Solar cell efficiencies of laboratory-scale devices using these materials have increased from 3.8% in 2009 to 25.5% in 2020 in single-junction architectures, and, in silicon-based tandem cells, to 29.15%, exceeding the maximum efficiency achieved in single-junction silicon solar cells. Perovskite solar cells have therefore been the fastest-advancing solar technology as of 2016[update]. With the potential of achieving even higher efficiencies and very low production costs, perovskite solar cells have become commercially attractive. Core problems and research subjects include their short- and long-term stability.
Metal halide perovskites possess unique features that make them useful for solar cell applications. The raw materials used, and the possible fabrication methods (such as various printing techniques) are both low cost. Their high absorption coefficient enables ultrathin films of around 500 nm to absorb the complete visible solar spectrum. These features combined result in the possibility to create low cost, high efficiency, thin, lightweight and flexible solar modules. Perovskite solar cells have found use in powering low-power wireless electronics for the ambient powered internet of things applications, and may help mitigate climate change.
Crystal structure of CH3NH3PbX3 perovskites (X=I, Br and/or Cl). The methylammonium cation (CH3NH3+) is surrounded by PbX6 octahedra.
The name 'perovskite solar cell' is derived from the ABX3crystal structure of the absorber materials, which is referred to as perovskite structure and where A and B are cations and X is an anion. A cations with radii between 1.60 Å and 2.50 Å were found to form perovskite structures. The most commonly studied perovskite absorber is methylammonium lead trihalide (CH3NH3PbX3, where X is a halogen ion such as iodide, bromide or chloride), with an optical bandgap between ~1.55 and 2.3 eV depending on halide content. Formamidinium lead trihalide (H2NCHNH2PbX3) has also shown promise, with bandgaps between 1.48 and 2.2 eV. The minimum bandgap is closer to the optimal for a single-junction cell than methylammonium lead trihalide, so it should be capable of higher efficiencies. The first use of perovskite in a solid state solar cell was in a dye-sensitized cell using CsSnI3 as a p-type hole transport layer and absorber.
A common concern is the inclusion of lead as a component of the perovskite materials; solar cells based on tin-based perovskite absorbers such as CH3NH3SnI3 have also been reported with lower power-conversion efficiencies.
Solar cell efficiency is limited by the Shockley-Queisser limit. This calculated limit sets the maximum theoretical efficiency of a solar cell using a single junction with no other loss aside from radiative recombination in the solar cell. Based on the AM1.5G global solar spectra, the maximum power conversion efficiency is correlated to a respective bandgap, forming a parabolic relationship.
This limit is described by the equation
and u is the ultimate efficiency factor, and v is the ratio of open circuit voltage Vop to band-gap voltage Vg, and m is the impedance matching factor, and Vc is the thermal voltage, and Vs is the voltage equivalent of the temperature of the Sun.
The most efficient bandgap is found to be at 1.34 eV, with a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 33.7%. Reaching this ideal bandgap energy can be difficult, but utilizing tunable perovskite solar cells allows for the flexibility to match this value. Further experimenting with multijunction solar cells allow for the Shockley-Queisser limit to be surpassed, expanding to allow photons of a broader wavelength range to be absorbed and converted, without increasing thermalisation loss.
The actual band gap for formamidinium (FA) lead trihalide can be tuned as low as 1.48 eV, which is closer to the ideal bandgap energy of 1.34 eV for maximum power-conversion efficiency single junction solar cells, predicted by the Shockley Queisser Limit. More recently, the 1.3 eV bandgap energy has been successfully achieved with the (FAPbI 3) 1−x(CsSnI 3) x hybrid cell, which has a tunable bandgap energy (Eg) from 1.24 – 1.41 eV
Perovskite semiconductors offer an option that has the potential to rival the efficiency of multijunction solar cells, but can be synthesized under more common conditions at a greatly reduced cost. Rivaling the double, triple, and quadruple junction solar cells mentioned above, are all-perovskite tandem cells with a max PCE of 31.9%, all-perovskite triple-junction cell reaching 33.1%, and the perovskite-Si triple-junction cell, reaching an efficiency of 35.3%. These multijunction perovskite solar cells, in addition to being available for cost-effective synthesis, also maintain high PCE under varying weather extremes – making them utilizable worldwide.
Utilizing organic chiral ligands shows promise for increasing the maximum power conversion efficiency for halide perovskite solar cells, when utilized correctly. Chirality can be produced in inorganic semiconductors by enantiomeric distortions near the surface of the lattice, electronic coupling between the substrate and a chiral ligand, assembly into a chiral secondary structure, or chiral surface defects. By attaching a chiral phenylethylamine ligand to an achiral lead bromide perovskite nanoplatelet, a chiral inorganic-organic perovskite is formed. Inspection of the inorganic-organic perovskite via Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, reveals two regions. One represents the charge transfer between the ligand and the nanoplatelet (300-350 nm), and the other represents the excitonic absorption maximum of the perovskite. Evidence of charge transfer in these systems shows promise for increasing power conversion efficiency in perovskite solar cells.
Improvement in the power conversion efficiency of Inorganic Perovskites over the past decade of development, basic structure
The highest performing perovskites solar cells utilize Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Perovskites (OIHPs), which have a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of ~25%. These cells, however, come with significant drawbacks due to their long term chemical instability. The organic components - such as methylammonium or formamidinium - are inherently volatile and prone to destructive reaction with water, air, heat, or even simple illumination. OIHPs thus require encapsulation, an expensive and energy intensive process to prevent their interaction with air and water. Fully inorganic perovskites are designed to avoid this volatility, using only chemically stable inorganic compounds. The first fully inorganic perovskites, developed in 2012, were tin-based CsSnI3 cells with a PCE of just 0.88%. Significant development has occurred throughout the past decade, and modern inorganic perovskites have PCE over 17%. These modern, high performing fully inorganic perovskite cells are created using CsPbI3, which has a band gap similar to that of high performing OIHPs (~1.7 eV), as well as excellent optoelectrical properties. Although chemically stable, these perovskite materials face significant issues with phase stability that prevent its broad industrial application. In high efficiency CsPbI3, for example, the photoactive black α-phase is prone to transforming into the inactive yellow δ-phase seriously inhibiting the performance, especially when exposed to moisture.  The challenge of stabilizing the photoactive black α-phase of inorganic perovskite materials has been tackled in a variety of strategies, including octahedral anchoring and secondary crystal growth.
Other research and developments
In another recent development, solar cells based on transition metal oxide perovskites and heterostructures thereof such as LaVO3/SrTiO3 are studied.
Rice University scientists have discovered a novel phenomenon of light-induced lattice expansion in perovskite materials.
Research is being conducted to develop a new 3rd generation perovskite quantum dot solar cell technology, which could solve the long-term reliability issues that have been the roadblock to the success of other perovskite solar cells despite their high conversion efficiencies. 
In order to overcome the instability issues with lead-based organic perovskite materials in ambient air and reduce the use of lead, perovskite derivatives, such as Cs2SnI6 double perovskite, have also been investigated.
Perovskite solar cells hold an advantage over traditional silicon solar cells in the simplicity of their processing and their tolerance to internal defects. Traditional silicon cells require expensive, multi-step processes, conducted at high temperatures (>1000 °C) under high vacuum in special cleanroom facilities. Meanwhile, the hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite material can be manufactured with simpler wet chemistry techniques in a traditional lab environment. Most notably, methylammonium and formamidinium lead trihalides, also known as hybrid perovskites, have been created using a variety of solution deposition techniques, such as spin coating, slot-die coating, blade coating, spray coating, inkjet printing, screen printing, electrodeposition, and vapor deposition techniques, all of which have the potential to be scaled up with relative ease except spin coating.
The solution-based processing method can be classified into one-step solution deposition and two-step solution deposition. In one-step deposition, a perovskite precursor solution that is prepared by mixing lead halide and organic halide together, is directly deposited through various coating methods, such as spin coating, spraying, blade coating, and slot-die coating, to form perovskite film. One-step deposition is simple, fast, and inexpensive but it’s also more challenging to control the perovskite film uniformity and quality. In the two-step deposition, the lead halide film is first deposited then reacts with organic halide to form perovskite film. The reaction takes time to complete but it can be facilitated by adding Lewis-bases or partial organic halide into lead halide precursors. In two-step deposition method, the volume expansion during the conversion of lead halide to perovskite can fill any pinholes to realize a better film quality. The vapor phase deposition processes can be categorized into physical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). PVD refers to the evaporation of a perovskite or its precursor to form a thin perovskite film on the substrate, which is free of solvent. While CVD involves the reaction of organic halide vapor with the lead halide thin film to convert it into the perovskite film. A solution-based CVD, aerosol-assisted CVD (AACVD) was also introduced to fabricate halide perovskite films, such as CH3NH3PbI3, CH3NH3PbBr3, and Cs2SnI6.
One-step solution deposition vs two-step solution deposition
One-step solution deposition
In one-step solution processing, a lead halide and a methylammonium halide can be dissolved in a solvent and spin coated onto a substrate. Subsequent evaporation and convective self-assembly during spinning results in dense layers of well crystallized perovskite material, due to the strong ionic interactions within the material (The organic component also contributes to a lower crystallization temperature). However, simple spin-coating does not yield homogenous layers, instead requiring the addition of other chemicals such as GBL, DMSO, and toluene drips. Simple solution processing results in the presence of voids, platelets, and other defects in the layer, which would hinder the efficiency of a solar cell.
Another technique using room temperature solvent-solvent extraction produces high-quality crystalline films with precise control over thickness down to 20 nanometers across areas several centimeters square without generating pinholes. In this method "perovskite precursors are dissolved in a solvent called NMP and coated onto a substrate. Then, instead of heating, the substrate is bathed in diethyl ether, a second solvent that selectively grabs the NMP solvent and whisks it away. What's left is an ultra-smooth film of perovskite crystals."
In another solution processed method, the mixture of lead iodide and methylammonium halide dissolved in DMF is preheated. Then the mixture is spin coated on a substrate maintained at higher temperature. This method produces uniform films of up to 1 mm grain size.
Pb halide perovskites can be fabricated from a PbI2 precursor, or non-PbI2 precursors, such as PbCl2, Pb(Ac)2, and Pb(SCN)2, giving films different properties.
Two-step solution deposition
In 2015, a new approach for forming the PbI2 nanostructure and the use of high CH3NH3I concentration have been adopted to form high quality (large crystal size and smooth) perovskite film with better photovoltaic performances. On one hand, self-assembled porous PbI2 is formed by incorporating small amounts of rationally chosen additives into the PbI2 precursor solutions, which significantly facilitate the conversion of perovskite without any PbI2 residue. On the other hand, through employing a relatively high CH3NH3I concentration, a firmly crystallized and uniform CH3NH3PbI3 film is formed. Furthermore, this is an inexpensive approach.
In vapor assisted techniques, spin coated or exfoliated lead halide is annealed in the presence of methylammonium iodide vapor at a temperature of around 150 °C. This technique holds an advantage over solution processing, as it opens up the possibility for multi-stacked thin films over larger areas. This could be applicable for the production of multi-junction cells. Additionally, vapor deposited techniques result in less thickness variation than simple solution processed layers. However, both techniques can result in planar thin film layers or for use in mesoscopic designs, such as coatings on a metal oxide scaffold. Such a design is common for current perovskite or dye-sensitized solar cells.
Scalability includes not only scaling up the perovskite absorber layer, but also scaling up charge-transport layers and electrode. Both solution and vapor processes hold promise in terms of scalability. Process cost and complexity is significantly less than that of silicon solar cells. Vapor deposition or vapor assisted techniques reduce the need for use of further solvents, which reduces the risk of solvent remnants. Solution processing is cheaper. Current issues with perovskite solar cells revolve around stability, as the material is observed to degrade in standard environmental conditions, suffering drops in efficiency (See alsoStability).
In order to scale up the perovskite layer while maintaining high efficiency, various techniques have been developed to coat the perovskite film more uniformly. For example, some physical approaches are developed to promote supersaturation through rapid solvent removal, thus getting more nucleations and reducing grain growth time and solute migration. Heating, gas flow, vacuum, and anti-solvent can all assist solvent removal. And chemical additives, such as chloride additives, Lewis base additives, surfactant additive, and surface modification, can influence the crystal growth to control the film morphology. For example, a recent report of surfactant additive, such as L-α-phosphatidylcholine (LP), demonstrated the suppression of solution flow by surfactants to eliminate gaps between islands and meanwhile the surface wetting improvement of perovskite ink on the hydrophobic substrate to ensure a full coverage. Besides, LP can also passivate charge traps to further enhance the device performance, which can be used in blade coating to get a high-throughput of PSCs with minimal efficiency loss.
Scaling up the charge-transport layer
Scaling up the charge-transport layer is also necessary for the scalability of PSCs. Common electron transport layer (ETL) in n-i-p PSCs are TiO2, SnO2 and ZnO. Currently, to make TiO2 layer deposition be compatible with flexible polymer substrate, low-temperature techniques, such as atomic layer deposition,molecular layer deposition, hydrothermal reaction, and electrodeposition, are developed to deposit compact TiO2 layer in large area. Same methods also apply to SnO2 deposition.
As for hole transport layer (HTL), instead of commonly used PEDOT:PSS, NiOx is used as an alternative due to the water absorption of PEDOT, which can be deposited through room-temperature solution processing. CuSCN and NiO are alternative HTL materials which can be deposited by spray coating, blade coating, and electrodeposition, which are potentially scalable. Researchers also report a molecular doping method for scalable blading to make HTL-free PSCs.
Scaling up the back electrode
Evaporation deposition of back electrode is mature and scalable but it requires vacuum. Vacuum-free deposition of back electrode is important for full solution processibility of PSCs. Silver electrodes can be screen-printed, and silver nanowire network can be spray-coated as back electrode. Carbon is also a potential candidate as scalable PSCs electrode, such as graphite, carbon nanotubes, and graphene.
Toxicity issues associated with the Pb content in perovskite solar cells strains the public perception and acceptance of the technology. The health and environmental impact of toxic heavy metals has been much debated in the case of CdTe solar cells, whose efficiency became industrially relevant in the 1990s. Although, CdTe is a thermally and chemically very stable compound with a low solubility product, Ksp, of 10−34 and, accordingly, its toxicity was revealed to be extremely low, rigorous industrial hygiene programmes and recycling commitment programmes have been implemented. In contrast to CdTe, hybrid perovskites are very unstable and easily degrade to rather soluble compounds of Pb or Sn with KSP=4.4×10−9, which significantly increases their potential bioavailability and hazard for human health, as confirmed by recent toxicological studies. Although the 50 % lethal dose of lead [LD50(Pb)] is less than 5 mg per kg of body weight, health issues arise at much lower exposure levels. Young children absorb 4–5 times as much lead as adults and are most susceptible to the adverse effects of lead. In 2003, a maximum blood Pb level (BLL) of 5 μg/dL was imposed by the World Health Organization, which corresponds to the amount of Pb contained in only 5x5 mm2 of the perovskite solar module. Furthermore, the BLL of 5 μg/dL was revoked in 2010 after the discovery of decreased intelligence and behavioral difficulties in children exposed to even lower values.
Efforts in Reducing Lead Toxicity
Replacing Lead in Perovskites
Various studies have been performed to analyze promising alternatives to lead perovskite for use in PSCs. Good candidates for replacement, which ideally have low toxicity, narrow direct bandgaps, high optical absorption coefficients, high carrier mobility, and good charge transport properties, include Tin/Germanium-halide perovskites, double perovskites, and Bismuth/Antimony-halides with perovskite-like structures.
Research done on Tin halide-based PSCs show that they have a lower power conversion efficiency (PCE), with those fabricated experimentally achieving a PCE of 9.6%. This relatively low PCE is in part due to the oxidation of Sn2+ to Sn4+, which will act as a p-type dopant in the structure and result in higher dark carrier concentration and increased carrier recombination rates. Gemanium halide perovskites have proven similarly unsuccessful due to low efficiencies and issues with oxidising tendencies, with one experimental solar cells displaying a PCE of only 0.11%. Higher PCEs have been reported from some Germanium Tin alloy-based Perovskites, however, with an all-inorganic CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 film having a reported PCE of 7.11%. In addition to this higher efficiency, the Germanium Tin alloy Perovskites have also been found to have high photostability.
Apart from the Tin and Germanium based perovskites, there has also been research on the viability of double-perovskites with the formula of A2M+M3+X6. While these double-perovskites have a favorable bandgap of approximately 2 eV and exhibit good stability, several issues including high electron/hole effective masses and the presence of indirect bandgaps result in lowered carrier mobility and charge transport. Research exploring the viability of Bismuth/Antimony halides in replacing lead perovskites has also been done, particularly with Cs3Sb2I9 and Cs3Bi2I9, which also have bandgaps of approximately 2 eV. Experimental results have also shown that, while Antimony and Bismuth halide-based PSCs have good stability, their low carrier mobilities and poor charge transport properties restrict their viability in replacing lead-based perovskites.
Encapsulation to Reduce Lead Leakage
Recent research into the usage of encapsulation as a method for reducing lead leakage has been conducted, particularly focusing on the utilization of self-healing polymers. Research has been done on two promising polymers, Surlyn and a thermal crosslinking epoxy-resin, diglycidyl ether bisphenol A:n-octylamine:m-xylylenediamine = 4:2:1. Experiments showed a substantial reduction in lead leakage from PSCs using these self-healing polymers under simulated sunny weather conditions and after simulated hail damage had cracked the outer glass encapsulation. Notably, the epoxy-resin encapsulation was able to reduce lead leakage by a factor of 375 times when heated by simulated sunlight.
Coatings to Adsorb Lead Leakage
Chemically lead-binding coatings have also been employed experimentally to reduce lead leakage from PSCs. In particular, Cation Exchange Resins (CERs) and P,P′-di(2-ethylhexyl)methanediphosphonic acid (DMDP) have been employed experimentally in this effort. Both coatings work similarly, chemically sequestering lead that might leak from a PSC module after weather damage occurs. Research into CERs has shown that, through diffusion-controlled processes, Pb2+ lead is effectively adsorbed and bonded onto the surface of CERs, even in the presence of competing divalent ions such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ that might also occupy binding sites on the CER surface.
To test the efficacy of CER-based coatings in adsorbing lead in practical conditions, researchers dripped slightly acidic water, meant to simulate rainwater, onto a PSC module cracked by simulated hail damage. Researchers found that by applying a CER coating onto the copper electrodes of damaged PSC modules, lead leakage was reduced by 84%. When the CER was integrated into a carbon-based electrode paste applied to PSC and on the top of the encapsulating glass, the lead leakage decreased by 98%. A similar test was also performed on a PSC module with DMDP coated on both the top and bottom of the module to study the efficacy of DMDP in reducing lead leakage. In this test, the module was cracked by simulated hail damage, and placed in a solution of acidic water containing aqueous Ca2+ ions, meant to simulate acidic rain with low levels of aqueous Calcium present. The lead concentration of acidic water was tracked, and researchers found that the lead sequestration efficiency of the DMDP coating at room temperature 96.1%.
An important characteristic of the most commonly used perovskite system, the methylammonium lead halides, is a bandgap controllable by the halide content.
The materials also display a diffusion length for both holes and electrons of over one micron.
The long diffusion length means that these materials can function effectively in a thin-film architecture, and that charges can be transported in the perovskite itself over long distances.
It has recently been reported that charges in the perovskite material are predominantly present as free electrons and holes, rather than as bound excitons, since the exciton binding energy is low enough to enable charge separation at room temperature.
Perovskite solar cell bandgaps are tunable and can be optimised for the solar spectrum by altering the halide content in the film (i.e., by mixing I and Br). The Shockley–Queisser limit radiative efficiency limit, also known as the detailed balance limit, is about 31% under an AM1.5G solar spectrum at 1000 W/m2, for a Perovskite bandgap of 1.55 eV. This is slightly smaller than the radiative limit of gallium arsenide of bandgap 1.42 eV which can reach a radiative efficiency of 33%.
Values of the detailed balance limit are available in tabulated form and a MATLAB program for implementing the detailed balance model has been written.
In the meantime, the drift-diffusion model has found to successfully predict the efficiency limit of perovskite solar cells, which enable us to understand the device physics in-depth, especially the radiative recombination limit and selective contact on device performance. There are two prerequisites for predicting and approaching the perovskite efficiency limit. First, the intrinsic radiative recombination needs to be corrected after adopting optical designs which will significantly affect the open-circuit voltage at its Shockley–Queisser limit. Second, the contact characteristics of the electrodes need to be carefully engineered to eliminate the charge accumulation and surface recombination at the electrodes. With the two procedures, the accurate prediction of efficiency limit and precise evaluation of efficiency degradation for perovskite solar cells are attainable by the drift-diffusion model.
Along with analytical calculations, there have been many first principle studies to find the characteristics of the perovskite material numerically. These include but are not limited to bandgap, effective mass, and defect levels for different perovskite materials. Also there have some efforts to cast light on the device mechanism based on simulations where Agrawal et al. suggests a modeling framework, presents analysis of near ideal efficiency, and  talks about the importance of interface of perovskite and hole/electron transport layers. However, Sun et al. tries to come up with a compact model for perovskite different structures based on experimental transport data.
Schematic of a sensitized perovskite solar cell in which the active layer consist of a layer of mesoporousTiO2 which is coated with the perovskite absorber. The active layer is contacted with an n-type material for electron extraction and a p-type material for hole extraction. b) Schematic of a thin-film perovskite solar cell. In this architecture in which just a flat layer of perovskite is sandwiched between two selective contacts. c) Charge generation and extraction in the sensitized architecture. After light absorption in the perovskite absorber the photogenerated electron is injected into the mesoporous TiO2 through which it is extracted. The concomitantly generated hole is transferred to the p-type material. d) Charge generation and extraction in the thin-film architecture. After light absorption both charge generation as well as charge extraction occurs in the perovskite layer.
Perovskite solar cells function efficiently in a number of somewhat different architectures depending either on the role of the perovskite material in the device, or the nature of the top and bottom electrode. Devices in which positive charges are extracted by the transparent bottom electrode (cathode), can predominantly be divided into 'sensitized', where the perovskite functions mainly as a light absorber, and charge transport occurs in other materials, or 'thin-film', where most electron or hole transport occurs in the bulk of the perovskite itself. Similar to the sensitization in dye-sensitized solar cells, the perovskite material is coated onto a charge-conducting mesoporous scaffold – most commonly TiO2 – as light-absorber. The photogenerated electrons are transferred from the perovskite layer to the mesoporous sensitized layer through which they are transported to the electrode and extracted into the circuit. The thin film solar cell architecture is based on the finding that perovskite materials can also act as highly efficient, ambipolar charge-conductor.
After light absorption and the subsequent charge-generation, both negative and positive charge carrier are transported through the perovskite to charge selective contacts. Perovskite solar cells emerged from the field of dye-sensitized solar cells, so the sensitized architecture was that initially used, but over time it has become apparent that they function well, if not ultimately better, in a thin-film architecture. More recently, some researchers also successfully demonstrated the possibility of fabricating flexible devices with perovskites, which makes it more promising for flexible energy demand. Certainly, the aspect of UV-induced degradation in the sensitized architecture may be detrimental for the important aspect of long-term stability.
There is another different class of architectures, in which the transparent electrode at the bottom acts as cathode by collecting the photogenerated p-type charge carriers.
Perovskite materials have been well known for many years, but the first incorporation into a solar cell was reported by Tsutomu Miyasaka et al. in 2009.
This was based on a dye-sensitized solar cell architecture, and generated only 3.8% power conversion efficiency (PCE) with a thin layer of perovskite on mesoporous TiO2 as electron-collector. Moreover, because a liquid corrosive electrolyte was used, the cell was only stable for a few minutes. Nam-Gyu Park et al. improved upon this in 2011, using the same dye-sensitized concept, achieving 6.5% PCE.
A breakthrough came in 2012, when Mike Lee and Henry Snaith from the University of Oxford realised that the perovskite was stable if contacted with a solid-state hole transporter such as spiro-OMeTAD and did not require the mesoporous TiO2 layer in order to transport electrons.
They showed that efficiencies of almost 10% were achievable using the 'sensitized' TiO2 architecture with the solid-state hole transporter, but higher efficiencies, above 10%, were attained by replacing it with an inert scaffold.
Further experiments in replacing the mesoporous TiO2 with Al2O3 resulted in increased open-circuit voltage and a relative improvement in efficiency of 3–5% more than those with TiO2 scaffolds.
This led to the hypothesis that a scaffold is not needed for electron extraction, which was later proved correct. This realisation was then closely followed by a demonstration that the perovskite itself could also transport holes, as well as electrons.
A thin-film perovskite solar cell, with no mesoporous scaffold, of > 10% efficiency was achieved.
In 2013 both the planar and sensitized architectures saw a number of developments.
Burschka et al. demonstrated a deposition technique for the sensitized architecture exceeding 15% efficiency by a two-step solution processing, At a similar time Olga Malinkiewicz et al, and Liu et al. showed that it was possible to fabricate planar solar cells by thermal co-evaporation, achieving more than 12% and 15% efficiency in a p-i-n and an n-i-p architecture respectively.
Docampo et al. also showed that it was possible to fabricate perovskite solar cells in the typical 'organic solar cell' architecture, an 'inverted' configuration with the hole transporter below and the electron collector above the perovskite planar film.
A range of new deposition techniques and even higher efficiencies were reported in 2014. A reverse-scan efficiency of 19.3% was claimed by Yang Yang at UCLA using the planar thin-film architecture. In November 2014, a device by researchers from KRICT achieved a record with the certification of a non-stabilized efficiency of 20.1%.
In December 2015, a new record efficiency of 21.0% was achieved by researchers at EPFL.
As of March 2016, researchers from KRICT and UNIST hold the highest certified record for a single-junction perovskite solar cell with 22.1%.
June 2018 Oxford Photovoltaics 1 cm² perovskite-silicon tandem solar cell has achieved a 27.3% conversion efficiency, certified by the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE. This exceeds the 26.7% efficiency world record for a single-junction silicon solar cell.
In September 2019, a new efficiency record of 20.3% with a module of 11.2cm². This module was developed by the Apolo project consortium at CEA laboratories. The module is composed of 8 cells in series combining coating deposition techniques and laser patterning. The project has the objective to reach module cost below 0.40€/Wp (Watt peak).
One big challenge for perovskite solar cells (PSCs) is the aspect of short-term and long-term stability. The traditional silicon-wafer solar cell in a power plant can last 20-25 years, setting that timeframe as the standard for solar cell stability. PSCs have great difficulty lasting that long . The instability of PSCs is mainly related to environmental influence (moisture and oxygen), thermal stress and intrinsic stability of methylammonium-based perovskite, and formamidinium-based perovskite, heating under applied voltage, photo influence (ultraviolet light) (visible light) and mechanical fragility. Several studies about PSCs stability have been performed and some elements have been proven to be important to the PSCs stability. However, there is no standard "operational" stability protocol for PSCs. But a method to quantify the intrinsic chemical stability of hybrid halide perovskites has been recently proposed.
The water-solubility of the organic constituent of the absorber material make devices highly prone to rapid degradation in moist environments. The degradation which is caused by moisture can be reduced by optimizing the constituent materials, the architecture of the cell, the interfaces and the environment conditions during the fabrication steps. Encapsulating the perovskite absorber with a composite of carbon nanotubes and an inert polymer matrix can prevent the immediate degradation of the material by moist air at elevated temperatures. However, no long term studies and comprehensive encapsulation techniques have yet been demonstrated for perovskite solar cells. Devices with a mesoporous TiO2 layer sensitized with the perovskite absorber, are also UV-unstable, due to the interaction between photogenerated holes inside the TiO2 and oxygen radicals on the surface of TiO2.
The measured ultra low thermal conductivity of 0.5 W/(Km) at room temperature in CH3NH3PbI3 can prevent fast propagation of the light deposited heat, and keep the cell resistive on thermal stresses that can reduce its life time. The PbI2 residue in perovskite film has been experimentally demonstrated to have a negative effect on the long-term stability of devices. The stabilization problem is claimed to be solved by replacing the organic transport layer with a metal oxide layer, allowing the cell to retain 90% capacity after 60 days. Besides, the two instabilities issues can be solved by using multifunctional fluorinated photopolymer coatings that confer luminescent and easy-cleaning features on the front side of the devices, while concurrently forming a strongly hydrophobic barrier toward environmental moisture on the back contact side. The front coating can prevent the UV light of the whole incident solar spectrum from negatively interacting with the PSC stack by converting it into visible light, and the back layer can prevent water from permeation within the solar cell stack. The resulting devices demonstrated excellent stability in terms of power conversion efficiencies during a 180-day aging test in the lab and a real outdoor condition test for more than 3 months.
In July 2015, major hurdles were that the largest perovskite solar cell was only the size of a fingernail and that they degraded quickly in moist environments. However, researchers from EPFL published in June 2017, a work successfully demonstrating large scale perovskite solar modules with no observed degradation over one year (short circuit conditions). Now, together with other organizations, the research team aims to develop a fully printable perovskite solar cell with 22% efficiency and with 90% of performance after ageing tests.
Early in 2019, the longest stability test reported to date showed a steady power output during at least 4000 h of continuous operation at Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) under 1 sun illumination from a xenon lamp based solar simulator without UV light filtering. Remarkably, the light harvester used during the stability test is classical methylammonium (MA) based perovskite, MAPbI3, but devices are built up with neither organic based selective layer nor metal back contact. Under these conditions, only thermal stress was found to be the major factor contributing to the loss of operational stability in encapsulated devices.
The intrinsic fragility of the perovskite material requires extrinsic reinforcement to shield this crucial layer from mechanical stresses. Insertion of mechanically reinforcing scaffolds directly into the active layers of perovskite solar cells resulted in the compound solar cell formed exhibiting a 30-fold increase in fracture resistance, repositioning the fracture properties of perovskite solar cells into the same domain as conventional c-Si, CIGS and CdTe solar cells. Several approaches have been developed to improve perovskite solar cell stability.[clarification needed] For instance,
in 2021 researchers reported that the stability and long-term reliability of perovskite solar cells was improved with a new kind of "molecular glue".
As of 2021, the existing stability tests for solar panels and solar cell systems are designed solely for those containing silicon wafers. As such, these tests, produced by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), have been re-evaluated for their lack of suitability. At the International Summit on Organic PV Stability (ISOS), stability checks for in-lab development of all solar cells were created, but these were not adopted by the IEC. These tests are not pass/fail criteria, rather they evaluate the various causes of solar cell stability issues to root out the problems. They are grouped into five categories: dark storage testing, outdoor testing, light soaking testing, thermal cycling testing, and light-humidity-thermal cycling testing. In these tests, the PCE and J-V data graphs of the PSCs were calculated among varying physical conditions to determine the various causes of PSC degradation.
Overall, these ISOS tests helped determine the causes of PSC degradation, which were found to include extended exposure to visible and UV light, environmental contamination, high temperatures, and electrical biases. After 200 temperature cycles, the 2020 PSCs still retained 90% of their power, indicating that they are capable of short-term stability. Now, what remains to be researched is long-term stability, and what material advances could be applied to boost these 200 temperature cycles (days) to 20-25 years.
Another core problem in the development, production and use of perovskite solar cells is their recyclability. Perovskite recycling is an absolute necessity due to the presence of lead in perovskites. The use of this element means that simply disposing of perovskite solar cells into landfills would be a major health hazard due to lead runoff and toxicity to both bodies of water and human health . Designs and processes or protocols for efficient recycling would reduce negative environmental impacts, exploitation of critical materials, health impacts and energy requirements beyond what can be achieved with increases in device lifetime. In a review, scientists concluded that "recycle and recovery technologies of perovskite solar cells should be researched and developed proactively". Some aspects of recyclability and recycling-rates depend on the design of the disseminated products. Scientific research and development may not get facilitated to design for recyclability – instead most scientists mainly "look at performance" – "energy conversion efficiency and stability" and often "neglect designing for recycling".
In 2021, many solar cells implemented in the year 2000 are nearing their end-of-life stage. As such, research into perovskite recycling is crucial. One tricky component of perovskites to recycle is lead. Currently, producing 1 GW of energy using the most efficient perovskite solar cell would result in 3.5 tons of lead waste. The main strategy used right now to mitigate lead contamination is in-operation of the solar cell. Lead absorbing P,P’-di(2-ethylhexyl)methanediphosphonic acid and sulfonic acid cation-exchange resin are used to prevent lead leaking from any damages the solar panels may incur during use 195.
Research is ongoing to discover means to reduce lead’s impact beyond simply lead leakage prevention. Carboxylic acid cation-exchange resin has been found to adsorb lead ions via ion-exchange with hydrogen, and these ions can be easily released via recrystallization from adding sodium iodide to the aqueous solution. This process was found to be low-cost compared to other existing lead recycling techniques, and could theoretically be implemented commercially.
Recently, since the efficiency of the best perovskite solar-cell reached 25.5%, comparable to the best PV cells made of single-crystal silicon, it is optimistic for the perovskite PV cells to be commercial in the future. Therefore, the recycling of the lead and transparent conductors are essential for the development of perovskite PV cells since the former reduces harmful environmental impact and the latter reduces costs. The organic solvent such as dimethylformamide (DMF) is used in the research to dissolve Pb and separate ITO/glass, then the carboxylic acid cation-exchange resin, in this research WAC-gel is used because of best performance, is utilized to absorb Pb ions in the DMF and release it in a form of Pb(NO3)2. By adding NaI into the solution, PbI2 can precipitate and be recycled. The recycled materials properties are analyzed in that both PbI2 and ITO/glass have the same performance as the new ones do, and the recycling efficiency reached 99.2%. Moreover, the cost analysis shows that solar modules based on recycling cost around $12 per square meter, whereas those based on new materials cost around $24.8 per square meter. Therefore, it is beneficial to recycle the perovskite PV cells from both environmental and economical perspectives.
Hysteretic current-voltage behavior
Another major challenge for perovskite solar cells is the observation that current-voltage scans yield ambiguous efficiency values.
The power conversion efficiency of a solar cell is usually determined by characterizing its current-voltage (IV) behavior under simulated solar illumination. In contrast to other solar cells, however, it has been observed that the IV-curves of perovskite solar cells show a hysteretic behavior: depending on scanning conditions – such as scan direction, scan speed, light soaking, biasing – there is a discrepancy between the scan from forward-bias to short-circuit (FB-SC) and the scan from short-circuit to forward bias (SC-FB). Various causes have been proposed such as ion movement, polarization, ferroelectric effects, filling of trap states, however, the exact origin for the hysteretic behavior is yet to be determined. But it appears that determining the solar cell efficiency from IV-curves risks producing inflated values if the scanning parameters exceed the time-scale which the perovskite system requires in order to reach an electronic steady-state. Two possible solutions have been proposed: Unger et al. show that extremely slow voltage-scans allow the system to settle into steady-state conditions at every measurement point which thus eliminates any discrepancy between the FB-SC and the SC-FB scan.
Henry Snaith et al. have proposed 'stabilized power output' as a metric for the efficiency of a solar cell. This value is determined by holding the tested device at a constant voltage around the maximum power-point (where the product of voltage and photocurrent reaches its maximum value) and track the power-output until it reaches a constant value.
Both methods have been demonstrated to yield lower efficiency values when compared to efficiencies determined by fast IV-scans. However, initial studies have been published that show that surface passivation of the perovskite absorber is an avenue with which efficiency values can be stabilized very close to fast-scan efficiencies.
No obvious hysteresis of photocurrent was observed by changing the sweep rates or the direction in devices or the sweep rates. This indicates that the origin of hysteresis in photocurrent is more likely due to the trap formation in some non optimized films and device fabrication processes. The ultimate way to examine the efficiency of a solar cell device is to measure its power output at the load point. If there is large density of traps in the devices or photocurrent hysteresis for other reasons, the photocurrent would rise slowly upon turning on illumination This suggests that the interfaces might play a crucial role with regards to the hysteretic IV behavior since the major difference of the inverted architecture to the regular architectures is that an organic n-type contact is used instead of a metal oxide.
The observation of hysteretic current-voltage characteristics has thus far been largely underreported. Only a small fraction of publications acknowledge the hysteretic behavior of the described devices, even fewer articles show slow non-hysteretic IV curves or stabilized power outputs. Reported efficiencies, based on rapid IV-scans, have to be considered fairly unreliable and make it currently difficult to genuinely assess the progress of the field.
The ambiguity in determining the solar cell efficiency from current-voltage characteristics due to the observed hysteresis has also affected the certification process done by accredited laboratories such as NREL. The record efficiency of 20.1% for perovskite solar cells accepted as certified value by NREL in November 2014, has been classified as 'not stabilized'. To be able to compare results from different institution, it is necessary to agree on a reliable measurement protocol, as it has been proposed by  including the corresponding Matlab code which can be found at GitHub.
As of 2021, the recorded peak power conversion efficiency has been found to be 25.6% efficiency. This was done using a formamidinium lead iodide metal-halide perovskite. Anions were pumped into existing highly efficient perovskites, and functioned to fill in gaps caused by trapped holes in the PV cell. Furthermore, this cell was found to be stable up to 450 hours, which is considered long-term stability. Finally, this device served to prove that anions other than iodine and bromine ions are capable of being bombarded into gaps in PV cells, breaking a trend that was evidently hindering prior research .
Perovskites for tandem applications
A perovskite cell combined with bottom cell such as Si or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) as a tandem design can suppress individual cell bottlenecks and take advantage of the complementary characteristics to enhance the efficiency. This type of cells have higher efficiency potential, and therefore attracted recently a large attention from academic researchers.
Using a four terminal configuration in which the two sub-cells are electrically isolated, Bailie et al. obtained a 17% and 18.6% efficient tandem cell with mc-Si (η ~ 11%) and copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS, η ~ 17%) bottom cells, respectively. A 13.4% efficient tandem cell with a highly efficient a-Si:H/c-Si heterojunction bottom cell using the same configuration was obtained. The application of TCO-based transparent electrodes to perovskite cells allowed to fabricate near-infrared transparent devices with improved efficiency and lower parasitic absorption losses. The application of these cells in 4-terminal tandems allowed improved efficiencies up to 26.7% when using a silicon bottom cell and up to 23.9% with a CIGS bottom cell. In 2020, KAUST-University of Toronto teams reported 28.2% efficient four terminal perovskite/silicon tandems solar cells. To achieve this results, the team used Zr-doped In2O3 transparent electrodes on semitransparent perovskite top cells, which was previously introduced by Aydin et al., and improved the near infrared response of the silicon bottom cells by utilizing broadband transparent H-doped In2O3 electrodes. Also, the team enhanced the electron-diffusion length (up to 2.3 µm) thanks to Lewis base passivation via urea. The record efficiency for perovskite/silicon tandems currently stands at 28.2 %
Mailoa et al. started the efficiency race for monolithic 2-terminal tandems using an homojunction c-Si bottom cell and demonstrate a 13.7% cell, largely limited by parasitic absorption losses. Then, Albrecht et al. developed a low-temperature processed perovskite cells using a SnO2 electron transport layer. This allowed the use of silicon heterojunction solar cells as bottom cell and tandem efficiencies up to 18.1%. Werner et al. then improved this performance replacing the SnO2 layer with PCBM and introducing a sequential hybrid deposition method for the perovskite absorber, leading to a tandem cell with 21.2% efficiency. Important parasitic absorption losses due to the use of Spiro-OMeTAD were still limiting the overall performance. An important change was demonstrated by Bush et al., who inverted the polarity of the top cell (n-i-p to p-i-n). They used a bilayer of SnO2 and zinc tin oxide (ZTO) processed by ALD to work as a sputtering buffer layer, which enables the following deposition of a transparent top indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode. This change helped to improve the environmental and thermal stability of the perovskite cell and was crucial to further improve the perovskite/silicon tandem performance to 23.6%.
In the continuity, using a p-i-n perovskite top cell, Sahli et al. demonstrated in June 2018 a fully textured monolithic tandem cell with 25.2% efficiency, independently certified by Fraunhofer ISE CalLab. This improved efficiency can largely be attributed to the massively reduced reflection losses (below 2% in the range 360 nm-1000 nm, excluding metallization) and reduced parasitic absorption losses, leading to certified short-circuit currents of 19.5 mA/cm2. Also in June 2018 the company Oxford Photovoltaics presented a cell with 27.3% efficiency. In March 2020, KAUST-University of Toronto teams reported tandem devices with spin-cast perovskite films on fully textured textured bottom cells with 25.7% in Science Magazine. In the present, the research teams show effort to utilize more solution-based scalable techniques on textured bottom cells. Accordingly blade-coated perovskite based tandems were reported by a collaborative team of University of North Carolina and Arizona State University. Following this, in August 2020 KAUST team demonstrated first slot-die coated perovskite based tandems, which was important step for accelerated processing of tandems. In September 2020, Aydin et al. showed the highest certified short-circuit currents of 19.8 mA/cm2 on fully textured silicon bottom cells. Also, Aydin et al. showed the first outdoor performance results for perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells, which was an important hurdle for the reliability tests of such devices. In December 2021, KAUST team updated the champion PCE to 28.2% (certified).
The record efficiency for perovskite/silicon tandems currently stands at 29.8% as of December 2021.
There have been some efforts to predict the theoretical limits for these traditional tandem designs using a perovskite cell as top cell on a c-Si or a-Si/c-Si heterojunction bottom cell. To show that the output power can be even further enhanced, bifacial structures were studied as well. It was concluded that extra output power can be extracted from the bifacial structure as compared to a bifacial HIT cell when the albedo reflection takes on values between 10 and 40%, which are realistic.
It has been pointed out that the so-called impact ionization process can take place in strongly correlated insulators such as some oxide perovskites, which can lead to
multiple carrier generation. Also, Aydin et al. revealed that, the temperature should be considered while calculating the theoretical limits since these devices reaches the temperature of almost 60 °C under real operations. This case is special to perovskite/silicon tandems since the temperature dependence of both the silicon and perovskite bandgaps—which follow opposing trends—shifts the devices away from current matching for two-terminal tandems that are optimized at standard test conditions.
In May 2016, IMEC and its partner Solliance announced a tandem structure with a semi-transparent perovskite cell stacked on top of a back-contacted silicon cell. A combined power conversion efficiency of 20.2% was claimed, with the potential to exceed 30%.
In 2016, the development of efficient low-bandgap (1.2 - 1.3eV) perovskite materials and the fabrication of efficient devices based on these enabled a new concept: all-perovskite tandem solar cells, where two perovskite compounds with different bandgaps are stacked on top of each other. The first two- and four-terminal devices with this architecture reported in the literature achieved efficiencies of 17% and 20.3%. All-perovskite tandem cells offer the prospect of being the first fully solution-processable architecture that has a clear route to exceeding not only the efficiencies of silicon, but also GaAs and other expensive III-V semiconductor solar cells.
In 2017, Dewei Zhao et al. fabricated low-bandgap (~1.25 eV) mixed Sn-Pb perovskite solar cells (PVSCs) with the thickness of 620 nm, which enables larger grains and higher crystallinity to extend the carrier lifetimes to more than 250 ns, reaching a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 17.6%. Furthermore, this low-bandgap PVSC reached an external quantum efficiency (EQE) of more than 70% in the wavelength range of 700–900 nm, the essential infrared spectral region where sunlight transmitted to bottom cell. They also combined the bottom cell with a ~1.58 eV bandgap perovskite top cell to create an all-perovskite tandem solar cell with four terminals, obtaining a steady-state PCE of 21.0%, suggesting the possibility of fabricating high-efficiency all-perovskite tandem solar cells.
A study in 2020 shows that all-perovskite tandems have much lower carbon footprints than silicon-pervoskite tandems.
Additionally, in 2020, all-perovskite tandem efficiencies hit a new peak of 24.2% efficiency for 1cm2 solar cells. This value was measured and recorded by Japan Electrical Safety and Environment Technology Laboratories, and was reached by passivating defects at grain boundaries of the traditional lead-tin perovskite using zwitterionic molecules. These inhibit tin ion oxidation, a process which lowers the efficiency of the solar cell by increasing trap density and preventing diffusion. The introduction of zwitterionic antioxidants greatly boosts the efficiency of these devices while only permitting an additional 2% degradation. The addition of zwitterionic substances also requires using an environment rich with formamidine sulfinic acid, catalyzing the necessary reactions to permit charge to transport between the solar cells. No higher efficiency in perovskite-perovskite tandems has yet to be recorded and reviewed.
As of 2021[update] there is a little manufacturing in Poland and China, but large-scale deployment is held back by the instability and shorter lifespan. However companies hope to have perovskite-on-silicon tandem products on the market with a 25 year warranty sometime in the mid-2020s. They may help to meet the high targets for new solar power in India.Building integrated photovoltaics is a possible area of commercialisation once stability is assured.
^ abManser, Joseph S. and Christians, Jeffrey A. and Kamat, Prashant V. (2016). "Intriguing Optoelectronic Properties of Metal Halide Perovskites". Chemical Reviews. 116 (21): 12956–13008. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00136. PMID27327168.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Hamers, Laurel (26 July 2017). "Perovskites power up the solar industry". Science News.
^ abKojima, Akihiro; Teshima, Kenjiro; Shirai, Yasuo; Miyasaka, Tsutomu (May 6, 2009). "Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 131 (17): 6050–6051. doi:10.1021/ja809598r. PMID19366264.
^Sun, Kai; Wang, Yanyan; Xu, Haoyuan; Zhang, Jing; Zhu, Yuejin; Hu, Ziyang (2019). "Short-Term Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells Affected by In Situ Interface Modification". Solar RRL. 3 (9): 1900089. doi:10.1002/solr.201900089. S2CID 202229877.
^Stefano Razza, Sergio Castro-Hermosa, Aldo Di Carlo, and Thomas M. Brown (2016). "Research Update: Large-area deposition, coating, printing, and processing techniques for the upscaling of perovskite solar cell technology". APL Materials. 4 (91508): 091508. Bibcode:2016APLM....4i1508R. doi:10.1063/1.4962478.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Wan-Jian Yin, Tingting Shi, Yanfa Yan (15 May 2014). "Unique Properties of Halide Perovskites as Possible Origins of the Superior Solar Cell Performance". Advanced Materials. 26 (27): 4653–4658. doi:10.1002/adma.201306281. PMID24827122.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Kantareddy, Sai Nithin R., Ian Mathews, Shijing Sun, Mariya Layurova, Janak Thapa, Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena, Rahul Bhattacharyya Tonio Buonassisi, Sanjay E. Sarma, and Ian Marius Peters. (2019). "Perovskite PV-powered RFID: enabling lowcost self-powered IoT sensors". IEEE Sensors Journal. 20: 471–478. arXiv:1909.09197. Bibcode:2019arXiv190909197K. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2939293. S2CID 202712514.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^O’Connor, David; Hou, Deyi (November 2021). "Manage the environmental risks of perovskites". One Earth. 4 (11): 1534–1537. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.002. S2CID 244430089.
^Eames, Christopher; Frost, Jarvist M.; Barnes, Piers R. F.; o'Regan, Brian C.; Walsh, Aron; Islam, M. Saiful (2015). "Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells". Nature Communications. 6: 7497. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.7497E. doi:10.1038/ncomms8497. PMC4491179. PMID26105623.
^Park, N.-G. (2015). "Perovskite solar cells: an emerging photovoltaic technology". Materials Today. 18 (2): 65–72. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.07.007.
^ abEperon, Giles E.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Menelaou, Christopher; Johnston, Michael B.; Herz, Laura M.; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Formamidinium lead trihalide: a broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells". Energy & Environmental Science. 7 (3): 982. doi:10.1039/C3EE43822H.
^Chung, I.; Lee, B.; He, J.; Chang, R.P.H; Kanatzidis, M.G. (2012). "All-Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with High Efficiency". Nature. 485 (7399): 486–489. Bibcode:2012Natur.485..486C. doi:10.1038/nature11067. PMID22622574. S2CID 4420558.
^Noel, Nakita K.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Abate, Antonio; Wehrenfennig, Christian; Guarnera, Simone; Haghighirad, Amir-Abbas; Sadhanala, Aditya; Eperon, Giles E.; Pathak, Sandeep K.; Johnston, Michael B.; Petrozza, Annamaria; Herz, Laura M.; Snaith, Henry J. (May 1, 2014). "Lead-free organic–inorganic tin halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications". Energy & Environmental Science. 7 (9): 3061. doi:10.1039/C4EE01076K. S2CID 4483675.
^Wilcox, Kevin (May 13, 2014). "Solar Researchers Find Promise in Tin Perovskite Line". Civil Engineering. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014.
^Meehan, Chris (May 5, 2014). "Getting the lead out of Perovskite Solar Cells". Solar Reviews.
^Zong, Yingxia; Wang, Ning; Zhang, Lin; Ju, Ming‐Gang; Zeng, Xiao Cheng; Sun, Xiao Wei; Zhou, Yuanyuan; Padture, Nitin P. (2 October 2017). "Rücktitelbild: Homogenous Alloys of Formamidinium Lead Triiodide and Cesium Tin Triiodide for Efficient Ideal‐Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells (Angew. Chem. 41/2017)". Angewandte Chemie. 129 (41): 12966. doi:10.1002/ange.201708387.
^McMeekin, David; Mahesh, Suhas; Noel, Nakita; Klug, Matthew; Lim, JongChul; Warby, Jonathan; Ball, James; Herz, Laura; Johnston, Michael; Snaith, Henry (2019-02-11). "Solution-Processed All-Perovskite Multi-Junction Solar Cells". Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Hybrid and Organic Photovoltaics. València: Fundació Scito. 3 (2). doi:10.29363/nanoge.hopv.2019.099. S2CID 182243452.
^Werthen, J.G. (June 1987). "Multijunction concentrator solar cells". Solar Cells. 21 (1–4): 452. doi:10.1016/0379-6787(87)90150-5.
^Georgieva, Zheni N.; Bloom, Brian P.; Ghosh, Supriya; Waldeck, David H. (June 2018). "Imprinting Chirality onto the Electronic States of Colloidal Perovskite Nanoplatelets". Advanced Materials. 30 (23): 1800097. doi:10.1002/adma.201800097. PMID29700859.
^ abTai, Qidong; Tang, Kai-Chi; Yan, Feng (2019). "Recent progress of inorganic perovskite solar cells". Energy & Environmental Science. 12 (8): 2375–2405. doi:10.1039/C9EE01479A. S2CID 195424464.
^Wang, Yong; Chen, Gaoyuan; Ouyang, Dan; He, Xinjun; Li, Can; Ma, Ruiman; Yin, Wan‐Jian; Choy, Wallace C. H. (June 2020). "High Phase Stability in CsPbI 3 Enabled by Pb–I Octahedra Anchors for Efficient Inorganic Perovskite Photovoltaics". Advanced Materials. 32 (24): 2000186. doi:10.1002/adma.202000186. PMID32363655. S2CID 218493218.
^Elias Assmann; Peter Blaha; Robert Laskowski; Karsten Held; Satoshi Okamoto & Giorgio Sangiovanni (2013). "Oxide Heterostructures for Efficient Solar Cells". Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (7): 078701. arXiv:1301.1314. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110g8701A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078701. PMID25166418. S2CID 749031.
^Lingfei Wang; Yongfeng Li; Ashok Bera; Chun Ma; Feng Jin; Kaidi Yuan; Wanjian Yin; Adrian David; Wei Chen; Wenbin Wu; Wilfrid Prellier; Suhuai Wei & Tom Wu (2015). "Device Performance of the Mott Insulator LaVO3 as a Photovoltaic Material". Physical Review Applied. 3 (6): 064015. Bibcode:2015PhRvP...3f4015W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.064015.
^"Light 'relaxes' crystal to boost solar cell efficiency". news.rice.edu.
^Quantum Dot Solar Cell Market Trends -2/ "Quantum Dot Solar Cell Market Trends, Top Manufactures, Quantum Dot Solar Cell Market Demands, Industry Growth Analysis & Forecast 2026" Check |url= value (help). https://www.nwdiamondnotes.com/. External link in |website= (help)
^Ke, Jack Chun-Ren; Lewis, David J.; Walton, Alex S.; Spencer, Ben F.; O'Brien, Paul; Thomas, Andrew G.; Flavell, Wendy R. (2018). "Ambient-air-stable inorganic Cs2SnI6 double perovskite thin films via aerosol-assisted chemical vapour deposition". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 6 (24): 11205–11214. doi:10.1039/c8ta03133a.
^Jun, Kang (10 January 2017). "High Defect Tolerance in Lead Halide Perovskite CsPbBr3". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 8 (2): 489–493. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02800. OSTI 1483838. PMID28071911.
^Is Perovskite the Future of Solar Cells?. engineering.com. December 6, 2013
^Saidaminov, Makhsud I.; Abdelhady, Ahmed L.; Murali, Banavoth; Alarousu, Erkki; Burlakov, Victor M.; Peng, Wei; Dursun, Ibrahim; Wang, Lingfei; He, Yao; MacUlan, Giacomo; Goriely, Alain; Wu, Tom; Mohammed, Omar F.; Bakr, Osman M. (2015). "High-quality bulk hybrid perovskite single crystals within minutes by inverse temperature crystallization". Nature Communications. 6: 7586. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.7586S. doi:10.1038/ncomms8586. PMC4544059. PMID26145157.
^Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Perovskites: The Emergence of a New Era for Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cells". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 4 (21): 3623–3630. doi:10.1021/jz4020162.
^Jung, Yen‐Sook; Hwang, Kyeongil; Heo, Youn‐Jung; Kim, Jueng‐Eun; Vak, Doojin; Kim, Dong‐Yu (2018). "Progress in Scalable Coating and Roll‐to‐Roll Compatible Printing Processes of Perovskite Solar Cells toward Realization of Commercialization". Advanced Optical Materials. 6 (9): 1701182. doi:10.1002/adom.201701182.
^Li, Zhen; Klein, Talysa R.; Kim, Dong Hoe; Yang, Mengjin; Berry, Joseph J.; Hest, Maikel F. A. M. van; Zhu, Kai (2018). "Scalable fabrication of perovskite solar cells". Nature Reviews Materials. 3 (4): 18017. Bibcode:2018NatRM...318017L. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.17. OSTI 1430821.
^ abKe, Chun-Ren; Lewis, David J.; Walton, Alex S.; Chen, Qian; Spencer, Ben F.; Mokhtar, Muhamad Z.; Compean-Gonzalez, Claudia L.; O’Brien, Paul; Thomas, Andrew G.; Flavell, Wendy R. (26 August 2019). "Air-Stable Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskite Thin Films Fabricated via Aerosol-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition from a Pseudohalide Pb(SCN) 2 Precursor". ACS Applied Energy Materials. 2 (8): 6012–6022. doi:10.1021/acsaem.9b01124. S2CID 201232856.
^Lewis, David J.; O'Brien, Paul (2014). "Ambient pressure aerosol-assisted chemical vapour deposition of (CH 3 NH 3 )PbBr 3 , an inorganic–organic perovskite important in photovoltaics". Chem. Commun. 50 (48): 6319–6321. doi:10.1039/c4cc02592j. PMID24799177.
^Ke, Jack Chun-Ren; Lewis, David J.; Walton, Alex S.; Spencer, Ben F.; O'Brien, Paul; Thomas, Andrew G.; Flavell, Wendy R. (2018). "Ambient-air-stable inorganic Cs 2 SnI 6 double perovskite thin films via aerosol-assisted chemical vapour deposition". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 6 (24): 11205–11214. doi:10.1039/C8TA03133A.
^ abJeon, Nam Joong; Noh, Jun Hong; Kim, Young Chan; Yang, Woon Seok; Ryu, Seungchan; Seok, Sang Il (2014). "Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells". Nature Materials. 13 (9): 897–903. Bibcode:2014NatMa..13..897J. doi:10.1038/nmat4014. PMID24997740.
^Zhou, Yuanyuan; Yang, Mengjin; Wu, Wenwen; Vasiliev, Alexander L.; Zhu, Kai; Padture, Nitin P. (2015). "Room-temperature crystallization of hybrid-perovskite thin films via solvent–solvent extraction for high-performance solar cells". J. Mater. Chem. A. 3 (15): 8178–8184. doi:10.1039/C5TA00477B. S2CID 56292381.
^Nie, Wanyi; Tsai, Hsinhan; Asadpour, Reza; Blancon, Jean-Christophe; Neukirch, Amanda J.; Gupta, Gautam; Crochet, Jared J.; Chhowalla, Manish; Tretiak, Sergei (2015-01-30). "High-efficiency solution-processed perovskite solar cells with millimeter-scale grains". Science. 347 (6221): 522–525. Bibcode:2015Sci...347..522N. doi:10.1126/science.aaa0472. PMID25635093. S2CID 14990570.
^Chen, Qian; Mokhtar, Muhamad Z.; Ke, Jack Chun-Ren; Thomas, Andrew G.; Hadi, Aseel; Whittaker, Eric; Curioni, Michele; Liu, Zhu (2018). "A one-step laser process for rapid manufacture of mesoscopic perovskite solar cells prepared under high relative humidity". Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2 (6): 1216–1224. doi:10.1039/C8SE00043C.
^ abZhang, Hong; Choy, C.H.Wallace (2015). "A Smooth CH3NH3PbI3 Film via a New Approach for Forming the PbI2 Nanostructure Together with Strategically High CH3NH3I Concentration for High Efficient Planar-Heterojunction Solar Cells". Adv. Energy Mater. 5 (23): 1501354. doi:10.1002/aenm.201501354.
^Chen, Qi; Zhou, Huanping; Hong, Ziruo; Luo, Song; Duan, Hsin-Sheng; Wang, Hsin-Hua; Liu, Yongsheng; Li, Gang; Yang, Yang (2014). "Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells via Vapor-Assisted Solution Process". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 136 (2): 622–625. doi:10.1021/ja411509g. PMID24359486.
^ abLiu, Mingzhen; Johnston, Michael B.; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition". Nature. 501 (7467): 395–8. Bibcode:2013Natur.501..395L. doi:10.1038/nature12509. PMID24025775. S2CID 205235359.
^"Olga Malinkiewicz | Innovators Under 35". innovatorsunder35.com. 2015. Archived from the original on 2017-08-02. Retrieved 2017-08-02.
^Printable solar cells just got a little closer. Univ. of Toronto Engineering News (2017-02-16). Retrieved on 2018-04-11.
^Liao, Hsueh‐Chung; Guo, Peijun; Hsu, Che‐Pu; Lin, Ma; Wang, Binghao; Zeng, Li; Huang, Wei; Soe, Chan Myae Myae; Su, Wei‐Fang; Bedzyk, Michael J.; Wasielewski, Michael R.; Facchetti, Antonio; Chang, Robert P. H.; Kanatzidis, Mercouri G.; Marks, Tobin J. (2016). "Enhanced Efficiency of Hot‐Cast Large‐Area Planar Perovskite Solar Cells/Modules Having Controlled Chloride Incorporation". Advanced Energy Materials. 7 (8): 1601660. doi:10.1002/aenm.201601660.
^Gao, Li-Li; Li, Cheng-Xin; Li, Chang-Jiu; Yang, Guan-Jun (2017). "Large-area high-efficiency perovskite solar cells based on perovskite films dried by the multi-flow air knife method in air". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 5 (4): 1548–1557. doi:10.1039/C6TA09565H.
^Li, Xiong; Bi, Dongqin; Yi, Chenyi; Décoppet, Jean-David; Luo, Jingshan; Zakeeruddin, Shaik Mohammed; Hagfeldt, Anders; Grätzel, Michael (2016). "EA vacuum flash–assisted solution process for high-efficiency large-area perovskite solar cells". Science. 353 (6294): 58–62. Bibcode:2016Sci...353...58L. doi:10.1126/science.aaf8060. PMID27284168. S2CID 10488230.
^Lee, Michael M.; Teuscher, Joël; Miyasaka, Tsutomu; Murakami, Takurou N.; Snaith, Henry J. (2012). "Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites". Science. 338 (6107): 643–647. Bibcode:2012Sci...338..643L. doi:10.1126/science.1228604. PMID23042296. S2CID 37971858.
^Lee, Jin-Wook; Kim, Hui-Seon; Park, Nam-Gyu (2016). "Lewis Acid–Base Adduct Approach for High Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells". Accounts of Chemical Research. 49 (2): 311–319. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00440. PMID26797391.
^Wang, Zhao-Kui; Gong, Xiu; Li, Meng; Hu, Yun; Wang, Jin-Miao; Ma, Heng; Liao, Liang-Sheng (2016). "Induced Crystallization of Perovskites by a Perylene Underlayer for High-Performance Solar Cells". ACS Nano. 10 (5): 5479–5489. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b01904. PMID27128850.
^Francesco Di Giacomo, Valerio Zardetto, Alessandra D'Epifanio, Sara Pescetelli, Fabio Matteocci, Stefano Razza, Aldo Di Carlo, Silvia Licoccia, Wilhelmus M. M. Kessels, Mariadriana Creatore, Thomas M. Brown (2015). "Flexible Perovskite Photovoltaic Modules and Solar Cells Based on Atomic Layer Deposited Compact Layers and UV‐Irradiated TiO2 Scaffolds on Plastic Substrates". Advanced Energy Materials. 5 (8): 1401808. doi:10.1002/aenm.201401808.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Sundberg, Pia; Karppinen, Maarit (2014-07-22). "Organic and inorganic–organic thin film structures by molecular layer deposition: A review". Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 5: 1104–1136. doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.123. PMC4143120. PMID25161845.
^Azhar Fakharuddin, Francesco Di Giacomo, Alessandro L. Palma, Fabio Matteocci, Irfan Ahmed, Stefano Razza, Alessandra D’Epifanio, Silvia Licoccia, Jamil Ismail, Aldo Di Carlo, Thomas M. Brown, and Rajan Jose (2015). "Vertical TiO2 Nanorods as a Medium for Stable and High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Modules". ACS Nano. 9 (8): 8420–8429. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b03265. PMID26208221.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Tzu-Sen Su, Tsung-Yu Hsieh, Cheng-You Hong & Tzu-Chien Wei (2015). "Electrodeposited Ultrathin TiO2 Blocking Layers for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells". Scientific Reports. 5: 16098. Bibcode:2015NatSR...516098S. doi:10.1038/srep16098. PMC4630649. PMID26526771.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Yi Hou, Wei Chen, Derya Baran, Tobias Stubhan, Norman A. Luechinger, Benjamin Hartmeier, Moses Richter, Jie Min, Shi Chen, Cesar Omar Ramirez Quiroz, Ning Li, Hong Zhang, Thomas Heumueller, Gebhard J. Matt, Andres Osvet, Karen Forberich, Zhi‐Guo Zhang, Yongfang Li, Benjamin Winter, Peter Schweizer, Erdmann Spiecker, Christoph J. Brabec (2016). "Overcoming the interface losses in planar heterojunction perovskite-based solar cells". Advanced Materials. 28 (25): 5112–5120. doi:10.1002/adma.201504168. PMID27144875.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Di Girolamo, Diego; Matteocci, Fabio; Kosasih, Felix Utama; Chistiakova, Ganna; Zuo, Weiwei; Divitini, Giorgio; Korte, Lars; Ducati, Caterina; Di Carlo, Aldo; Dini, Danilo; Abate, Antonio (August 2019). "Stability and Dark Hysteresis Correlate in NiO‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells". Advanced Energy Materials. 9 (31): 1901642. doi:10.1002/aenm.201901642. S2CID 199076776.
^In Seok Yang, Mi Rae Sohn, Sang Do Sung, Yong Joo Kim, Young Jun Yoo, Jeongho Kim, Wan In Lee (2017). "Formation of pristine CuSCN layer by spray deposition method for efficient perovskite solar cell with extended stability". Nano Energy. 32: 414–421. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.059.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Peng Qin, Soichiro Tanaka, Seigo Ito, Nicolas Tetreault, Kyohei Manabe, Hitoshi Nishino, Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin & Michael Grätzel (2014). "Inorganic hole conductor-based lead halide perovskite solar cells with 12.4% conversion efficiency". Nature Communications. 5: 3834. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.3834Q. doi:10.1038/ncomms4834. hdl:10754/597000. PMID24815001.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Senyun Ye, Weihai Sun, Yunlong Li, Weibo Yan, Haitao Peng, Zuqiang Bian, Zhiwei Liu, and Chunhui Huang (2015). "CuSCN-Based Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cell with an Average PCE of 15.6%". Nano Letters. 15 (6): 3723–3728. Bibcode:2015NanoL..15.3723Y. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00116. PMID25938881.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Wu-Qiang Wu, Qi Wang, Yanjun Fang, Yuchuan Shao, Shi Tang, Yehao Deng, Haidong Lu, Ye Liu, Tao Li, Zhibin Yang, Alexei Gruverman & Jinsong Huang (2018). "Molecular doping enabled scalable blading of efficient hole-transport-layer-free perovskite solar cells". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 1625. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.1625W. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04028-8. PMC5915422. PMID29691390.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Thomas M. Schmidt, Thue T. Larsen‐Olsen, Jon E. Carlé, Dechan Angmo, Frederik C. Krebs (2015). "Upscaling of Perovskite Solar Cells: Fully Ambient Roll Processing of Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells with Printed Back Electrodes". Advanced Energy Materials. 5 (15): 1625. doi:10.1002/aenm.201500569.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Chih-Yu Chang, Kuan-Ting Lee, Wen-Kuan Huang, Hao-Yi Siao, and Yu-Chia Chang (2015). "High-Performance, Air-Stable, Low-Temperature Processed Semitransparent Perovskite Solar Cells Enabled by Atomic Layer Deposition". Chemistry of Materials. 7 (14): 5122–5130. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01933.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Zhiliang Ku, Yaoguang Rong, Mi Xu, Tongfa Liu & Hongwei Han (2013). "Full Printable Processed Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 Heterojunction Solar Cells with Carbon Counter Electrode". Chemistry of Materials. 3: 3132. Bibcode:2013NatSR...3E3132K. doi:10.1038/srep03132. PMC3816285. PMID24185501.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Zhen Li, Sneha A. Kulkarni, Pablo P. Boix, Enzheng Shi, Anyuan Cao, Kunwu Fu, Sudip K. Batabyal, Jun Zhang, Qihua Xiong, Lydia Helena Wong, Nripan Mathews, and Subodh G. Mhaisalkar (2014). "Laminated Carbon Nanotube Networks for Metal Electrode-Free Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells". ACS Nano. 8 (7): 6797–6804. doi:10.1021/nn501096h. PMID24924308.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Peng You, Zhike Liu, Qidong Tai, Shenghua Liu, Feng Yan (2015). "Efficient Semitransparent Perovskite Solar Cells with Graphene Electrodes". Advanced Materials. 27 (24): 3632–3638. doi:10.1002/adma.201501145. PMID25969400.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Bohland, J.R.; Smigielski, K. (2000). "First Solar's Cd Te module manufacturing experience; environmental, health and safety results". Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37036). pp. 575–578. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2000.915904. ISBN 0-7803-5772-8. S2CID 121877756.
^"First Solar: "The recyclign advantage"". First Solar. 2020.
^Hailegnaw, Bekele; Kirmayer, Saar; Edri, Eran; Hodes, Gary; Cahen, David (2015-05-07). "Rain on Methylammonium Lead Iodide Based Perovskites: Possible Environmental Effects of Perovskite Solar Cells". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 6 (9): 1543–1547. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00504. PMID26263309.
^Babayigit, Aslihan; Duy Thanh, Dinh; Ethirajan, Anitha; Manca, Jean; Muller, Marc; Boyen, Hans-Gerd; Conings, Bert (2016-01-13). "Assessing the toxicity of Pb- and Sn-based perovskite solar cells in model organism Danio rerio". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 18721. Bibcode:2016NatSR...618721B. doi:10.1038/srep18721. PMC4725943. PMID26759068.
^ abFewtrell, Lorna; Kaufman, Rachel; Prüss-Üstün, Annette (May 2003). Lead: Assessing the Environmental Burden of Disease at National and Local Levels. World Health Organization. hdl:10665/42715. ISBN 978-92-4-154610-2.
^Preventing disease through healthy environments: exposure to lead: a major public health concern. World Health Organization. 2019. hdl:10665/329953.
^ abKe, Weijun; Kanatzidis, Mercouri G. (December 2019). "Prospects for low-toxicity lead-free perovskite solar cells". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 965. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10..965K. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08918-3. PMC6393492. PMID30814499.
^Jokar, Efat; Chien, Cheng-Hsun; Tsai, Cheng-Min; Fathi, Amir; Diau, Eric Wei-Guang (January 2019). "Robust Tin-Based Perovskite Solar Cells with Hybrid Organic Cations to Attain Efficiency Approaching 10". Advanced Materials. 31 (2): e1804835. doi:10.1002/adma.201804835. PMID30411826. S2CID 53242660.
^Krishnamoorthy, Thirumal; Ding, Hong; Yan, Chen; Leong, Wei Lin; Baikie, Tom; Zhang, Ziyi; Sherburne, Matthew; Li, Shuzhou; Asta, Mark; Mathews, Nripan; Mhaisalkar, Subodh G. (24 November 2015). "Lead-free germanium iodide perovskite materials for photovoltaic applications". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 3 (47): 23829–23832. doi:10.1039/C5TA05741H.
^Chen, Min; Ju, Ming-Gang; Garces, Hector F.; Carl, Alexander D.; Ono, Luis K.; Hawash, Zafer; Zhang, Yi; Shen, Tianyi; Qi, Yabing; Grimm, Ronald L.; Pacifici, Domenico; Zeng, Xiao Cheng; Zhou, Yuanyuan; Padture, Nitin P. (3 January 2019). "Highly stable and efficient all-inorganic lead-free perovskite solar cells with native-oxide passivation". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 16. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10...16C. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07951-y. PMC6318336. PMID30604757.
^Giustino, Feliciano; Snaith, Henry J. (9 December 2016). "Toward Lead-Free Perovskite Solar Cells". ACS Energy Letters. 1 (6): 1233–1240. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00499.
^McCall, Kyle M.; Stoumpos, Constantinos C.; Kostina, Svetlana S.; Kanatzidis, Mercouri G.; Wessels, Bruce W. (9 May 2017). "Strong Electron–Phonon Coupling and Self-Trapped Excitons in the Defect Halide Perovskites A3M2I9 (A = Cs, Rb; M = Bi, Sb)". Chemistry of Materials. 29 (9): 4129–4145. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01184. OSTI 1494819.
^Jiang, Yan; Qiu, Longbin; Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Ono, Luis K.; Hu, Zhanhao; Liu, Zonghao; Wu, Zhifang; Meng, Lingqiang; Wang, Qijing; Qi, Yabing (July 2019). "Reduction of lead leakage from damaged lead halide perovskite solar modules using self-healing polymer-based encapsulation". Nature Energy. 4 (7): 585–593. Bibcode:2019NatEn...4..585J. doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0406-2. S2CID 189929914.
^ abChen, Shangshang; Deng, Yehao; Gu, Hangyu; Xu, Shuang; Wang, Shen; Yu, Zhenhua; Blum, Volker; Huang, Jinsong (2 November 2020). "Trapping lead in perovskite solar modules with abundant and low-cost cation-exchange resins". Nature Energy. 5 (12): 1003–1011. Bibcode:2020NatEn...5.1003C. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00716-2. S2CID 228806268.
^Li, Xun; Zhang, Fei; He, Haiying; Berry, Joseph J.; Zhu, Kai; Xu, Tao (February 2020). "On-device lead sequestration for perovskite solar cells". Nature. 578 (7796): 555–558. Bibcode:2020Natur.578..555L. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2001-x. OSTI 1602693. PMID32076266. S2CID 211195242.
^Noh, Jun Hong; Im, Sang Hyuk; Heo, Jin Hyuck; Mandal, Tarak N.; Seok, Sang Il (March 21, 2013). "Chemical Management for Colorful, Efficient, and Stable Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Nanostructured Solar Cells". Nano Letters. 13 (4): 1764–9. Bibcode:2013NanoL..13.1764N. doi:10.1021/nl400349b. PMID23517331.
^ abStranks, S. D.; Eperon, G. E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M. J. P.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L. M.; Petrozza, A.; et al. (October 17, 2013). "Electron-Hole Diffusion Lengths Exceeding 1 Micrometer in an Organometal Trihalide Perovskite Absorber". Science. 342 (6156): 341–344. Bibcode:2013Sci...342..341S. doi:10.1126/science.1243982. PMID24136964. S2CID 10314803.
^"Oxford Researchers Creating Simpler, Cheaper Solar Cells". SciTechDaily.com. November 12, 2013.
^Liu, Shuhao; Wang, Lili; Lin, Wei-Chun; Sucharitakul, Sukrit; Burda, Clemens; Gao, Xuan P. A. (2016-12-14). "Imaging the Long Transport Lengths of Photo-generated Carriers in Oriented Perovskite Films". Nano Letters. 16 (12): 7925–7929. arXiv:1610.06165. Bibcode:2016NanoL..16.7925L. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04235. PMID27960525. S2CID 1695198.
^D’Innocenzo, Valerio; Grancini, Giulia; Alcocer, Marcelo J. P.; Kandada, Ajay Ram Srimath; Stranks, Samuel D.; Lee, Michael M.; Lanzani, Guglielmo; Snaith, Henry J.; et al. (April 8, 2014). "Excitons versus free charges in organo-lead tri-halide perovskites". Nature Communications. 5: 3586. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.3586D. doi:10.1038/ncomms4586. PMID24710005.
^Collavini, S., Völker, S. F. and Delgado, J. L. (2015). "Understanding the Outstanding Power Conversion Efficiency of Perovskite-Based Solar Cells". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 54 (34): 9757–9759. doi:10.1002/anie.201505321. PMID26213261.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Sha, Wei E. I.; Ren, Xingang; Chen, Luzhou; Choy, Wallace C. H. (2015). "The efficiency limit of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells". Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 (22): 221104. arXiv:1506.09003. Bibcode:2015ApPhL.106v1104S. doi:10.1063/1.4922150. S2CID 117040796.
^ abSha, Wei E. I. (2016). "MATLAB Program of Detailed Balance Model for Perovskite Solar Cells" (Data Set). Unpublished. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.17132.36481. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ abRühle, Sven (2016-02-08). "Tabulated Values of the Shockley-Queisser Limit for Single Junction Solar Cells". Solar Energy. 130: 139–147. Bibcode:2016SoEn..130..139R. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.015.
^ abRen, Xingang; Wang, Zishuai; Sha, Wei E. I.; Choy, Wallace C. H. (2017). "Exploring the Way To Approach the Efficiency Limit of Perovskite Solar Cells by Drift-Diffusion Model". ACS Photonics. 4 (4): 934–942. arXiv:1703.07576. Bibcode:2017arXiv170307576R. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.6b01043. S2CID 119355156.
^Mosconi, Edoardo; Amat, Anna; Nazeeruddin, Md. K.; Grätzel, Michael; Angelis, Filippo De (2013-07-01). "First-Principles Modeling of Mixed Halide Organometal Perovskites for Photovoltaic Applications". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 117 (27): 13902–13913. doi:10.1021/jp4048659.
^Lang, Li; Yang, Ji-Hui; Liu, Heng-Rui; Xiang, H. J.; Gong, X. G. (2014-01-10). "First-principles study on the electronic and optical properties of cubic ABX3 halide perovskites". Physics Letters A. 378 (3): 290–293. arXiv:1309.0070. Bibcode:2014PhLA..378..290L. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.11.018. S2CID 119206094.
^Gonzalez-Pedro, Victoria; Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Arsyad, Waode-Sukmawati; Barea, Eva M.; Fabregat-Santiago, Francisco; Mora-Sero, Ivan; Bisquert, Juan (2014-01-10). "General Working Principles of CH 3 NH 3 PbX 3 Perovskite Solar Cells". Nano Letters. 14 (2): 888–893. Bibcode:2014NanoL..14..888G. doi:10.1021/nl404252e. hdl:10234/131066. PMID24397375.
^Umari, Paolo; Mosconi, Edoardo; Angelis, Filippo De (2014-03-26). "Relativistic GW calculations on CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3SnI3 Perovskites for Solar Cell Applications". Scientific Reports. 4 (4467): 4467. arXiv:1309.4895. Bibcode:2014NatSR...4E4467U. doi:10.1038/srep04467. PMC5394751. PMID24667758.
^Agarwal, S.; Nair, P.R. (2014-06-01). Performance optimization for Perovskite based solar cells. Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2014 IEEE 40th. pp. 1515–1518. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925202. ISBN 978-1-4799-4398-2. S2CID 23608158.
^Agarwal, Sumanshu; Nair, Pradeep R. (2015). "Device engineering of perovskite solar cells to achieve near ideal efficiency". Applied Physics Letters. 107 (12): 123901. arXiv:1506.07253. Bibcode:2015ApPhL.107l3901A. doi:10.1063/1.4931130. S2CID 119290700.
^Minemoto, Takashi; Murata, Masashi (2014-08-07). "Device modeling of perovskite solar cells based on structural similarity with thin film inorganic semiconductor solar cells". Journal of Applied Physics. 116 (5): 054505. Bibcode:2014JAP...116e4505M. doi:10.1063/1.4891982.
^Sun, Xingshu; Asadpour, R.; Nie, Wanyi; Mohite, A.D.; Alam, M.A. (2015-09-01). "A Physics-Based Analytical Model for Perovskite Solar Cells". IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 5 (5): 1389–1394. arXiv:1505.05132. Bibcode:2015arXiv150505132S. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2451000. S2CID 21240831.
^ abEperon, Giles E.; Burlakov, Victor M.; Docampo, Pablo; Goriely, Alain; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Morphological Control for High Performance, Solution-Processed Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells". Advanced Functional Materials. 24 (1): 151–157. doi:10.1002/adfm.201302090.
^Docampo, Pablo; Ball, James M.; Darwich, Mariam; Eperon, Giles E.; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates". Nature Communications. 4: 2761. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2761D. doi:10.1038/ncomms3761. PMID24217714.
^You, Jingbi; Hong, Ziruo; Yang, Yang (Michael); Chen, Qi; Cai, Min; Song, Tze-Bin; Chen, Chun-Chao; Lu, Shirong; Liu, Yongsheng (February 25, 2014). "Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Perovskite Solar Cells with High Efficiency and Flexibility". ACS Nano. 8 (2): 1674–1680. doi:10.1021/nn406020d. PMID24386933.
^Zhang, Hong (2015). "Pinhole-free and Surface-Nanostructured NiOx Film by Room-Temperature Solution Process for High-Performance Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells with Good Stability and Reproducibility". ACS Nano. 10 (1): 1503–1511. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b07043. PMID26688212.
^Im, Jeong-Hyeok; Lee, Chang-Ryul; Lee, Jin-Wook; Park, Sang-Won; Park, Nam-Gyu (2011). "6.5% efficient perovskite quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell". Nanoscale. 3 (10): 4088–4093. Bibcode:2011Nanos...3.4088I. doi:10.1039/C1NR10867K. PMID21897986. S2CID 205795756.
^Lee, M. M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T. N.; Snaith, H. J. (October 4, 2012). "Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites". Science. 338 (6107): 643–647. Bibcode:2012Sci...338..643L. doi:10.1126/science.1228604. PMID23042296. S2CID 37971858.
^Hadlington, Simon (October 4, 2012). "Perovskite coat gives hybrid solar cells a boost". RSC Chemistry world.
^Ball, James M.; Lee, Michael M.; Hey, Andrew; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells". Energy & Environmental Science. 6 (6): 1739. doi:10.1039/C3EE40810H.
^Saliba, Michael; Tan, Kwan Wee; Sai, Hiroaki; Moore, David T.; Scott, Trent; Zhang, Wei; Estroff, Lara A.; Wiesner, Ulrich; Snaith, Henry J. (July 31, 2014). "Influence of Thermal Processing Protocol upon the Crystallization and Photovoltaic Performance of Organic–Inorganic Lead Trihalide Perovskites". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 118 (30): 17171–17177. doi:10.1021/jp500717w.
^Tan, Kwan Wee; Moore, David T.; Saliba, Michael; Sai, Hiroaki; Estroff, Lara A.; Hanrath, Tobias; Snaith, Henry J.; Wiesner, Ulrich (May 27, 2014). "Thermally Induced Structural Evolution and Performance of Mesoporous Block Copolymer-Directed Alumina Perovskite Solar Cells". ACS Nano. 8 (5): 4730–4739. doi:10.1021/nn500526t. PMC4046796. PMID24684494.
^Burschka, Julian; Pellet, Norman; Moon, Soo-Jin; Humphry-Baker, Robin; Gao, Peng; Nazeeruddin, Mohammad K.; Grätzel, Michael (July 10, 2013). "Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells". Nature. 499 (7458): 316–319. Bibcode:2013Natur.499..316B. doi:10.1038/nature12340. PMID23842493. S2CID 4348717.
^Olga Malinkiewicz, Aswani Yella, Yong Hui Lee, Guillermo Mínguez Espallargas, Michael Graetzel, Mohammad K. Nazeeruddin & Henk J. Bolink (2013). "Perovskite solar cells employing organic charge-transport layers". Nature Photonics. 8 (2): 128–132. Bibcode:2014NaPho...8..128M. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.341.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Liu, Mingzhen; Johnston, Michael B.; Snaith, Henry J. (September 11, 2013). "Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition". Nature. 501 (7467): 395–398. Bibcode:2013Natur.501..395L. doi:10.1038/nature12509. PMID24025775. S2CID 205235359.
^Miodownik, Mark (2 March 2014). "The perovskite lightbulb moment for solar power". The Guardian.
^Docampo, Pablo; Ball, James M.; Darwich, Mariam; Eperon, Giles E.; Snaith, Henry J. (November 12, 2013). "Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates". Nature Communications. 4: 2761. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2761D. doi:10.1038/ncomms3761. PMID24217714.
^Gimeno, Carles (November 21, 2019). "Perovskite Photovoltaic Technology Reached a New Record".
^Gong, Jian; Darling, Seth B.; You, Fengqi (2015). "Perovskite photovoltaics: Life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts". Energy & Environmental Science. 8 (7): 1953–1968. doi:10.1039/C5EE00615E.
^Bryant, Daniel; Aristidou, Nicholas; Pont, Sebastian; Sanchez-Molina, Irene; Chotchunangatchaval, Thana; Wheeler, Scot; Durrant, James R.; Haque, Saif A. (2016). "Light and oxygen induced degradation limits the operational stability of methylammonium lead triiodide perovskite solar cells". Energy Environ. Sci. 9 (5): 1655–1660. doi:10.1039/C6EE00409A.
^Chun-Ren Ke, Jack; Walton, Alex S.; Lewis, David J.; Tedstone, Aleksander; O'Brien, Paul; Thomas, Andrew G.; Flavell, Wendy R. (2017-05-04). "In situ investigation of degradation at organometal halide perovskite surfaces by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy at realistic water vapour pressure". Chem. Commun. 53 (37): 5231–5234. doi:10.1039/c7cc01538k. PMID28443866.
^Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Hawash, Zafer; Raga, Sonia R.; Ono, Luis K.; Qi, Yabing (2016). "Thermal degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite into NH3 and CH3I gases observed by coupled thermogravimetry–mass spectrometry analysis". Energy Environ. Sci. 9 (11): 3406–3410. doi:10.1039/C6EE02016J.
^ abJuarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Ono, Luis K.; Maeda, Maki; Jiang, Yan; Hawash, Zafer; Qi, Yabing (2018). "Photodecomposition and thermal decomposition in methylammonium halide lead perovskites and inferred design principles to increase photovoltaic device stability". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 6 (20): 9604–9612. doi:10.1039/C8TA03501F.
^Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Ono, Luis K.; Uriarte, Iciar; Cocinero, Emilio J.; Qi, Yabing (2019). "Degradation Mechanism and Relative Stability of Methylammonium Halide Based Perovskites Analyzed on the Basis of Acid–Base Theory". ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 11 (13): 12586–12593. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b02374. PMID30848116.
^Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Ono, Luis K.; Qi, Yabing (2019). "Thermal degradation of formamidinium based lead halide perovskites into sym-triazine and hydrogen cyanide observed by coupled thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry analysis". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 7 (28): 16912–16919. doi:10.1039/C9TA06058H. S2CID 197047404.
^Yuan, Yongbo; Wang, Qi; Shao, Yuchuan; Lu, Haidong; Li, Tao; Gruverman, Alexei; Huang, Jinsong (2016). "Electric-Field-Driven Reversible Conversion Between Methylammonium Lead Triiodide Perovskites and Lead Iodide at Elevated Temperatures". Advanced Energy Materials. 6 (2): 1501803. doi:10.1002/aenm.201501803.
^ abcMatteocci, Fabio; Cinà, Lucio; Lamanna, Enrico; Cacovich, Stefania; Divitini, Giorgio; Midgley, Paul A.; Ducati, Caterina; Di Carlo, Aldo (2016-12-01). "Encapsulation for long-term stability enhancement of perovskite solar cells" (PDF). Nano Energy. 30: 162–172. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.041. hdl:2108/210706.
^Rolston, Nicholas; Watson, Brian L.; Bailie, Colin D.; McGehee, Michael D.; Bastos, João P.; Gehlhaar, Robert; Kim, Jueng-Eun; Vak, Doojin; Mallajosyula, Arun Tej (2016). "Mechanical integrity of solution-processed perovskite solar cells". Extreme Mechanics Letters. 9: 353–358. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2016.06.006. S2CID 42992826.
^Li, Xiong; Tschumi, Manuel; Han, Hongwei; Babkair, Saeed Salem; Alzubaydi, Raysah Ali; Ansari, Azhar Ahmad; Habib, Sami S.; Nazeeruddin, Mohammad Khaja; Zakeeruddin, Shaik M.; Grätzel, Michael (June 2015). "Outdoor Performance and Stability under Elevated Temperatures and Long-Term Light Soaking of Triple-Layer Mesoporous Perovskite Photovoltaics". Energy Technology. 3 (6): 551–555. doi:10.1002/ente.201500045.
^Leijtens, Tomas; Eperon, Giles E.; Noel, Nakita K.; Habisreutinger, Severin N.; Petrozza, Annamaria; Snaith, Henry J. (October 2015). "Stability of Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells". Advanced Energy Materials. 5 (20): 1500963. doi:10.1002/aenm.201500963.
^García-Fernández, Alberto; Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Castro-García, Socorro; Sánchez-Andújar, Manuel; Ono, Luis K.; Jiang, Yan; Qi, Yabing (2018). "Benchmarking Chemical Stability of Arbitrarily Mixed 3D Hybrid Halide Perovskites for Solar Cell Applications". Small Methods. 2 (10): 1800242. doi:10.1002/smtd.201800242.
^ abHabisreutinger, Severin N.; Leijtens, Tomas; Eperon, Giles E.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Nicholas, Robin J.; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Composites as a Highly Stable Hole Extraction Layer in Perovskite Solar Cells". Nano Letters. xx (x): 5561–8. Bibcode:2014NanoL..14.5561H. doi:10.1021/nl501982b. PMID25226226.
^Van Noorden, Richard (September 24, 2014). "Cheap solar cells tempt businesses". Nature. 513 (7519): 470. Bibcode:2014Natur.513..470V. doi:10.1038/513470a. PMID25254454. S2CID 205082350.
^Leijtens, Tomas; Eperon, Giles E.; Pathak, Sandeep; Abate, Antonio; Lee, Michael M.; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Overcoming ultraviolet light instability of sensitized TiO₂ with meso-superstructured organometal tri-halide perovskite solar cells". Nature Communications. 6: 2885. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2885L. doi:10.1038/ncomms3885. PMID24301460.
^Zhang, Hong; Cheng, Jiaqi; Lin, Francis; He, Hexiang; Mao, Jian; Wong, Kam Sing; Jen, Alex K.-Y.; Choy, Wallace C. H. (2016). "Pinhole-Free and Surface-Nanostructured NiOxFilm by Room-Temperature Solution Process for High-Performance Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells with Good Stability and Reproducibility". ACS Nano. 10 (1): 1503–1511. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b07043. PMID26688212.
^You, Jingbi; Meng, Lei; Song, Tze-Bin; Guo, Tzung-Fang; Yang, Yang (Michael); Chang, Wei-Hsuan; Hong, Ziruo; Chen, Huajun; Zhou, Huanping (2015). "Improved air stability of perovskite solar cells via solution-processed metal oxide transport layers". Nature Nanotechnology. 11 (1): 75–81. Bibcode:2016NatNa..11...75Y. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.230. PMID26457966.
^ abFederico Bella; Gianmarco Griffini; Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Guido Saracco; Michael Grätzel; Anders Hagfeldt; Stefano Turri; Claudio Gerbaldi (2016). "Improving efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells with photocurable fluoropolymers". Science. 354 (6309): 203–206. Bibcode:2016Sci...354..203B. doi:10.1126/science.aah4046. PMID27708051. S2CID 26368425.
^Sivaram, Varun; Stranks, Samuel D.; Snaith, Henry J. (2015). "Outshining Silicon". Scientific American. 313 (July 2015): 44–46. Bibcode:2015SciAm.313a..54S. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0715-54.
^G. Grancini, C. Roldán-Carmona, I. Zimmermann, E. Mosconi, X. Lee, D. Martineau, S. Narbey, F. Oswald, F. De Angelis, M. Graetzel & Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin (2017). "One-Year stable perovskite solar cells by 2D/3D interface engineering". Nature Communications. 8 (15684): 15684. Bibcode:2017NatCo...815684G. doi:10.1038/ncomms15684. PMC5461484. PMID28569749.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Ana Milena Cruz; Mónica Della Perreira (April 2018). "The New Generation of Photovoltaic Cells Entering the Market, Leitat, Barcelona, April 12, 2018".
^Islam, M. Bodiul; Yanagida, M.; Shirai, Y.; Nabetani, Y.; Miyano, K. (2019). "Highly stable semi-transparent MAPbI3 perovskite solar cells with operational output for 4000 h". Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 195: 323–329. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.004. S2CID 108779926.
^Watson, Brian L.; Rolston, Nicholas; Printz, Adam D.; Dauskardt, Reinhold H. (2017). "Scaffold-reinforced perovskite compound solar cells". Energy Environ. Sci. 10 (12): 2500. doi:10.1039/c7ee02185b.
^""Molecular glue" strengthens the weak point in perovskite solar cells". New Atlas. 2021-05-10. Retrieved 13 June 2021.
^ abcSnaith, Henry J.; Abate, Antonio; Ball, James M.; Eperon, Giles E.; Leijtens, Tomas; Noel, Nakita K.; Wang, Jacob Tse-Wei; Wojciechowski, Konrad; Zhang, Wei; Zhang, Wei (2014). "Anomalous Hysteresis in Perovskite Solar Cells". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 5 (9): 1511–1515. doi:10.1021/jz500113x. PMID26270088.
^ abcdUnger, Eva L.; Hoke, Eric T.; Bailie, Colin D.; Nguyen, William H.; Bowring, Andrea R.; Heumuller, Thomas; Christoforo, Mark G.; McGehee, Michael D. (2014). "Hysteresis and transient behavior in current-voltage measurements of hybrid-perovskite absorber solar cells". Energy & Environmental Science. 7 (11): 3690–3698. doi:10.1039/C4EE02465F.
^Noel, Nakita K; Abate, Antonio; Stranks, Samuel D.; Parrott, Elizabeth S.; Burlakov, Victor M.; Goriely, Alain; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Enhanced Photoluminescence and Solar Cell Performance via Lewis Base Passivation of Organic–Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskites". ACS Nano. 8 (10): 9815–9821. doi:10.1021/nn5036476. PMID25171692.
^Abate, Antonio; Saliba, Michael; Hollman, Derek J.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Wojciechowski, Konrad; Avolio, Roberto; Grancini, Giulia; Petrozza, Annamaria; Snaith, Henry J. (June 11, 2014). "Supramolecular Halogen Bond Passivation of Organic–Inorganic Halide Perovskite Solar Cells". Nano Letters. 14 (6): 3247–3254. Bibcode:2014NanoL..14.3247A. doi:10.1021/nl500627x. PMID24787646.
^Zimmermann, Eugen; Wong, Ka Kan; Mueller, Michael; Hu, Hao; Ehrenreich, Philipp; Kohlstaedt, Markus; Würfel, Uli; Mastroianni, Simone; Mathiazhagan, Gayathri; Hinsch, Andreas; Gujar, Tanji P.; Thelakkat, Mukundan; Pfadler, Thomas; Schmidt-Mende, Lukas (2016). "Characterization of perovskite solar cells: Towards a reliable measurement protocol". APL Materials. 4 (9): 091901. Bibcode:2016APLM....4i1901Z. doi:10.1063/1.4960759.
^Zimmermann, Eugen (2018-08-20). "GitHub Repository". GitHub.
^Rühle, Sven (2017). "The detailed balance limit of perovskite/silicon and perovskite/CdTe tandem solar cells". Physica Status Solidi A. 214 (5): 1600955. Bibcode:2017PSSAR.21400955R. doi:10.1002/pssa.201600955.
^Werner, Jérémie; Niesen, Bjoern; Ballif, Christophe (January 2018). "Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells: Marriage of Convenience or True Love Story? – An Overview". Advanced Materials Interfaces. 5 (1): 1700731. doi:10.1002/admi.201700731.
^Chen, Bo; Zheng, Xiaopeng; Bai, Yang; Padture, Nitin P.; Huang, Jinsong (July 2017). "Progress in Tandem Solar Cells Based on Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Perovskites". Advanced Energy Materials. 7 (14): 1602400. doi:10.1002/aenm.201602400.
^Lal, Niraj N.; Dkhissi, Yasmina; Li, Wei; Hou, Qicheng; Cheng, Yi-Bing; Bach, Udo (September 2017). "Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells". Advanced Energy Materials. 7 (18): 1602761. doi:10.1002/aenm.201602761.
^Bailie, Colin D.; Christoforo, M. Greyson; Mailoa, Jonathan P.; Bowring, Andrea R.; Unger, Eva L.; Nguyen, William H.; Burschka, Julian; Pellet, Norman; Lee, Jungwoo Z.; Grätzel, Michael; Noufi, Rommell; Buonassisi, Tonio; Salleo, Alberto; McGehee, Michael D. (2015). "Semi-transparent perovskite solar cells for tandems with silicon and CIGS". Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (3): 956–963. doi:10.1039/c4ee03322a. OSTI 1220721. S2CID 98057129.
^Mailoa, Jonathan P.; Bailie, Colin D.; Johlin, Eric C.; Hoke, Eric T.; Akey, Austin J.; Nguyen, William H.; McGehee, Michael D.; Buonassisi, Tonio (2015-03-23). "A 2-terminal perovskite/silicon multijunction solar cell enabled by a silicon tunnel junction". Applied Physics Letters. 106 (12): 121105. Bibcode:2015ApPhL.106l1105M. doi:10.1063/1.4914179. hdl:1721.1/96207.
^Albrecht, Steve; Saliba, Michael; Correa Baena, Juan Pablo; Lang, Felix; Kegelmann, Lukas; Mews, Mathias; Steier, Ludmilla; Abate, Antonio; Rappich, Jörg; Korte, Lars; Schlatmann, Rutger; Nazeeruddin, Mohammad Khaja; Hagfeldt, Anders; Grätzel, Michael; Rech, Bernd (2016). "Monolithic perovskite/silicon-heterojunction tandem solar cells processed at low temperature". Energy & Environmental Science. 9 (1): 81–88. doi:10.1039/C5EE02965A.
^Werner, Jérémie; Weng, Ching-Hsun; Walter, Arnaud; Fesquet, Luc; Seif, Johannes Peter; De Wolf, Stefaan; Niesen, Bjoern; Ballif, Christophe (24 December 2015). "Efficient Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cell with Cell Area >1 cm". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 7 (1): 161–166. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02686. PMID26687850.
^Bush, Kevin A.; Bailie, Colin D.; Chen, Ye; Bowring, Andrea R.; Wang, Wei; Ma, Wen; Leijtens, Tomas; Moghadam, Farhad; McGehee, Michael D. (May 2016). "Thermal and Environmental Stability of Semi-Transparent Perovskite Solar Cells for Tandems Enabled by a Solution-Processed Nanoparticle Buffer Layer and Sputtered ITO Electrode". Advanced Materials. 28 (20): 3937–3943. doi:10.1002/adma.201505279. PMID26880196. S2CID 14643245.
^Bush, Kevin A.; Palmstrom, Axel F.; Yu, Zhengshan J.; Boccard, Mathieu; Cheacharoen, Rongrong; Mailoa, Jonathan P.; McMeekin, David P.; Hoye, Robert L. Z.; Bailie, Colin D.; Leijtens, Tomas; Peters, Ian Marius; Minichetti, Maxmillian C.; Rolston, Nicholas; Prasanna, Rohit; Sofia, Sarah; Harwood, Duncan; Ma, Wen; Moghadam, Farhad; Snaith, Henry J.; Buonassisi, Tonio; Holman, Zachary C.; Bent, Stacey F.; McGehee, Michael D. (2017). "23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability". Nature Energy. 2 (4): 17009. Bibcode:2017NatEn...217009B. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.9. hdl:1721.1/118870.
^Sahli, Florent; Werner, Jérémie; Kamino, Brett A.; Bräuninger, Matthias; Monnard, Raphaël; Paviet-Salomon, Bertrand; Barraud, Loris; Ding, Laura; Diaz Leon, Juan J.; Sacchetto, Davide; Cattaneo, Gianluca; Despeisse, Matthieu; Boccard, Mathieu; Nicolay, Sylvain; Jeangros, Quentin; Niesen, Bjoern; Ballif, Christophe (11 June 2018). "Fully textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with 25.2% power conversion efficiency" (PDF). Nature Materials. 17 (9): 820–826. Bibcode:2018NatMa..17..820S. doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0115-4. PMID29891887. S2CID 48360906.
^Osborne, Mark (June 25, 2018) Oxford PV takes record perovskite tandem solar cell to 27.3% conversion efficiency. pv-tech.org
^Hou, Yi; Aydin, Erkan; De Bastiani, Michele; Xiao, Chuanxiao; Isikgor, Furkan H.; Xue, Ding-Jiang; Chen, Bin; Chen, Hao; Bahrami, Behzad; Chowdhury, Ashraful H.; Johnston, Andrew (2020-03-06). "Efficient tandem solar cells with solution-processed perovskite on textured crystalline silicon". Science. 367 (6482): 1135–1140. Bibcode:2020Sci...367.1135H. doi:10.1126/science.aaz3691. hdl:10754/661949. PMID32139544. S2CID 212560453.
^Subbiah, Anand S.; Isikgor, Furkan H.; Howells, Calvyn T.; De Bastiani, Michele; Liu, Jiang; Aydin, Erkan; Furlan, Francesco; Allen, Thomas G.; Xu, Fuzong; Zhumagali, Shynggys; Hoogland, Sjoerd (2020-09-11). "High-Performance Perovskite Single-Junction and Textured Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells via Slot-Die-Coating". ACS Energy Letters. 5 (9): 3034–3040. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01297. hdl:10754/664695. S2CID 225497627.
^ abcAydin, Erkan; Allen, Thomas G.; De Bastiani, Michele; Xu, Lujia; Ávila, Jorge; Salvador, Michael; Van Kerschaver, Emmanuel; De Wolf, Stefaan (2020-09-14). "Interplay between temperature and bandgap energies on the outdoor performance of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells". Nature Energy. 5 (11): 851–859. Bibcode:2020NatEn...5..851A. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00687-4. hdl:10754/665149. S2CID 224974516.
^Dumé, Isabelle (January 10, 2020) Tandem solar cells break new record. physicsworld.com
^Schneider, Bennett W.; Lal, Niraj N.; Baker-Finch, Simeon; White, Thomas P. (2014-10-20). "Pyramidal surface textures for light trapping and antireflection in perovskite-on-silicon tandem solar cells". Optics Express. 22 (S6): A1422–30. Bibcode:2014OExpr..22A1422S. doi:10.1364/oe.22.0a1422. hdl:1885/102145. PMID25607299.
^Filipič, Miha; Löper, Philipp; Niesen, Bjoern; Wolf, Stefaan De; Krč, Janez; Ballif, Christophe; Topič, Marko (2015-04-06). "CH_3NH_3PbI_3 perovskite / silicon tandem solar cells: characterization based optical simulations". Optics Express. 23 (7): A263–78. Bibcode:2015OExpr..23A.263F. doi:10.1364/oe.23.00a263. PMID25968792.
^Asadpour, Reza; Chavali, Raghu V. K.; Khan, M. Ryyan; Alam, Muhammad A. (2015). "Bifacial Si heterojunction-perovskite organic-inorganic tandem to produce highly efficient (ηT* ∼ 33%) solar cell". Applied Physics Letters. 106 (24): 243902. arXiv:1506.01039. Bibcode:2015ApPhL.106x3902A. doi:10.1063/1.4922375. S2CID 109438804.
^Manousakis, Efstratios (2010). "Photovoltaic effect in narrow gap Mott insulators". Physical Review B. 82 (12): 1251089. arXiv:0911.4933. Bibcode:2010PhRvB..82l5109M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.125109. S2CID 118490877.
^Coulter, John E.; Manousakis, Efstratios; Gali, Adam (2014). "Optoelectronic excitations and photovoltaic effect in strongly correlated materials". Physical Review B. 90 (12): 165142. arXiv:1409.8261. Bibcode:2014PhRvB..90p5142C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.165142. S2CID 119159407.
^Manners, David. (2016-05-25) Electronics Weekly. Electronics Weekly. Retrieved on 2018-04-11.
^Eperon, Giles E.; Leijtens, Tomas; Bush, Kevin A.; Prasanna, Rohit; Green, Thomas; Wang, Jacob Tse-Wei; McMeekin, David P.; Volonakis, George; Milot, Rebecca L. (2016-11-18). "Perovskite-perovskite tandem photovoltaics with optimized band gaps". Science. 354 (6314): 861–865. arXiv:1608.03920. Bibcode:2016Sci...354..861E. doi:10.1126/science.aaf9717. PMID27856902. S2CID 28954845.
^Zhao, Dewei; Yu, Yue; Wang, Changlei; Liao, Weiqiang; Shrestha, Niraj; Grice, Corey R.; Cimaroli, Alexander J.; Guan, Lei; Ellingson, Randy J. (2017). "Low-bandgap mixed tin–lead iodide perovskite absorbers with long carrier lifetimes for all-perovskite tandem solar cells". Nature Energy. 2 (4): 17018. Bibcode:2017NatEn...217018Z. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.18. OSTI 1371834.
^ abTian, Xueyu; Stranks, Samuel D.; You, Fengqi (2020-07-01). "Life cycle energy use and environmental implications of high-performance perovskite tandem solar cells". Science Advances. 6 (31): eabb0055. Bibcode:2020SciA....6...55T. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb0055. PMC7399695. PMID32789177.
^"Can the most exciting new solar material live up to its hype?". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2021-11-20.
^ abSchmidt-Mende, Lukas; Dyakonov, Vladimir; Olthof, Selina; Ünlü, Feray; Lê, Khan Moritz Trong; Mathur, Sanjay; Karabanov, Andrei D.; Lupascu, Doru C.; Herz, Laura M.; Hinderhofer, Alexander; Schreiber, Frank (2021-10-01). "Roadmap on organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite semiconductors and devices". APL Materials. 9 (10): 109202. Bibcode:2021APLM....9j9202S. doi:10.1063/5.0047616. S2CID 240026499.
^"Perovskite: the wonder crystal set to transform solar power". cosmosmagazine.com. Retrieved 2021-11-20.
^Kajal, Priyanka; Verma, Bhupesh; Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao; Powar, Satvasheel (2021). "Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon-Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique". Global Challenges. doi:10.1002/gch2.202100070. S2CID 240476544.
Xiao, Ke; Lin, Renxing; Han, Qiaolei; Hou, Yi; Qin, Zhenyuan; Nguyen, Hieu T.; Wen, Jin; Wei, Mingyang; Yeddu, Vishal; Saidaminov, Makhsud I.; Gao, Yuan; Luo, Xin; Wang, Yurui; Gao, Han; Zhang, Chunfeng; Xu, Jun; Zhu, Jia; Sargent, Edward H.; Tan, Hairen (November 2020). "All-perovskite tandem solar cells with 24.2% certified efficiency and area over 1 cm2 using surface-anchoring zwitterionic antioxidant". Nature Energy. 5 (11): 870–880. Bibcode:2020NatEn...5..870X. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00705-5. S2CID 223569048.