This article first explores the notion of a jet of a real valued function in one real variable, followed by a discussion of generalizations to several real variables. It then gives a rigorous construction of jets and jet spaces between Euclidean spaces. It concludes with a description of jets between manifolds, and how these jets can be constructed intrinsically. In this more general context, it summarizes some of the applications of jets to differential geometry and the theory of differential equations.
Jets of functions between Euclidean spacesEdit
Before giving a rigorous definition of a jet, it is useful to examine some special cases.
Suppose that is a real-valued function having at least k + 1 derivatives in a neighborhoodU of the point . Then by Taylor's theorem,
Then the k-jet of f at the point is defined to be the polynomial
Jets are normally regarded as abstract polynomials in the variable z, not as actual polynomial functions in that variable. In other words, z is an indeterminate variable allowing one to perform various algebraic operations among the jets. It is in fact the base-point from which jets derive their functional dependency. Thus, by varying the base-point, a jet yields a polynomial of order at most k at every point. This marks an important conceptual distinction between jets and truncated Taylor series: ordinarily a Taylor series is regarded as depending functionally on its variable, rather than its base-point. Jets, on the other hand, separate the algebraic properties of Taylor series from their functional properties. We shall deal with the reasons and applications of this separation later in the article.
Mappings from one Euclidean space to anotherEdit
Suppose that is a function from one Euclidean space to another having at least (k + 1) derivatives. In this case, Taylor's theorem asserts that
The k-jet of f is then defined to be the polynomial
in , where .
Algebraic properties of jetsEdit
There are two basic algebraic structures jets can carry. The first is a product structure, although this ultimately turns out to be the least important. The second is the structure of the composition of jets.
If are a pair of real-valued functions, then we can define the product of their jets via
Here we have suppressed the indeterminate z, since it is understood that jets are formal polynomials. This product is just the product of ordinary polynomials in z, modulo. In other words, it is multiplication in the ring , where is the ideal generated by polynomials homogeneous of order ≥ k + 1.
We now move to the composition of jets. To avoid unnecessary technicalities, we consider jets of functions that map the origin to the origin. If and with f(0) = 0 and g(0) = 0, then . The composition of jets is defined by
It is readily verified, using the chain rule, that this constitutes an associative noncommutative operation on the space of jets at the origin.
In fact, the composition of k-jets is nothing more than the composition of polynomials modulo the ideal of polynomials homogeneous of order .
In one dimension, let and . Then
Jets at a point in Euclidean space: rigorous definitionsEdit
Let be the vector space of smooth functions. Let k be a non-negative integer, and let p be a point of . We define an equivalence relation on this space by declaring that two functions f and g are equivalent to order k if f and g have the same value at p, and all of their partial derivatives agree at p up to (and including) their k-th-order derivatives. In short, iff to k-th order.
The k-th-order jet space of at p is defined to be the set of equivalence classes of , and is denoted by .
The k-th-order jet at p of a smooth function is defined to be the equivalence class of f in .
The following definition uses ideas from algebraic geometry and commutative algebra to establish the notion of a jet and a jet space. Although this definition is not particularly suited for use in algebraic geometry per se, since it is cast in the smooth category, it can easily be tailored to such uses.
Let be the vector space of germs of smooth functions at a point p in . Let be the ideal consisting of germs of functions that vanish at p. (This is the maximal ideal for the local ring.) Then the ideal consists of all function germs that vanish to order k at p. We may now define the jet space at p by
If is a smooth function, we may define the k-jet of f at p as the element of by setting
Regardless of the definition, Taylor's theorem establishes a canonical isomorphism of vector spaces between and . So in the Euclidean context, jets are typically identified with their polynomial representatives under this isomorphism.
Jet spaces from a point to a pointEdit
We have defined the space of jets at a point . The subspace of this consisting of jets of functions f such that f(p) = q is denoted by
Jets of functions between two manifoldsEdit
If M and N are two smooth manifolds, how do we define the jet of a function ? We could perhaps attempt to define such a jet by using local coordinates on M and N. The disadvantage of this is that jets cannot thus be defined in an invariant fashion. Jets do not transform as tensors. Instead, jets of functions between two manifolds belong to a jet bundle.
Jets of functions from the real line to a manifoldEdit
Suppose that M is a smooth manifold containing a point p. We shall define the jets of curves through p, by which we henceforth mean smooth functions such that f(0) = p. Define an equivalence relation as follows. Let f and g be a pair of curves through p. We will then say that f and g are equivalent to order k at p if there is some neighborhoodU of p, such that, for every smooth function , . Note that these jets are well-defined since the composite functions and are just mappings from the real line to itself. This equivalence relation is sometimes called that of k-th-order contact between curves at p.
We now define the k-jet of a curve f through p to be the equivalence class of f under , denoted or . The k-th-order jet space is then the set of k-jets at p.
As p varies over M, forms a fibre bundle over M: the k-th-order tangent bundle, often denoted in the literature by TkM (although this notation occasionally can lead to confusion). In the case k=1, then the first-order tangent bundle is the usual tangent bundle: T1M = TM.
To prove that TkM is in fact a fibre bundle, it is instructive to examine the properties of in local coordinates. Let (xi)= (x1,...,xn) be a local coordinate system for M in a neighborhood U of p. Abusing notation slightly, we may regard (xi) as a local diffeomorphism.
Claim. Two curves f and g through p are equivalent modulo if and only if .
Indeed, the only if part is clear, since each of the n functions x1,...,xn is a smooth function from M to . So by the definition of the equivalence relation , two equivalent curves must have .
Conversely, suppose that ; is a smooth real-valued function on M in a neighborhood of p. Since every smooth function has a local coordinate expression, we may express ; as a function in the coordinates. Specifically, if q is a point of M near p, then
for some smooth real-valued function ψ of n real variables. Hence, for two curves f and g through p, we have
The chain rule now establishes the if part of the claim. For instance, if f and g are functions of the real variable t , then
which is equal to the same expression when evaluated against g instead of f, recalling that f(0)=g(0)=p and f and g are in k-th-order contact in the coordinate system (xi).
Hence the ostensible fibre bundle TkM admits a local trivialization in each coordinate neighborhood. At this point, in order to prove that this ostensible fibre bundle is in fact a fibre bundle, it suffices to establish that it has non-singular transition functions under a change of coordinates. Let be a different coordinate system and let be the associated change of coordinates diffeomorphism of Euclidean space to itself. By means of an affine transformation of , we may assume without loss of generality that ρ(0)=0. With this assumption, it suffices to prove that is an invertible transformation under jet composition. (See also jet groups.) But since ρ is a diffeomorphism, is a smooth mapping as well. Hence,
which proves that is non-singular. Furthermore, it is smooth, although we do not prove that fact here.
Intuitively, this means that we can express the jet of a curve through p in terms of its Taylor series in local coordinates on M.
Examples in local coordinates:
As indicated previously, the 1-jet of a curve through p is a tangent vector. A tangent vector at p is a first-order differential operator acting on smooth real-valued functions at p. In local coordinates, every tangent vector has the form
Given such a tangent vector v, let f be the curve given in the xi coordinate system by . If φ is a smooth function in a neighborhood of p with φ(p) = 0, then
is a smooth real-valued function of one variable whose 1-jet is given by
which proves that one can naturally identify tangent vectors at a point with the 1-jets of curves through that point.
The space of 2-jets of curves through a point.
In a local coordinate system xi centered at a point p, we can express the second-order Taylor polynomial of a curve f(t) through p by
So in the x coordinate system, the 2-jet of a curve through p is identified with a list of real numbers . As with the tangent vectors (1-jets of curves) at a point, 2-jets of curves obey a transformation law upon application of the coordinate transition functions.
Let (yi) be another coordinate system. By the chain rule,
Hence, the transformation law is given by evaluating these two expressions at t = 0.
Note that the transformation law for 2-jets is second-order in the coordinate transition functions.
Jets of functions from a manifold to a manifoldEdit
We are now prepared to define the jet of a function from a manifold to a manifold.
Suppose that M and N are two smooth manifolds. Let p be a point of M. Consider the space consisting of smooth maps defined in some neighborhood of p. We define an equivalence relation on as follows. Two maps f and g are said to be equivalent if, for every curve γ through p (recall that by our conventions this is a mapping such that ), we have on some neighborhood of 0.
The jet space is then defined to be the set of equivalence classes of modulo the equivalence relation . Note that because the target space N need not possess any algebraic structure, also need not have such a structure. This is, in fact, a sharp contrast with the case of Euclidean spaces.
If is a smooth function defined near p, then we define the k-jet of f at p, , to be the equivalence class of f modulo .
John Mather introduced the notion of multijet. Loosely speaking, a multijet is a finite list of jets over different base-points. Mather proved the multijet transversality theorem, which he used in his study of stable mappings.
Jets of sectionsEdit
Suppose that E is a finite-dimensional smooth vector bundle over a manifold M, with projection . Then sections of E are smooth functions such that is the identity automorphism of M. The jet of a section s over a neighborhood of a point p is just the jet of this smooth function from M to E at p.
The space of jets of sections at p is denoted by . Although this notation can lead to confusion with the more general jet spaces of functions between two manifolds, the context typically eliminates any such ambiguity.
Unlike jets of functions from a manifold to another manifold, the space of jets of sections at p carries the structure of a vector space inherited from the vector space structure on the sections themselves. As p varies over M, the jet spaces form a vector bundle over M, the k-th-order jet bundle of E, denoted by Jk(E).
Example: The first-order jet bundle of the tangent bundle.
We work in local coordinates at a point and use the Einstein notation. Consider a vector field
in a neighborhood of p in M. The 1-jet of v is obtained by taking the first-order Taylor polynomial of the coefficients of the vector field:
In the x coordinates, the 1-jet at a point can be identified with a list of real numbers . In the same way that a tangent vector at a point can be identified with the list (vi), subject to a certain transformation law under coordinate transitions, we have to know how the list is affected by a transition.
So consider the transformation law in passing to another coordinate system yi. Let wk be the coefficients of the vector field v in the y coordinates. Then in the y coordinates, the 1-jet of v is a new list of real numbers . Since
it follows that
Expanding by a Taylor series, we have
Note that the transformation law is second-order in the coordinate transition functions.
Krasil'shchik, I. S., Vinogradov, A. M., [et al.], Symmetries and conservation laws for differential equations of mathematical physics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999, ISBN 0-8218-0958-X.
Kolář, I., Michor, P., Slovák, J., Natural operations in differential geometry. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, 1993. ISBN 3-540-56235-4, ISBN 0-387-56235-4.
Saunders, D. J., The Geometry of Jet Bundles, Cambridge University Press, 1989, ISBN 0-521-36948-7
Olver, P. J., Equivalence, Invariants and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press, 1995, ISBN 0-521-47811-1
Sardanashvily, G., Advanced Differential Geometry for Theoreticians: Fiber bundles, jet manifolds and Lagrangian theory, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013, ISBN 978-3-659-37815-7; arXiv:0908.1886