Resistance distance

Summary

In graph theory, the resistance distance between two vertices of a simple, connected graph, G, is equal to the resistance between two equivalent points on an electrical network, constructed so as to correspond to G, with each edge being replaced by a resistance of one ohm. It is a metric on graphs.

Definition edit

On a graph G, the resistance distance Ωi,j between two vertices vi and vj is[1]

 
where  

with + denotes the Moore–Penrose inverse, L the Laplacian matrix of G, |V| is the number of vertices in G, and Φ is the |V| × |V| matrix containing all 1s.

Properties of resistance distance edit

If i = j then Ωi,j = 0. For an undirected graph

 

General sum rule edit

For any N-vertex simple connected graph G = (V, E) and arbitrary N×N matrix M:

 

From this generalized sum rule a number of relationships can be derived depending on the choice of M. Two of note are;

 

where the λk are the non-zero eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix. This unordered sum

 

is called the Kirchhoff index of the graph.

Relationship to the number of spanning trees of a graph edit

For a simple connected graph G = (V, E), the resistance distance between two vertices may be expressed as a function of the set of spanning trees, T, of G as follows:

 

where T' is the set of spanning trees for the graph G' = (V, E + ei,j). In other words, for an edge  , the resistance distance between a pair of nodes   and   is the probability that the edge   is in a random spanning tree of  .

Relationship to random walks edit

The resistance distance between vertices   and   is proportional to the commute time   of a random walk between   and  . The commute time is the expected number of steps in a random walk that starts at  , visits  , and returns to  . For a graph with   edges, the resistance distance and commute time are related as  .[2]

As a squared Euclidean distance edit

Since the Laplacian L is symmetric and positive semi-definite, so is

 

thus its pseudo-inverse Γ is also symmetric and positive semi-definite. Thus, there is a K such that   and we can write:

 

showing that the square root of the resistance distance corresponds to the Euclidean distance in the space spanned by K.

Connection with Fibonacci numbers edit

A fan graph is a graph on n + 1 vertices where there is an edge between vertex i and n + 1 for all i = 1, 2, 3, …, n, and there is an edge between vertex i and i + 1 for all i = 1, 2, 3, …, n – 1.

The resistance distance between vertex n + 1 and vertex i ∈ {1, 2, 3, …, n} is

 

where Fj is the j-th Fibonacci number, for j ≥ 0.[3]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ "Resistance Distance".
  2. ^ Chandra, Ashok K and Raghavan, Prabhakar and Ruzzo, Walter L and Smolensky, Roman (1989). "The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times". Proceedings of the twenty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '89. pp. 574–685. doi:10.1145/73007.73062. ISBN 0897913078.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Bapat, R. B.; Gupta, Somit (2010). "Resistance distance in wheels and fans" (PDF). Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 41 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s13226-010-0004-2. MR 2650096.
  • Klein, D. J.; Randic, M. J. (1993). "Resistance Distance". J. Math. Chem. 12: 81–95. doi:10.1007/BF01164627. S2CID 16382100.
  • Gutman, Ivan; Mohar, Bojan (1996). "The quasi-Wiener and the Kirchhoff indices coincide". J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36 (5): 982–985. doi:10.1021/ci960007t.
  • Palacios, Jose Luis (2001). "Closed-form formulas for the Kirchhoff index". Int. J. Quantum Chem. 81 (2): 135–140. doi:10.1002/1097-461X(2001)81:2<135::AID-QUA4>3.0.CO;2-G.
  • Babic, D.; Klein, D. J.; Lukovits, I.; Nikolic, S.; Trinajstic, N. (2002). "Resistance-distance matrix: a computational algorithm and its application". Int. J. Quantum Chem. 90 (1): 166–167. doi:10.1002/qua.10057.
  • Klein, D. J. (2002). "Resistance Distance Sum Rules" (PDF). Croatica Chem. Acta. 75 (2): 633–649. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-26.
  • Bapat, Ravindra B.; Gutman, Ivan; Xiao, Wenjun (2003). "A simple method for computing resistance distance". Z. Naturforsch. 58a (9–10): 494–498. Bibcode:2003ZNatA..58..494B. doi:10.1515/zna-2003-9-1003.
  • Placios, Jose Luis (2004). "Foster's formulas via probability and the Kirchhoff index". Method. Comput. Appl. Probab. 6 (4): 381–387. doi:10.1023/B:MCAP.0000045086.76839.54. S2CID 120309331.
  • Bendito, Enrique; Carmona, Angeles; Encinas, Andres M.; Gesto, Jose M. (2008). "A formula for the Kirchhoff index". Int. J. Quantum Chem. 108 (6): 1200–1206. Bibcode:2008IJQC..108.1200B. doi:10.1002/qua.21588.
  • Zhou, Bo; Trinajstic, Nenad (2009). "The Kirchhoff index and the matching number". Int. J. Quantum Chem. 109 (13): 2978–2981. Bibcode:2009IJQC..109.2978Z. doi:10.1002/qua.21915.
  • Zhou, Bo; Trinajstic, Nenad (2009). "On resistance-distance and the Kirchhoff index". J. Math. Chem. 46: 283–289. doi:10.1007/s10910-008-9459-3. hdl:10338.dmlcz/140814. S2CID 119389248.
  • Zhou, Bo (2011). "On sum of powers of Laplacian eigenvalues and Laplacian Estrada Index of graphs". Match Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 62: 611–619. arXiv:1102.1144.
  • Zhang, Heping; Yang, Yujun (2007). "Resistance distance and Kirchhoff index in circulant graphs". Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107 (2): 330–339. Bibcode:2007IJQC..107..330Z. doi:10.1002/qua.21068.
  • Yang, Yujun; Zhang, Heping (2008). "Some rules on resistance distance with applications". J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 (44): 445203. Bibcode:2008JPhA...41R5203Y. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/44/445203. S2CID 122226781.