Kuratowski convergence

Summary

In mathematics, Kuratowski convergence or Painlevé-Kuratowski convergence is a notion of convergence for subsets of a topological space. First introduced by Paul Painlevé in lectures on mathematical analysis in 1902,[1] the concept was popularized in texts by Felix Hausdorff[2] and Kazimierz Kuratowski.[3] Intuitively, the Kuratowski limit of a sequence of sets is where the sets "accumulate".

Definitions edit

For a given sequence   of points in a space  , a limit point of the sequence can be understood as any point   where the sequence eventually becomes arbitrarily close to  . On the other hand, a cluster point of the sequence can be thought of as a point   where the sequence frequently becomes arbitrarily close to  . The Kuratowski limits inferior and superior generalize this intuition of limit and cluster points to subsets of the given space  .

Metric Spaces edit

Let   be a metric space, where   is a given set. For any point   and any non-empty subset  , define the distance between the point and the subset:

 

For any sequence of subsets   of  , the Kuratowski limit inferior (or lower closed limit) of   as  ; is

 
the Kuratowski limit superior (or upper closed limit) of   as  ; isFailed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "http://localhost:6011/en.wikipedia.org/v1/":): {\displaystyle \begin{align} \mathop{\mathrm{Ls}} A_{n} :=& \left\{ x \in X : \begin{matrix} \mbox{for all open neighbourhoods } U \mbox{ of } x, U \cap A_{n} \neq \emptyset \mbox{ for infinitely many } n \end{matrix} \right\} \\ =&\left\{ x \in X : \liminf_{n \to \infty} d(x, A_{n}) = 0 \right\}; \end{align}} If the Kuratowski limits inferior and superior agree, then the common set is called the Kuratowski limit of   and is denoted  .

Topological Spaces edit

If   is a topological space, and   are a net of subsets of  , the limits inferior and superior follow a similar construction. For a given point   denote   the collection of open neighbhorhoods of  . The Kuratowski limit inferior of   is the set

 
and the Kuratowski limit superior is the set
 
Elements of   are called limit points of   and elements of   are called cluster points of  . In other words,   is a limit point of   if each of its neighborhoods intersects   for all   in a "residual" subset of  , while   is a cluster point of   if each of its neighborhoods intersects   for all   in a cofinal subset of  .

When these sets agree, the common set is the Kuratowski limit of  , denoted  .

Examples edit

  • Suppose   is separable where   is a perfect set, and let   be an enumeration of a countable dense subset of  . Then the sequence   defined by   has  .
  • Given two closed subsets  , defining   and   for each   yields   and  .
  • The sequence of closed balls  converges in the sense of Kuratowski when   in   and   in  , and in particular,  . If  , then   while  .
  • Let  . Then   converges in the Kuratowski sense to the entire line.
  • In a topological vector space, if   is a sequence of cones, then so are the Kuratowski limits superior and inferior. For example, the sets   converge to  .

Properties edit

The following properties hold for the limits inferior and superior in both the metric and topological contexts, but are stated in the metric formulation for ease of reading.[4]

  • Both   and   are closed subsets of  , and   always holds.
  • The upper and lower limits do not distinguish between sets and their closures:   and  .
  • If   is a constant sequence, then  .
  • If   is a sequence of singletons, then   and   consist of the limit points and cluster points, respectively, of the sequence  .
  • If   and  , then  .
  • (Hit and miss criteria) For a closed subset  , one has
    •  , if and only if for every open set   with   there exists   such that   for all  ,
    •  , if and only if for every compact set   with   there exists   such that   for all  .
  • If   then the Kuratowski limit exists, and  . Conversely, if   then the Kuratowski limit exists, and  .
  • If   denotes Hausdorff metric, then   implies  . However, noncompact closed sets may converge in the sense of Kuratowski while   for each  [5]
  • Convergence in the sense of Kuratowski is weaker than convergence in the sense of Vietoris but equivalent to convergence in the sense of Fell. If   is compact, then these are all equivalent and agree with convergence in Hausdorff metric.

Kuratowski Continuity of Set-Valued Functions edit

Let   be a set-valued function between the spaces   and  ; namely,   for all  . Denote  . We can define the operators

 
where   means convergence in sequences when   is metrizable and convergence in nets otherwise. Then,
  •   is inner semi-continuous at   if  ;
  •   is outer semi-continuous at   if  .

When   is both inner and outer semi-continuous at  , we say that   is continuous (or continuous in the sense of Kuratowski).

Continuity of set-valued functions is commonly defined in terms of lower- and upper-hemicontinuity popularized by Berge.[6] In this sense, a set-valued function is continuous if and only if the function   defined by   is continuous with respect to the Vietoris hyperspace topology of  . For set-valued functions with closed values, continuity in the sense of Vietoris-Berge is stronger than continuity in the sense of Kuratowski.

Examples edit

  • The set-valued function   is continuous  .
  • Given a function  , the superlevel set mapping   is outer semi-continuous at  , if and only if   is lower semi-continuous at  . Similarly,   is inner semi-continuous at  , if and only if   is upper semi-continuous at  .

Properties edit

  • If   is continuous at  , then   is closed.
  •   is outer semi-continuous at  , if and only if for every   there are neighborhoods   and   such that  .
  •   is inner semi-continuous at  , if and only if for every   and neighborhood   there is a neighborhood   such that   for all  .
  •   is (globally) outer semi-continuous, if and only if its graph   is closed.
  • (Relations to Vietoris-Berge continuity). Suppose   is closed.
    •   is inner semi-continuous at  , if and only if   is lower hemi-continuous at   in the sense of Vietoris-Berge.
    • If   is upper hemi-continuous at  , then   is outer semi-continuous at  . The converse is false in general, but holds when   is a compact space.
  • If  has a convex graph, then   is inner semi-continuous at each point of the interior of the domain of  . Conversely, given any inner semi-continuous set-valued function  , the convex hull mapping   is also inner semi-continuous.

Epi-convergence and Γ-convergence edit

For the metric space   a sequence of functions  , the epi-limit inferior (or lower epi-limit) is the function   defined by the epigraph equation

 
and similarly the epi-limit superior (or upper epi-limit) is the function   defined by the epigraph equation
 
Since Kuratowski upper and lower limits are closed sets, it follows that both   and   are lower semi-continuous functions. Similarly, since  , it follows that   uniformly. These functions agree, if and only if   exists, and the associated function is called the epi-limit of  .

When   is a topological space, epi-convergence of the sequence   is called Γ-convergence. From the perspective of Kuratowski convergence there is no distinction between epi-limits and Γ-limits. The concepts are usually studied separately, because epi-convergence admits special characterizations that rely on the metric space structure of  , which does not hold in topological spaces generally.

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ This is reported in the Commentary section of Chapter 4 of Rockafellar and Wets' text.
  2. ^ Hausdorff, Felix (1927). Mengenlehre (in German) (2nd ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
  3. ^ Kuratowski, Kazimierz (1933). Topologie, I & II (in French). Warsaw: Panstowowe Wyd Nauk.
  4. ^ The interested reader may consult Beer's text, in particular Chapter 5, Section 2, for these and more technical results in the topological setting. For Euclidean spaces, Rockafellar and Wets report similar facts in Chapter 4.
  5. ^ For an example, consider the sequence of cones in the previous section.
  6. ^ Rockafellar and Wets write in the Commentary to Chapter 6 of their text: "The terminology of 'inner' and 'outer' semicontinuity, instead of 'lower' and 'upper', has been foorced on us by the fact that the prevailing definition of 'upper semicontinuity' in the literature is out of step with developments in set convergence and the scope of applications that must be handled, now that mappings   with unbounded range and even unbounded value sets   are so important... Despite the historical justification, the tide can no longer be turned in the meaning of 'upper semicontinuity', yet the concept of 'continuity' is too crucial for applications to be left in the poorly usable form that rests on such an unfortunately restrictive property [of upper semicontinuity]"; see pages 192-193. Note also that authors differ on whether "semi-continuity" or "hemi-continuity" is the preferred language for Vietoris-Berge continuity concepts.

References edit

  • Beer, Gerald (1993). Topologies on closed and closed convex sets. Mathematics and its Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group. pp. xii+340.
  • Kuratowski, Kazimierz (1966). Topology. Volumes I and II. New edition, revised and augmented. Translated from the French by J. Jaworowski. New York: Academic Press. pp. xx+560. MR0217751
  • Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell; Wets, Roger J.-B. (1998). Variational analysis. Berlin. ISBN 978-3-642-02431-3. OCLC 883392544.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)