KNOWPIA
WELCOME TO KNOWPIA

In mathematics, **Newton's identities**, also known as the **Girard–Newton formulae**, give relations between two types of symmetric polynomials, namely between power sums and elementary symmetric polynomials. Evaluated at the roots of a monic polynomial *P* in one variable, they allow expressing the sums of the *k*-th powers of all roots of *P* (counted with their multiplicity) in terms of the coefficients of *P*, without actually finding those roots. These identities were found by Isaac Newton around 1666, apparently in ignorance of earlier work (1629) by Albert Girard. They have applications in many areas of mathematics, including Galois theory, invariant theory, group theory, combinatorics, as well as further applications outside mathematics, including general relativity.

Let *x*_{1}, ..., *x*_{n} be variables, denote for *k* ≥ 1 by *p*_{k}(*x*_{1}, ..., *x*_{n}) the *k*-th **power sum**:

and for *k* ≥ 0 denote by *e*_{k}(*x*_{1}, ..., *x*_{n}) the elementary symmetric polynomial (that is, the sum of all distinct products of *k* distinct variables), so

Then Newton's identities can be stated as

valid for all *n* ≥ *k* ≥ 1.

Also, one has

for all *k* > *n* ≥ 1.

Concretely, one gets for the first few values of *k*:

The form and validity of these equations do not depend on the number *n* of variables (although the point where the left-hand side becomes 0 does, namely after the *n*-th identity), which makes it possible to state them as identities in the ring of symmetric functions. In that ring one has

and so on; here the left-hand sides never become zero.
These equations allow to recursively express the *e*_{i} in terms of the *p*_{k}; to be able to do the inverse, one may rewrite them as

In general, we have

valid for all *n* ≥*k* ≥ 1.

Also, one has

for all *k* > *n* ≥ 1.

The polynomial with roots *x*_{i} may be expanded as

where the coefficients are the symmetric polynomials defined above.
Given the *power sums* of the roots

the coefficients of the polynomial with roots may be expressed recursively in terms of the power sums as

Formulating polynomials in this way is useful in using the method of Delves and Lyness^{[1]} to find the zeros of an analytic function.

When the polynomial above is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix *A* (in particular when *A* is the companion matrix of the polynomial), the roots are the eigenvalues of the matrix, counted with their algebraic multiplicity. For any positive integer *k*, the matrix *A*^{k} has as eigenvalues the powers *x*_{i}^{k}, and each eigenvalue of *A* contributes its multiplicity to that of the eigenvalue *x*_{i}^{k} of *A*^{k}. Then the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of *A*^{k} are given by the elementary symmetric polynomials *in those powers* *x*_{i}^{k}. In particular, the sum of the *x*_{i}^{k}, which is the *k*-th power sum p_{k} of the roots of the characteristic polynomial of *A*, is given by its trace:

The Newton identities now relate the traces of the powers *A*^{k} to the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of *A*. Using them in reverse to express the elementary symmetric polynomials in terms of the power sums, they can be used to find the characteristic polynomial by computing only the powers *A*^{k} and their traces.

This computation requires computing the traces of matrix powers *A*^{k} and solving a triangular system of equations. Both can be done in complexity class NC (solving a triangular system can be done by divide-and-conquer). Therefore, characteristic polynomial of a matrix can be computed in NC. By the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, every matrix satisfies its characteristic polynomial, and a simple transformation allows to find the adjugate matrix in NC.

Rearranging the computations into an efficient form leads to the *Faddeev–LeVerrier algorithm* (1840), a fast parallel implementation of it is due to L. Csanky (1976). Its disadvantage is that it requires division by integers, so in general the field should have characteristic 0.

For a given *n*, the elementary symmetric polynomials *e*_{k}(*x*_{1},...,*x*_{n}) for *k* = 1,..., *n* form an algebraic basis for the space of symmetric polynomials in *x*_{1},.... *x*_{n}: every polynomial expression in the *x*_{i} that is invariant under all permutations of those variables is given by a polynomial expression in those elementary symmetric polynomials, and this expression is unique up to equivalence of polynomial expressions. This is a general fact known as the fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials, and Newton's identities provide explicit formulae in the case of power sum symmetric polynomials. Applied to the monic polynomial with all coefficients *a*_{k} considered as free parameters, this means that every symmetric polynomial expression *S*(*x*_{1},...,*x*_{n}) in its roots can be expressed instead as a polynomial expression *P*(*a*_{1},...,*a*_{n}) in terms of its coefficients only, in other words without requiring knowledge of the roots. This fact also follows from general considerations in Galois theory (one views the *a*_{k} as elements of a base field with roots in an extension field whose Galois group permutes them according to the full symmetric group, and the field fixed under all elements of the Galois group is the base field).

The Newton identities also permit expressing the elementary symmetric polynomials in terms of the power sum symmetric polynomials, showing that any symmetric polynomial can also be expressed in the power sums. In fact the first *n* power sums also form an algebraic basis for the space of symmetric polynomials.

There are a number of (families of) identities that, while they should be distinguished from Newton's identities, are very closely related to them.

Denoting by *h*_{k} the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial (that is, the sum of all monomials of degree *k*), the power sum polynomials also satisfy identities similar to Newton's identities, but not involving any minus signs. Expressed as identities of in the ring of symmetric functions, they read

valid for all n ≥ *k* ≥ 1. Contrary to Newton's identities, the left-hand sides do not become zero for large *k*, and the right-hand sides contain ever more non-zero terms. For the first few values of *k*, one has

These relations can be justified by an argument analogous to the one by comparing coefficients in power series given above, based in this case on the generating function identity

Proofs of Newton's identities, like these given below, cannot be easily adapted to prove these variants of those identities.

As mentioned, Newton's identities can be used to recursively express elementary symmetric polynomials in terms of power sums. Doing so requires the introduction of integer denominators, so it can be done in the ring Λ_{Q} of symmetric functions with rational coefficients:

and so forth.^{[2]} The general formula can be conveniently expressed as

where the *B _{n}* is the complete exponential Bell polynomial. This expression also leads to the following identity for generating functions:

Applied to a monic polynomial, these formulae express the coefficients in terms of the power sums of the roots: replace each *e*_{i} by *a*_{i} and each *p*_{k} by *s*_{k}.

The analogous relations involving complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials can be similarly developed, giving equations

and so forth, in which there are only plus signs. In terms of the complete Bell polynomial,

These expressions correspond exactly to the cycle index polynomials of the symmetric groups, if one interprets the power sums *p*_{i} as indeterminates: the coefficient in the expression for *h*_{k} of any monomial *p*_{1}^{m1}*p*_{2}^{m2}...*p*_{l}^{ml} is equal to the fraction of all permutations of *k* that have *m*_{1} fixed points, *m*_{2} cycles of length 2, ..., and *m*_{l} cycles of length *l*. Explicitly, this coefficient can be written as where ; this *N* is the number permutations commuting with any given permutation π of the given cycle type. The expressions for the elementary symmetric functions have coefficients with the same absolute value, but a sign equal to the sign of π, namely (−1)^{m2+m4+...}.

It can be proved by considering the following inductive step:

By analogy with the derivation of the generating function of the , we can also obtain the generating function of the , in terms of the power sums, as:

This generating function is thus the plethystic exponential of .

One may also use Newton's identities to express power sums in terms of elementary symmetric polynomials, which does not introduce denominators:

The first four formulas were obtained by Albert Girard in 1629 (thus before Newton).^{[3]}

The general formula (for all positive integers *m*) is:

This can be conveniently stated in terms of ordinary Bell polynomials as

or equivalently as the generating function:^{[4]}

which is analogous to the Bell polynomial *exponential* generating function given in the previous subsection.

The multiple summation formula above can be proved by considering the following inductive step:

Finally one may use the variant identities involving complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials similarly to express power sums in term of them:

and so on. Apart from the replacement of each *e*_{i} by the corresponding *h*_{i}, the only change with respect to the previous family of identities is in the signs of the terms, which in this case depend just on the number of factors present: the sign of the monomial is −(−1)^{m1+m2+m3+...}. In particular the above description of the absolute value of the coefficients applies here as well.

The general formula (for all non-negative integers *m*) is:

One can obtain explicit formulas for the above expressions in the form of determinants, by considering the first *n* of Newton's identities (or it counterparts for the complete homogeneous polynomials) as linear equations in which the elementary symmetric functions are known and the power sums are unknowns (or vice versa), and apply Cramer's rule to find the solution for the final unknown. For instance taking Newton's identities in the form

we consider and as unknowns, and solve for the final one, giving

Solving for instead of for is similar, as the analogous computations for the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials; in each case the details are slightly messier than the final results, which are (Macdonald 1979, p. 20):

Note that the use of determinants makes that the formula for has additional minus signs compared to the one for , while the situation for the expanded form given earlier is opposite. As remarked in (Littlewood 1950, p. 84) one can alternatively obtain the formula for by taking the permanent of the matrix for instead of the determinant, and more generally an expression for any Schur polynomial can be obtained by taking the corresponding immanant of this matrix.

Each of Newton's identities can easily be checked by elementary algebra; however, their validity in general needs a proof. Here are some possible derivations.

One can obtain the *k*-th Newton identity in *k* variables by substitution into

as follows. Substituting *x*_{j} for *t* gives

Summing over all *j* gives

where the terms for *i* = 0 were taken out of the sum because *p*_{0} is (usually) not defined. This equation immediately gives the *k*-th Newton identity in *k* variables. Since this is an identity of symmetric polynomials (homogeneous) of degree *k*, its validity for any number of variables follows from its validity for *k* variables. Concretely, the identities in *n* < *k* variables can be deduced by setting *k* − *n* variables to zero. The *k*-th Newton identity in *n* > *k* variables contains more terms on both sides of the equation than the one in *k* variables, but its validity will be assured if the coefficients of any monomial match. Because no individual monomial involves more than *k* of the variables, the monomial will survive the substitution of zero for some set of *n* − *k* (other) variables, after which the equality of coefficients is one that arises in the *k*-th Newton identity in *k* (suitably chosen) variables.

Another derivation can be obtained by computations in the ring of formal power series *R*[[*t*]], where *R* is **Z**[*x*_{1},..., *x*_{n}], the ring of polynomials in *n* variables *x*_{1},..., *x*_{n} over the integers.

Starting again from the basic relation

and "reversing the polynomials" by substituting 1/*t* for *t* and then multiplying both sides by *t*^{n} to remove negative powers of *t*, gives

(the above computation should be performed in the field of fractions of *R*[[*t*]]; alternatively, the identity can be obtained simply by evaluating the product on the left side)

Swapping sides and expressing the *a*_{i} as the elementary symmetric polynomials they stand for gives the identity

One formally differentiates both sides with respect to *t*, and then (for convenience) multiplies by *t*, to obtain

where the polynomial on the right hand side was first rewritten as a rational function in order to be able to factor out a product out of the summation, then the fraction in the summand was developed as a series in *t*, using the formula

and finally the coefficient of each *t* ^{j} was collected, giving a power sum. (The series in *t* is a formal power series, but may alternatively be thought of as a series expansion for *t* sufficiently close to 0, for those more comfortable with that; in fact one is not interested in the function here, but only in the coefficients of the series.) Comparing coefficients of *t*^{k} on both sides one obtains

which gives the *k*-th Newton identity.

The following derivation, given essentially in (Mead, 1992), is formulated in the ring of symmetric functions for clarity (all identities are independent of the number of variables). Fix some *k* > 0, and define the symmetric function *r*(*i*) for 2 ≤ *i* ≤ *k* as the sum of all distinct monomials of degree *k* obtained by multiplying one variable raised to the power *i* with *k* − *i* distinct other variables (this is the monomial symmetric function *m*_{γ} where γ is a hook shape (*i*,1,1,...,1)). In particular *r*(*k*) = *p*_{k}; for *r*(1) the description would amount to that of *e*_{k}, but this case was excluded since here monomials no longer have any distinguished variable. All products *p*_{i}*e*_{k−i} can be expressed in terms of the *r*(*j*) with the first and last case being somewhat special. One has

since each product of terms on the left involving distinct variables contributes to *r*(*i*), while those where the variable from *p*_{i} already occurs among the variables of the term from *e*_{k−i} contributes to *r*(*i* + 1), and all terms on the right are so obtained exactly once. For *i* = *k* one multiplies by *e*_{0} = 1, giving trivially

Finally the product *p*_{1}*e*_{k−1} for *i* = 1 gives contributions to *r*(*i* + 1) = *r*(2) like for other values *i* < *k*, but the remaining contributions produce *k* times each monomial of *e*_{k}, since any one of the variables may come from the factor *p*_{1}; thus

The *k*-th Newton identity is now obtained by taking the alternating sum of these equations, in which all terms of the form *r*(*i*) cancel out.

A short combinatorial proof of Newton's Identities is given in (Zeilberger, 1984)^{[5]}

- Power sum symmetric polynomial
- Elementary symmetric polynomial
- Newton's inequalities
- Symmetric function
- Fluid solutions, an article giving an application of Newton's identities to computing the characteristic polynomial of the Einstein tensor in the case of a perfect fluid, and similar articles on other types of exact solutions in general relativity.

**^**Delves, L. M. (1967). "A Numerical Method of Locating the Zeros of an Analytic Function".*Mathematics of Computation*.**21**(100): 543–560. doi:10.2307/2004999. JSTOR 2004999.**^**N.b., the coefficients of the weighted product terms in the sum given by the identity above are related to the*M2*numbers in Section 26.4 of the DLMF and/or the coefficients involved in the expansions of Faa di Bruno's formula**^**Tignol, Jean-Pierre (2004).*Galois' theory of algebraic equations*(Reprinted ed.). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific. pp. 37–38. ISBN 981-02-4541-6.**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Symmetric Polynomial".*MathWorld*.**^**Zeilberger, Doron (1984). "A Combinatorial Proof of Newton's Identities".*Discrete Mathematics*.**49**(3): 319. doi:10.1016/0012-365X(84)90171-7.

- Tignol, Jean-Pierre (2001).
*Galois' theory of algebraic equations*. Singapore: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-4541-2. - Bergeron, F.; Labelle, G. & Leroux, P. (1998).
*Combinatorial species and tree-like structures*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-57323-8. - Cameron, Peter J. (1999).
*Permutation Groups*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-65378-7. - Cox, David; Little, John & O'Shea, Donal (1992).
*Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms*. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-97847-5. - Eppstein, D.; Goodrich, M. T. (2007). "Space-efficient straggler identification in round-trip data streams via Newton's identities and invertible Bloom filters".
*Algorithms and Data Structures, 10th International Workshop, WADS 2007*. Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4619. pp. 637–648. arXiv:0704.3313. Bibcode:2007arXiv0704.3313E. - Littlewood, D. E. (1950).
*The theory of group characters and matrix representations of groups*. Oxford: Oxford University Press. viii+310. ISBN 0-8218-4067-3. - Macdonald, I. G. (1979).
*Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials*. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. viii+180. ISBN 0-19-853530-9. MR 0553598. - Macdonald, I. G. (1995).
*Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials*. Oxford Mathematical Monographs (Second ed.). New York: Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. p. x+475. ISBN 0-19-853489-2. MR 1354144. - Mead, D.G. (1992). "Newton's Identities".
*The American Mathematical Monthly*. Mathematical Association of America.**99**(8): 749–751. doi:10.2307/2324242. JSTOR 2324242. - Stanley, Richard P. (1999).
*Enumerative Combinatorics, Vol. 2*. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-56069-1. (hardback). (paperback). - Sturmfels, Bernd (1992).
*Algorithms in Invariant Theory*. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-82445-1. - Tucker, Alan (1980).
*Applied Combinatorics*(5/e ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-73507-6.

- Newton–Girard formulas on MathWorld
- A Matrix Proof of Newton's Identities in Mathematics Magazine
- Application on the number of real roots
- A Combinatorial Proof of Newton's Identities by Doron Zeilberger