Memory management and address translation can still be implemented on top of a flat memory model in order to facilitate the operating system's functionality, resource protection, multitasking or to increase the memory capacity beyond the limits imposed by the processor's physical address space, but the key feature of a flat memory model is that the entire memory space is linear, sequential and contiguous.
In a simple controller, or in a single tasking embedded application, where memory management is not needed nor desirable, the flat memory model is the most appropriate, because it provides the simplest interface from the programmer's point of view, with direct access to all memory locations and minimum design complexity.
In a general purpose computer system, which requires multitasking, resource allocation, and protection, the flat memory system must be augmented by some memory management scheme, which is typically implemented through a combination of dedicated hardware (inside or outside the CPU) and software built into the operating system. The flat memory model (at the physical addressing level) still provides the greatest flexibility for implementing this type of memory management.
The majority of processor architectures implement a flat memory design, including all early 8-bit processors, the Motorola 68000 series, etc. One exception was the original 8086, Intel's first 16-bit microprocessor, which implemented a crude segmented memory model which allowed access to more than 64 KiB of memory without the cost of extending all addresses to more than 16-bits.
Most modern memory models fall into one of three categories:
Flat memory modelEdit
Simple interface for programmers, clean design
Greatest flexibility due to uniform access speed (segmented memory page switches usually incur varied latency due to longer accesses of other pages, either due to extra CPU logic in changing page, or hardware requirements)
Minimum hardware and CPU real estate for simple controller applications[clarification needed]
Maximum execution speed[why?]
Not suitable for general computing or multitasking operating systems unless enhanced[why?] with additional memory management hardware/software; but this is almost always the case in modern CISC processors, which implement advanced memory management and protection technology over a flat memory model. Linux e.g. uses a flat memory model, see x86 memory segmentation#Practices.
Paged memory modelEdit
Suitable for multitasking, general operating system design, resource protection and allocation
Suitable for virtual memory implementation
More CPU real estate, somewhat lower speed
More complex to program
Rigid page boundaries, not always the most memory efficient
Similar to paged memory, but paging is achieved by the implicit addition of two relatively shifted registers: segment:offset
Variable page boundaries, more efficient and flexible than the paged memory model
Quite complex and awkward from a programmer's point of view
More difficult for compilers
Pages can overlap / poor resource protection and isolation
Many to one address translation correspondence: Many segment:offset combinations resolve to the same physical address
Greater chance of programming errors
Implemented in the original Intel 8086, 8088, 80186, 80286, and supported by 80386 and all subsequent x86 machines through to present day Pentium and Core 2 processors. This memory model has remained ever since in the x86 machines, which now provide multi-mode operation and rarely operate in the compatible segmented mode.[clarification needed] See x86 memory segmentation for details.
Within the x86 architectures, when operating in the real mode (or emulation), physical address is computed as:
Address = 16 × segment + offset
(I.e., the 16-bit segment register is shifted left by 4 bits and added to a 16-bit offset, resulting in a 20-bit address.)