Government negotiation with terrorists

Summary

Most Western countries have a stated policy of not negotiating with terrorists. This policy is typically invoked during hostage crises and is limited to paying ransom demands, not other forms of negotiation. Motivations for such policies include a lack of guarantee that terrorists will ensure the safe return of hostages, and decreasing the incentive for terrorists to take more hostages in the future.

On June 18, 2013, G8 leaders signed an agreement against paying ransoms to terrorists.[1] However, most Western states have violated this policy on certain occasions. An investigation by The New York Times found that Al-Qaeda and its affiliates have taken in at least $125 million in revenue from kidnappings since 2008. These payments were made almost exclusively by European governments, which funneled the money through a network of proxies, sometimes masking it as development aid.[2][3]

Some Western countries, such as the United States, Canada, and Britain, tend to not negotiate or pay ransoms to terrorists. Others, such as France, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland are more open to negotiation. This is a source of tension between governments with opposing policies.[1][2]

By country edit

United States edit

The United States traditionally has a policy against negotiating with terrorists.[4][5] However, there have been heavily criticized incidents in which U.S. government leaders were found to have negotiated with terrorists:

Israel edit

Israel negotiated the Oslo accords in 1993 with the Palestine Liberation Organization.

Israel generally does not negotiate with terrorists.[7] Counter examples include:

Other edit

In 1988, the Spanish government negotiated with the ETA six months after the group had killed 21 shoppers in the 1987 Hipercor bombing.[7]

The British government maintained a secret back-channel to the Irish Republican Army, even after the 1991 Downing Street mortar attack.[7]

In January 2015, hostages Haruna Yukawa and Kenji Goto were beheaded by ISIL after Japan refused to meet ISIL's demand of $200 million for the release of the hostages.[8][2]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b Meyer, Josh. "Why the G8 pact to stop paying terrorist ransoms probably won't work—and isn't even such a great idea". Quartz. Archived from the original on 2017-02-26. Retrieved 2017-02-26.
  2. ^ a b c "Where Exactly Is the Rule That Says Governments Can't Negotiate with Terrorists? - VICE". Vice. Archived from the original on 2017-02-26. Retrieved 2017-02-26.
  3. ^ Callimachi, Rukmini (2014-07-29). "Paying Ransoms, Europe Bankrolls Qaeda Terror". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2017-03-08. Retrieved 2017-02-26.
  4. ^ U.S. Department of State Public Affairs Bureau (October 17, 1995), Fact sheet: International terrorism–American hostages, p. 1076, ISBN 9780275995300, Public Affairs Bureau file B91219207B, retrieved 2017-03-22 – via Evolution of U. S. Counterterrorism Policy by Alexander Kraft (2007)
  5. ^ Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism (November 2001). "Fact Sheet: International Terrorism: American Hostages". U.S. Foreign Policy Agenda. 6 (3): 32–33. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  6. ^ Powell, Jonathan. "We must negotiate with terrorists: The dirty secret our government does not want to admit". Salon. Archived from the original on March 16, 2017. Retrieved February 26, 2017.
  7. ^ a b c d Neumann, Peter R. (2007-01-01). "Negotiating With Terrorists". Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 2017-02-26. Retrieved 2017-02-26.
  8. ^ "ISIS Beheads Haruna Yukawa: Why The Japanese Hostages Were In Syria". International Business Times. 2015-01-24. Archived from the original on 2016-10-06. Retrieved 2017-02-26.