If more than one ground state exists, they are said to be degenerate. Many systems have degenerate ground states. Degeneracy occurs whenever there exists a unitary operator that acts non-trivially on a ground state and commutes with the Hamiltonian of the system.
Now, consider a small interval around ; i.e., . Take a new (deformed) wave function ψ'(x) to be defined as , for ; and , for ; and constant for . If is small enough, this is always possible to do, so that ψ'(x) is continuous.
Assuming around , one may write
where is the norm.
Note that the kinetic-energy densities hold everywhere because of the normalization. More significantly, the average kinetic energy is lowered by by the deformation to ψ'.
Now, consider the potential energy. For definiteness, let us choose . Then it is clear that, outside the interval , the potential energy density is smaller for the ψ' because there.
On the other hand, in the interval we have
which holds to order .
However, the contribution to the potential energy from this region for the state ψ with a node is
lower, but still of the same lower order as for the deformed state ψ', and subdominant to the lowering of the average kinetic energy.
Therefore, the potential energy is unchanged up to order , if we deform the state with a node into a state ψ' without a node, and the change can be ignored.
We can therefore remove all nodes and reduce the energy by , which implies that ψ' cannot be the ground state. Thus the ground-state wave function cannot have a node. This completes the proof. (The average energy may then be further lowered by eliminating undulations, to the variational absolute minimum.)
The reasoning goes by contradiction: For if the ground state would be degenerate then there would be two orthonormal stationary states and — later on represented by their complex-valued position-space wave functions and — and any superposition with the complex numbers fulfilling the condition would also be a be such a state, i.e. would have the same energy-eigenvalue and the same spin-state.
Now let be some random point (where both wave functions are defined) and set:
(according to the premise no nodes).
Therefore the position-space wave function of is
for all .
But i.e., is a node of the ground state wave function and that is in contradiction to the premise that this wave function cannot have a node.
Note that the ground state could be degenerate because of different spin states like and while having the same position-space wave function: Any superposition of these states would create a mixed spin state but leave the spatial part (as a common factor of both) unaltered.
Initial wave functions for the first four states of a one-dimensional particle in a box
The wave function of the ground state of a particle in a one-dimensional box is a half-period sine wave, which goes to zero at the two edges of the well. The energy of the particle is given by , where h is the Planck constant, m is the mass of the particle, n is the energy state (n = 1 corresponds to the ground-state energy), and L is the width of the well.
The wave function of the ground state of a hydrogen atom is a spherically symmetric distribution centred on the nucleus, which is largest at the center and reduces exponentially at larger distances. The electron is most likely to be found at a distance from the nucleus equal to the Bohr radius. This function is known as the 1s atomic orbital. For hydrogen (H), an electron in the ground state has energy −13.6 eV, relative to the ionization threshold. In other words, 13.6 eV is the energy input required for the electron to no longer be bound to the atom.
The exact definition of one second of time since 1997 has been the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom at rest at a temperature of 0 K.
See, for example, Cohen, M. (1956). "Appendix A: Proof of non-degeneracy of the ground state" (PDF). The energy spectrum of the excitations in liquid helium (Ph.D.). California Institute of Technology. Published as Feynman, R. P.; Cohen, Michael (1956). "Energy Spectrum of the Excitations in Liquid Helium" (PDF). Physical Review. 102 (5): 1189. Bibcode:1956PhRv..102.1189F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.1189.