Let M = G/H be a homogeneous space for a Lie group G and a Lie subgroup H. Every representation ${\displaystyle \rho :H\rightarrow \mathrm {Aut} (\mathbb {V} )}$  gives rise to a vector bundle

${\displaystyle V=G\times _{H}\mathbb {V} \;{\text{where}}\;(gh,v)\sim (g,\rho (h)v)\;\forall \;g\in G,\;h\in H\;{\text{and}}\;v\in \mathbb {V} .}$ 

Sections ${\displaystyle \varphi \in \Gamma (V)}$  can be identified with

${\displaystyle \Gamma (V)=\{\varphi :G\rightarrow \mathbb {V} \;:\;\varphi (gh)=\rho (h^{-1})\varphi (g)\;\forall \;g\in G,\;h\in H\}.}$ 

In this form the group G acts on sections via

${\displaystyle (\ell _{g}\varphi )(g')=\varphi (g^{-1}g').}$ 

Now let V and W be two vector bundles over M. Then a differential operator

${\displaystyle d:\Gamma (V)\rightarrow \Gamma (W)}$ 

that maps sections of V to sections of W is called invariant if

${\displaystyle d(\ell _{g}\varphi )=\ell _{g}(d\varphi ).}$ 

for all sections ${\displaystyle \varphi }$  in ${\displaystyle \Gamma (V)}$  and elements g in G. All linear invariant differential operators on homogeneous parabolic geometries, i.e. when G is semi-simple and H is a parabolic subgroup, are given dually by homomorphisms of generalized Verma modules.

Given two connections ${\displaystyle \nabla }$  and ${\displaystyle {\hat {\nabla }}}$  and a one form ${\displaystyle \omega }$ , we have

${\displaystyle \nabla _{a}\omega _{b}={\hat {\nabla }}_{a}\omega _{b}-Q_{ab}{}^{c}\omega _{c}}$ 

for some tensor ${\displaystyle Q_{ab}{}^{c}}$ .^[1] Given an equivalence class of connections ${\displaystyle [\nabla ]}$ , we say that an operator is invariant if the form of the operator does not change when we change from one connection in the equivalence class to another. For example, if we consider the equivalence class of all torsion free connections, then the tensor Q is symmetric in its lower indices, i.e. ${\displaystyle Q_{ab}{}^{c}=Q_{(ab)}{}^{c}}$ . Therefore we can compute

${\displaystyle \nabla _{[a}\omega _{b]}={\hat {\nabla }}_{[a}\omega _{b]},}$ 

where brackets denote skew symmetrization. This shows the invariance of the exterior derivative when acting on one forms. Equivalence classes of connections arise naturally in differential geometry, for example:

• in conformal geometry an equivalence class of connections is given by the Levi Civita connections of all metrics in the conformal class;
• in projective geometry an equivalence class of connection is given by all connections that have the same geodesics;
• in CR geometry an equivalence class of connections is given by the Tanaka-Webster connections for each choice of pseudohermitian structure

1. The usual gradient operator ${\displaystyle \nabla }$  acting on real valued functions on Euclidean space is invariant with respect to all Euclidean transformations.
2. The differential acting on functions on a manifold with values in 1-forms (its expression is
        ${\displaystyle d=\sum _{j}\partial _{j}\,dx_{j}}$ 
   in any local coordinates) is invariant with respect to all smooth transformations of the manifold (the action of the transformation on differential forms is just the pullback).
3. More generally, the exterior derivative
        ${\displaystyle d:\Omega ^{n}(M)\rightarrow \Omega ^{n+1}(M)}$ 
   that acts on n-forms of any smooth manifold M is invariant with respect to all smooth transformations. It can be shown that the exterior derivative is the only linear invariant differential operator between those bundles.
4. The Dirac operator in physics is invariant with respect to the Poincaré group (if we choose the proper action of the Poincaré group on spinor valued functions. This is, however, a subtle question and if we want to make this mathematically rigorous, we should say that it is invariant with respect to a group which is a double cover of the Poincaré group)
5. The conformal Killing equation
        ${\displaystyle X^{a}\mapsto \nabla _{(a}X_{b)}-{\frac {1}{n}}\nabla _{c}X^{c}g_{ab}}$ 
   is a conformally invariant linear differential operator between vector fields and symmetric trace-free tensors.

•  
  The sphere (here shown as a red circle) as a conformal homogeneous manifold.

Given a metric

${\displaystyle g(x,y)=x_{1}y_{n+2}+x_{n+2}y_{1}+\sum _{i=2}^{n+1}x_{i}y_{i}}$ 

on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n+2}}$ , we can write the sphere ${\displaystyle S^{n}}$  as the space of generators of the nil cone

${\displaystyle S^{n}=\{[x]\in \mathbb {RP} _{n+1}\;:\;g(x,x)=0\}.}$ 

In this way, the flat model of conformal geometry is the sphere ${\displaystyle S^{n}=G/P}$  with ${\displaystyle G=SO_{0}(n+1,1)}$  and P the stabilizer of a point in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n+2}}$ . A classification of all linear conformally invariant differential operators on the sphere is known (Eastwood and Rice, 1987).^[2]

• Differential operators
• Laplace invariant
• Invariant factorization of LPDOs

^[1]

• Slovák, Jan (1993). Invariant Operators on Conformal Manifolds. Research Lecture Notes, University of Vienna (Dissertation).
• Kolář, Ivan; Michor, Peter; Slovák, Jan (1993). Natural operators in differential geometry (PDF). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-03-30. Retrieved 2011-01-05.
• Eastwood, M. G.; Rice, J. W. (1987). "Conformally invariant differential operators on Minkowski space and their curved analogues". Commun. Math. Phys. 109 (2): 207–228. Bibcode:1987CMaPh.109..207E. doi:10.1007/BF01215221. S2CID 121161256.
• Kroeske, Jens (2008). "Invariant bilinear differential pairings on parabolic geometries". PhD Thesis from the University of Adelaide. arXiv:0904.3311. Bibcode:2009PhDT.......274K.