Marx and Engels used the term more broadly than Marxists did later, and applied it not only to hunter-gatherers but also to some communities that engaged in subsistence agriculture. There is also no agreement among later scholars, including Marxists, on the historical extent, or longevity, of primitive communism. Marx and Engels also noted how capitalist accumulation latched itself onto social organizations of primitive communism. For instance, in private correspondence the same year that The Origin of the Family was published, Engels attacked European colonialism, describing the Dutch regime in Java directly organizing agricultural production and profiting from it, "on the basis of the old communistic village communities".[clarification needed] He added that cases like the Dutch East Indies, British India and the Russian Empire showed "how today primitive communism furnishes ... the finest and broadest basis of exploitation".
There was little development in the research of "primitive communism" among Marxist scholars beyond Engels' study until the 20th and 21st centuries when Ernest Mandel, Rosa Luxemburg,Ian Hodder, Marija Gimbutas and others took up and developed upon the original theses. Non-Marxist scholars of prehistory and early history did not take the term seriously, although it was occasionally engaged with and often dismissed. The term primitive communism first appeared in Russian scholarship in the late 19th century, with references to primitive communism existing in ancient Crete. However, it was not researched in any depth until the 20th century, with work such as that of the ethnographer Dmitry Konstantinovich Zelenin, who looked at non-hunter-gatherer societies within the Soviet Union to identify remnants of primitive communism within their societies.
The belief of primitive communism as based on Morgan's work is flawed due to Morgan's misunderstandings of Haudenosaunee society and his since-proven-wrong theory of social evolution. Subsequent and more accurate research has focused on hunter-gatherer societies and aspects of such societies in relation to land ownership, communal ownership, and criminality and justice. A newer definition of primitive communism could be summarized as societies that practice economic cooperation among the members of their community, where almost every member of a community has their own contribution to society and land and natural resources are often shared peacefully among the community.
In a primitive communist society, the productive forces would have consisted of all able-bodied persons engaged in obtaining food and resources from the land, and everyone would share in what was produced by hunting and gathering. There would be no private property, which is distinguished from personal property such as articles of clothing and similar personal items, because primitive society produced no surplus; what was produced was quickly consumed and this was because there existed no division of labour, hence people were forced to work together. The few things that existed for any length of time - the means of production (tools and land), housing - were held communally.
 In Engels' view, in association with matrilocal residence and matrilineal descent,reproductive labour was shared. There would have also been a lack of state.
A term usually associated with Karl Marx, but most fully elaborated by Friedrich Engels (in The Origin of the Family, 1884), and referring to the collective right to basic resources, egalitarianism in social relationships, and absence of authoritarian rule and hierarchy that is supposed to have preceded stratification and exploitation in human history. Both Marx and Engels were heavily influenced by Lewis Henry Morgan's speculative evolutionary history, which described the "liberty, equality and fraternity of the ancient gentes", and the "communism in living" said to be evident in the village architecture of native Americans.
—John Scott and Gordon Marshall, 2007, Dictionary of Sociology.
Egalitarian and communist-like hunter-gatherer societies have been studied and described by many well-known social anthropologists including James Woodburn,Richard Borshay Lee, Alan Barnard and Jerome Lewis. Anthropologists such as Christopher Boehm,Chris Knight and Lewis offer theoretical accounts to explain how communistic, assertively egalitarian social arrangements might have emerged in the prehistoric past. Despite differences in emphasis, these and other anthropologists follow Engels in arguing that evolutionary change—resistance to primate-style sexual and political dominance—culminated eventually in a revolutionary transition. Lee criticizes the mainstream and dominant culture's long-time bias against the idea of primitive communism, deriding "Bourgeois ideology [that] would have us believe that primitive communism doesn't exist. In popular consciousness it is lumped with romanticism, exoticism: the noble savage."
Papers have argued that the depiction of hunter-gatherers as egalitarian is misleading. According to one paper published in Current Anthropology, while levels of inequality were low, they were still present, with the average hunter-gatherer group having a Gini coefficient of 0.25 (for comparison, this was attained by the nation of Denmark in 2007). This argument is in part supported by Alain Testart and others, who have said that a society without property is not free from problems of exploitation, domination or wars. Marx and Engels, however, did not argue that communism brought about equality, as according to them equality was a concept without connection in physical reality. Testart does support Engels' observations that societies without surplus are economically egalitarian and conversely that societies with surplus are unequal.
Arnold Petersen has used the existence of primitive communism to argue against the idea that communism goes against human nature.Hikmet Kıvılcımlı in his The Thesis of History argued that in pre-capitalist societies, the main dynamic of historical change "was not class struggle within society but rather the strong collective action" of egalitarian and collectivist values of "primitive socialist society".
Çatalhöyük after the first excavations
Due to the strong evidence of an egalitarian society, lack of hierarchy, and lack of economic inequality, historian Murray Bookchin has argued that Çatalhöyük was an early example of anarcho-communism, and so an example of primitive communism in a proto-city. However, still others use Çatalhöyük as an example that refutes the concept of primitive communism. Similarly it has been argued that the Indus Valley civilisation is an example of a primitive communist society due to its perceived lack of conflict and social hierarchies.Daniel Miller and others argue that such an assessment of the Indus Valley civilisation is not correct.
The Indian communist politicianShripad Amrit Dange considered ancient Indian society to be of a primitive communist nature. Other communists within India have also labelled the societies of current indigenous groups, such as the Adivasi, as examples of primitive communism. In Alfred Radcliffe-Brown's study of the Andamanese at the beginning of the 20th century he comments that they have "customs which result in an approach to communism" and "their domestic policy may be described as a communism".
Alexander Mikhailovich Zolotarev [ru], in his 1960 work on the development of religious cult communities from tribal communities in the Balkans, spoke of the primitive communism of the "archaic form of the tribal system".
Rolf Jensen in the 1980s conducted a historical study of Wolof society in west Africa looking at the development of class antagonisms from a primitive communist society. Also in the 1980s, Bourgeault looked at the forceful transition of indigenous societies in Canada from their traditional structures, which were anarchist and communistic in nature, into capitalist exploitation due to encroaching imperialism and colonialism. Such an area of interest has been a common topic of research for many fields beyond just Marxist scholars. Some anthropologists, such as John H. Moore, have continued to argue that societies such as those of Native Americans constitute primitive communist societies, whilst acknowledging and incorporating the research showing the complexity and diversity in native American societies.
James Connolly believed that "Gaelic primitive communism" existed in remnants in Irish society after it "had almost entirely disappeared" from much of western Europe. The agrariancommunes of the rundale system in Ireland have subsequently been assessed using a framework of primitive communism, where the system fits Marx and Engels' definition.
Criticism of the idea of primitive communism relates to definitions of property, where anthropologists such as Margaret Mead argue that private property exists in hunter-gatherer and other "primitive societies" but provide examples that Marx and subsequent theorists label as personal property, not private property. The idea has also been critiqued by other anthropologists for being based on Morgan's evolutionary model of society and for romanticising non‐Western societies.
Western and non-Western Scholars have criticised applying models that are too ethnocentrically European to non-European societies. Western scholars, including Leacock, have also criticised the ethnocentric point of view and biases in previous ethnographic research into hunter-gatherer societies. This is similar to criticism of adhering to stadialism in analysing cultures.Feminist scholars have criticised the idea of the lack of subjugation of women as suggested from the works of Engels, while Marxist feminists have been critical of and have reassessed Engels' ideas and suggestions in The Origin of the Family related to the development of women's subjugation in the transition from primitive communism to class society.
The Marxian economist Ernest Mandel criticised the research of Soviet scholars on primitive communism due to the influence of "Soviet-Marxist ideology" in their social sciences work.
David Graeber and David Wengrow's The Dawn of Everything challenges the notion that humans ever lived in precarious, small scale societies with little or no surplus. While they provide examples of sharing egalitarian societies in pre-history they claim that a huge variety of complex societies (some with large cities) existed long before the supposed agricultural and then urban revolutions proposed by V. Gordon Childe. Graeber and Wengrow's understanding of hunter-gatherer societies has, however, been questioned by other anthropologists.
The use of the term "communism" to describe these societies has been questioned when put in comparison with a future post-industrial communism, particularly in relation to the difference in scale from small communal groups to the size of modern nation-states.
Use of the term "primitive"Edit
"Primitive" in recent anthropological and social studies has begun to fall out of use due to racial stereotypes surrounding the ideas of what is primitive.
 Such a move has been supported by indigenous peoples who have faced racial stereotyping and violence due to being viewed as "primitive". Due to this, the term "primitive communism" may be replaced by terms such as Pre-Marxist communism.
Alain Testart and others have said that anthropologists should be careful when using research on current hunter-gatherer societies to determine the structure of societies in the paleolithic, where viewing current hunter-gatherer communities as "the most ancient of so-called primitive societies" is likely due to appearances and perceptions and does not reflect the progress and development that such societies have undergone in the past 10,000 years.
There have been Marxist historians criticised for their comments on the "primitivism" and "barbarism" of societies prior to their contact with European empires, such as the comments of Endre Sík. Such views on "primitivism" and "barbarism" are also prevalent in the works of their non-Marxist contemporaries. Marxist anthropologists have criticised and denounced Soviet anthropologists and historians for declaring indigenous communities they were studying for primitive communism as "degenerate".
^Felluga, Dino (1 January 2011). "Introductory Guide to Critical Theory - Modules on Marx: On the Stages of Economic Development". Purdue University. Archived from the original on 28 February 2021. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
^Pal Singh, Nikhil (September 2016). "On Race, Violence, and So-Called Primitive Accumulation" (PDF). Social Text. 34 (3): 27–50. doi:10.1215/01642472-3607564. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021.
^Clark, John P.; Martin, Camille (2005). "Elisee Reclus: Anarchy (1894)". In Graham, Robert (ed.). Anarchism: A documentary history of libertarian ideas. Vol. 1. Black Rose Books.
^Barnard, Alan (17 December 1992). "Primitive communism and mutual aid, Kropotkin visits the Bushmen". In Hann, C.M. (ed.). Socialism: Ideals, Ideologies, and Local Practice. Routledge. ISBN 9780415083225.
^Löwy, Michael (1 January 2012). "Zachodni imperializm przeciwko pierwotnemu komunizmowi - nowe odczytanie pism ekonomicznych Róży Luksemburg" [Western imperialism against primitive communism - a new reading of Rosa Luxemburg's economic writings]. Dziedzictwo Róży Luksemburg (in Polish). 6: 299–310. doi:10.14746/prt.2012.6.16.
^Reinisch, Dieter, ed. (2012). Der Urkommunismus. Auf den Spuren der egalitären Gesellschaft [Primitive communism. On the trail of the egalitarian society] (in German). Vienna: Promedia. ISBN 978-3-85371-350-1.
^ abParreira Álvares, Lucas (2017). "Comunismo Primitivo e transição capitalista no pensamento de Rosa Luxemburgo" [Primitive Communism and Capitalist Transition in Rosa Luxemburg's Thought]. Revista Direito e Práxis (in Portuguese). 8 (1). Archived from the original on 21 April 2021.
^Morton, Stephen (2018). "Capital Accumulation and Debt Colonialism after Rosa Luxemburg". New Formations. Lawrence & Wishart Ltd. 94 (94): 82–99. doi:10.3898/NEWF:94.06.2018. S2CID 158517913.
^Zelenin, Dmitry Konstantinovich (1934). "Имущественные запреты как пережитки первобытного коммунизма" [Property Restrictions as Survivals of Primitive Communism]. Transactions of the Institute of Anthropology and Ethnography (in Russian). Leningrad. 1 (1).
^Reshetov, A. M. (1972). Охотники, собиратели, рыболовы. Проблемы социально-экономических отношений в доземледельческом обществе [Hunters, Gatherers, Fishermen: Problems of Socioeconomic Relations in Pre-Agrarian Society] (in Russian).
^Vaitovich, Alexandra Vladimirovna; Kurlovich, Polina Sergeevna (2020). ""Первобытно-коммунистическое общество и его распад": доисторическое прошлое территории Беларуси согласно концепции В. К. Щербакова" ["Primitive communist society and its disintegration": the prehistoric past of the territory of Belarus according to the concept of V. K. Shcherbakov]. Journal of the Belarusian State University. History (in Russian). 4 (3). doi:10.33581/2520-6338-2020-3-54-63.
^Fehlmann, Meret (2011). Die Rede vom Matriarchat: Zur Gebrauchsgeschichte eines Arguments [Talk of matriarchy. To the history of use of an argument] (Thesis) (in German). Zurich: Chronos. ISBN 978-3-0340-1067-2. Archived from the original on 6 December 2018.
^Fromm, Erich (1999). "Rezension zu Wilhelm Reich "Der Einbruch der Sexualmoral"" [Review of Wilhelm Reich's "The Invasion of Compulsory Sex Morality"]. Erich Fromm: Gesamtausgabe in zwölf Bänden [Erich Fromm: Complete edition in twelve volumes] (in German). Vol. 8. Munich. pp. 93–96. ISBN 3421052808.
^Faludi, Julianna; Crosby, Michelle (2021). "The Digital Economy of the Sourdough: Housewifisation in the Time of COVID-19". tripleC. tripleC. 19 (1). Archived from the original on 13 May 2021.
^Sims, Lionel (9 February 2012). "Primitive communism, barbarism and the origins of class society". Weekly Worker. Archived from the original on 7 October 2021.
^Cadigan-Deutsch, Noah; Ford, Peter; O'loughlin, Daniel (2020). "The Revolutionary Theory of Karl Marx". In Young, Gregory D.; Leszczcynski, Mateusz (eds.). Revolution: Theorists, Theories & Practice(PDF). University of Colorado, Boulder. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 April 2021.
^Barnard, Alan (2008). "Social origins: sharing, exchange, kinship". In Botha, Rudolf; Knight, Chris (eds.). The Cradle of Language (Studies in the Evolution of Language 12). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 219–35.
^Lewis, Jerome (2002). Forest Hunter-Gatherers and Their World: A Study of Mbendjele Yaka Pygmies of Congo-Brazzaville and Their Secular and Religious Activities and Representations(PDF) (PhD). London School of Economics and Political Science. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
^Cörüt, İlker; Jongerden, Joost (31 May 2021). "Radical Approaches to Nation: An Introduction". In Cörüt, İlker; Jongerden, Joost (eds.). Beyond Nationalism and the Nation-State: Radical Approaches to Nation. Routledge. ISBN 9780367684020.
^Bookchin, Murray (1987). The Rise of Urbanisation and Decline of Citizenship. pp. 18–22.
^Cork, Edward (2005). "Peaceful Harappans? Reviewing the evidence for the absence of warfare in the Indus Civilisation of north-west India and Pakistan (c. 2500-1900 BC)". Antiquity. 79 (304): 411–423. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0011419X. S2CID 160617108.
^Gordon Childe, Vere (1940). Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles. London/Edinburgh: W. and R. Chambers.
^Gordon Childe, Vere (1935). The Prehistory of Scotland. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.
^Vencl, Slavomil (1988). "The problem of disappearance of hunter-gatherer societies in prehistory. Archaeological evidence and testimonies of classical authors". Listy filologické / Folia philologica. Centre for Classical Studies at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences. 111 (3): 129–143. JSTOR 23465415.
^Dange, Shripad Amrit (1949). India from Primitive Communism to Slavery: A Marxist Study of Ancient History in Outline.
^Shah, Alpa (February 2021). "For an anthropological theory of praxis: dystopic utopia in Indian Maoism and the rise of the Hindu Right". Social Anthropology. Wiley. 29 (1): 68–86. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12978.
^Shephard, Henry M. (2020). "On some geographical distribution of the Old Indo-European layer derivative roots". On Some Geographical Distribution of the Derivatives Roots of Old Indo-European Layer. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021.
^Bourgeault, Ron G. (1983). "The Indian, the Métis and the Fur Trade Class, Sexism and Racism in the Transition from "Communism" to Capitalism". Studies in Political Economy: A Socialist Review. 12 (1): 45–80. doi:10.1080/19187033.1983.11675649.
^Anthony, Thalia (23 March 2021). "Marx and Anti-Colonialism". In Gordon, Faith; Newman, Daniel (eds.). Leading Works in Law and Social Justice. Routledge.
^Pejnović, Vesna Stanković, ed. (2021). Beyond Capitalism and Neoliberalism. Belgrade: Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade. ISBN 978-86-7419-337-2. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021.
^Moore, John H. (2007). "Free Goods and Primitive Communism: An Anthropological Perspective" (PDF). Nature, Society, and Thought. 20 (3–4): 418–424. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2021.
^Dobbins, Gregory (2008). "Connolly, the archive, and method". Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies. 10 (1): 48–66. doi:10.1080/13698010801933853. S2CID 143827225.
^Slater, Eamonn; Flaherty, Eoin (2009). "Marx on Primitive Communism: The Irish Rundale Agrarian Commune, its internal Dynamics and the Metabolic Rift" (PDF). Irish Journal of Anthropology. 12 (2). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 June 2021.
^Slezkine, Yuri (30 April 1997). "Primitive Communism and the Other Way Around". In Lahusen, Thomas; Dobrenko, Evgeny (eds.). Socialist Realism without Shores. Duke University Press. ISBN 9780822398097.
^Grant, Bruce (8 February 2018). "The burdens of primitive communism". Anuário Antropológico. 25 (1): 157–174. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021.
^Fryd, Vivien Green (1995). "Rereading the Indian in Benjamin West's "Death of General Wolfe"". American Art. 9 (1): 75. doi:10.1086/424234. JSTOR 3109196.
^Mead, Margaret (1 January 1961). "Some Anthropological Considerations Concerning Natural Law" (PDF). Natural Law Forum: 51–64. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021.
^Lowie, Robert H. (March 1928). "Incorporeal Property in Primitive Society". The Yale Law Journal. 37 (5): 551–563. doi:10.2307/790747. JSTOR 790747.
^Martin, Keir (5 September 2018). "Communism". In Callan, Hilary; Coleman, Simon (eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology(PDF). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.doi:10.1002/9781118924396. ISBN 9780470657225. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021.
^Bianchi, Bernardo; Filion-Donato, Emilie; Miguel, Marlon; Yuva, Ayşe (2021). "From 'Materialism' towards 'Materialities'". In Bianchi, Bernardo; Filion-Donato, Emilie; Miguel, Marlon; Yuva, Ayşe (eds.). Materialism and Politics(PDF). Berlin: ICI Berlin Press. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2021.
^Yunkaporta, Tyson (2020). Sand Talk: How Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World. Melbourne: Text Publishing.
^Dozier, Edward P. (1955). "The Concepts of "Primitive" and "Native" in Anthropology". Yearbook of Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research: 187–202. JSTOR 3031146. Retrieved 25 September 2021.
Casal, Paula (2020). "G. A. Cohen's historical materialism: a feminist critique". Journal of Political Ideologies. 25 (3): 316–333. doi:10.1080/13569317.2020.1773072.
Corry, Stephen (27 February 2009). "Stephen Corry: Don't call these people primitive". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021.
Croom, Adam M. (2015). "Slurs, stereotypes, and in-equality: a critical review of "How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal"". Language Sciences. 52: 139–154. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.001. ISSN 0388-0001. Archived from the original on 19 April 2021.
Dunayevskaya, Raya (2018). "Marx's "New Humanism" and the Dialectics of Women's Liberation in "Primitive" and Modern Societies". In Dmitryev, Franklin (ed.). Marx's Philosophy of Revolution in Permanence for Our Day. Brill. pp. 241–256. ISBN 9789004383678.
Haller Jr., John S. (1971). "Race and the Concept of Progress in Nineteenth Century American Ethnology". American Anthropologist. 73 (3): 710–724. doi:10.1525/aa.1971.73.3.02a00120.
Hume, Brad D. (January 2011). "Evolutionisms: Lewis Henry Morgan, Time, and the Question of Sociocultural Evolutionary Theory". Histories of Anthropology Annual. 7 (1): 91–126. doi:10.1353/haa.2011.0009. S2CID 170478166. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021.
Kostick, Conor (10 November 2021). "'Primitive Communism': Did it Ever Exist?". Independent Left. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
Lee, Richard B. (1990). "Primitive communism and the origin of social inequality". In Upham, S. (ed.). Evolution of political systems: Sociopolitics in small-scale sedentary societies(PDF). Cambridge University Press. pp. 225–246. ISBN 0521382521. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 April 2021.
McGregor, Shiela Margaret (12 March 2021). "Engels on women, the family, class and gender". Human Geography. doi:10.1177/19427786211000047.
Svizzero, Serge; Tisdell, Clement A. (2016). "Economic evolution, diversity of societies and stages of economic development: A critique of theories applied to hunters and gatherers and their successors". Cogent Economics & Finance. 4 (1). doi:10.1080/23322039.2016.1161322.
Tomba, Massimiliano (9 November 2012). Marx's Temporalities. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-23679-0.
Ward Gailey, Christine (September 2016). "Locating primitive communism in capitalist social formations". Dialectical Anthropology. 40 (3): 259–266. doi:10.1007/s10624-016-9431-8. S2CID 148006390.
Yang, Manuel (September 2012). "Specter of the commons: Karl Marx, Lewis Henry Morgan, and nineteenth-century European stadialism". Borderlands. Gale Academic OneFile. 11 (2).
Historic and original textsEdit
(in French) Paul Lafargue, La propriété, Origine et évolution, Éditions du Sandre, 2007 (1890) (Read online, Marxist Internet Archive)
Paul Lafargue, The Evolution of Property from Savagery to Civilization, (1891), (new edition, 1905)
(in French)Paul Lafargue, Le Déterminisme économique de Karl Marx. Recherche sur l'origine des idées de Justice, du Bien, de l'âme et de dieu, L'Harmattan, 1997 (1909)
(in German) Heinrich Eildermann [de]: Urkommunismus und Urreligion: Geschichtsmaterialistisch beleuchtet. Nabu, 2011, ISBN 978-1245831512 (reprint from 1921; Full text on archive.org).
(in German)Karl August Wittfogel: Vom Urkommunismus bis zur proletarischen Revolution. Eine Skizze der Entwicklung der menschlichen Gesellschaft. Part 1: Urkommunismus und Feudalismus. Junge Garde, Berlin 1922.
(in Hungarian) István Kertész [hu]Az ősközösség kora és az ókori-keleti társadalmak, IKVA Kiadó, Budapest, 1990
Johann Jakob Bachofen, Myth, Religion, and Mother Right: Selected Writings of J.J. Bachofen by Joseph Campbell (Introduction) and George Boas (preface), Princeton University Press, 380p., 1992
Marx, Engels, Luxemburg and the Return to Primitive Communism
Primitive Communism, Barbarism and the Origins of Class Society by Lionel Sims
Hunter-Gatherers and the Mythology of the Market by John Gowdy