Radicalesbians

Summary

"Radicalesbians" were several lesbian-feminist organizations founded in the post-Stonewall period of gay activism.[1] The first, most well-known of these groups was founded in New York City, and was short-lived, though their impact was not: the manifesto the group distributed during their protest, titled "The Woman-Identified Woman," came to be known as one of the foundational documents of lesbian-feminism.[2][3][4]

Following the first group in New York City, other groups known as "Radicalesbians" arose elsewhere. The Philadelphia Radicalesbians were explicitly connected to the New York City group, and some of the membership overlapped. However, another group of Radicalesbians in Australia also formed in the 1970s, unrelated to the United States groups, but motivated by similar concerns of misogyny and homophobia.

Historical context edit

In the 1960s, both women's liberation and gay liberation movements in the United States were amassing increasing levels of support. Yet, some lesbian women of this time period were feeling excluded from both movements.

In response to misogyny from the men of gay liberation organizations such as the New York City Gay Liberation Front, lesbians began to form their own, distinctive groups. They also held their own events, beginning with their first women's dance on April 3, 1970.[5][6] Similarly, lesbian women often found themselves on the margins of women's groups due to their sexuality. This issue was exacerbated by comments from Betty Friedan, then-leader of the National Organization for Women (NOW), who referred to lesbians as a "lavender menace" to the women's movement in 1969. Then, in March 1970, Susan Brownmiller's article "Sisterhood is Powerful" (published in The New York Times) referred to lesbians as a "lavender herring."[7] While Brownmiller's comment has since been characterized as her "attempting to make a joke and dissociate from Friedan’s views," it was clear that "some activists did not see the humor in it, and instead saw it as a comment on lesbians’ insignificance in the march toward women’s rights."[8]

In New York City, the frustration some lesbian women felt at this time led to one group of women deciding it was time to take action, and they formed a temporary group to protest the Second Congress to Unite Women on May 1, 1970.[9][10]

Second Congress to Unite Women edit

 
A "Lavender Menace" t-shirt from the NYC protest, (donated to the Lesbian Herstory Archives in Brooklyn, NYC).

Around 7pm, during the conference's opening session (led by author Kate Millett), the women began their zap. One newsletter after the event recalled: "The lights went out, people heard running, laughter, a rebel yell here and there, and when the lights were turned back on, those same 300 women found themselves in the hands of the LAVENDER MENACE."[9]

The women sported t-shirts they had designed themselves, featuring the words "Lavender Menace" across the front. Some of the women took to the stage and "announced their intention to discuss lesbian issues." Members of the group who had remained seated stood to reveal their own "Lavender Menace" shirts and voice their support.[2]

The group had anticipated resistance (though Millet encouraged the zap), but they were pleasantly surprised as the conversation was actually welcomed. The remaining two days of the Congress became dedicated to discussions, debates, and workshops about lesbian issues and their needs from other women in the movement.[2]

United States edit

US-based Radicalesbians chapters continued to organize for lesbian-feminism after the May 1970 action.[11]

New York City group edit

The NYC-based women who had organized the protest began to hold consciousness-raising groups for women of all sexualities. They also took on a name, abandoning their prior label of "Gay Liberation Front Women."[12] and the "Lavender Menace" (the title of their demonstration[9]). They first experimented with the name Lesbian Liberation, then adopted their better-known name, Radicalesbians.[2] Despite the changes, Radicalesbians of NYC is sometimes still mistakenly referred to as "Lavender Menace," given it was that demonstration that is typically considered the catalyst for the Radicalesbians group and the rapid growth in lesbian-feminist thought.[9][13]

Known members edit

There is not a full list of the membership of the NYC Radicalesbians, but many of its members have written about their participation and thus made their connections public. Some known members of the group include:[10][2]

Dissolution of New York group edit

In an effort to avoid unjust, "patriarchal 'leadership hierarchies' that would allow individual women to exert undue influence on the group," the group adopted a lot system that ensured responsibilities were spread around, allowing all women to participate in each role. Though this method showed some promise, over time, some women were routinely taking on leadership roles in an unofficial capacity due to their perceived expertise or experience. This led to some women feeling like they were unable to participate equally.[14]

Other women criticized the group for a lack of direct action. Those who sought a more active role in the lesbian-feminist movement eventually began to turn elsewhere.[11]

 
The Radicalesbians' manifesto, as seen reprinted in the Gay Liberation Front newsletter for June/July 1970.

Legacy edit

The Congress where the women held their initial protest was in Manhattan, in the building known today as New York City Lab School for Collaborative Studies; the site is recognized by the NYC LGBT Historic Sites Project as a historic location.[9]

Their manifesto, "The Woman-Identified Woman," provided a new way to discuss lesbianism that diverged from the pathologizing definitions in psychology at the time.[15]

Philadelphia edit

In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, another Radicalesbians group began in 1971.[16] Some of the women in this chapter had experiences in the NYC chapter, and therefore wanted to avoid the problems that led to the NYC group's dissolution. Philadelphia Radicalesbians "focused on the meaningful connections between and among women in consciousness-raising groups and small direct actions," trying to maintain a greater sense of community than what existed in their NYC counterpart.[10][11]

Australia edit

In the 1970s, tensions between lesbian women and the mainstream gay rights movement, mirroring those in the US, were rising in Australia. By 1972, lesbian women were forming their own groups, separate from mixed-gender groups.[17]

The Sorrento Conference (1973) edit

In July 1973, Australian lesbian-feminists held their first conference, nicknamed the "Sorrento Conference" as it was held at the Whitehall Guest House in Sorrento, Australia.[18] This initial conference allowed lesbian feminists of Australia their first organized effort at defining "what a lesbian is, what she could be and what we could do about it."[17][19]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Metcalf, Meg. "Research Guides: LGBTQIA+ Studies: A Resource Guide: Activism After Stonewall". guides.loc.gov. Retrieved 2024-03-07.
  2. ^ a b c d e Rapp, Linda (2015). "Radicalesbians" (PDF). GLBTQ Archive.
  3. ^ Bedikian, Christine (2020). "Lesbians and Their Role Within the Women's Liberation Movement in the Early 1970s". Gender and Sexuality Throughout World History. Library Partners Press - Wake Forest University.
  4. ^ Weiss, Penny A. (2018). "The Woman-Identified Woman - Radicalesbians". Feminist Manifestos: A Global Documentary Reader. New York University Press. pp. 221–226. ISBN 9781479805419.
  5. ^ "Page One · Gay Liberation in New York City, 1969-1973, by Lindsay Branson · OutHistory". outhistory.org. Retrieved 2024-03-08.
  6. ^ Brownworth, Victoria A. (2023-10-18). "Radicalesbians, the first lesbian rights group post-Stonewall". Philadelphia Gay News. Retrieved 2024-03-07. The Gay Liberation Front (GLF) was also an inadvertent co-founder of Radicalesbians. While some men involved in GLF were attuned to sexism within the nascent movement, others were not. And many lesbian activists felt as separate from the gay men of GLF as they did from straight women of NOW.
  7. ^ "'Sisterhood Is Powerful' (Published 1970)". 1970-03-15. Retrieved 2024-03-07.
  8. ^ "How the Lavender Menace Fought for Lesbian Liberation in the 1970s". Them. 2019-06-19. Retrieved 2024-03-07.
  9. ^ a b c d e Kahn, Emily (2020). "Lavender Menace Action at Second Congress to Unite Women".
  10. ^ a b c Shumsky, Ellen (2009-07-01). "Radicalesbians". The Gay & Lesbian Review. Retrieved 2024-03-07.
  11. ^ a b c Brownworth, Victoria A. (2023-10-18). "Radicalesbians, the first lesbian rights group post-Stonewall". Philadelphia Gay News. Retrieved 2024-03-08.
  12. ^ Kesner, Arlene (1970). "Women Coming Together With Women" (PDF). Come Out!. 1 (4): 14.
  13. ^ "Out Of The Past". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2024-03-08.
  14. ^ "Page Three · Gay Liberation in New York City, 1969-1973, by Lindsay Branson · OutHistory". outhistory.org. Retrieved 2024-03-08.
  15. ^ Phelan, Shane (1989). Identity Politics: Lesbian Feminism and the Limits of Community. Temple University Press. pp. 39–41. ISBN 978-0-87722-651-2. At the second Congress to Unite Women, held at the beginning of May 1970, 'The Woman-Identified Woman' was distributed and discussed, and the result was a completely new ground for discourse about and understanding of lesbianism. The centerpiece of 'The Woman-Identified Woman' is its answer to the question, 'What is a lesbian?' The answer is not to be found in psychology textbooks.
  16. ^ Stein, Marc (2004). "Radicalesbian Feminism In "Fillydykia," 1971-1972". City Of Sisterly And Brotherly Loves: Lesbian And Gay Philadelphia, 1945-1972. Temple University Press. p. 343. ISBN 9781592131303.
  17. ^ a b Sitka, Chris. "A Radicalesbian Herstory" (PDF). Retrieved March 9, 2024.
  18. ^ Willett, Graham; Bailey, Angela; Jones, Timothy W.; Rood, Sarah (2021). "A History of LGBTIQ+ Victoria" (PDF). p. 20. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
  19. ^ Calder, Bill (2016-05-03). "Feminist collectives or private owners: both used media to advance lesbian goals". Feminist Media Studies. 16 (3): 413–428. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1105842. ISSN 1468-0777.