Personal air vehicle

Summary

A personal air vehicle (PAV) is a proposed type of aircraft providing on-demand aviation services.

A Carter PAV from 2014

The emergence of this alternative to traditional ground transport methods has been enabled by unmanned aerial vehicle technologies and electric propulsion. Barriers include aviation safety, airworthiness, operating costs, usability, airspace integration, aircraft noise and emissions, tackled first by small UAS certification then experience.[1]

DefinitionEdit

The personal air vehicle (PAV) is intended to provide flight convenience similar to the private car in terms of accessibility and ease of operation, while also offering the speed and routing efficiencies made possible by direct point-to-point flight. The PAV differs from conventional general aviation types and flying cars in being usable by people with no pilot qualifications.[2]

HistoryEdit

NASA established the Personal Air Vehicle Sector Project in 2002, as part of their Vehicle Systems Program (VSP). This project was part of the NASA Vehicle Integration, Strategy, and Technology Assessment (VISTA) office, which also included sectors for Subsonic Transports, VTOL Aircraft, Supersonic Aircraft, and High Altitude Long Endurance Aircraft. The objective of each sector was to establish vehicle capability goals and the required technology investment strategies to achieve those breakthroughs.[3]

The difference in vehicle characteristics between PAVs and existing General Aviation single engine piston aircraft was set out in 2003 at an American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) conference.[4] Advanced concepts would be needed to dramatically enhance ease of use, safety, efficiency, field length performance, and affordability.

In 2006 the VSP was replaced by new NASA Aeronautics initiatives. PAV technology development efforts at NASA shifted to a prize-based investment, with NASA Centennial Challenge Prize funds of $250,000 being provided for a Personal Air Vehicle Challenge in 2007.[citation needed]

BenefitsEdit

Currently the doorstep-to-doorstep average speed for cars is 35 miles per hour (56 km/h). In the greater Los Angeles area, this speed is predicted to degrade to 22 miles per hour (35 km/h) by year 2020. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) states that 6.7 billion US gallons (25,000,000 m3) of gasoline are wasted in traffic jams each year.

A future system of travel by PAVs might avoid air traffic jams and could help to relieve those on highways.[citation needed]

BarriersEdit

Air traffic controlEdit

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) infrastructure is not currently capable of handling the increase in aircraft traffic that would be generated by PAVs. The FAA plan to upgrade forms the Next Generation Air Transportation System, planned for 2025.[5] An interim plan is to use smaller airports. Modeling by NASA and others have shown that PAVs using smaller community airports would not interfere with commercial traffic at larger airports. Currently there are over 10,000 public and private small airports in the United States that could be used for this type of transportation. This infrastructure is currently underutilized, used primarily by recreational aircraft.

NoiseEdit

Noise from PAVs could also upset communities if they operate near homes and businesses. Without lower noise levels that enable residential landings, any PAV must take off and land at an FAA-controlled airfield, where higher sound levels have been approved.

Studies have explored ways to make helicopters and aircraft less noisy, but noise levels remain high. In 2005 a simple method of reducing noise was identified: Keep aircraft at a higher altitude during landing. This is called a Continuous Descent Approach (CDA).[6]

RangeEdit

Many proposed PAV aircraft are based on electric batteries, however they have low range due to the low specific energy of current batteries.[7] This range may be insufficient to provide adequate safety margin to find a landing site in an emergency.

Fuel cell aircraft have been proposed as a solution to this issue, owing to the much higher specific energy of hydrogen.[7][8]

SafetyEdit

Urban flight safety is a well-known problem for regulators and industry. On May 16, 1977, the New York Airways accident of a Sikorsky S-61 helicopter shuttle from John F. Kennedy International Airport, which landed on the roof of the Pan Am Building (now MetLife Building) when a landing gear collapsed and a detached rotor blade killed several people on the helipad and one woman on Madison Avenue, ending that business for decades almost around the world. Current helicopter accident rates would be insufficient for urban mobility. The Sikorsky S-92's safety-focused design still allows one fatal accident per million flight hours. This rate would lead to 150 accidents per year for 50,000 eVTOLs flying 3,000 hours a year.[9]

For Sikorsky Innovations, the emerging $30 billion urban air mobility market needs safety at least as good as FAR Part 29 governing over 7,000 lb (3.2 t) helicopters. By May 2018, Sikorsky flew an S-76 120 hours with full point-to-point, real time autonomous flight and terrain avoidance the hard way, with Level A software and redundancy, with a safety pilot.[10] Sikorsky Aircraft want to reach a vertical flight safety of one failure per 10 million hours on high-utilization platforms by combining current rotorcraft experience with advances in autonomous flight, airspace integration and electric propulsion.[9]

StudiesEdit

The European Union is funding a 3-leg 4.2m study (under the Seventh Framework Programme) of technologies and impacts for PAVs; Human-aircraft interaction, Automation of aerial systems in cluttered environments, and Exploring the socio-technological environment.[11][12]

ProgressEdit

Fulfillment of the NASA vision for PAVs is likely to unfold over several decades. Several vehicle types exist which strive to meet the PAV definition:

Most vehicles in the above category do not meet all the requirements set by NASA. However, some vehicles come close. Ultrallight aircraft are of special interest since their energy usage is low. Hybrid forms of the vehicle types above can also be useful. Some hybrid forms that exist are:

AutonomyEdit

Besides the fabrication of personal air vehicles, the creation of autonomous systems for PAVs is also being researched. First off, synthetic vision electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) as Highway in the sky (HITS) makes it much easier to control aircraft.[14] Also, Phantom Works is working on designing a system that allows to automate PAVs. The PAVs are designated their own "lanes" in the sky, thereby ensuring the avoidance of possible collisions. In addition, the different PAVs are also capable of detecting each other and communicating with each other, further decreasing the risk of collisions.[15]

PAV challengeEdit

NASA Langley has researched and prototyped the necessary PAV technologies and has dedicated the largest cash prize in the history of GA to the PAV that can demonstrate the best overall combination of performance. The PAV flight competition for this prize, known as the first annual PAV Challenge, was held Aug 4-12, 2007 and hosted the CAFE Foundation in Santa Rosa, California.[16]

In 2008 the challenge was renamed as the General Aviation Technology Challenge.

The new prizes were:

  • The Community Noise Prize ($150,000)
  • The Green Prize ($50,000) (MPG)
  • The Aviation Safety Prize ($50,000) (Handling, eCFI)
  • The CAFE 400 Prize ($25,000) (Speed)
  • The Quietest LSA Prize ($10,000)

The winners were:

  • Community Noise Lambada N109UA $20,000
  • Green Prize no winner n/a
  • CAFE Safety Pipistrel N2471P $50,000
  • CAFE 400 Pipistrel N2471P $2,000
  • Quietest LSA Lambada N109UA $10,000
  • Shortest Takeoff Pipistrel N2471P $3,750
  • Best Angle of Climb Pipistrel N2471P $3,750
  • Best Glide Ratio at 100 MPH Flightdesign CTSW N135CT $3,750
  • Cabin Noise (tie) Lambada N109UA Pipistrel N2471P $3,750 ($1,875 each)

Other notable designsEdit

List of Personal Air Vehicles with VTOL capability

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Graham Warwick (May 6, 2016). "Problems Aerospace Still Has To Solve". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  2. ^ "Final Report Summary - PPLANE (Personal plane: assessment and validation of pioneering concepts for personal air transport systems)", European Commission, 2013. (retrieved 3 July 2021)
  3. ^ Mark D. Moore; "NASA Personal Air Transportation Technologies", NASA LAngley Research centre, 2006. (retrieved 3 July 2021)
  4. ^ "Innovation in Flight: Research of the NASA Langley Research Center on Revolutionary Advanced Concepts for Aeronautics" (PDF). NASA. 22 February 2005.
  5. ^ "FAA NGATS". Archived from the original on October 17, 2006.
  6. ^ "Reducing Airplane Noise: Acoustical Engineers Find Simple Way to Reduce Airplane Noise". ScienceDaily. July 1, 2005.
  7. ^ a b "Flying Car Startup Alaka'i Bets Hydrogen Outdoes Batteries". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2020-01-20.
  8. ^ "Hydrogen-powered flying vehicle touted as Southern California traffic tonic". Reuters UK. 2019-05-30. Retrieved 2020-01-20.
  9. ^ a b Guy Norris (Jan 26, 2018). "Reality Check for Urban eVTOL On Safety And Production". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  10. ^ Mark Huber (May 1, 2018). "Sikorsky Exec Stresses Urban Air Safety". AIN online.
  11. ^ Czyzewski, Andrew. Personal flying vehicles project aims to end road congestion The Engineer (UK magazine), 22 June 2011. Accessed: 26 July 2011.
  12. ^ myCopter European Union, 2011. Accessed: 26 July 2011.
  13. ^ Bellows, Alan (2006-03-31). "Gravity powered plane". Damninteresting.com. Retrieved 2011-04-25.
  14. ^ Harry Kraemer (2003-12-01). "Highway in the sky". Aviationtoday.com. Retrieved 2011-04-25.
  15. ^ Gary Sanders (July 2004). "Boeing technical experts check the feasibility of Personal Air Vehicles". Boeing Frontiers.
  16. ^ "CAFE Foundation & The PAV Centennial Challenge". March 7, 2007. Archived from the original on March 7, 2007.

Further readingEdit

  • "NASA Announces Aeronautical Centennial Challenge". NASA. July 28, 2005.
  • "2007 NASA PAV Challenge Results". CAFE Foundation. August 16, 2007.
  • Danny Hakim (June 16, 2014). "A Helicopter of One's Own". The New York Times.
  • Mark Huber (Dec 2017). "It's a bird, it's a plane, it's…an Uber?". Business Jet Traveler.
  • "The Electric VTOL News". The Vertical Flight Technical Society.
  • "Are air taxis on a ride to nowhere?". FlightGlobal.com. 19 Feb 2018.
  • Stephen Trimble (21 Feb 2018). "Electric unmanned rotorcraft make economic case for air taxi role". FlightGlobal.
  • Kenneth I. Swartz (5 March 2020). "Transformative Vertical Flight 2020". Vertiflite.

ReportsEdit

  • R. John Hansman, Parker D. Vascik (April 21, 2016). "Operational Aspects of Aircraft-Based On-Demand Mobility" (PDF). Joint University Program for Air Transportation.
  • Fast-Forwarding to a Future of On-Demand Urban Air Transportation (PDF). Elevate (Report). Uber. October 27, 2016.
  • Michael J. Duffy; et al. (May 2017). "A Study in Reducing the Cost of Vertical Flight with Electric Propulsion". The Boeing Company.
  • Arthur Brown and Wesley L. Harris (January 2018). "A Vehicle Design and Optimization Model for On-Demand Aviation" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.