Popular science


Title page of Mary Somerville's On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences (1834), an early popular-science book.

Popular science (also called pop-science or popsci) is an interpretation of science intended for a general audience. While science journalism focuses on recent scientific developments, popular science is more broad-ranging. It may be written by professional science journalists or by scientists themselves. It is presented in many forms, including books, film and television documentaries, magazine articles, and web pages.

History and role

As early as 1830, astronomer John Herschel had recognized the need for the genre of popular science. In a letter to philosopher William Whewell, he wrote that the general public needed "digests of what is actually known in each particular branch of science... to give a connected view of what has been done, and what remains to be accomplished."[1] Indeed, as the British population became not just increasingly literate but also well-educated, there was growing demand for science titles. Mary Somerville became an early and highly successful science writer of the nineteenth century. Her On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences (1834), intended for the mass audience, sold quite well.[2][3] Arguably one of the first books in the genre of popular science, it contained few diagrams and very little mathematics. It had ten editions and was translated into multiple languages. It was the most popular science title from the publisher John Murray until On the Origin of Species (1859) by Charles Darwin.[1]

Popular science is a bridge between scientific literature as a professional medium of scientific research, and the realms of popular political and cultural discourse. The goal of the genre is often to capture the methods and accuracy of science while making the language more accessible. Many science-related controversies are discussed in popular science books and publications, such as the long-running debates over biological determinism and the biological components of intelligence, stirred by popular books such as The Mismeasure of Man and The Bell Curve.[4]

The purpose of scientific literature is to inform and persuade peers as to the validity of observations and conclusions and the forensic efficacy of methods. Popular science attempts to inform and convince scientific outsiders (sometimes along with scientists in other fields) of the significance of data and conclusions and to celebrate the results. Statements in the scientific literature are often qualified and tentative, emphasizing that new observations and results are consistent with and similar to established knowledge wherein qualified scientists are assumed to recognize the relevance. By contrast, popular science emphasizes uniqueness and generality, taking a tone of factual authority absent from the scientific literature. Comparisons between original scientific reports, derivative science journalism, and popular science typically reveal at least some level of distortion and oversimplification which can often be quite dramatic, even with politically neutral scientific topics.[5]

Popular science literature can be written by non-scientists who may have a limited understanding of the subject they are interpreting and it can be difficult for non-experts to identify misleading popular science, which may also blur the boundaries between real science and pseudoscience. However, sometimes non-scientists with a fair scientific background and strong technical communication skills can make good popular science writers because of their ability to put themselves in the layperson's place more easily.

Common threads

Some usual features of popular science productions include:

  • Entertainment value or personal relevance to the audience
  • Emphasis on uniqueness and radicalness
  • Exploring ideas overlooked by specialists or falling outside of established disciplines
  • Generalized, simplified science concepts
  • Presented for an audience with little or no science background, hence explaining general concepts more thoroughly
  • Synthesis of new ideas that cross multiple fields and offer new applications in other academic specialties
  • Use of metaphors and analogies to explain difficult or abstract scientific concepts

Notable English-language popularizers of science

In alphabetical order by last name:

Some sources of popular science

Science media

Science in the headlines

  • Science Media Centre (UK)
  • Science Media Center (USA)
  • SMC Global Network
  • Inside Science (AIP)
  • LiveScience
  • Science360 (NSF)
  • ScienceDaily
  • Science (AAAS)
  • ScienceNews (SSP)
  • Smithsonian Science

Science gateways

  • Science.gov
  • WorldWideScience
  • [1]

News online

  • ABC (aus)
  • ABC (usa)
  • BBC
  • CBC
  • CBS
  • ITV
  • Motherboard (Vice Media)
  • NBC
  • NPR
  • PBS
  • VOA
  • The Daily Beast
  • Huffington Post
  • International Business Times
  • Newser
  • Slate
  • Spiked
  • US News & World Report
  • Ciencia del Sur[permanent dead link]

News agencies

  • Associated Press
  • EurekAlert! (AAAS)
  • Reuters


  • Remember Newspaper Science Sections? They’re Almost All Gone Christopher Zara, International Business Times

Daily newspapers

  • The Australian
  • Chicago Tribune
  • The Globe and Mail
  • The Guardian
  • The Independent
  • Los Angeles Times
  • The New York Times
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Philadelphia Inquirer
  • The Sydney Morning Herald
  • The Telegraph
  • The Times
  • The Times of India
  • USA Today
  • The Washington Post


  • The Economist
  • Maclean's
  • The Nation
  • New Statesman
  • Newsweek
  • The New Yorker
  • The Spectator
  • Time
  • The Week


  • Frontline
  • National Review
  • New Republic


  • The Atlantic
  • Prospect
  • Vanity Fair


  • Harvard Magazine
  • Mother Jones

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ a b Holmes, Richard (22 October 2014). "In retrospect: On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences". Nature. 514 (7523): 432–433. doi:10.1038/514432a.
  2. ^ Baraniuk, Chris (28 June 2017). "Mary Somerville: Queen of 19th-century science". New Scientist. 235 (3132): 40–1. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(17)31271-X.
  3. ^ Strickland, Elisabetta (September 2017). "Mary Fairfax Somerville, Queen of Science". Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 64 (8): 929–31. doi:10.1090/noti1569.
  4. ^ Murdz William McRae, "Introduction: Science in Culture" in The Literature of Science, pp. 1–3, 10–11
  5. ^ Jeanne Fahnestock, "Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts" in The Literature of Science, pp. 17–36
  6. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2008). The Oxford book of modern science writing. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0-19-921680-2.
  7. ^ Editorial (October 1987). "Peter Medawar (obituary)". New Scientist. 116 (1581): 16. {{cite journal}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  8. ^ "Pharyngula". Scienceblogs.com. 2011-11-04. Retrieved 2011-11-08.
  9. ^ "The Loom". Blogs.discovermagazine.com. Retrieved 2011-11-08.
  10. ^ "ABC Science". Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  11. ^ "BBC Nature". Retrieved 2014-07-19.
  12. ^ "BBC Science". Retrieved 2014-07-19.
  13. ^ "BEYOND: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science". Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  14. ^ "CASW". Retrieved 2013-01-04.
  15. ^ "Science & Technology". Retrieved 2013-08-03.
  16. ^ "60 Minutes: Health & Science". Retrieved 2013-12-18.
  17. ^ "60 Minutes: Nature". Retrieved 2013-12-18.
  18. ^ "This Morning: HealthWatch". Retrieved 2013-08-03.
  19. ^ "Evening News: Health". Retrieved 2013-08-03.
  20. ^ "Sunday Morning: Nature". Retrieved 2013-08-03.
  21. ^ "Discovery Radio Programme". Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  22. ^ "Discovery Podcasts". Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  23. ^ "Inside Science". Retrieved 2013-07-18.
  24. ^ "Inside Science (AIP)". Retrieved 2013-08-06.
  25. ^ "ITV Science News". Retrieved 2013-08-08.
  26. ^ "Leading Edge". Retrieved 2014-01-02.
  27. ^ "The Life Scientific". Retrieved 2012-12-14.
  28. ^ "MITnews:science". Retrieved 2013-07-07.
  29. ^ "Nature online"
  30. ^ "NBC Science". Retrieved 2013-08-03.
  31. ^ "NBC Technology". Retrieved 2013-08-03.
  32. ^ "NBC Health". Retrieved 2013-08-03.
  33. ^ "Behind the Headlines ¬ Your guide to the science that makes the news"
  34. ^ "PBS Science & Nature". Retrieved 2013-01-26.
  35. ^ "PBS NewsHour: Science". Retrieved 2013-12-27.
  36. ^ "Nova: science in the news". Retrieved 2014-05-10.
  37. ^ "CBCnews Technology & Science". Retrieved 2013-01-31.
  38. ^ "The Ri Channel". Archived from the original on 2017-11-29. Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  39. ^ "Science Fantastic with Michio Kaku News/Audio/Video/About/Listen Live". Talk Radio Network. Retrieved 2013-09-22.
  40. ^ "NPR Science". Retrieved 2013-01-18.
  41. ^ "The Science Hour". Retrieved 2013-08-06.
  42. ^ "The Science Hour Podcasts". Retrieved 2013-08-06.
  43. ^ "Online Science"
  44. ^ "Science Niblets". Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  45. ^ "Science & Technology News – Latest in scientific breakthroughs and gadgets – VOA News". Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  46. ^ "Science World". Retrieved 2012-11-03.
  47. ^ "WIRED Science". Retrieved 2013-07-17.
  48. ^ "WIRED Science Blogs". Retrieved 2014-05-10.
  49. ^ "WIRED UK Science". Archived from the original on 2012-07-08. Retrieved 2012-07-08.
  50. ^ "Latest News from Science"

General bibliography

  • McRae, Murdo William (editor). The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing. The University of Georgia Press: Athens, 1993. ISBN 0-8203-1506-0.

External links

  • Media related to Popular science at Wikimedia Commons
  • The dictionary definition of popular science at Wiktionary