Reusable launch vehicle


A reusable launch vehicle has parts that can be recovered and reflown, while carrying payloads from the surface to outer space. Rocket stages are the most common launch vehicle parts aimed for reuse. Smaller parts such as rocket engines and boosters can also be reused, though reusable spacecraft may be launched on top of an expendable launch vehicle. Reusable launch vehicles do not need to make these parts for each launch, therefore reducing its launch cost significantly. However, these benefits are diminished by the cost of recovery and refurbishment.

Booster hooked up on a crane
Recovery of Falcon 9 first-stage booster after its first landing

Reusable launch vehicles may contain additional avionics and propellant, making them heavier than their expendable counterparts. Reused parts may need to enter the atmosphere and navigate through it, so they are often equipped with heat shields, grid fins, and other flight control surfaces. By modifying their shape, spaceplanes can leverage aviation mechanics to aid in its recovery, such as gliding or lift. In the atmosphere, parachutes or retrorockets may also be needed to slow it down further. Reusable parts may also need specialized recovery facilities such as runways or autonomous spaceport drone ships. Some concepts rely on ground infrastructures such as mass drivers to accelerate the launch vehicle beforehand.

Since at least in the early 20th century, single-stage-to-orbit reusable launch vehicles have existed in science fiction. In the 1960s and 1970s, the first reusable launch vehicles were manufactured, named the Space Shuttle and Energia. However, in the 1990s, due to both programs' failure to meet expectations, reusable launch vehicle concepts were reduced to prototype testing. The rise of private spaceflight companies in the 2000s and 2010s lead to a resurgence of their development, such as in SpaceShipOne, New Shepard, Electron, Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy. Many launch vehicles are now expected to debut with reusability in the 2020s, such as Starship, New Glenn, Soyuz-7, Ariane Next, Long March, and the Dawn Mk-II Aurora.[1]


Reusable launch systems may be either fully or partially reusable.

Fully reusable launch vehicleEdit

As of January 2023, fully reusable orbital systems have yet to be built and made operational. Fully reusable launch vehicles could theoretically be single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) vehicles, as well as multi-stage-to orbit systems.

At least four companies are currently in development to achieve fully reusable launch vehicles as of February 2023. Each of them is working on a two-stage-to-orbit system. SpaceX, with their SpaceX Starship, which has been in development since 2016 and has made an initial test flight in April 2023.[2] Relativity Space, with their Terran R beginning development by 2021, is aiming to make an initial orbital launch test by 2024.[3][4] Blue Origin, with Project Jarvis, began development work by early 2021, but has announced no date for testing, nor even been public with their plans.[5] Stoke Space is also developing a rocket which is planned to be reusable.[6][7]

Earlier plans to run tests of enhanced reusability on the second stage of the SpaceX Falcon 9 were set aside in 2018.

Partially reusable launch systemsEdit

Partial reusable launch systems, in the form of multiple stage to orbit systems have been so far the only reusable configurations in use.

Liftoff stagesEdit

Existing reusable launch systems use rocket-propelled vertical liftoff.[needs update]

Other than that a range of non-rocket liftoff systems have been proposed and explored over time as reusable systems for liftoff, from balloons[8][relevant?] to space elevators. Existing examples are systems which employ winged horizontal jet-engine powered liftoff. Such aircraft can air launch expendable rockets and can because of that be considered partially reusable systems if the aircraft is thought of as the first stage of the launch vehicle. An example of this configuration is the Orbital Sciences Pegasus. For suborbital flight the SpaceShipTwo uses for liftoff a carrier plane, its mothership the Scaled Composites White Knight Two.

Orbital insertion stagesEdit

So far, launch systems achieve orbital insertion with multistaged rockets, particularly with the second and third stages. Only the Space Shuttle has achieved a partial reuse of the orbital insertion stage, by using the engines of its orbiter.

Reusable orbiterEdit

Launch systems can be combined with reusable orbiters. The Space Shuttle orbiter, SpaceShipTwo, Dawn Mk-II Aurora, and the under-development Indian RLV-TD are examples for a reusable space vehicle (a spaceplane) as well as a part of its launch system.

More contemporarily the Falcon 9 launch system has carried reusable vehicles such as the Dragon 2 and X-37, transporting two reusable vehicles at the same time.

Contemporary reusable orbital vehicles include the X-37, the Dream Chaser, the Dragon 2, the Indian RLV-TD and the upcoming European Space Rider (successor to the IXV).

As with launch vehicles, all pure spacecraft during the early decades of human capacity to achieve spaceflight were designed to be single-use items. This was true both for satellites and space probes intended to be left in space for a long time, as well as any object designed to return to Earth such as human-carrying space capsules or the sample return canisters of space matter collection missions like Stardust (1999–2006)[9] or Hayabusa (2005–2010).[10][11] Exceptions to the general rule for space vehicles were the US Gemini SC-2, the Soviet Union spacecraft Vozvraschaemyi Apparat (VA), the US Space Shuttle orbiter (mid-1970s-2011, with 135 flights between 1981 and 2011) and the Soviet Buran (1980-1988, with just one uncrewed test flight in 1988). Both of these spaceships were also an integral part of the launch system (providing launch acceleration) as well as operating as medium-duration spaceships in space. This began to change in the mid-2010s.

In the 2010s, the space transport cargo capsule from one of the suppliers resupplying the International Space Station was designed for reuse, and after 2017,[12] NASA began to allow the reuse of the SpaceX Dragon cargo spacecraft on these NASA-contracted transport routes. This was the beginning of design and operation of a reusable space vehicle.

Since then also the Boeing Starliner capsules reduce their fall speed with parachutes and deploy an airbag shortly before touchdown on the ground, in order to retrieve and reuse the vehicle.

As of 2021, SpaceX is currently building and testing the Starship spaceship to be capable of surviving multiple hypersonic reentries through the atmosphere so that they become truly reusable long-duration spaceships; no Starship operational flights have yet occurred.

Entry systemsEdit

Heat shieldEdit

With possible inflatable heat shields, as developed by the US (Low Earth Orbit Flight Test Inflatable Decelerator - LOFTID)[13] and China,[14] single-use rockets like the Space Launch System are considered to be retrofitted with such heat shields to salvage the expensive engines, possibly reducing the costs of launches significantly.[15]

Retrograde thrustEdit

Reusable launch system stages such as the Falcon 9 employ retrograde burns for deorbit, re-entry, and landing.[citation needed]

Landing systemsEdit

Reusable systems can come in single or multiple (two or three) stages to orbit configurations. For some or all stages the following landing system types can be employed.



These are landing systems that employ parachutes and bolstered hard landings, like in a splashdown at sea or a touchdown at land.

Though such systems have been in use since the beginning of astronautics to recover space vehicles, particularly crewed space capsules, only later have the vehicles been reused.


Horizontal (winged)Edit

Single or main stages, as well as fly-back boosters can employ a horizontal landing system.

Examples are:

A variant is an in-air-capture tow back system, advocated by a company called EMBENTION with its FALCon project.[16]

Vehicles that land horizontally on a runway require wings and undercarriage. These typically consume about 9-12% of the landing vehicle mass,[citation needed] which either reduces the payload or increases the size of the vehicle. Concepts such as lifting bodies offer some reduction in wing mass,[citation needed] as does the delta wing shape of the Space Shuttle.

Vertical (retrograde)Edit

Systems like the McDonnell Douglas DC-X (Delta Clipper) and those by SpaceX are examples of a retrograde system. The boosters of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy land using one of their nine engines. The Falcon 9 rocket is the first orbital rocket to vertically land its first stage on the ground. Both stages of Starship are planned to land vertically.

Retrograde landing typically requires about 10% of the total first stage propellant, reducing the payload that can be carried due to the rocket equation.[17]

Landing using aerostatic forceEdit

There is also the concept of a launch vehicle with an inflatable, reusable first stage. The shape of this structure will be supported by excess internal pressure (using light gases). It is assumed that the bulk density of the first stage (without propellant) is less than the bulk density of air. Upon returning from flight, such a first stage remains floating in the air (without touching the surface of the Earth). This will ensure that the first stage is retained for reuse. Increasing the size of the first stage increases aerodynamic losses. This results in a slight decrease in payload. This reduction in payload is compensated for by the reuse of the first stage. [18]


Extra weightEdit

Reusable stages weigh more than equivalent expendable stages. This is unavoidable due to the supplementary systems, landing gear and/or surplus propellant needed to land a stage. The actual mass penalty depends on the vehicle and the return mode chosen.[19]


After the launcher lands, it may need to be refurbished to prepare it for its next flight. This process may be lengthy and expensive. The launcher may not be able to be recertified as human-rated after refurbishment, although SpaceX has flown reused Falcon 9 boosters for human missions. There is eventually a limit on how many times a launcher can be refurbished before it has to be retired, but how often a launcher can be reused differs significantly between the various launch system designs.


With the development of rocket propulsion in the first half of the twentieth century, space travel became a technical possibility.

Early ideas of a single-stage reusable spaceplane proved unrealistic and although even the first practical rocket vehicles (V-2) could reach the fringes of space, reusable technology was too heavy. In addition many early rockets were developed to deliver weapons, making reuse impossible by design. The problem of mass efficiency was overcome by using multiple expendable stages in a vertical-launch multistage rocket. USAF and NACA had been studying orbital reusable spaceplanes since 1958, e.g. Dyna-Soar, but the first reusable stages did not fly until the advent of the US Space Shuttle in 1981.

20th centuryEdit

McDonnell Douglas DC-X used vertical takeoff and vertical landing

Perhaps the first reusable launch vehicles were the ones conceptualized and studied by Wernher von Braun from 1948 until 1956. The Von Braun Ferry Rocket underwent two revisions: once in 1952 and again in 1956. They would have landed using parachutes.[20][21]

The General Dynamics Nexus was proposed in the 1960s as a fully reusable successor to the Saturn V rocket, having the capacity of transporting up to 450–910 t (990,000–2,000,000 lb) to orbit.[22][23] See also Sea Dragon, and Douglas SASSTO.

The BAC Mustard was studied starting in 1964. It would have comprised three identical spaceplanes strapped together and arranged in two stages. During ascent the two outer spaceplanes, which formed the first stage, would detach and glide back individually to earth. It was canceled after the last study of the design in 1967 due to a lack of funds for development.[24]

NASA started the Space Shuttle design process in 1968, with the vision of creating a fully reusable spaceplane using a crewed fly-back booster. This concept proved expensive and complex, therefore the design was scaled back to reusable solid rocket boosters and an expendable external tank.[25][26] Space Shuttle Columbia launched and landed 27 times and was lost with all crew on the 28th landing attempt; Challenger launched and landed 9 times and was lost with all crew on the 10th launch attempt; Discovery launched and landed 39 times; Atlantis launched and landed 33 times.

In 1986 President Ronald Reagan called for an air-breathing scramjet National Aerospace Plane (NASP)/X-30. The project failed due to technical issues and was canceled in 1993.[27]

In the late 1980s a fully reusable version of the Energia rocket, the Energia II, was proposed. Its boosters and core would have had the capability of landing separately on a runway.[28]

In the 1990s the McDonnell Douglas Delta Clipper VTOL SSTO proposal progressed to the testing phase. The DC-X prototype demonstrated rapid turnaround time and automatic computer control.

In mid-1990s, British research evolved an earlier HOTOL design into the far more promising Skylon design, which remains in development.

From the late 1990s to the 2000s, the European Space Agency studied the recovery of the Ariane 5 solid rocket boosters.[29] The last recovery attempt took place in 2009.[30]

The commercial ventures, Rocketplane Kistler and Rotary Rocket, attempted to build reusable privately developed rockets before going bankrupt.[citation needed]

NASA proposed reusable concepts to replace the Shuttle technology, to be demonstrated under the X-33 and X-34 programs, which were both cancelled in the early 2000s due to rising costs and technical issues.

21st centuryEdit

Scaled Composites SpaceShipOne used horizontal landing after being launched from a carrier airplane
Falcon Heavy side boosters landing during 2018 demonstration mission.

The Ansari X Prize contest was intended to develop private suborbital reusable vehicles. Many private companies competed, with the winner, Scaled Composites, reaching the Kármán line twice in a two-week period with their reusable SpaceShipOne.

In 2012, SpaceX started a flight test program with experimental vehicles. These subsequently led to the development of the Falcon 9 reusable rocket launcher.[31]

On 23 November 2015 the New Shepard rocket became the first Vertical Take-off, Vertical Landing (VTVL) sub-orbital rocket to reach space by passing the Kármán line (100 km or 62 mi), reaching 329,839 ft (100,535 m) before returning for a propulsive landing.[32][33]

SpaceX achieved the first vertical soft landing of a reusable orbital rocket stage on December 21, 2015, after delivering 11 Orbcomm OG-2 commercial satellites into low Earth orbit.[34]

The first reuse of a Falcon 9 first stage occurred on 30 March 2017.[35] SpaceX now routinely recovers and reuses their first stages, as well as reusing fairings.[36]

In 2019 Rocket Lab announced plans to recover and reuse the first stage of their Electron launch vehicle, intending to use parachutes and mid-air retrieval.[37] On 20 November 2020, Rocket Lab successfully returned an Electron first stage from an orbital launch, the stage softly splashing down in the Pacific Ocean.[38]

China is researching the reusability of the Long March 8 system.[39]

As of May 2020, the only operational reusable orbital-class launch systems are the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, the latter of which is based upon the Falcon 9. SpaceX is also developing the fully reusable Starship launch system,[40] and Blue Origin is developing its own New Glenn partially reusable orbital rocket, as it is intending to recover and reuse only the first stage.

5 October 2020, Roscosmos signed a development contract for Amur a new launcher with a reusable first stage.[41]

In December 2020, ESA signed contracts to start developing THEMIS, a prototype reusable first stage launcher.[42]

List of reusable launch systemsEdit

Company Vehicle Country Type Status Recovered Relaunched Notes
ISRO RLV TSTO India Orbital Under development Two Stage to Orbit with initial upper stage reusability and eventual full reusability
NPO-Energia Energia-Buran or OK-GLI USSR Orbital Retired 1 0 Only Buran orbiter payload reusable; Energia launcher fully expended.
NASA Space Shuttle US Orbital Retired 133 128 Orbiter and side boosters reusable
SpaceX Falcon 9 US Orbital Operational 188 163 First stage and fairing reusable.
SpaceX Falcon Heavy US Orbital Operational 8 (side boosters recovered but center core failed, fell over or was expended in all 4 launches) 2 (some side boosters converted to standard falcon 9) First stage core, side boosters and fairing reusable.
SpaceX Starship US Orbital Under development 0 0 Fully reusable.
Dawn Aerospace Dawn Mk-II Aurora New Zealand Suborbital Under development 35 35 Fully reusable spaceplane. Currently conducting same-day low-altitude flights. [43]
Rocket Lab Electron Orbital Operational 4 0 First stage recovered but not yet reused.
Rocket Lab Neutron Orbital Under development First stage and fairing reusable
Blue Origin New Shepard US Suborbital Operational 20 17 Fully reusable
Blue Origin New Glenn US Orbital Under development First stage reusable
Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo (VSS Unity) US Suborbital Operational 5 4 Designed for space tourism. Fully reusable
Virgin Galactic SpaceShipThree (VSS Imagine) US Suborbital Prototype Designed for space tourism. Fully reusable
United Launch Alliance Vulcan Centaur US Orbital Under development First stage engine module reusable in a later development.
PLD Space Miura 5 Spain Orbital Under development First stage reusable.
I-space Hyperbola-2 China Orbital Under development Prototype
Galactic Energy Pallas-1 China Orbital Under development Prototype, planned to feature vertical first stage recovery
China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology Long March 8 China Orbital Under development First stage and attached boosters reusable
Roscosmos Amur Russia Orbital Under development Prototype
ESA Themis EU Orbital Under development Prototype, aiming for first stage reuse
Relativity Space Terran R US Orbital Under development First fully reusable 3D printed rocket

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ "Dawn Aerospace unveils the Mk II Aurora suborbital space plane, capable of multiple same-day flights". TechCrunch. 28 July 2020. Retrieved 2022-08-19.
  2. ^ Strickland, Jackie Wattles,Ashley (2023-04-20). "SpaceX's Starship rocket lifts off for inaugural test flight but explodes midair". CNN. Retrieved 2023-04-29.
  3. ^ Sheetz, Michael (25 February 2021). "Relativity Space unveils a reusable, 3D-printed rocket to compete with SpaceX's Falcon 9". CNBC. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
  4. ^ Berger, Eric (8 June 2021). "Relativity has a bold plan to take on SpaceX, and investors are buying it". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 8 June 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
  5. ^ Berger, Eric (27 July 2021). "Blue Origin has a secret project named "Jarvis" to compete with SpaceX". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 30 July 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
  6. ^ "STOKE Space Raises $65M Series A to Make Space Access Sustainable and Scalable". 2021-12-15. Retrieved 2023-02-05.
  7. ^ Volosín, Trevor Sesnic, Juan I. Morales (2023-02-04). "Full Reusability By Stoke Space". Everyday Astronaut. Retrieved 2023-02-05.
  8. ^ Reyes, Tim (October 17, 2014). "Balloon launcher Zero2Infinity Sets Its Sights to the Stars". Universe Today. Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  9. ^ Muir, Hazel (15 January 2006). "Pinch of comet dust lands safely on Earth". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
  10. ^ "Mission Accomplished For Japan's Asteroid Explorer Hayabusa". Archived from the original on June 16, 2010.
  11. ^ "Space Probe, Perhaps with a Chunk of Asteroid, Returns to Earth Sunday". 13 June 2010. Archived from the original on 16 June 2010. Retrieved 13 June 2010.
  12. ^ Clark, Stephen. "Cargo manifest for SpaceX's 11th resupply mission to the space station". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 9 August 2018. Retrieved 3 June 2017.
  13. ^ Marder, Jenny (3 July 2019). "Inflatable Decelerator Will Hitch a Ride on the JPSS-2 Satellite". NOAA. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  14. ^ Xinhua Editorial Board (5 May 2020). ""胖五"家族迎新 送新一代载人飞船试验船升空——长征五号B运载火箭首飞三大看点 (LM5 Family in focus: next generation crewed spacecraft and other highlight of the Long March 5B maiden flight)". Xinhua News (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 7 August 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  15. ^ Bill D'Zio (7 May 2020). "Is China's inflatable space tech a $400 Million Cost savings for NASA's SLS?". Archived from the original on 10 May 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  16. ^ "FALCon". Archived from the original on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  17. ^ "SpaceX on Twitter". Twitter. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020. Retrieved January 7, 2016.
  18. ^ Pidvysotskyi, Valentyn (July 2021), The Concept of an Inflatable Reusable Launch Vehicle, doi:10.31224/, S2CID 243032818, archived from the original on 2021-08-18, retrieved 2021-08-18
  19. ^ Sippel, M; Stappert, S; Bussler, L; Dumont, E (September 2017), "Systematic Assessment of Reusable First-Stage Return Options" (PDF), IAC-17-D2.4.4, 68th International Astronautical Congress, Adelaide, Australia., archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-04-13, retrieved 2017-12-26
  20. ^ "von Braun concept vehicle". Archived from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  21. ^ Portree, David S. F. "Wernher von Braun's Fantastic Vision: Ferry Rocket | WIRED". Wired. Archived from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2020-11-15 – via
  22. ^ "ch2".
  23. ^ "Nexus". Archived from the original on 2020-11-09. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  24. ^ "Forgotten 1960s 'Thunderbirds' projects brought to life". BAE Systems | United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 2021-01-18. Retrieved 2021-02-07.
  25. ^ NASA-CR-195281, "Utilization of the external tanks of the space transportation system"
  26. ^ "STS External Tank Station". Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  27. ^ "Copper Canyon". Archived from the original on 2020-09-20. Retrieved 2018-06-08.
  28. ^ "Б.И.Губанов. Триумф и трагедия "Энергии" глава 41". Archived from the original on 2020-11-08. Retrieved 2020-11-14.
  29. ^ "Recovery of an Ariane 5 booster at sea". Archived from the original on 2021-10-01. Retrieved 2021-03-03.
  30. ^ "France in Space #387". Archived from the original on 2009-01-25. Retrieved 2021-03-03.
  31. ^ Lindsey, Clark (2013-03-28). "SpaceX moving quickly towards fly-back first stage". NewSpace Watch. Archived from the original on 2013-04-16. Retrieved 2013-03-29.
  32. ^ "Blue Origin Makes Historic Reusable Rocket Landing in Epic Test Flight". Calla Cofield. Space.Com. 2015-11-24. Archived from the original on 2021-02-09. Retrieved 2015-11-25.
  33. ^ Berger, Eric (24 November 2015). "Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk spar over gravity of Blue Origin rocket landing". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  34. ^ "SpaceX on Twitter". Twitter. Archived from the original on 2020-09-20. Retrieved 2015-12-22.
  35. ^ "SpaceX successful [sic] launches first recycled rocket – video". The Guardian. Reuters. 31 March 2017. Archived from the original on 9 February 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
  36. ^ April 2019, Mike Wall 12 (12 April 2019). "SpaceX Recovered Falcon Heavy Nose Cone, Plans to Re-fly it This Year (Photos)". Archived from the original on 2021-02-09. Retrieved 2019-04-29.
  37. ^ "Rocket Lab Announces Reusability Plans For Electron Rocket". Rocket Lab. 6 August 2019. Archived from the original on 21 May 2021. Retrieved 7 December 2019.
  38. ^ "Rocket Lab launches Electron in test of booster recovery". SpaceNews. 2020-11-20. Archived from the original on 2021-10-01. Retrieved 2020-11-20.
  39. ^ "China to test rocket reusability with planned Long March 8 launcher". 2018-04-30. Archived from the original on 2021-10-01. Retrieved 2020-10-04.
  40. ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: Elon Musk (29 September 2017). Becoming a Multiplanet Species (video). 68th annual meeting of the International Astronautical Congress in Adelaide, Australia: SpaceX. Retrieved 2017-12-31 – via YouTube.{{cite AV media}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  41. ^ "Trouble-free as a Kalashnikov assault rifle: the Amur methane rocket" (in Russian). Roscosmos. 5 October 2020. Archived from the original on 6 October 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
  42. ^ "ESA plans demonstration of a reusable rocket stage". Space Daily. Archived from the original on 2020-12-16. Retrieved 2020-12-19.
  43. ^ "After nearly 40 flights on surrogate jets, we are pretty close to - Stefan Powell on LinkedIn". Retrieved 2022-08-19.


  • Heribert Kuczera, et al.: Reusable space transportation systems. Springer, Berlin 2011, ISBN 978-3-540-89180-2.

External linksEdit

  • Illustration of a Space Shuttle at takeoff and Orbiter (Visual Dictionary - QAInternational)
  • Lunar Lander Module