Nanjemoy Formation

Summary

The Nanjemoy Formation is a geologic formation pertaining to both the Wilcox Group and the Pamunkey Group of the eastern United States, stretching across the states of Virginia, Maryland, and District of Columbia. The formation crops out east of the Appalachians and dates back to the Paleogene period. Specifically to the Ypresian stage of the Eocene epoch, about 55 to 50 Ma or Wasatchian in the NALMA classification, defined by the contemporaneous Wasatch Formation of the Pacific US coast.

Nanjemoy Formation
Stratigraphic range: Ypresian (Wasatchian)
~54.5–50.3 Ma
TypeFormation
Unit ofPamunkey Group
Sub-unitsWoodstock & Potapaco
UnderliesPiney Point & Calvert
OverliesAquia & Marlboro Clay
ThicknessAbout 20 m (66 ft)
Lithology
PrimarySandstone, claystone
OtherMarl, limestone
Location
Coordinates38°48′N 76°42′W / 38.8°N 76.7°W / 38.8; -76.7
Approximate paleocoordinates39°06′N 60°48′W / 39.1°N 60.8°W / 39.1; -60.8
Region Virginia
 Maryland
 District of Columbia
Country United States
ExtentExtent
Type section
Named forNanjemoy Creek
Etymology
Named byClark & Martin
Year defined1901
Nanjemoy Formation is located in the United States
Nanjemoy Formation
Nanjemoy Formation (the United States)
Nanjemoy Formation is located in Maryland
Nanjemoy Formation
Nanjemoy Formation (Maryland)

The about 20 metres (66 ft) thin formation crops out in a narrow irregular band and only in certain of the many creeks of the Maryland peninsula and on the southern side of the Potomac River in Virginia. The two members the formation was divided into by Clark and Martin in 1901; Potapaco and Woodstock, represent different phases in the basin history. The lower Potapaco Member is much more clayey, described as marl, than the upper Woodstock Member, probably characteristic of less storm influences in the shallow shelf sediments.

The formation has provided a wealth of fossils of mainly fish, but also mammals, reptiles, birds and flora. The presence of the sharks Otodus obliquus and Carcharocles aksuaticus, as well as various other shark and ray species are notable. Crocodylian, snake, turtle, mammal, and bird remains have all been found in the Nanjemoy Formation.[1]

Etymology edit

 
Algonquian languages; the Nanjemoy Formation crops out in the territories of the Nanticoke and Powhatan

The formation is named after Nanjemoy Creek, a left tributary of the Potomac River.[2] Nanjemoy is probably an Ojibwe word, meaning "one goes downward,"[2] representing the many rivers and creeks in the wet watershed of Chesapeake Bay, an area originally inhabited by the Algonquin-speaking Nanticoke and Powhatan.[3]

Wicomico is the name of two separate rivers, one on Maryland's Eastern Shore, Wicomico River (Maryland eastern shore), and another in Southern Maryland, Wicomico River (Potomac River tributary), and is the name of a small thoroughfare in southeastern Charles County.[2]

Wigh or wik, representing "pleasant" and accomico "dwelling, village" was the native's way of telling the Europeans they liked living there.[2]

Potapaco was an early name for Port Tobacco Creek[4] that was named after the Piscataway people.

Mattawoman, found in Charles County, Prince George's County, and on the Eastern Shore, has remnants of not only Algonquin, but Fox and Ojibwe as well, and translates to "where one goes pleasantly."[2]

Definition edit

 
Geologic map of Maryland (1901)

The Nanjemoy Formation was defined by Clark and Martin in 1901, as part of the mapping by the Maryland Geological Survey. The Nanjemoy Formation was divided into two members, the lower or Potapaco, and the upper or Woodstock. The main lithologic distinction is that the lower part of the Nanjemoy is much more clayey than the upper part. In the subsurface, the distinction between the members is less evident than in outcrops, especially in Maryland, so the formation has been left undivided.[5]

In the outcrops along the Potomac River near Popes Creek, the contact between the Woodstock and Potapaco at about 10 feet (3.0 m) above the water level.[5]

Extent edit

 
 
FS
 
Ws
Nanjemoy Formation (Virginia)
 
 
NC
Nanjemoy Formation (Maryland)
 
Notable sites of the Nanjemoy Formation in the Potomac River basin in northeastern Virginia and western Maryland
NC - Nanjemoy Creek, Ws - Woodstock, FS - Fisher/Sullivan site

The Nanjemoy Formation, represented as Tn on the geologic map of the Washington West 30' × 60' Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington D.C., restricted to the southeastern side of the Potomac Basin represented in the quadrangle.[6] Scott (2005) in his thesis included a map showing the thin bands of outcrops of both the underlying Marlboro Clay and the Nanjemoy Formation, restricted to the many creeks feeding the Chesapeake Bay.[7]

The Nanjemoy Formation (Eocene), the Marlboro Clay (Paleocene), and the Aquia Formation (Paleocene) are present in the westernmost part of the Potomac channel.[8]

The outcrop area of the formation is designated Nanjemoy Wildlife Management Area.

Geology edit

 
The Nanjemoy Formation is represented by the orange Paleo-Eocene surrounding the Potomac River
Learn more Geology of the Appalachians under that article.

Geologically, the area of deposition of the Nanjemoy Formation is part of the Atlantic coastal plain province.

Potomac Basin edit

The Potomac Basin represents the central part of the Atlantic coastal plain that stretches along the Atlantic coast of Canada and the United States. The basin stretches across parts of four states (Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia), as well as the District of Columbia. This area is also called the Potomac watershed. It includes all of the land area where water drains towards the mouth of the Potomac – the point where the river spills into the Chesapeake Bay. The Potomac River basin is the 2nd largest watershed in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.[9]

Land

The drainage area of the Potomac includes 14,670 square miles in four states: Virginia (5,723 sq. mi.), Maryland (3,818 sq. mi.), West Virginia (3,490 sq. mi.), Pennsylvania (1,570 sq. mi.), and the District of Columbia (69 sq. mi.). The basin’s total area varies depending on map projection used. The basin lies in five geological provinces: the Appalachian Plateau, the Ridge and Valley, Blue Ridge, Piedmont Plateau, and Coastal Plain. The Potomac meanders over 383 miles from Fairfax Stone, West Virginia to Point Lookout, Maryland. The river’s distance will vary with map projection and location of measuring tool in the river (ie. middle of the river, Maryland shoreline, Virginia shoreline).

Based on information from the NLCD 2011 database, the majority of the basin’s land area is covered by forests at 54.6 percent of the land area. Developed land makes up 14.1 percent of the basin’s land area, while agriculture covers 26.0 percent. Water and wetlands make up 5.9 percent of the basin’s land area.

The Potomac's major tributaries include: the Anacostia River, Antietam Creek, the Cacapon River, Catoctin Creek, Conococheague Creek, the Monocacy River, the North Branch, the South Branch, the Occoquan River, the Savage River, the Seneca Creek, and the Shenandoah River.

People

The population of the basin is approximately 6.11 million (2010 estimated census). The population has increased by about five percent since 2005. The following information is based on 2010 estimated census data.

Stratigraphy edit

 
The Potomac Basin is located entirely on the North American Plate

The Nanjemoy Formation belongs to two geologic groups; the Wilcox Group of the Gulf of Mexico Basin in the southernmost surface expression of the formation and the Pamunkey Group in the northern and central portions from Maryland in the north through Virginia and the Carolinas. Both geologic groups have been dated to the early Paleogene; the Paleocene and Eocene periods, or in the commonly used NALMA classification; Wasatchian, defined by the age-equivalent Wasatch Formation of Wyoming.

The third-oldest unit in the Pamunkey Group is the Nanjemoy Formation that overlies the Marlboro Clay and is partly overlain by the Piney Point Formation and in many areas covered by the Miocene Calvert Formation, separated by an unconformity representing about 34 Ma.

The upper surface reaches an elevation of about 50 metres (160 ft) and is overlain in most places by the Calvert Formation (Tc). The unit is present only in the southeastern part of the map area of Washington D.C., and it reaches a maximum thickness of about 20 metres (66 ft).[6]

Petrology edit

The formation comprises glauconitic quartz sand, dark-grayish-green to olive-black (tan to orange where weathered), fine to medium-grained; and dark-greenish-gray silty clay. In places, the sand is very muddy or contains many small quartz pebbles, and the clay is silty or sandy. Both lithologies contain richly fossiliferous beds including abundant mollusk shells.[6]

Robert E. Weems and Gary J. Grimsley (1999) described the geology of the Fisher/Sullivan site in Virginia as:[10]

Formation Member Bed Lithology Thickness (ft)
Nanmejoy Potomac B Sand, dominantly quartz, fine-grained, well sorted, micaceous, glauconitic, medium-brown, spa$e wood fragments present and molds and casts of shells 1
Sand, dominantly quartz, dominantly fine-grained but with abundant rounded grains of medium- to coarse-grained quartz and scattered rounded quartz granules and pebbles to 1 cm (0.39 in) in diameter, glauconitic, medium-brown, contains abundant shell casts of Venericardia potapacoensis and abundant teeth and bones 2
Unconformity
Nanmejoy Potomac A Sand, dominantly quartz, very fine- to fine-grained, bioturbated and massive, glauconitic, medium-brownish- gray, scattered wood fragments throughout and scattered molds and casts of shells, upper foot bioturbated and burrows filled with matrix from above bed, basal foot contains abundant medium- to coarse-grains and is more glauconitic than sediments above 15
Marlboro Clay Clay, silty, finely micaceous, greasy, sticky, lightgray, upper two feet intensely burrowed and burrows filled with matrix from bed above 8
Total section exposed 26

Paleogeography edit

 
Earth in the Ypresian (50 Ma)

Climate edit

 
Global temperatures in the Ypresian were at an all-time high during the Eocene Thermal Maximum 2 (ETM-2), Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum (MECO) and the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM)

The climate of the Early Eocene and Late Paleocene was very hot and rich in CO2. Based on the fossils of the terrifyingly large Titanoboa cerrejonensis, dating to the latest Paleocene, a body mass of 1,135 kilograms (40,000 oz) for the snake was estimated. This enormous size could only have been possible under the most ideal conditions for such large species, around 6 to 8 Ma after the extinction of the previous megafauna; the dinosaurs. The climate of the Neotropical biome was estimated at 34 °C (93 °F) average yearly temperatures and 2000 ppm atmospheric CO2.[11]

Depositional environment edit

The depositional environment of the Nanjemoy Formation is mostly shallow shelf. The more clayey beds suggest an area or time of quiet water, not affected by waves, tides, or current activity; intercalated sandier zones may reflect the higher energy of waves or currents during episodic storms. Its regional dip is eastward at 15–20 ft per mile (3-3.5 m/km).[5]

Paleontology edit

The floral and faunal assemblage of the Nanjemoy Formation is very varied and provides an insight into the paleobiological and paleoclimatological environment of the early Eocene. Fossils of bivalves, sharks, rays, actinopterygian fishes, reptiles, birds and mammals, and of fruits and seeds are common in the Potapaco Member. More than 2000 vertebrate coprolites from the Potapaco Member at the Fisher/Sullivan Site in Virginia were analyzed by Dentzien Dias et al. (2019). The chemical composition (phosphatic), inclusions and morphology suggest that only carnivorous scats were preserved.[12]

All Nanjemoy coprolites were produced by fishes; chondrichthyans, Carcharhiniformes, and lamniform sharks, probably the genus Carcharias. Other morphotypes were produced by actinopterygian fishes. The surface marks and the lack of flatness on most coprolites suggests early lithification of the Potapaco Member.[12]

Main fossil sites of the Nanjemoy Formation are

  • Nanjemoy Creek; Charles County, MD[13]
  • Woodstock; King George County, VA[14][15][16]
  • Fisher/Sullivan; Stafford County, VA[17][18]
  • Evergreen Plantation; Prince Charles County, VA[19]

Fisher/Sullivan site, VA edit

In October 1990, Mr. Richard Brezina of the Maryland Geological Society (MGS) discovered an important fossil site east of Fredericksburg, in eastern Stafford County, Virginia. This locality, along an unnamed tributary of Muddy Creek, became known as the Fisher/Sullivan site in recognition of its principle landowners.[20]

Brezina immediately realized that the site was exceptional, because it yielded numerous shark teeth and other vertebrate remains from the sands and gravels in the unnamed tributary. Brezina notified other members of the Maryland Geological Society, and together members of the MGS began to screen stream sediments at the site for more shark teeth and other remains. It soon became apparent, from the types of teeth that were being found and from the color and texture of the sediments in the banks of the creek, that the fossils were being reworked from glauconitic ("greensand") horizons of the Lower Tertiary (Paleocene-Eocene) Pamunkey Group.[20]

Because the Pamunkey Group previously had yielded only sparse vertebrate remains, it seemed reasonable to suspect that this locality was scientifically important.[20]

Fossil content edit

Among many invertebrates (such as gastropods, bivalves, corals, and bryozoans), the following fossils have been reported from the Nanjemoy Formation:

Group Fossils Member Site Images Refs
Mammals Peradectes guottai, Pisodus oweni, cf. Esthonyx sp., aff. Homogalax sp., Miacidae indet., Nyctitheriidae indet., ?Ischyromyidae indet. Potapaco Fisher/Sullivan, Prince Charles County, VA [18]
cf. Hyopsodus sp.
 
cf. Palaeosinopa sp.
 
Birds ?Odontopteryx sp.
 
?Graculavidae indet., Scolopaci indet., ?Steatornithidae indet., ?Caprimulgidae indet., Aegialornithidae indet., ?Phoenicopteridae indet. Ypresiglaux gulottai
Reptiles cf. Eosphargis gigas, ?Dollochelys sp., Puppigerus camperi, cf. Trionyx pennatus, Eosuchus lerichei, Thoracosaurus neocesariensis, Parophisaurus mccloskeyi, Palaeophis toliapicus, Palaeophis virginianus, Palaeophis casei
Palaeophis grandis, Palaeophis sp. Woodstock King George County, VA
 
[14]
Fish Myliobatis dixoni, Odontaspis macrota [15]
Lamna cuspidata, Galeocerdo latidens [16]
Hypotodus verticalis Nanjemoy Creek, MD [13]
Odontaspis macrota, Evergreen Plantation, VA [19]
Otodus obliquus Potapaco Evergreen Plantation
Fisher/Sullivan, VA
 
[19][18]
Isistius trituratus, Squatina prima, Squalus crenatidens, Triakis wardi, Rhinobatus bruxelliensis, Pristis luthami, Propristis schweinfurthi, Anoxypristis macrodens, Anoxypristis sp., Coupatezia woatersi, Hypolophodon sylvestris, Myliobatis latidens, Myliobatis dixoni, Myliobatis striatus, Archaeomanta melenhorsti, Burnhamia daviesi, Aetomylaeus sp., Aetobatis irregularis, Rhinoptera sherboni, Meridiania conyexa, Heterotorpedo fowleri, Jacquhermania duponti, Echinorhinus priscus, Striatolamia macrota, Anomotodon novus, Serratolamna aschersoni, Serratolamna lerichei, Cretolamna appendiculata, Odontaspis winkleri, Carcharias hopei, Carcharias teretidens, Palaeohypotodus ratoti, Physogaleus secundas, Abdounia recticona, Abdounia minutissima, Abdounia beaugei, Eugaleus ypresiensis, Pachygaleus lefevrei, Palaeogaleus vincenti, Heterodontus lerichei, Scyliorhinus gilberti, Orectolobidae indet., Ginglymostoma africanam, Ginglymostoma subafricanum, Nebrius thielensis, Nebrius serra, Palaeorhincodon wardi, Hexanchus sp., Acipenser sp., Cylindracanthus rectus, Voltaconger latispinus, cf. Bolcyrus formosissimus, Phyllodus toliapicus, Paralbula marylandica, Egertonia isodonta, Albula eppsi, Teratichthys antiquitatus, Sphyraena bognorensis, Acanthocybium proosti, Sarda delheidi, Scomberomorus sp., Scomberomorus bleekeri, Scombrinus sp., Aglyptorhynchus veneblesi, Trichiurides sagittidens, Sullivanichthys mccloskeyi, Fisherichthys folmeri, Prolates dormaalensis, Cyclopoma folmeri, cf. Sciaenurus bowerbanki, ?Arius sp., Brychaetus muelleri, Pycnodus sp., Amia sp., Lepisosteus sp., Megalopidae indet., Ostraciidae indet., ?Perciformes indet. Potapaco Fisher/Sullivan, VA [18]
Flora Canarium parksii, Iodes multireticulata, Nipa burtini, Premontria degremonti, Symplocos grimsleyi, Tinospora folmerii, Wetherellia marylandica, cf. Coturnipes cooperi, Ampelopsis sp., Nyssa sp., Vitis sp., ?Beckettia sp. [17][18]

Contemporaneous fossiliferous units edit

Wasatchian correlations in North America
Formation Wasatch DeBeque Claron Indian Meadows Pass Peak Tatman Willwood Golden Valley Coldwater Allenby Kamloops Ootsa Lake Margaret Nanjemoy Hatchetigbee Tetas de Cabra Hannold Hill Coalmont Cuchara Galisteo San Jose Ypresian (IUCS) • Itaboraian (SALMA)
Bumbanian (ALMA) • Mangaorapan (NZ)
Basin Powder River
Uinta
Piceance
Colorado Plateau
Wind River
Green River
Bighorn
Piceance




Colorado Plateau





Wind River





Green River






Bighorn
Williston Okanagan Princeton Buck Creek Nechako Sverdrup Potomac GoM Laguna Salada Rio Grande North Park Raton Galisteo San Juan
Nanjemoy Formation (North America)
Country   United States   Canada   United States   Mexico   United States
Copelemur        
Coryphodon                    
Diacodexis              
Homogalax              
Oxyaena          
Paramys                  
Primates              
Birds          
Reptiles              
Fish              
Insects            
Flora                  
Environments Alluvial-fluvio-lacustrine Fluvial Fluvial Fluvio-lacustrine Fluvial Lacustrine Fluvio-lacustrine Deltaic-paludal Shallow marine Fluvial Shallow marine Fluvial Fluvial
  Wasatchian volcanoclastics

  Wasatchian fauna

  Wasatchian flora
Volcanic Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No


Ypresian, Wasatchian and Casamayoran formations:[21]

North America
South America
Antarctica
Europe
Asia
  • Çeltek, Kirkkavak and Yoncali Formations, Turkey
  • Umm al-Rua’us Formation, Saudi Arabia
  • Alai Beds, Kyrgyzstan
  • Ghazij, Mami Khel and Shekhan Formations, Pakistan
  • Cambay Shale, Naredi and Subathu Formations, Sylhet Limestone and Upper Ranikot Group, India
  • Dabu, Qimugen Formation and Ulunguhe Formations, Xinjiang, China
  • Arshanto Formation, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Yangxi Formation, Hubei, China
  • Lingcha Formation, Hunan, China
  • Wutu Formation, Shandong, China
  • Tadushi Formation, Primorsky Krai, Russia
  • Takaradayskaya Formation, Sakhalin, Russia
  • Ommai Formation, Kamchatka, Russia
  • Akasaki Formation, Japan
Africa
  • Esna, El Rufuf Formation and Thebes Formations, Egypt
  • Al Jir and Jdeir Formations, Libya
  • Gafsa Phosphates Formation, Tunisia
  • Ait Ouarhitane Formation, Morocco
  • Tamaguélelt Formation, Mali
  • Thies Formation, Senegal
  • Auradu Formation, Somalia
  • Landana Formation, Cabinda, Angola
Oceania
  • Red Bluff Tuff Formation, Tutuiri Greensand and Tumaio and Te Whanga Limestones, New Zealand
  • Macquarie Harbor Formation, Tasmania, Australia
  • Dilwyn Formation, Victoria
  • Redbank Plains Formation, Queensland
  • Jubilee Member of Cardabia Formation, Western Australia

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Weems & Grimsley, 1999
  2. ^ a b c d e Joseph Norris, TheBayNet, 2016
  3. ^ Library of Congress - National atlas. Indian tribes, cultures & languages: United States
  4. ^ UoC, 1938, p.1713
  5. ^ a b c McCartan et al., 1995, p.17
  6. ^ a b c Geologic Map MD; VA; D.C., USGS, 2017
  7. ^ Scott, 2005, p.67
  8. ^ McCartan et al., 1995, p.7
  9. ^ Nardolilli et al., 2020
  10. ^ Weems & Grimsley, 1999, p.5
  11. ^ Head et al., 2009
  12. ^ a b Dentzien Dias et al., 2019
  13. ^ a b Nanjemoy Creek at Fossilworks.org
  14. ^ a b Woodstock at Fossilworks.org
  15. ^ a b Woodstock 2 at Fossilworks.org
  16. ^ a b Woodstock 3 at Fossilworks.org
  17. ^ a b Fisher/Sullivan 1 at Fossilworks.org
  18. ^ a b c d e Fisher/Sullivan 2 at Fossilworks.org
  19. ^ a b c Evergreen Plantation 1 at Fossilworks.org
  20. ^ a b c Weems & Grimsley, 1999, p.3
  21. ^ Fossilworks.org

Bibliography edit

Nanjemoy
  • Norris, Joseph (23 October 2016). "Do you know the Indian name places in Maryland?". TheBayNet.com. Retrieved 2020-03-06.
  • Wilmarth, M. Grace (1938). "Lexicon of geologic names of the United States - Part 2 M-Z". USGS Bulletin. 896: 1–2396. Retrieved 2020-03-08.
Potomac Basin
  • Nardolilli, Mike; Bolle, Robert; Park, Bo; Wang, Wendy; Hunter, DeeDee; Dalpra, Curtis; Bourassa, Renee (2020). "Potomac Basin Facts". Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (ICPRB): 1. Retrieved 2020-03-06. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

Geology publications edit

  • Lyttle, Peter T.; Aleinikoff, John N.; Burton, William C.; Crider Jr., E. Allen; Drake Jr., Avery A.; Froelich, Albert J.; Wright Horton Jr., J.; Kasselas, Gregorios; Mixon, Lucy McCartan, Arthur E. Nelson, Wayne L. Newell, Louis Pavlides, David S. Powars, C. Scott Southworth, and Robert E. Weems, Robert B. (2017). "Geologic Map of the Washington West 30' × 60' Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington D.C." (PDF). USGS: 1. Retrieved 2020-03-07. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Scott, Mitchell Louis (2005). Mapping and Characterization of the Marlboro Clay formation (M.Sc. thesis). University of Maryland. pp. 1–115.

Paleontology publications edit

  • Dentzien Dias, Paula; Hunt, Adrian P.; Lucas, Spencer G.; Francischini, Heitor; Gulotta Sr., Marco N. (2019). "Fish coprolites from the Nanjemoy Formation, Lower Eocene, Virginia, USA". Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs. 51: 1.
  • Head, J.J.; Bloch, J.I.; Hastings, A.K.; Bourque, J.R.; Cadena, E.A.; Herrera, F.A.; Polly, P.D.; Jaramillo, C.A. (2009). "Giant boid snake from the paleocene neotropics reveals hotter past equatorial temperatures". Nature. 457 (7230): 715–718. Bibcode:2009Natur.457..715H. doi:10.1038/nature07671. PMID 19194448. S2CID 4381423.
  • Weems, Robert E.; Grimsley, Gary J. (1999). "Early Eocene Vertebrates and Plants from the Fisher/Sullivan Site (Nanjemoy Formation) Stafford County, Virginia" (PDF). Virginia Division of Mineral Resources. pp. 1–201. Retrieved 2020-03-06.
  • Leriche, M (1942). "Contribution à l'étude des faunes ichthyologiques marines des terrains tertiaires de la plaine cotière Atlantique et du centre des États-Unis". Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France. Nouvelle Série. 45: 1–111.

Further reading edit

  • Tejedor, Marcelo F.; Goin, Francisco J.; Gelfo, Javier N.; López, Guillermo; Bond, Mariano; Carlini, Alfredo A.; Scillato Yané, Gustavo J.; Woodburne, Michael O.; Chornogubsky, Eugenio Aragón, Marcelo A. Reguero, Nicholas J. Czaplewski, Sergio Vincon, Gabriel M. Martin, Martín Ciancio, Laura (2009). "New Early Eocene Mammalian Fauna from Western Patagonia, Argentina" (PDF). American Museum Novitates (3638): 1–43. doi:10.1206/577.1. S2CID 85941397. Retrieved 2019-03-02.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Ancient publications
  • R. E. Weems. 1985. Vertebrate biozones of the Pamunkey Group (Paleocene and Eocene, Maryland and Virginia). Stratigraphy and paleontology of the outcropping Tertiary beds in the Pamunkey River region, central Virginia Coastal Plain—Guidebook for Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association 1984 field Trip: Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association 198-209
  • R. Weems and S. Horman. 1983. Teleost fish remains (Osteoglossidae, Blochiidae, Scombridae, Triodontidae, Diodontidae) from the Lower Eocene Nanjemoy Formation of Maryland. Proceedings of The Biological Society of Washington 96(1):38-49
  • K. V. Palmer and D. C. Brann. 1965. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene molluscs of the southern and eastern United States. Part 1. Pelecypoda, Amphineura, Peteropoda, Scaphopoda and Cephalopoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology 48:1-471
  • S.F. Blake. 1941. Note on a vertebra of Palaeophis from the Eocene of Maryland. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 31(12):501-503
  • W. B. Clark and G. C. Martin. 1901. Mollusca. Maryland Geological Survey, Eocene 122-203
  • C. R. Eastman. 1901. Pisces. Maryland Geological Survey Eocene 98-115
  • W. B. Clark. 1895. Contributions to the Eocene fauna of the Middle Atlantic slope. Johns Hopkins University Circulars 15(121):3-6