BREAKING NEWS
Cloud Server Hosting For Online Businesses
Inexpensive SEO Services
Benefits of Wanting to play Free Online Slot machines
Kraepelinian dichotomy

Summary

The Kraepelinian dichotomy is the division of the major endogenous psychoses into the disease concepts of dementia praecox, which was reformulated as schizophrenia by Eugen Bleuler by 1908,[1][2] and manic-depressive psychosis, which has now been reconceived as bipolar disorder.[3] This division was formally introduced in the sixth edition of Emil Kraepelin's psychiatric textbook Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studirende und Aerzte, published in 1899.[3] It has been highly influential on modern psychiatric classification systems, the DSM and ICD, and is reflected in the taxonomic separation of schizophrenia from affective psychosis.[4] However, there is also a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder to cover cases that seem to show symptoms of both.

Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926)

History edit

 
Karl Ludwig Kahlbaum (1828–1899)

The Kraepelinian system and the modern classification of psychoses are ultimately derived from the insights of Karl Kahlbaum.[5] In 1863 the Prussian psychiatrist published his habilitation which was entitled, Die Gruppierung der psychischen Krankheiten (The Classification of Psychiatric Diseases).[6] In this text he reviewed the then heterogeneous state of medical taxonomies of mental illness and enumerated the existence of some thirty such nosologies from the early seventeenth-century until the mid-nineteenth-century.[7] The major contribution of his published dissertation, which is still the foundation of modern psychiatric nosology,[7] was to first formulate the clinical method for the classification of psychosis by symptom, course and outcome.[8]

Kahlbaum also differentiated between two major groups of mental illnesses which he termed vecordia and vesania.[7]

Emil Kraepelin first introduced his proposed dichotomy between the endogenous psychoses of manic-depressive illness and dementia praecox during a public lecture in Heidelberg, Germany on 27 November 1898.[9]

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ Jablensky 2007, p. 383; Greene 2007, p. 362
  2. ^ Yuhas, Daisy. "Throughout History, Defining Schizophrenia Has Remained a Challenge". Scientific American Mind (March 2013). Retrieved 2 March 2013.
  3. ^ a b Decker 2007, p. 399.
  4. ^ Greene 2007, p. 361; Palm & Möller 2011, p. 318
  5. ^ Jablensky 1999, p. 96; Berrios, Luque & Villagrán 2003, p. 126
  6. ^ Noll 2007, p. 242; Kahlbaum 1863
  7. ^ a b c Angst 2002, p. 6.
  8. ^ Angst 2002, p. 6; Möller 2008, p. 60
  9. ^ Noll 2007, p. 262.

Bibliography edit

  • Angst, J. (2002). "Historical aspects of the dichotomy between manic-depressive disorders and schizophrenia". Schizophrenia Research. 57 (1): 5–13. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00328-6. PMID 12165371. S2CID 33585559.
  • Angst, J.; Gamma, A. (2008). "Diagnosis and course of affective psychoses: was Kraepelin right?" (PDF). European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 258: 107–10. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2013-2. PMID 18516522. S2CID 34384739.
  • Berrios, German E.; Luque, Rogelio; Villagrán, José M. (2003). "Schizophrenia: a conceptual history". International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy. 3 (2): 111–40.
  • Bora, E.; Yucel, M.; Fornito, A.; Berk, M.; Pantelis, C. (2008). "Major psychoses with mixed psychotic and mood symptoms: are mixed psychoses associated with different neurobiological markers?". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 118 (3): 172–87. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01230.x. ISSN 0001-690X. PMID 18699952. S2CID 205802830.
  • Briole, G. (2012). "Emil Kraepelin: The Fragility of a Colossal Oeuvre". Hurly-Burly 8: 125–147.
  • Craddock, N.; Owen, M.J. (2005). "The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy". British Journal of Psychiatry. 186 (5): 364–6. doi:10.1192/bjp.186.5.364. PMID 15863738.
  • Craddock, N.; Owen, M. J. (2010). "The Kraepelinian dichotomy - going, going... but still not gone". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 196 (2): 92–5. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.073429. ISSN 0007-1250. PMC 2815936. PMID 20118450.
  • Crow, T. J. (2008). "Craddock & Owen vs Kraepelin: 85 years late, mesmerised by 'polygenes'". Schizophrenia Research. 103 (1–3): 156–60. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2008.03.001. PMID 18434093. S2CID 12676461.
  • Cuesta, M. J.; Peralta, V. (2009). "Psychopathological assessment of schizophrenia: relevance for classification". Current Psychiatry Reports. 11 (4): 324–31. doi:10.1007/s11920-009-0047-4. PMID 19635242. S2CID 34738750.
  • Decker, Hannah S. (2007). "How Kraepelinian was Kraepelin? How Kraepelinian are the neo-Kraepelinians? - from Emil Kraepelin to the DSM-III" (PDF). History of Psychiatry. 18 (3): 337–60. doi:10.1177/0957154X07078976. PMID 18175636. S2CID 19754009.
  • deVries, M. W (2008). "Multifactorial inheritance, rates of maturation and psychiatry's taxonomic dilemma". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 258: 25–8. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2005-2. PMID 18516513. S2CID 19974805.
  • Fischer, B. A.; Carpenter, W. T. (2009). "Will the Kraepelinian Dichotomy Survive DSM-V?". Neuropsychopharmacology. 34 (9): 2081–7. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.32. PMC 2721021. PMID 19295511.
  • Gaebel, W.; Zielasek, J. (2008). "The DSM-V initiative "deconstructing psychosis" in the context of Kraepelin's concept on nosology". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 258 (Suppl. 2): 41–7. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2009-y. PMID 18516517. S2CID 29574424.
  • Greene, Talya (2007). "The Kraepelinian dichotomy: the twin pillars crumbling?" (PDF). History of Psychiatry. 18 (3): 361–79. doi:10.1177/0957154X07078977. PMID 18175637. S2CID 12158661.
  • Häfner, Heinz; Heiden, Wolfram an der; Maurer, Kurt (2008). "Evidence for separate diseases?". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 258 (Suppl. 2): 85–96. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2011-4. PMID 18516520. S2CID 24800860.
  • Hippius, H.; Müller, N. (2008). "The work of Emil Kraepelin and his research group in München". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 258 (Suppl. 2): 3–11. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2001-6. PMID 18516510. S2CID 29850296.
  • Jablensky, Assen (1999). "The conflict of the nosologists: views on schizophrenia and manic-depressive illness in the early part of the 20th century". Schizophrenia Research. 39 (2): 95–100. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00106-1. PMID 10507518. S2CID 27097154.
  • Jablensky, Assen (2007). "Living in a Kraepelinian world. Kraepelin's impact on modern psychiatry" (PDF). History of Psychiatry. 18 (3): 381–8. doi:10.1177/0957154X07079690. PMID 18175638. S2CID 33487387.
  • Kahlbaum, Karl Ludwig (1863). Die Gruppierung der psychischen Krankheiten und die Eintheilung der Seelenstörungen: Entwurf einer historisch-kritischen Darstellung der bisherigen Eintheilungen und Versuch zur Anbahnung einer empirisch-wissenschaftlichen Grundlage der Psychiatrie als klinischer Disciplin. Danzig: Kafemann.
  • Lake, Charles Ray; Hurwitz, Nathaniel (2008). "Schizoaffective Disorder—Its Rise and Fall: Perspectives for DSM-V". Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses. 2 (1): 91–7. doi:10.3371/csrp.2.1.8.
  • Maier, Wolfgang (2006). "Do schizoaffective disorders exist at all?". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 113 (5): 369–371. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00763.x. ISSN 0001-690X. PMID 16603028. S2CID 22029255.
  • Möller, Hans-Jürgen; Bottlender, R.; Gross, A; Hoff, P.; Wittmann, J.; Wegner, U.; Strauss, A. (2002). "The Kraepelinian dichotomy: preliminary results of a 15-year follow-up study on functional psychoses: focus on negative symptoms". Schizophrenia Research. 56 (1–2): 87–94. doi:10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00252-3. PMID 12084423. S2CID 28477589.
  • Möller, Hans-Jürgen (2008). "Systematic of psychiatric disorders between categorical and dimensional approaches: Kraepelin's dichotomy and beyond". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 258 (Suppl. 2): 48–73. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2004-3. PMID 18516518. S2CID 35482134.
  • Müller, N.; Schwarz, M. J (2008). "A psychoneuroimmunological perspective to Emil Kraepelins dichotomy". European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 258: 97–106. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2012-3. PMID 18516521. S2CID 25050832.
  • Noll, Richard (2007). The Encyclopedia of Schizophrenia and other Psychotic Disorders (3rd ed.). New York: Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8160-6405-2.
  • Palm, Ulrich; Möller, Hans-Jürgen (2011). "Reception of Kraepelin's ideas 1900–1960". Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 65 (4): 318–325. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02226.x. PMID 21682810.
  • Pilgrim, D. (2002). "The biopsychosocial model in Anglo-American psychiatry: past, present and future". Journal of Mental Health. 11 (6): 585–94. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.413.4801. doi:10.1080/09638230020023930. S2CID 17957615.
  • Radden, Jennifer (1996). "Lumps and Bumps:Kantian Faculty Psychology, Phrenology, and Twentieth-Century Psychiatric Classification". Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology. 3 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1353/ppp.1996.0008. ISSN 1086-3303. S2CID 143590585.
  • Roelcke, Volker (1997). "Biologizing social facts: An early 20th century debate on Kraepelin's concepts of culture, neurasthenia, and degeneration". Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 21 (4): 383–403. doi:10.1023/A:1005393121931. PMID 9492972. S2CID 30190500.
  • Rogler, L.H. (1997). "Making Sense of Historical Changes in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Five Propositions". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 38 (1): 9–20. doi:10.2307/2955358. JSTOR 2955358. PMID 9097505.
  • Stefanis, N. (2008). "Genes do not read DSM-IV: implications for psychosis classification". Annals of General Psychiatry. 7 (Suppl 1): S68. doi:10.1186/1744-859X-7-S1-S68.

By using this platform, you agree to the Terms of Use ©2020 Knowpia