A government entity which is also known as government-owned enterprise or government-owned corporation or statutory corporation or government-owned-company or nationalised company in India established by the government with the objective of development, aim to control monopoly by the private sector entities, offer products and services at an affordable price to the citizens along with the role to earn profit for the government is called a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) or a Public Sector Enterprise (PSE). These establishments are wholly or partly owned by the Government of India and/or one of the many state or territorial governments. Central Public Sector Undertakings (CPSU, CPSE) are wholly or partly owned by the Government of India, while State Public Sector Undertakings (SPSU, SPSE) are wholly or partly owned by state or territorial governments.
In 1951, there were just 5 PSEs under the ownership of government sector in India. By March 2021, the number of such government entities had increased to 365.[1] These government entities represented a total investment of about ₹16.41 lakh crore as of 31 March 2019. Their total paid-up capital as of 31 March 2019 stood at about ₹2.76 lakh crore. CPSEs have earned a revenue of about ₹25.43 lakh crore during the financial year 2018–19.[1]
When India achieved independence in 1947, it was primarily an agrarian entity, with a weak industrial base. There were only eighteen state-owned Indian Ordnance Factories, previously established to reduce the dependency of the British Indian Army on imported arms.[2]
The British Raj had previously elected to leave agricultural production to the Private sector, with tea processing firms, Jute mills (such as the Acland Mill), railways, electricity utilities, banks, coal mines, and steel mills being just some of the economic entities largely owned by private individuals like the industrialist Jamsetji Tata. Other entities were listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange.[3]
Critics of private ownership of India’s agricultural and industrial entities—most notably Mahatma Gandhi’s independence movement—instead advocated for a self-sufficient, largely agrarian, communal village-based existence for India in the first half of the 20th century.[4][5] Other contemporary criticisms of India’s public sector targeted the lack of well-funded schools, public libraries, universities, hospitals and medical and engineering colleges; a lack seen as impeding an Indian replication of Britain’s own industrialization in the previous century.[6][7][8][9][10]
Post-Independence, the national consensus turned in favor of rapid industrialisation of the economy, a process seen as the key to economic development, improved living standards and economic sovereignty.[11] Building upon the Bombay Plan, which noted the necessity of government intervention and regulation in the economy, the first Industrial Policy Resolution announced in 1948 laid down in broad strokes such a strategy of industrial development. Later, the Planning Commission was formed by a cabinet resolution in March 1950 and the Industrial (Development and Regulation) Act was enacted in 1951 with the objective of empowering the government to take necessary steps to regulate industry.[12]
The first Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, promoted an economic policy based on import substitution industrialisation and advocated a mixed economy.[13] He believed that the establishment of basic and heavy industry was fundamental to the development and modernisation of the Indian economy. India's second five year plan (1956–60) and the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956 emphasized the development of public sector enterprises to meet Nehru's national industrialisation policy. His vision was carried forward by Dr. V. Krishnamurthy, a figure known as the "Father of Public sector undertakings in India". Indian statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis was instrumental to its formulation, which was later termed the Feldman–Mahalanobis model.[14][15]
In 1969, Indira Gandhi's government nationalised fourteen of India's largest private banks, and an additional six in 1980. This government-led industrial policy, with corresponding restrictions on private enterprise, was the dominant pattern of Indian economic development until the 1991 Indian economic crisis.[12] After the crisis, the government began divesting its ownership of several PSUs to raise capital and privatize companies facing poor financial performance and low efficiency.[16][17]
All of the public sector undertakings have been awarded additional financial autonomy. These units are government establishments that have comparative advantages", giving them greater autonomy to compete in the global market so as to "support [them] in their drive to become global giants".[18] Financial autonomy was initially awarded to nine PSUs as Navratna status in 1997.[19] Originally, the term Navaratna meant a talisman composed of nine precious gems. Later, this term was adopted in the courts of Gupta emperor Vikramaditya and Mughal emperor Akbar, as the collective name for nine extraordinary courtiers at their respective courts.
In 2010, the central government established the higher Maharatna category, which raises a public sector unit's investment ceiling from ₹1,000 crore to ₹5,000 crore.[20] The Maharatna public sector units can now decide on investments of up to 15 per cent of their net worth in a project while the Navaratna companies could invest up to ₹1,000 crore without explicit government approval. Two categories of Miniratnas afford less extensive financial autonomy.
Guidelines for awarding Ratna[21] status are as follows:
Category | Eligibility | Benefits for investment |
---|---|---|
Maharatna | Three years with an average annual net profit of over ₹2,500 crore, OR
Average annual Net worth of ₹10,000 crore for 3 years, OR Average annual Turnover of ₹20,000 crore for 3 years (against Rs 25,000 crore prescribed earlier)[22] |
₹1,000 crore – ₹5,000 crore, or free to decide on investments up to 15% of their net worth in a project |
Navaratna | A score of 60 (out of 100), based on six parameters which include net profit, net worth, total manpower cost, total cost of production, cost of services, PBDIT (Profit Before Depreciation, Interest and Taxes), capital employed, etc., AND
A psu must first be a Miniratna and have 4 independent directors on its board before it can be made a Navratna. |
up to ₹1,000 crore or 15% of their net worth on a single project or 30% of their net worth in the whole year (not exceeding ₹1,000 crores). |
Miniratna Category-I | Have made profits continuously for the last three years or earned a net profit of ₹30 crore or more in one of the three years | up to ₹500 crore or equal to their net worth, whichever is lower. |
Miniratna Category-II | Have made profits continuously for the last three years and should have a positive net worth. | up to ₹300 crore or up to 50% of their net worth, whichever is lower. |
PSUs in India are also categorised based on their special non-financial objectives and are registered under Section 8 of Companies Act, 2013 (erstwhile Section 25 of Companies Act, 1956).
S. No. | CPSE Name | Net Profit (₹ crore) | Share (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) | 13,445 | 9.7 |
2 | Coal India Limited (CIL) | 11,281 | 8.2 |
3 | Power Grid Corporation of India (PGCIL) | 10,811 | 7.8 |
4 | National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) | 10,113 | 7.3 |
5 | Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) | 6,621 | 4.8 |
6 | Mahanadi Coalfields (MCL) | 6,427 | 4.7 |
7 | Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFCL) | 5,655 | 4.1 |
8 | Northern Coalfields (NCL) | 4,971 | 3.6 |
9 | Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) | 4,886 | 3.5 |
10 | Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) | 4,459 | 3.2 |
Other CPSEs | 59,443 | 43 | |
Aggregated profit of profit-making CPSEs | 1,38,112 | 100 |
S. No. | CPSE Name | Net Loss (₹ crore) | Share (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) | 15,500 | 34.6 |
2 | Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited (RINL) | 3,910 | 8.7 |
3 | Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) | 3,696 | 8.2 |
4 | Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) | 2,708 | 6.0 |
5 | Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (CPCL) | 2,078 | 4.6 |
6 | Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL) | 1,473 | 3.3 |
7 | ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals Limited (OMPL) | 1,400 | 3.1 |
8 | Bharat Petro Resources Ltd (BPRL) | 915 | 2.0 |
9 | Hindustan Copper Ltd (HCL) | 569 | 1.3 |
Other CPSEs | 4,094 | 9.1 | |
Aggregate loss of loss-making CPSEs | 44,817 | 100 |
Public Sector Units (PSUs) can be classified as Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs), Public Sector Banks (PSBs), or State Level Public Enterprises (SLPEs). CPSEs are administered by the Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises. The Department of Public Enterprises (DPE), Ministry of Finance is the nodal department for all the Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs).
As of October 2021, there are 11 Maharatnas, 13 Navratnas and 73 Miniratnas (divided into Category 1 and Category 2).[24][25]
Currently there are 12 Nationalised Banks in India (Government Shareholding power is denoted in %, as of 1 April 2020):
Currently there are 43 Regional Rural Banks in India, as of 1 April 2020:[27]
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Puducherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Currently there are 7 Nationalized Insurance Companies (Government Shareholding power denoted in %, as of 1 April 2020):
Currently there are 28 Nationalized Financial Market Exchanges in India (Government Shareholding power denoted in %, as of 1 April 2020):
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)