealed that approximately 25% of all CO2 emissions from human activities 'flow' (i.e. are imported or exported) from one country to another. The flow of carbon was found to be roughly 50% emissions associated with trade in commodities such as steel, cement, and chemicals, and 50% in semi-finished/finished products such as motor vehicles, clothing or industrial machinery and equipment.[6]

Embodied carbon in architectureEdit

Architect Carl Elefante is known for coining the phrase, "The greenest building is the building that is already built."[7]

The reason that existing buildings are greener than new buildings is that the amount of carbon emissions which occurs during construction of a building is so large in comparison to the annual operating emissions of the building, especially as operations become more energy efficient.[8][9]

The embodied carbon of buildings is estimated to count for 11% of global carbon emissions and 75% of a building’s emissions over its entire lifecycle.[10]

The World Green Building Council wants all new buildings to have at least 40% less embodied carbon.[9]

A life-cycle assessment for embodied carbon calculates the carbon used throughout each stage of a building's life: construction, use and maintenance, and demolition or disassembly.[11]

Manufacturers of structural materials such as steel re-bar, glulam, and precast concrete may provide Environmental Product Declarations (EPD) which certify the carbon impact as well as general environmental impacts of their products.[12]

Minimizing the use of carbon-intensive materials may mean selecting lower carbon versions of glass and steel products, and products manufactured using low-emissions energy sources. Embodied carbon may be reduced in concrete construction through the use of recycled aggregates and industry by-products. Carbon-neutral, carbon positive, and carbon-storing materials include bio-based materials such as timber, bamboo, hemp fibre and hempcrete, wool, dense-pack cellulose insulation, and cork.[13][14][15]

A 2021 study focused on "carbon-intensive hotspot materials (e.g., concrete foundations and slab floors, insulated roof and wall panels, and structural framing) in light industrial buildings" estimated that a "sizable reduction (~60%) in embodied carbon is possible in two to three years by bringing readily-available low-carbon materials into wider use".[16]

Embodied carbon policy and legislationEdit

 
Different views on a ban for products that emit more greenhouse gases in the EU, China and the US among respondents of the 2020–21 European Investment Bank Climate Survey

A variety of policies, regulations, and standards exist worldwide with respect to embodied carbon, according to the American Institute of Architects.[17]

Eight states introduced procurement policies related to embodied carbon in 2021: Washington, Oregon, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey.[18]

In Colorado, HB21-1303: Global Warming Potential for Public Project Materials (better known as “Buy Clean Colorado”) was signed into law July 6, 2021. The law uses environmental product declarations (EPDs) to help drive the use of low-embodied-carbon materials.[19]

"In Europe, embodied carbon emissions have been limited in the Netherlands since 2018, and this is scheduled to happen in Denmark, Sweden, France and Finland between 2023 and 2027."[20]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ UK Parliament (10 March 2010). "House of Commons, minutes of evidence, taken before the Environmental Audit Committee, International Climate Change Negotiations, Rt Hon Edward Miliband MP, Mr Peter Betts and Ms Jan Thompson. Reply to Q39". UK Parliament website. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
  2. ^ Toth, F.L.; et al. (2001). "Decision-making Frameworks. In: Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (B. Metz et al. Eds.)". Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., and New York, N.Y., U.S.A. Archived from the original on 5 October 2018. Retrieved 10 January 2010.
  3. ^ Black, R. (19 December 2005). "Trade can 'export' CO2 emissions". BBC News. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
  4. ^ Wang, T. and J. Watson (October 2007). "Who Owns China's Carbon Emissions? Tyndall Centre Briefing Note No. 23". Tyndall Centre website. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
  5. ^ Davis, S.K. and K. Caldeira (March 2010). "Consumption-based Accounting of CO2 Emissions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (12): 5687–92. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.5687D. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906974107. PMC 2851800. PMID 20212122.
  6. ^ "International Carbon Flows". Carbon Trust. May 2011. Retrieved 12 November 2012.
  7. ^ "Embodied Carbon in Buildings conference speakers". Boston Society for Architecture. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
  8. ^ Architecture 2030. "New Buildings: Embodied Carbon". Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  9. ^ a b Rubidge, Lloyd (28 October 2020). "Embodied Carbon: An Architect's View". +IMPACT Magazine. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  10. ^ Berg, Nate (4 February 2021). "Energy efficiency is no longer enough. This is the next big challenge for green building". Fast Company. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
  11. ^ Westwood, Tom (6 August 2021). "Why Embodied Energy is the Elephant in the Room". Bristol Housing Festival. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  12. ^ "Embodied Energy and Carbon". Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). 15 May 2015. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
  13. ^ Varriale, Fabrizio (27 May 2021). "The other side of the coin: Understanding embodied carbon". RICS World Built Environment Forum. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  14. ^ Knopps, Abigail; Jain, Diksha. "Carbon-Positive Materials: No Longer Far-Fetched, Increasingly Available – My amast". AMAST. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  15. ^ Pak, Anthony (1 November 2020). "Embodied Carbon: Key Considerations for Key Materials". Canadian Architect. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  16. ^ Kriegh, Julie (17 February 2021). "Carbon-Storing Materials: Summary Report". Carbon Leadership Forum. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  17. ^ American Institute of Architects (15 January 2020). "Policies for Embodied Carbon: An International Snapshot". Architect Magazine. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  18. ^ Lewis, Meghan (10 July 2021). "States Act to Reduce Embodied Carbon in Public Procurement". Carbon Leadership Forum. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  19. ^ Rocky Mountain Institute (22 July 2021). "Colorado Passes Embodied Carbon Legislation — The Most Important Climate Solution You've Never Heard of". CleanTechnica. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  20. ^ Arnold, Will (23 July 2021). "We need a Part Z to regulate embodied carbon". Building. Retrieved 12 August 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

External linksEdit

  • Resources: Embodied Carbon in Buildings, Boston Society for Architecture
  • Ten Steps Towards Reducing Embodied Carbon, The American Institute of Architects
  • Carbon Positive Reset! 1.5° C 2020 Teach-In
  • Carbon Smart Materials Palette