BREAKING NEWS
Cloud Server Hosting For Online Businesses
Inexpensive SEO Services
Benefits of Wanting to play Free Online Slot machines
Meredith Whittaker

Summary

Meredith Whittaker is the president of the Signal Foundation and serves on its board of directors.[1][2][3] She was formerly the Minderoo Research Professor at New York University (NYU), and the co-founder and faculty director of the AI Now Institute. She also served as a senior advisor on AI to Chair Lina Khan at the Federal Trade Commission.[4] Whittaker was employed at Google for 13 years, where she founded Google's Open Research group[5][6][7][excessive citations] and co-founded the M-Lab.[8] In 2018, she was a core organizer of the Google Walkouts and resigned from the company in July 2019.[9][10]

Meredith Whittaker
Whittaker in 2022
Alma materUniversity of California, Berkeley
EmployerSignal Foundation

Early life and education edit

Whittaker completed her bachelor's degree in rhetoric at University of California, Berkeley.[11][12]

Research and career edit

Whittaker is the president of the Signal foundation and serves on their board of directors. She was formerly the Minderoo Research Professor at NYU, and the Faculty Director of NYU’s AI Now Institute.[13]

She joined Google in 2006.[11] She founded Google Open Research[14] which collaborated with the open source and academic communities on issues related to net neutrality measurement, privacy, security, and the social consequences of artificial intelligence.[15] Whittaker was a speaker at the 2018 World Summit on AI.[16] She has written for the American Civil Liberties Union.[17]

Whittaker co-founded M-Lab, a globally distributed network measurement system that provides the world’s largest source of open data on Internet performance. She has also worked extensively on issues of data validation, privacy, the social implications of artificial intelligence, the political economy of tech, and labor movements in the context of tech and the tech industry.[18] She has spoken out about the need for privacy and against weakening encryption.[19] She has advised the White House, the FCC, the FTC, the City of New York, the European Parliament, and many other governments and civil society organizations on artificial intelligence, Internet policy, measurement, privacy, and security.[20]

AI Now edit

Whittaker is the co-founder and former faculty director of the AI Now Institute at NYU, a leading university institute dedicated to researching the social implications of artificial intelligence and related technologies which she started with Kate Crawford in 2017 after a symposium hosted by the White House.[21][22][23] AI Now is partnered with the New York University Tandon School of Engineering, New York University Center for Data Science and Partnership on AI.[24] They have produced annual reports that examine the social implications of artificial intelligence, including bias, rights and liberties.[25][26]

Congressional testimony edit

 
Whittaker testifies before the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee in 2019

Whittaker has testified before Congress, including testimony to the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space & Technology on "Artificial Intelligence: Societal and Ethical Implications" in June 2019.[27] In her testimony, Whittaker pointed to research and cases showing that AI systems can entrench bias and replicate harmful patterns. She called for whistleblower protections for tech workers arguing that the centrality of tech to core social institutions, and the opacity of tech deployment, made such disclosures crucial to the public interest.[28]

She testified to the House Oversight Committee on “Facial Recognition Technology: Ensuring Commercial Transparency & Accuracy” in January 2020.[29] She highlighted structural issues with facial recognition and the political economy of the industry, where these technologies are used by powerful actors on less powerful actors in ways that can entrench marginalization. She made the case that ‘bias’ was not the core concern, warned against an over reliance on technical audits that could be used to justify the use of systems without tackling structural issues such as the opacity of facial recognition systems, and the power dynamics that attend their use. Her testimony also pointed to the lack of sound scientific support for some of the claims used by private vendors, and called for a halt to the use of these technologies.[30][31]

Federal Trade Commission edit

In November 2021, Lina Khan confirmed Whittaker joined the United States Federal Trade Commission as a senior advisor on artificial intelligence to the chair.[4] Once announced as Signal's president, at the beginning of September 2022, she reported the ending of her term at the FTC.[1]

Signal edit

On September 6, 2022, Whittaker announced that she would be starting as Signal's president on September 12. Signal described the role as "a new position created in collaboration with Signal’s leadership".[3]

Activism edit

In 2018, Whittaker was one of the core organizers of the Google Walkouts, with over 20,000 Google employees walking out internationally to protest Google's culture when it comes to claims of sexual misconduct and citizen surveillance, they released a series of demands, some of which were met by Google.[32][33]

The walkout was prompted by Google's reported $90 million payout to Andy Rubin, who had been accused of sexual misconduct, and the company's involvement with Project Maven.[32][34] More than 3,000 Google employees signed a petition against Project Maven. Project Maven consisted of a contract between the US military and Google, in which Google was to develop machine vision technologies for the US drone program. Following the protests, Google did not renew the Maven contract.[35]

She was part of the movement that called for Google to rethink their AI ethics council after the appointment of Kay Coles James, the president of The Heritage Foundation who has fought against LGBT protections.[36] Whittaker claimed that she faced retaliation from Google, and wrote in an open letter that she had been told to "abandon her work" on enforcing ethics in technology at the AI Now Institute.[32][37][38][39]

In a note shared internally following her resignation, Whittaker called for tech workers to "unionize in a way that works, protect conscientious objectors and whistleblowers, demand to know what you’re working on and how it’s used, and to build solidarity with other tech workers beyond your company."[10]

Whittaker promotes organizing within Silicon Valley and tackling sexual harassment, gender inequality and racism in tech.[40]

Selected publications edit

  • Whittaker, Meredith (November - December 2021). “The Steep Cost of Capture”. Interactions, Volume 28, Issue 6. pp 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488666
  • Vgontzas Nantina; Whittaker, Meredith. (January 29, 2021). “These Machines Won’t Kill Fascism: Toward a Militant Progressive Vision for Tech”. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/society/tech-labor-progressive/
  • Sadowski, Jathan; Viljoen, Salomé; Whittaker, Meredith. “Everyone should decide how their digital data are used — not just tech companies”. Nature (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01812-3
  • Whittaker, Meredith; Alper, Meryl; Bennett, Cynthia L.; Hendren, Sara; Kaziunas, Elizabeth; Mills, Mara; Ringel Morris, Meredith; Rankin, Joy; Rogers, Emily; Salas, Marcel; West, Sarah Myers. (November 2019) "Disability, bias, and AI". AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/disabilitybiasai-2019.html
  • West, Sarah Myers; Whittaker, Meredith; Crawford, Kate. (April 2019). “Discriminating Systems: Gender, Race, and Power in AI”. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/Discriminatingsystems.html
  • Reisman, Dillon; Schultz, Jason; Crawford, Kate; Whittaker, Meredith (April 2018). "Algorithmic impact assessments: A practical framework for public agency accountability." AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/aiareport2018.html
  • Yuste, R., Goering, S., Arcas, B. et al. "Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI." Nature (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/551159a

References edit

  1. ^ a b "Meredith Whittaker: "We won't participate in the surveillance business model"". DER STANDARD (in Austrian German). Retrieved September 6, 2022.
  2. ^ "Meredith Whittaker | NYU Tandon School of Engineering". engineering.nyu.edu. Retrieved November 21, 2021.
  3. ^ a b "A Message from Signal's New President". Signal Messenger. Retrieved September 6, 2022.
  4. ^ a b "FTC Chair Lina M. Khan Announces New Appointments in Agency Leadership Positions". Federal Trade Commission. November 19, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
  5. ^ "Google Walkout Is Just the Latest Sign of Tech Worker Unrest". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
  6. ^ "A Googler who brought down Google's AI ethics board says she's now facing retaliation". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
  7. ^ "Meredith Whittaker, AI researcher and an organizer of last year's Google walkout, is leaving the company". TechCrunch. July 16, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
  8. ^ "Who we are – M-Lab". www.measurementlab.net. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
  9. ^ "Google Protest Leader Leaves, Warns of Company's Unchecked Power". July 18, 2019. Retrieved July 18, 2019.
  10. ^ a b change, Google Walkout For Real (July 16, 2019). "Onward! Another #GoogleWalkout Goodbye". Medium. Retrieved August 10, 2019.
  11. ^ a b "Scientifically Verifiable Broadband Policy | Berkman Klein Center". cyber.harvard.edu. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  12. ^ "Meredith Whittaker". opentech. Retrieved July 18, 2019.
  13. ^ "Faculty Director". ainowinstitute.org. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
  14. ^ Gershgorn, Dave. "The field of AI research is about to get way bigger than code". Quartz. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  15. ^ "Most Google Walkout Organizers Left Company". WIRED.
  16. ^ "World Summit AI | Meet 140 of the world's brightest AI brains". World Summit AI Amsterdam. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  17. ^ "Algorithms Are Making Government Decisions. The Public Needs to Have a Say". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  18. ^ Vgontzas, Nantina; Whittaker, Meredith (January 29, 2021). "These Machines Won't Kill Fascism: Toward a Militant Progressive Vision for Tech". The Nation. ISSN 0027-8378. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
  19. ^ "Wanting It Bad Enough Won't Make It Work: Why Adding Backdoors and Weakening Encryption Threatens the Internet". HuffPost. December 16, 2015. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
  20. ^ "Co-founder, Co-director". ainowinstitute.org. Retrieved August 10, 2019.
  21. ^ "Biased AI Is A Threat To Civil Liberties. The ACLU Has A Plan To Fix It". Fast Company. July 25, 2017. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  22. ^ "The Social and Economic Implications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Near-Term - Future of Life Institute". Future of Life Institute. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  23. ^ "About". ainowinstitute.org. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  24. ^ "Apply - Interfolio". apply.interfolio.com. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  25. ^ "Research". ainowinstitute.org. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  26. ^ "Research". ainowinstitute.org. Retrieved July 7, 2018.
  27. ^ "Artificial Intelligence: Societal and Ethical Implications | House Committee on Science, Space and Technology". science.house.gov. Retrieved August 10, 2019.
  28. ^ "Congressional Testimony on Societal Impact of AI". www.macfound.org. Retrieved August 10, 2019.
  29. ^ Whittaker, Meredith (January 15, 2020). ""Facial Recognition Technology (Part III): Ensuring Commercial Transparency & Accuracy"" (PDF).
  30. ^ "US lawmakers concerned by accuracy of facial recognition". BBC News. January 16, 2020. Retrieved May 19, 2022.
  31. ^ "Facial Recognition Technology | C-SPAN.org". www.c-span.org. Retrieved May 19, 2022.
  32. ^ a b c "How Google treats Meredith Whittaker is important to potential AI whistleblowers". VentureBeat. April 24, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  33. ^ Gaber, Claire Stapleton, Tanuja Gupta, Meredith Whittaker, Celie O'Neil-Hart, Stephanie Parker, Erica Anderson, Amr (November 1, 2018). "We're the Organizers of the Google Walkout. Here Are Our Demands". The Cut. Retrieved August 10, 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ Bird, Interviews by Cameron; Captain, Sean; Craig, Elise; Gilliland, Haley Cohen; Shan, Joy (March 29, 2019). "Silicon Valley revolt: meet the tech workers fighting their bosses over Ice, censorship and racism". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  35. ^ R, Bhagyashree (October 9, 2018). "Google opts out of Pentagon's $10 billion JEDI cloud computing contract, as it doesn't align with its ethical use of AI principles". Packt Hub. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  36. ^ Levin, Sam (April 1, 2019). "Google employees call for removal of rightwing thinktank leader from AI council". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  37. ^ Wong, Julia Carrie (April 22, 2019). "Demoted and sidelined: Google walkout organizers say company retaliated". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  38. ^ Wong, Julia Carrie (April 27, 2019). "Google worker activists accuse company of retaliation at 'town hall'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  39. ^ Sugandha Lahoti (April 27, 2019). "#NotOkGoogle: Employee-led town hall reveals hundreds of stories of retaliation at Google". Packt Hub. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  40. ^ "Claire Stapleton & Meredith Whittaker on the Google Walkout". Amanpour & Company. Retrieved August 10, 2019.

By using this platform, you agree to the Terms of Use ©2020 Knowpia