Similitude of ship models

Summary

Captain's view from the bridge of a Port Revel supertanker model
Emergency stop of a supertanker model with an escort tug

Manned models edit

Many research workers, hydraulics specialists and engineers have used scale models for over a century, in particular in towing tanks. Manned models are small scale models that can carry and be handled by at least one person on an open expanse of water. They must behave just like real ships, giving the shiphandler the same sensations. Physical conditions such as wind, currents, waves, water depths, channels and berths must be reproduced realistically.

Manned models are used for research (e.g. ship behaviour), engineering (e.g. port layout) and for training in shiphandling (e.g. maritime pilots, masters and officers). They are usually at 1:25 scale.

Similitude of manned models edit

Worldwide, manned model schools have chosen to apply the similitude law of William Froude (1810-1879) for its manned models. This means that gravity is considered to be preponderant over the other forces acting on the hull (viscosity, capillarity, cavitation, compressibility, etc.).

The different aspects of similitude may thus be defined as follows:

Physical similitude edit

Similitude of shape: The model has exactly the same geometric shape as the real ship. This means that all the length (L) dimensions of the real ship are divided by the same factor, the scale factor. The designers of Port Revel chose a scale (S) of 1:25, so:

S(L) = 25 (smaller, hence distance is 25 times less)

In this similitude, the proportions are kept (the ratios between the various dimensions of the ship are identical). This is also the case with the block coefficient. Furthermore, the angles are a length ratio, so they are also identical to the original ones. The scale factors of the areas and volumes are deduced from this, i.e.:

S2(L) = 252 = 625

S3(L) = 253 = 15 625

Similitude of mass (M): The model used for shiphandling training must not only resemble the original but also move in the same way as the original when subjected to similar forces. Consequently, the scale factor for the mass (M) and displacement is the same as that for the volumes, i.e.:

S(M) = S3(L) = 253 = 15 625

Similitude of forces (F): If the external forces on the model are in similitude, like the shapes, masses and inertia, the model's movement will be in similitude. It can thus be shown that the forces (F) must be at the same scale as the masses and weights, so:

S(F) = S(M) = 253 = 15 625

Similitude of speed(V): In agreement with Froude's law, the velocity scale is the square root of the length scale, so:

S(V) = S1/2(L) = sqrt(25) = 5 (times slower than in real life)

Similitude of time (T): Time is a distance (L) over speed (V), so:

S(T) = S(L) / S(V) = S1/2(L) = sqrt(25) = 5 (times faster than in real life)

Similitude of power (P): As the power P = F x V, hence S(P) = S(F) x S(V), so:

S(P) = S3(L) x S1/2(L) = S7/2(L) = 257/2 = 78 125

In conclusion, by choosing a scale of 1:25 for the lengths and by complying with Froude's law, the engineers at Sogreah – Port Revel built models 25 times smaller, operating 5 times more slowly, but as the distances are 25 times less, things occur 5 times faster. The ships are 78 125 times less powerful.

Similitude of manoeuvres edit

While the models must be in correct similitude, this is not enough. Other factors can affect the correct reproduction of the manoeuvres, such as the field of vision, on-board equipment and wind.

  • First, manoeuvres on a model require the same pilot's orders as those on a real ship. The only difference is that they are executed five times faster on the model, so there is no time to discuss them (in fact, the rate of operation is such that the captain and helmsman swap roles every hour to avoid fatigue). This encourages responses to become intuitive but based upon a pre-assessed but flexible plan. What is a crisis on Day 1 of a manned model course becomes routine by Days 3+ which has to be a good definition of training.
  • The captain's position gives him a true field of vision from the bridge. He gives his orders to the helmsman, who is seated in front of him and operates the wheel and engine.
  • Control panels show the usual information (engine speed, rudder angle, heading, log, wind speed and direction, shackles of chain lowered). This information is shown in real-life values to help the trainee forget as far as possible that he is on a scale model.
  • The ships are fitted with bow and stern thrusters and perfectly operational anchors. They behave like real ships from this point of view as well.
  • Tugs are under the captain's orders via remote control, and are handled by a real tug captain.
  • As far as the wind is concerned, it should be recalled that as the speed scale factor is 1 in 5, a wind of 10 knots on the lake is equivalent to a 50 knot squall in reality. Ripples on the surface of the water and the movement of leaves on the trees are therefore unreliable indicators. The wind and ship speeds displayed on the control panel are therefore very important for trainees. However, the lake is situated in a forest in a region with little wind, so that uncontrollable wind effects are minimised.

40 years' experience have shown that students quickly learn how to control the models just as they do the real ships that they are used to manoeuvring.
Manned model exercises promote good situational and spatial awareness, a lack of which contributes to most accidents and incidents.

Those who have trained on both claim that scale models are complementary to electronic simulators. While manoeuvres with currents, waves, tugs, anchors, bank effects, etc. are reproduced more accurately on scale models, numerical simulators are more realistic when it comes to the bridge environment.

References edit

  • Heller, V. (2011). "Scale Effects in Physical Hydraulic Engineering Models". Journal of Hydraulic Research. 49 (3): 293–306. doi:10.1080/00221686.2011.578914. S2CID 121563448.
  • Chadwick, A.; Reeve, D.; Fleming, C. (2004). Coastal Engineering: Processes, Theory and Design Practice. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-26840-0.
    • "8.3 Theory of physical models". pp. 300–3.
    • "8.4 Short-wave hydrodynamic models". p. 303.
    • "8.5 Long-wave hydrodynamic models". p. 305.
    • "8.6 Coastal sediment transport models". pp. 305–311.
  • Hughes, S.A. (1993). Physical Models and Laboratory Techniques in Coastal Engineering. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-1541-5.
  • Martins, Rui, ed. (2012) [1988]. Recent Advances in Hydraulic Physical Modelling. NATO ASI Series E: Applied Sciences. Vol. 165. Springer. ISBN 978-94-009-2344-7.
  • Dalrymple, Robert A., ed. (2018) [1981]. Physical Modelling in Coastal Engineering: Proceedings of an International Conference, Newark, Delaware, August 1981. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-351-42464-6.
  • "3. Model Design". Hydraulic laboratory techniques a guide for applying engineering knowledge to hydraulic studies based on 50 years of research and testing experience. A water resources technical publication. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Water and Power Resources Service. 1980. pp. 37–56. OCLC 6984558. 81-2613 – via HathiTrust.
  • Melby, J. (2005). "7.7 Composite-berm rubble mound breakwater". Proceedings of the International Conference on Coastlines, Structures and Breakwaters, 2005. Thomas Telford. pp. 520–530, See p. 523. ISBN 0-7277-3455-5.
  • van der Meulen, Barend (1998). "1. Coordination of Ship Propeller Design: Technical Models and the Relation of T.Y. Draco with Queen Elizabeth II: §2 Technical Model". Getting New Technologies Together: Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order. Walter de Gruyter. p. 22. ISBN 978-3-11-015630-0.

External links edit

  • Port Revel website
  • AFCAN website
  • Marine-Marchande.net website