without the repetition destroying other stuff.

Its not *destroying stuff* THHuxleynew and you well know it

Don't chihuahua-like yap to the Moderators. with your *noise*

Why should I start another thread?

Your arxiv find Durr et al 2015>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

__https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4088.pdf__

was right on the topic of this thread..

-precision and calculation in modelling of physics

It's just that your precision has been found very wanting and you can't man up to admit that

you mistakenly assumed 6 digit precision which turned out to be 2 digit precision

So much for your assumed precision of QED/QCD modelling of nuclear physics

Another thread as Wyttenbach suggested should be devoted to

"*but we know also now that already tomorrow there could be a better solution/model than we have today*."

perhaps I will start another thread *Einstein was right? Virginia*