KNOWPIA
WELCOME TO KNOWPIA

In general relativity, a **naked singularity** is a hypothetical gravitational singularity without an event horizon. In a black hole, the singularity is completely enclosed by a boundary known as the event horizon, inside which the gravitational force of the singularity is so strong that light cannot escape. Hence, objects inside the event horizon—including the singularity itself—cannot be directly observed. A naked singularity, by contrast, would be observable from the outside.

The theoretical existence of naked singularities is important because their existence would mean that it would be possible to observe the collapse of an object to *infinite density*. It would also cause foundational problems for general relativity, because general relativity cannot make predictions about the evolution of space-time near a singularity. In generic black holes, this is not a problem, as an outside viewer cannot observe the space-time within the event horizon.

Naked singularities have not been observed in nature. Astronomical observations of black holes indicate that their rate of rotation falls below the threshold to produce a naked singularity (spin parameter 1). GRS 1915+105 comes closest to the limit, with a spin parameter of 0.82-1.00.^{[1]}

According to the cosmic censorship hypothesis, gravitational singularities may not be observable. If loop quantum gravity is correct, naked singularities may be possible in nature.

From concepts drawn from rotating black holes, it is shown that a singularity, spinning rapidly, can become a ring-shaped object. This results in two event horizons, as well as an ergosphere, which draw closer together as the spin of the singularity increases. When the outer and inner event horizons merge, they shrink toward the rotating singularity and eventually expose it to the rest of the universe.

A singularity rotating fast enough might be created by the collapse of dust or by a supernova of a fast-spinning star. Studies of pulsars^{[2]} and some computer simulations (Choptuik, 1997) have been performed.^{[3]}

Mathematician Demetrios Christodoulou, a winner of the Shaw Prize, has shown that contrary to what had been expected, singularities which are not hidden in a black hole also occur.^{[4]} However, he then showed that such "naked singularities" are unstable.^{[5]}

Disappearing event horizons exist in the Kerr metric, which is a spinning black hole in a vacuum. Specifically, if the angular momentum is high enough, the event horizons could disappear. Transforming the Kerr metric to Boyer–Lindquist coordinates, it can be shown^{[6]} that the coordinate (which is not the radius) of the event horizon is

where , and . In this case, "event horizons disappear" means when the solutions are complex for , or . However, this corresponds to a case where exceeds (or in Planck units, ), i.e. the spin exceeds what is normally viewed as the upper limit of its physically possible values.

Disappearing event horizons can also be seen with the Reissner–Nordström geometry of a charged black hole. In this metric, it can be shown^{[7]} that the horizons occur at

where , and . Of the three possible cases for the relative values of and , the case where causes both to be complex. This means the metric is regular for all positive values of , or in other words, the singularity has no event horizon. However, this corresponds to a case where exceeds (or in Planck units, ), i.e. the charge exceeds what is normally viewed as the upper limit of its physically possible values.

See Kerr–Newman metric for a spinning, charged ring singularity.

A naked singularity could allow scientists to observe an infinitely dense material, which would under normal circumstances be impossible by the cosmic censorship hypothesis. Without an event horizon of any kind, some speculate that naked singularities could actually emit light.^{[8]}

The cosmic censorship hypothesis says that a gravitational singularity would remain hidden by the event horizon. LIGO events, including GW150914, are consistent with these predictions. Although data anomalies would have resulted in the case of a singularity, the nature of those anomalies remains unknown.^{[9]}

Some research has suggested that if loop quantum gravity is correct, then naked singularities could exist in nature,^{[10]}^{[11]}^{[12]} implying that the cosmic censorship hypothesis does not hold. Numerical calculations^{[13]} and some other arguments^{[14]} have also hinted at this possibility.

- M. John Harrison's Kefahuchi Tract trilogy of science fiction novels (
*Light*,*Nova Swing*and*Empty Space*) centre upon humanity's exploration of a naked singularity. - "Dark Peril" by James C. Glass (published in
*Analog*March 2005), is a story about space travelers on an exploratory mission. While they investigate a strange cosmological phenomenon, their two small space crafts begin to shake, and they are unable to leave the area. One crew member realizes that they are trapped in the ergosphere of a black hole or naked singularity. The story describes a cluster of multiple black holes or singularities, and what the crew does to try to survive this seemingly inescapable situation. - Stephen Baxter's Xeelee Sequence features the Xeelee, who create a massive ring that produces a naked singularity. It is used to travel to another universe.
- In the episode titled "Daybreak", the finale of the 2004 reimagined television series Battlestar Galactica, the Cylon colony orbits a naked singularity.
^{[citation needed]} - The Sleeping God in Peter Hamilton's
*The Night's Dawn Trilogy*is believed to be a naked singularity. - In Christopher Nolan's
*Interstellar*the nonexistence of a naked singularity hinders humanity from completing a theory of quantum gravity due to the inaccessibility of experimental data from inside the event horizon. - In the visual novel
*Steins;Gate*, a naked singularity is used to compress the digitalized memories of the protagonist into a smaller size, to then be sent back in time with an improvised "time leap machine". - In Vonda McIntyre's 1981
*Star Trek*novel,*The Entropy Effect,*a naked singularity is found to be a side effect of time travel experimentation, and threatens to destroy the universe if the time travel experiments are not stopped before they started.

**^**Jeanna Bryne. "Pushing the Limit: Black Hole Spins at Phenomenal Rate". space.com. Retrieved 2017-11-25.**^**Crew, Bec. "Naked Singularities Can Actually Exist in a Three-Dimensional Universe, Physicists Predict".*ScienceAlert*. Retrieved 2020-09-02.**^**Garfinkle, David (1997). "Choptuik scaling and the scale invariance of Einstein's equation".*Phys. Rev. D*.**56**(6): R3169–R3173. arXiv:gr-qc/9612015. Bibcode:1997PhRvD..56.3169G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.R3169.**^**D.Christodoulou (1994). "Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field".*Ann. Math*.**140**(3): 607–653. doi:10.2307/2118619. JSTOR 2118619.**^**D. Christodoulou (1999). "The instability of naked singularities in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field".*Ann. Math*.**149**(1): 183–217. arXiv:math/9901147. doi:10.2307/121023. JSTOR 121023. S2CID 8930550.**^**Hobson, et al.,*General Relativity an Introduction for Physicists*, Cambridge University Press 2007, p. 300-305**^**Hobson, et al.,*General Relativity an Introduction for Physicists*, Cambridge University Press 2007, p. 320-325**^**Battersby, Stephen (1 October 2007). "Is a 'naked singularity' lurking in our galaxy?".*New Scientist*. Retrieved 2008-03-06.**^**Pretorius, Frans (2016-05-31). "Viewpoint: Relativity Gets Thorough Vetting from LIGO".*Physics*.**9**. doi:10.1103/Physics.9.52.**^**M. Bojowald,*Living Rev. Rel.*8, (2005), 11 Archived 2015-12-21 at the Wayback Machine**^**Goswami, Rituparno; Joshi, Pankaj S. (2007-10-22). "Spherical gravitational collapse in N dimensions".*Physical Review D*.**76**(8): 084026. arXiv:gr-qc/0608136. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..76h4026G. doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.084026. ISSN 1550-7998. S2CID 119441682.**^**Goswami, Rituparno; Joshi, Pankaj S.; Singh, Parampreet (2006-01-27). "Quantum Evaporation of a Naked Singularity".*Physical Review Letters*.**96**(3): 031302. arXiv:gr-qc/0506129. Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96c1302G. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.031302. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 16486681. S2CID 19851285.**^**Eardley, Douglas M.; Smarr, Larry (1979-04-15). "Time functions in numerical relativity: Marginally bound dust collapse".*Physical Review D*. American Physical Society (APS).**19**(8): 2239–2259. Bibcode:1979PhRvD..19.2239E. doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.2239. ISSN 0556-2821.**^**Królak, Andrzej (1999). "Nature of Singularities in Gravitational Collapse".*Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement*.**136**: 45–56. arXiv:gr-qc/9910108. Bibcode:1999PThPS.136...45K. doi:10.1143/ptps.136.45. ISSN 0375-9687.

- Werner, M. C.; Petters, A. O. (2007-09-24). "Magnification relations for Kerr lensing and testing cosmic censorship".
*Physical Review D*.**76**(6): 064024. arXiv:0706.0132v2. Bibcode:2007PhRvD..76f4024W. doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.064024. ISSN 1550-7998. S2CID 119647924. - Pankaj S. Joshi, "Do Naked Singularities Break the Rules of Physics?",
*Scientific American*, January 2009. - Marcus Chown, "Fast-spinning black holes might reveal all"
*New Scientist*, August 2009.