Vowels edit

Laz vowel inventory consists of five sounds: a, e, i, o, u.

Consonants edit

The consonant inventory of Laz varies among the dialects. A full set of sounds is present in the Khopa-Chkhala dialect, while the Vitze-Arkabe and Atina-Artasheni dialects lost glottalized uvular q.

Phonological processes edit

Uvular q sound change edit

Glottalized uvular q is preserved only in the Khopa-Chkhala dialect before the vowels and the consonants v and l. This sound is also evidenced after glottalized stops and affricates in several words, such as p̌qorop (I love smb./sth.); ǩqorop (I love you); t̆qubi (twins), ǯqv-/ǯqvin- (to reconcile); ç̌qint̆i (fresh-soft and unripe). But in the most of cases *t̆q → t̆ǩ; *ǯq → ǯǩ; *ç̌q → ç̌ǩ.

In the Vitze-Arkabe dialect, in the neighborhood of consonants *q → ǩ (exception is the verb ovapu ← *oqvapu "to be"). In the word-initial prevocalic and in the intervocalic positions *q → ∅.

In Atina-Artasheni dialect:

• in word-initial prevocalic position q → ∅. E.g. *qoropa → oropa "love", *qona → ona "cornfield" etc.
• in intervocalic position *q → y/∅. E.g. *loqa → *loʔa → loya/loa "sweet", *luqu → *luʔu → luu "cabbage" etc.
• word-initial qv → ǩv/v. E.g. qvali → ǩvali/vali "cheese, *qvaci → ǩvaci/vaci "testicle" etc.
• intervocalic qv → y. E.g. *oqvapu → oyapu "to be/become", *iqven → iyen "s/he will be/become" etc.
• in all other cases q → ∅

Regressive assimilation edit

The most common types are:

• regressive voicing:
  • s → z
  • t → d
  • k → g
  • ş → j
  • ç → c
  • p → b
• regressive devoicing:
  • b → p
  • g → k
• regressive glottalization
  • b → p̌
  • p → p̌
  • g → ǩ

Dissimilative deletion of consonant edit

In some morphological contexts featuring two consonants n split only with a vowel, the former can be deleted. miqonun → miqoun (I have {an animate object}), iqvasinon → iqvasion (s/he will be), mulunan → *muluan → mulvan (they are coming).

Another dissimilation, presumably sporadic, occurs in deǩiǩe → deiǩe (minute); note also that the Arabic source of this word دقيقة daqīqa contains a uvular [q], and as above uvulars are unstable in Laz.

Intervocalic reduction of r edit

This process is evidenced in the Khopa-Chkhala and Vitze-Arkabe dialects, where in intervocalic position facultatively r → y → ∅.

Palatalization of velars edit

In the Atina-Artasheni dialect, the velars followed by the front vowels e and i and the glide y transform to alveolar affricates:

• g → c
• ǩ → ç̌
• k → ç

Alphabet edit

Laz is written in a Georgian script or in the Latin script (as used in Turkish, but with specific Laz extensions).

Laz has eight grammatical cases: nominative, ergative, dative, genitive, lative, ablative, instrumental and almost extinct adverbial.

Example of adjective declension edit

Example of noun declension edit

As in other South Caucasian languages, Laz distinguishes two classes of nouns and classifies objects as:

• 'Intelligent' entities. Respective interrogative is mi? (who?)
• 'Non-intelligent' entities. Respective interrogative is mu? (what?)

Noun classification scheme edit

The Laz numerals are near identical to their Megrelian equivalents with minor phonetic differences. The number system is vigesimal like in Georgian.

Cardinal numbers edit

Almost all basic Laz cardinal numbers stem from the Proto-Kartvelian language, except ar(t) (one) and eči (twenty), which are reconstructed only for the Karto-Zan chronological level, having regular phonetical reflexes in Zan (Megrelo-Laz) and Georgian. The numeral šilya (thousand) is a Pontic Greek loanword and is more commonly used than original Laz vitoši.

Laz cardinal numbers compared to Megrelian, Georgian and Svan edit

Ordinal numbers edit

Ordinal numbers in Laz are produced with the circumfix ma-...-a, which, in contrast with Megrelian, may be extended with suffix -n. The circumfix ma-...-a originates from Proto-Kartvelian and has regular phonetical equivalents in Georgian (me-...-e) and Svan (me-...-e)

Ordinal numbers' derivation rule edit

Laz ordinal numbers compared to Megrelian, Georgian and Svan edit

Fractional numbers edit

The fractional numbers' derivation rule in Laz and Megrelian is akin to Old Georgian and Svan.

Fractional numbers' derivation rule edit

Laz fractional numbers compared to Megrelian, Georgian and Svan edit

Personal pronouns edit

Possessive pronouns edit

Laz verbs are inflected for seven categories: person, number, version, tense, mood, aspect and voice.

Person and Number edit

In Laz, like Megrelian, Georgian and Svan, verbs can be unipersonal, bipersonal and tripersonal

• Monovalent verbs have only subjective person and are intransitive.
• Bivalent verbs have one subject and one object (direct or indirect). They are:
  • transitive if the object is direct
  • intransitive if the object is indirect
• Trivalent verbs have one subject and two objects (one direct and the other indirect) and are ditransitive.

The person may be singular or plural.

Subject and object markers in Laz are the same as in Megrelian

Subject markers edit

Object markers edit

In pre-consonant position, the markers v- and g- change phonetically:

• Before voiced consonants: v- → b-
• Before voiceless (nonglottalized) consonants:
  • v- → b- → p-
  • g- → k-
• Before glottalized consonants:
  • v- → b- → p̌-
  • g- → ǩ-

Version edit

Like Megrelian, Georgian and Svan, Laz has four types of version marking:

• subjective – shows that the action is intended for oneself,
• objective – action is intended for another person,
• objective-passive – the action is intended for another person and at the same time indicating the passiveness of subject,
• neutral – neutral with respect to intention.

Laz version markers compared to Megrelian, Georgian and Svan edit

Tenses edit

The maximum number of screeves in Laz is 22. They are grouped in three series. Two screeves (future I and past of future I) exist only for the verb r-, which serves as a 1st series root for oqopumu/ovapu/oyapu (to be).

Paradigm of verb conjugation edit

stems: ç̌ar- (to write) and r- (to be: just for future I and past of future I)

According to oldness these screeves can be grouped in two sets:

• old (primary) (common with Megrelian).
• new (secondary) derived from the basic screeves (specific Laz).

Classification of screeves according to oldness

Mood edit

Indicative edit

Indicative statement claims that the proposition should be taken as an apparent fact.

Interrogative edit

There are two ways to transform an indicative statement into a question:

• by means of interrogative words. E.g. mi? (who?), mu? (what?), so? (where?), mundes? (when?), muç̌o? (how?) etc. This rule is valid for Megrelian, Georgian and Svan as well.
• by adding an interrogative particle -i to the end of a verb. It has the same function as Megrelian -o, Old Georgian -a and Svan -ma/-mo/-mu.

Imperative edit

Indicates a command or request. The aorist form is used when addressing 2nd person (singular/plural) and aoristic optative in all other cases.

Subjunctive edit

Expresses possibility, wish, desire.

Conditional edit

Indicates condition in contrary to a fact. For this reason a verbal suffix -ǩo (At.-Arsh, Vtz.-Ark.) / -ǩon/-ǩoni (Khop.-Chkh.) is used.

Aspect edit

Voice edit

Notes edit

References edit

• Chikobava, Arn. (1936). Grammatical analysis of Laz with texts (in Georgian). Tiflis.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Chikobava, Arn. (1938). Chan-Megrel-Georgian Comparative Dictionary (in Georgian). Tbilisi.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Fähnrich, H. & Sardzhveladze, Z. (2000). Etymological Dictionary of the Kartvelian Languages (in Georgian). Tbilisi.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Kajaia, O. (2001–2002). Megrelian-Georgian dictionary. 3 Vols. (in Georgian). Tbilisi.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Kartozia, G. (2005). The Laz language and its place in the system of Kartvelian languages (in Georgian). Tbilisi.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Klimov, G. (1964). Etymological Dictionary of the Kartvelian Languages (in Russian). Moscow.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Klimov, G. (1998). Etymological Dictionary of the Kartvelian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Klimov, G. (1998). Languages of the World: Caucasian languages (in Russian). Moscow: Academia.
• Marr, N. (1910). Grammar of Chan (Laz) with reader and wordlist (in Russian). St. Petersburg.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
• Qipshidze, I. (1911). Additional information about Chan (in Russian). St. Petersburg.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Qipshidze, I. (1914). The Grammar of Mingrelian (Iver) Language with reader and dictionary (in Russian). St. Petersburg.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).
• Shanidze, A. (1973). Essentials of Georgian Grammar (in Georgian). Tbilisi.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Topuria, V. & Kaldani, M. (2000). Svan Dictionary (in Georgian). Tbilisi.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

• Laz Georgian-Latin and Latin-Georgian converter