In either case, the value at x = 0 is defined to be the limiting value
for all real a ≠ 0 (the limit can be proven using the squeeze theorem).
The normalization causes the definite integral of the function over the real numbers to equal 1 (whereas the same integral of the unnormalized sinc function has a value of π). As a further useful property, the zeros of the normalized sinc function are the nonzero integer values of x.
The only difference between the two definitions is in the scaling of the independent variable (the x axis) by a factor of π. In both cases, the value of the function at the removable singularity at zero is understood to be the limit value 1. The sinc function is then analytic everywhere and hence an entire function.
The function has also been called the cardinal sine or sine cardinal function.[3][4] The term sinc was introduced by Philip M. Woodward in his 1952 article "Information theory and inverse probability in telecommunication", in which he said that the function "occurs so often in Fourier analysis and its applications that it does seem to merit some notation of its own",[5] and his 1953 book Probability and Information Theory, with Applications to Radar.[6][7]
The function itself was first mathematically derived in this form by Lord Rayleigh in his expression (Rayleigh's formula) for the zeroth-order spherical Bessel function of the first kind.
Properties
edit
The local maxima and minima (small white dots) of the unnormalized, red sinc function correspond to its intersections with the blue cosine function.
The zero crossings of the unnormalized sinc are at non-zero integer multiples of π, while zero crossings of the normalized sinc occur at non-zero integers.
The local maxima and minima of the unnormalized sinc correspond to its intersections with the cosine function. That is, sin(ξ)/ξ = cos(ξ) for all points ξ where the derivative of sin(x)/x is zero and thus a local extremum is reached. This follows from the derivative of the sinc function:
The first few terms of the infinite series for the x coordinate of the n-th extremum with positive x coordinate are [citation needed]
where
and where odd n lead to a local minimum, and even n to a local maximum. Because of symmetry around the y axis, there exist extrema with x coordinates −xn. In addition, there is an absolute maximum at ξ0 = (0, 1).
The normalized sinc function has a simple representation as the infinite product:
The cardinal sine function sinc(z) plotted in the complex plane from -2-2i to 2+2i
The normalized sinc function has properties that make it ideal in relationship to interpolation of sampledbandlimited functions:
It is an interpolating function, i.e., sinc(0) = 1, and sinc(k) = 0 for nonzero integerk.
The functions xk(t) = sinc(t − k) (k integer) form an orthonormal basis for bandlimited functions in the function spaceL2(R), with highest angular frequency ωH = π (that is, highest cycle frequency fH = 1/2).
Other properties of the two sinc functions include:
The unnormalized sinc is the zeroth-order spherical Bessel function of the first kind, j0(x). The normalized sinc is j0(πx).
λ sinc(λx) (not normalized) is one of two linearly independent solutions to the linear ordinary differential equation The other is cos(λx)/x, which is not bounded at x = 0, unlike its sinc function counterpart.
Using normalized sinc,
The following improper integral involves the (not normalized) sinc function:
This is not an ordinary limit, since the left side does not converge. Rather, it means that
for every Schwartz function, as can be seen from the Fourier inversion theorem.
In the above expression, as a → 0, the number of oscillations per unit length of the sinc function approaches infinity. Nevertheless, the expression always oscillates inside an envelope of ±1/πx, regardless of the value of a.
This complicates the informal picture of δ(x) as being zero for all x except at the point x = 0, and illustrates the problem of thinking of the delta function as a function rather than as a distribution. A similar situation is found in the Gibbs phenomenon.
Summation
edit
All sums in this section refer to the unnormalized sinc function.
The sum of sinc(n) over integer n from 1 to ∞ equals π − 1/2:
The sum of the squares also equals π − 1/2:[10][11]
When the signs of the addends alternate and begin with +, the sum equals 1/2:
The alternating sums of the squares and cubes also equal 1/2:[12]
Series expansion
edit
The Taylor series of the unnormalized sinc function can be obtained from that of the sine (which also yields its value of 1 at x = 0):
The series converges for all x. The normalized version follows easily:
Euler famously compared this series to the expansion of the infinite product form to solve the Basel problem.
Higher dimensions
edit
The product of 1-D sinc functions readily provides a multivariate sinc function for the square Cartesian grid (lattice): sincC(x, y) = sinc(x) sinc(y), whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of a square in the frequency space (i.e., the brick wall defined in 2-D space). The sinc function for a non-Cartesian lattice (e.g., hexagonal lattice) is a function whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of the Brillouin zone of that lattice. For example, the sinc function for the hexagonal lattice is a function whose Fourier transform is the indicator function of the unit hexagon in the frequency space. For a non-Cartesian lattice this function can not be obtained by a simple tensor product. However, the explicit formula for the sinc function for the hexagonal, body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic and other higher-dimensional lattices can be explicitly derived[13] using the geometric properties of Brillouin zones and their connection to zonotopes.
^Singh, R. P.; Sapre, S. D. (2008). Communication Systems, 2E (illustrated ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill Education. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-07-063454-1. Extract of page 15
^Weisstein, Eric W. "Sinc Function". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2023-06-07.
^Merca, Mircea (2016-03-01). "The cardinal sine function and the Chebyshev–Stirling numbers". Journal of Number Theory. 160: 19–31. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2015.08.018. ISSN 0022-314X. S2CID 124388262.
^Woodward, P. M.; Davies, I. L. (March 1952). "Information theory and inverse probability in telecommunication" (PDF). Proceedings of the IEE - Part III: Radio and Communication Engineering. 99 (58): 37–44. doi:10.1049/pi-3.1952.0011.
^Poynton, Charles A. (2003). Digital video and HDTV. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. p. 147. ISBN 978-1-55860-792-7.
^Woodward, Phillip M. (1953). Probability and information theory, with applications to radar. London: Pergamon Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-89006-103-9. OCLC 488749777.
^Euler, Leonhard (1735). "On the sums of series of reciprocals". arXiv:math/0506415.
^Sanjar M. Abrarov; Brendan M. Quine (2015). "Sampling by incomplete cosine expansion of the sinc function: Application to the Voigt/complex error function". Appl. Math. Comput. 258: 425–435. arXiv:1407.0533. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.072.
^"Advanced Problem 6241". American Mathematical Monthly. 87 (6). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America: 496–498. June–July 1980. doi:10.1080/00029890.1980.11995075.
^Robert Baillie; David Borwein; Jonathan M. Borwein (December 2008). "Surprising Sinc Sums and Integrals". American Mathematical Monthly. 115 (10): 888–901. doi:10.1080/00029890.2008.11920606. hdl:1959.13/940062. JSTOR 27642636. S2CID 496934.
^Baillie, Robert (2008). "Fun with Fourier series". arXiv:0806.0150v2 [math.CA].
^ abcYe, W.; Entezari, A. (June 2012). "A Geometric Construction of Multivariate Sinc Functions". IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 21 (6): 2969–2979. Bibcode:2012ITIP...21.2969Y. doi:10.1109/TIP.2011.2162421. PMID 21775264. S2CID 15313688.
^Ainslie, Michael (2010). Principles of Sonar Performance Modelling. Springer. p. 636. ISBN 9783540876625.
^Günter, Peter (2012). Nonlinear Optical Effects and Materials. Springer. p. 258. ISBN 9783540497134.
^Schächter, Levi (2013). Beam-Wave Interaction in Periodic and Quasi-Periodic Structures. Springer. p. 241. ISBN 9783662033982.