BREAKING NEWS
Cloud Server Hosting For Online Businesses
Inexpensive SEO Services
Benefits of Wanting to play Free Online Slot machines
Soil respiration

Summary

Soil respiration refers to the production of carbon dioxide when soil organisms respire. This includes respiration of plant roots, the rhizosphere, microbes and fauna.

Soil respiration is a key ecosystem process that releases carbon from the soil in the form of CO2. CO2 is acquired by plants from the atmosphere and converted into organic compounds in the process of photosynthesis. Plants use these organic compounds to build structural components or respire them to release energy. When plant respiration occurs below-ground in the roots, it adds to soil respiration. Over time, plant structural components are consumed by heterotrophs. This heterotrophic consumption releases CO2 and when this CO2 is released by below-ground organisms, it is considered soil respiration.

The amount of soil respiration that occurs in an ecosystem is controlled by several factors. The temperature, moisture, nutrient content and level of oxygen in the soil can produce extremely disparate rates of respiration. These rates of respiration can be measured in a variety of methods. Other methods can be used to separate the source components, in this case the type of photosynthetic pathway (C3/C4), of the respired plant structures.

Soil respiration rates can be largely affected by human activity. This is because humans have the ability to and have been changing the various controlling factors of soil respiration for numerous years. Global climate change is composed of numerous changing factors including rising atmospheric CO2, increasing temperature and shifting precipitation patterns. All of these factors can affect the rate of global soil respiration. Increased nitrogen fertilization by humans also has the potential to affect rates over the entire planet.

Soil respiration and its rate across ecosystems is extremely important to understand. This is because soil respiration plays a large role in global carbon cycling as well as other nutrient cycles. The respiration of plant structures releases not only CO2 but also other nutrients in those structures, such as nitrogen. Soil respiration is also associated with positive feedback with global climate change. Positive feedback is when a change in a system produces response in the same direction of the change. Therefore, soil respiration rates can be affected by climate change and then respond by enhancing climate change.

Sources of carbon dioxide in soil edit

 
A portable soil respiration system measuring soil CO2 flux

All cellular respiration releases energy, water and CO2 from organic compounds. Any respiration that occurs below-ground is considered soil respiration. Respiration by plant roots, bacteria, fungi and soil animals all release CO2 in soils, as described below.

Tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle edit

The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle – or citric acid cycle – is an important step in cellular respiration. In the TCA cycle, a six carbon sugar is oxidized.[1] This oxidation produces the CO2 and H2O from the sugar. Plants, fungi, animals and bacteria all use this cycle to convert organic compounds to energy. This is how the majority of soil respiration occurs at its most basic level. Since the process relies on oxygen to occur, this is referred to as aerobic respiration.

Fermentation edit

Fermentation is another process in which cells gain energy from organic compounds. In this metabolic pathway, energy is derived from the carbon compound without the use of oxygen. The products of this reaction are carbon dioxide and usually either ethyl alcohol or lactic acid.[2] Due to the lack of oxygen, this pathway is described as anaerobic respiration. This is an important source of CO2 in soil respiration in waterlogged ecosystems where oxygen is scarce, as in peat bogs and wetlands. However, most CO2 released from the soil occurs via respiration and one of the most important aspects of below-ground respiration occurs in the plant roots.

Root respiration edit

Plants respire some of the carbon compounds which were generated by photosynthesis. When this respiration occurs in roots, it adds to soil respiration. Root respiration accounts for approximately half of all soil respiration. However, these values can range from 10 to 90% depending on the dominant plant types in an ecosystem and conditions under which the plants are subjected. Thus, the amount of CO2 produced through root respiration is determined by the root biomass and specific root respiration rates.[3] Directly next to the root is the area known as the rhizosphere, which also plays an important role in soil respiration.

Rhizosphere respiration edit

The rhizosphere is a zone immediately next to the root surface with its neighboring soil. In this zone there is a close interaction between the plant and microorganisms. Roots continuously release substances, or exudates, into the soil. These exudates include sugars, amino acids, vitamins, long chain carbohydrates, enzymes and lysates which are released when roots cells break. The amount of carbon lost as exudates varies considerably between plant species. It has been demonstrated that up to 20% of carbon acquired by photosynthesis is released into the soil as root exudates.[4] These exudates are decomposed primarily by bacteria. These bacteria will respire the carbon compounds through the TCA cycle; however, fermentation is also present. This is due to the lack of oxygen due to greater oxygen consumption by the root as compared to the bulk soil, soil at a greater distance from the root.[5] Another important organism in the rhizosphere are root-infecting fungi or mycorrhizae. These fungi increase the surface area of the plant root and allow the root to encounter and acquire a greater amount of soil nutrients necessary for plant growth. In return for this benefit, the plant will transfer sugars to the fungi. The fungi will respire these sugars for energy thereby increasing soil respiration.[6] Fungi, along with bacteria and soil animals, also play a large role in the decomposition of litter and soil organic matter.

Soil animals edit

Soil animals graze on populations of bacteria and fungi as well as ingest and break up litter to increase soil respiration. Microfauna are made up of the smallest soil animals. These include nematodes and mites. This group specializes on soil bacteria and fungi. By ingesting these organisms, carbon that was initially in plant organic compounds and was incorporated into bacterial and fungal structures will now be respired by the soil animal. Mesofauna are soil animals from 0.1 to 2 millimeters (0.0039 to 0.0787 in) in length and will ingest soil litter. The fecal material will hold a greater amount of moisture and have a greater surface area. This will allow for new attack by microorganisms and a greater amount of soil respiration. Macrofauna are organisms from 2 to 20 millimeters (0.079 to 0.787 in), such as earthworms and termites. Most macrofauna fragment litter, thereby exposing a greater amount of area to microbial attack. Other macrofauna burrow or ingest litter, reducing soil bulk density, breaking up soil aggregates and increasing soil aeration and the infiltration of water.[7]

Regulation of soil respiration edit

Regulation of CO2 production in soil is due to various abiotic, or non-living, factors. Temperature, soil moisture and nitrogen all contribute to the rate of respiration in soil.

Temperature edit

 
Graph showing soil respiration vs. soil temperature

Temperature affects almost all aspects of respiration processes. Temperature will increase respiration exponentially to a maximum, at which point respiration will decrease to zero when enzymatic activity is interrupted. Root respiration increases exponentially with temperature in its low range when the respiration rate is limited mostly by the TCA cycle. At higher temperatures the transport of sugars and the products of metabolism become the limiting factor. At temperatures over 35 °C (95 °F), root respiration begins to shut down completely.[8] Microorganisms are divided into three temperature groups; cryophiles, mesophiles and thermophiles. Cryophiles function optimally at temperatures below 20 °C (68 °F), mesophiles function best at temperatures between 20 and 40 °C (104 °F) and thermophiles function optimally at over 40 °C (104 °F). In natural soils many different cohorts, or groups of microorganisms exist. These cohorts will all function best at different conditions, so respiration may occur over a very broad range.[9] Temperature increases lead to greater rates of soil respiration until high values retard microbial function, this is the same pattern that is seen with soil moisture levels.

Soil moisture edit

Soil moisture is another important factor influencing soil respiration. Soil respiration is low in dry conditions and increases to a maximum at intermediate moisture levels until it begins to decrease when moisture content excludes oxygen. This allows anaerobic conditions to prevail and depress aerobic microbial activity. Studies have shown that soil moisture only limits respiration at the lowest and highest conditions with a large plateau existing at intermediate soil moisture levels for most ecosystems.[10] Many microorganisms possess strategies for growth and survival under low soil moisture conditions. Under high soil moisture conditions, many bacteria take in too much water causing their cell membrane to lyse, or break. This can decrease the rate of soil respiration temporarily, but the lysis of bacteria causes for a spike in resources for many other bacteria. This rapid increase in available labile substrates causes short-term enhanced soil respiration. Root respiration will increase with increasing soil moisture, especially in dry ecosystems; however, individual species' root respiration response to soil moisture will vary widely from species to species depending on life history traits. Upper levels of soil moisture will depress root respiration by restricting access to atmospheric oxygen. With the exception of wetland plants, which have developed specific mechanisms for root aeration, most plants are not adapted to wetland soil environments with low oxygen.[11] The respiration dampening effect of elevated soil moisture is amplified when soil respiration also lowers soil redox through bioelectrogenesis.[12] Soil-based microbial fuel cells are becoming popular educational tools for science classrooms.

Nitrogen edit

Nitrogen directly affects soil respiration in several ways. Nitrogen must be taken in by roots to promote plant growth and life. Most available nitrogen is in the form of NO3−, which costs 0.4 units of CO2 to enter the root because energy must be used to move it up a concentration gradient. Once inside the root the NO3− must be reduced to NH3. This step requires more energy, which equals 2 units of CO2 per molecule reduced. In plants with bacterial symbionts, which fix atmospheric nitrogen, the energetic cost to the plant to acquire one molecule of NH3 from atmospheric N2 is 2.36 CO2.[13] It is essential that plants uptake nitrogen from the soil or rely on symbionts to fix it from the atmosphere to assure growth, reproduction and long-term survival.

Another way nitrogen affects soil respiration is through litter decomposition. High nitrogen litter is considered high quality and is more readily decomposed by microorganisms than low quality litter. Degradation of cellulose, a tough plant structural compound, is also a nitrogen limited process and will increase with the addition of nitrogen to litter.[14]

Methods of measurement edit

Different methods exist for the measurement of soil respiration rate and the determination of sources. Methods can be divided into field- and laboratory-based methods. The most common field methods include the use of long-term stand alone soil flux systems for measurement at one location at different times; survey soil respiration systems for measurement of different locations and at different times. The use of stable isotope ratios can be used both in laboratory of field measurements.

Soil respiration can be measured alone or with added nutrients and (carbon) substrates that supply food sources to the microorganisms. Soil respiration without any additions of nutrients and substrates is called the basal soil respiration (BR). With the addition of nutrients (often nitrogen and phosphorus) and substrates (e.g. sugars), it is called the substrate-induced soil respiration (SIR). In both BR and SIR measurements, the moisture content can be adjusted with water.

Field methods edit

Long-term stand-alone soil flux systems for measurement at one location over time edit

 
An automated soil CO2 exchange system

These systems measure at one location over long periods of time. Since they only measure at one location, it is common to use multiple stations to reduce measuring error caused by soil variability over small distances. Soil variability may be tested with survey soil respiration instruments.

The long-term instruments are designed to expose the measuring site to ambient conditions as much as is possible between measurements.

Types of long-term stand-alone instruments edit

Closed, non-steady state systems edit

Closed systems take short-term measurements (typically over few minutes only) in a chamber sealed over the soil.[15] The rate of soil CO2 efflux is calculated on the basis of CO2 increased inside the chamber. As it is within the nature of closed chambers that CO2 continues to accumulate, measurement periods are reduced to a minimum to achieve a detectable, linear concentration increase, avoiding an excessive build-up of CO2 inside the chamber over time.

Both individual assay information and diurnal CO2 respiration measuring information is accessible. It is also common for such systems to also measure soil temperature, soil moisture and PAR (photosynthetically active radiation). These variables are normally recorded in the measuring file along with CO2 values.

For determination of soil respiration and the slope of CO2 increase, researchers have used linear regression analysis, the Pedersen (2001) algorithm, and exponential regression. There are more published references for linear regression analysis; however, the Pedersen algorithm and exponential regression analysis methods also have their following. Some systems offer a choice of mathematical methods.[16]

When using linear regression, multiple data points are graphed and the points can be fitted with a linear regression equation, which will provide a slope. This slope can provide the rate of soil respiration with the equation  , where F is the rate of soil respiration, b is the slope, V is the volume of the chamber and A is the surface area of the soil covered by the chamber.[17] It is important that the measurement is not allowed to run over a longer period of time as the increase in CO2 concentration in the chamber will also increase the concentration of CO2 in the porous top layer of the soil profile. This increase in concentration will cause an underestimation of soil respiration rate due to the additional CO2 being stored within the soil.[18]

Open, steady-state systems edit

Open mode systems are designed to find soil flux rates when measuring chamber equilibrium has been reached. Air flows through the chamber before the chamber is closed and sealed. This purges any non-ambient CO2 levels from the chamber before measurement. After the chamber is closed, fresh air is pumped into the chamber at a controlled and programmable flow rate. This mixes with the CO2 from the soil, and after a time, equilibrium is reached. The researcher specifies the equilibrium point as the difference in CO2 measurements between successive readings, in an elapsed time. During the assay, the rate of change slowly reduces until it meets the customer's rate of change criteria, or the maximum selected time for the assay. Soil flux or rate of change is then determined once equilibrium conditions are reached within the chamber. Chamber flow rates and times are programmable, accurately measured, and used in calculations. These systems have vents that are designed to prevent a possible unacceptable buildup of partial CO2 pressure discussed under closed mode systems. Since the air movement inside the chamber might cause increased chamber pressure, or external winds may produce reduced chamber pressure, a vent is provided that is designed to be as wind proof as possible.

Open systems are also not as sensitive to soil structure variation, or to boundary layer resistance issues at the soil surface. Air flow in the chamber at the soil surface is designed to minimize boundary layer resistance phenomena.

Hybrid Mode Systems edit

A hybrid system also exists. It has a vent that is designed to be as wind proof as possible, and prevent possible unacceptable partial CO2 pressure buildup, but is designed to operate like a closed mode design system in other regards.

Survey soil respiration systems – for testing the variation of CO2 respiration at different locations and at different times edit

 
Measuring spatial variability of soil respiration in the field

These are either open or closed mode instruments that are portable or semi-portable. They measure CO2 soil respiration variability at different locations and at different times. With this type of instrument, soil collars that can be connected to the survey measuring instrument are inserted into the ground and the soil is allowed to stabilize for a period of time. The insertion of the soil collar temporarily disturbs the soil, creating measuring artifacts. For this reason, it is common to have several soil collars inserted at different locations. Soil collars are inserted far enough to limit lateral diffusion of CO2. After soil stabilization, the researcher then moves from one collar to another according to experimental design to measure soil respiration.

Survey soil respiration systems can also be used to determine the number of long-term stand-alone temporal instruments that are required to achieve an acceptable level of error. Different locations may require different numbers of long-term stand-alone units due to greater or lesser soil respiration variability.

Isotope methods edit

Plants acquire CO2 and produce organic compounds with the use of one of three photosynthetic pathways. The two most prevalent pathways are the C3 and C4 processes. C3 plants are best adapted to cool and wet conditions while C4 plants do well in hot and dry ecosystems. Due to the different photosynthetic enzymes between the two pathways, different carbon isotopes are acquired preferentially. Isotopes are the same element that differ in the number of neutrons, thereby making one isotope heavier than the other. The two stable carbon isotopes are 12C and 13C. The C3 pathway will discriminate against the heavier isotope more than the C4 pathway. This will make the plant structures produced from C4 plants more enriched in the heavier isotope and therefore root exudates and litter from these plants will also be more enriched. When the carbon in these structures is respired, the CO2 will show a similar ratio of the two isotopes. Researchers will grow a C4 plant on soil that was previously occupied by a C3 plant or vice versa. By taking soil respiration measurements and analyzing the isotopic ratios of the CO2 it can be determined whether the soil respiration is mostly old versus recently formed carbon. For example, maize, a C4 plant, was grown on soil where spring wheat, a C3 plant, was previously grown. The results showed respiration of C3 SOM in the first 40 days, with a gradual linear increase in heavy isotope enrichment until day 70. The days after 70 showed a slowing enrichment to a peak at day 100.[19] By analyzing stable carbon isotope data it is possible to determine the source components of respired SOM that was produced by different photosynthetic pathways.

Substrate-induced respiration in the field using stable isotopes edit

One problem in the measurement of soil respiration in the field is that respiration of microorganisms can not be distinguished from respiration from plant roots and soil animals. This can be overcome using stable isotope techniques. Cane sugar is a C4 – sugar which can act as an isotopic tracer.[20][21] Cane sugar has a slightly higher abundance of 13C (δ13C ≈ −10‰) than the endogenous (natural) carbon in a C3 ecosystem (δ13C=−25 to −28‰). Cane sugar can be sprayed on the soil in a solution and will infiltrate the upper soil, Only microorganisms will respire the added sugar because roots exclusively respire carbon products that are assimilated by the plant via photosynthesis. By analyses of the δ13C of the CO2 evolving from the soil with or without adding cane sugar, the fraction of C3 (root and microbial) and C4 (microbial respiration) can be calculated.[22][23]

Field respiration using stable isotopes can be used as a tool to measure microbial respiration in-situ without disturbing the microbial communities by mixing soil nutrients, oxygen, and soil contaminants that may be present.[23]

Responses to human disturbance edit

Throughout the past 160 years, humans have changed land use and industrial practices, which have altered the climate and global biogeochemical cycles. These changes have affected the rate of soil respiration around the planet. In addition, increasingly frequent extreme climatic events[24] such as heat waves (involving high temperature disturbances and associated intense droughts), followed by intense rainfall, impact on microbial communities and soil physico-chemistry and may induce changes in soil respiration.[25]

Elevated carbon dioxide edit

Since the Industrial Revolution, humans have emitted vast amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere. These emissions have increased greatly over time and have increased global atmospheric CO2 levels to their highest in over 750,000 years. Soil respiration increases when ecosystems are exposed to elevated levels of CO2. Numerous free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) studies have been conducted to test soil respiration under predicted future elevated CO2 conditions. Recent FACE studies have shown large increases in soil respiration due to increased root biomass and microbial activity.[26] Soil respiration has been found to increase up to 40.6% in a sweetgum forest in Tennessee and poplar forests in Wisconsin under elevated CO2 conditions.[27] It is extremely likely that CO2 levels will exceed those used in these FACE experiments by the middle of this century due to increased human use of fossil fuels and land use practices.

Climate warming edit

Due to the increase in temperature of the soil, CO2 levels in our atmosphere increase, and as such the mean average temperature of the Earth is rising. This is due to human activities such as forest clearing, soil denuding, and developments that destroy autotrophic processes. With the loss of photosynthetic plants covering and cooling the surface of the soil, the infrared energy penetrates the soil heating it up and causing a rise in heterotrophic bacteria. Heterotrophs in the soil quickly degrade the organic matter and soil structure crumbles, thus it dissolves into streams and rivers into the sea. Much of the organic matter swept away in floods caused by forest clearing goes into estuaries, wetlands and eventually into the open ocean. Increased turbidity of surface waters causes biological oxygen demand and more autotrophic organisms die. Carbon dioxide levels rise with increased respiration of soil bacteria after temperatures rise due to loss of soil cover.

As mentioned earlier, temperature greatly affects the rate of soil respiration. This may have the most drastic influence in the Arctic. Large stores of carbon are locked in the frozen permafrost. With an increase in temperature, this permafrost is melting and aerobic conditions are beginning to prevail, thereby greatly increasing the rate of respiration in that ecosystem.[28]

Changes in precipitation edit

Due to the shifting patterns of temperature and changing oceanic conditions, precipitation patterns are expected to change in location, frequency and intensity. Larger and more frequent storms are expected when oceans can transfer more energy to the forming storm systems. This may have the greatest impact on xeric, or arid, ecosystems. It has been shown that soil respiration in arid ecosystems shows dynamic changes within a raining cycle. The rate of respiration in dry soil usually bursts to a very high level after rainfall and then gradually decreases as the soil dries.[10] With an increase in rainfall frequency and intensity over area without previous extensive rainfall, a dramatic increase in soil respiration can be inferred.

Nitrogen fertilization edit

Since the onset of the Green Revolution in the middle of the last century, vast amounts of nitrogen fertilizers have been produced and introduced to almost all agricultural systems. This has led to increases in plant available nitrogen in ecosystems around the world due to agricultural runoff and wind-driven fertilization. As discussed earlier, nitrogen can have a significant positive effect on the level and rate of soil respiration. Increases in soil nitrogen have been found to increase plant dark respiration, stimulate specific rates of root respiration and increase total root biomass.[29] This is because high nitrogen rates are associated with high plant growth rates. High plant growth rates will lead to the increased respiration and biomass found in the study. With this increase in productivity, an increase in soil activities and therefore respiration can be assured.

Importance edit

Soil respiration plays a significant role in the global carbon and nutrient cycles as well as being a driver for changes in climate. These roles are important to our understanding of the natural world and human preservation.

Global carbon cycling edit

Soil respiration plays a critical role in the regulation of carbon cycling at the ecosystem level and at global scales. Each year approximately 120 petagrams (Pg) of carbon are taken up by land plants and a similar amount is released to the atmosphere through ecosystem respiration. The global soils contain up to 3150 Pg of carbon, of which 450 Pg exist in wetlands and 400 Pg in permanently frozen soils. The soils contain more than four times the carbon as the atmosphere.[30] Researchers have estimated that soil respiration accounts for 77 Pg of carbon released to the atmosphere each year.[31] This level of release is greater than the carbon release due to anthropogenic sources (56 Pg per year) such as fossil fuel burning. Thus, a small change in soil respiration can seriously alter the balance of atmosphere CO2 concentration versus soil carbon stores. Much like soil respiration can play a significant role in the global carbon cycle, it can also regulate global nutrient cycling.

Nutrient cycling edit

A major component of soil respiration is from the decomposition of litter which releases CO2 to the environment while simultaneously immobilizing or mineralizing nutrients. During decomposition, nutrients such as nitrogen are immobilized by microbes for their own growth. As these microbes are ingested or die, nitrogen is added to the soil. Nitrogen is also mineralized from the degradation of proteins and nucleic acids in litter. This mineralized nitrogen is also added to the soil. Due to these processes, the rate of nitrogen added to the soil is coupled with rates of microbial respiration. Studies have shown that rates of soil respiration were associated with rates of microbial turnover and nitrogen mineralization.[5] Alterations of the global cycles can further act to change the climate of the planet.

Climate change edit

As stated earlier, the CO2 released by soil respiration is a greenhouse gas that will continue to trap energy and increase the global mean temperature if concentrations continue to rise. As global temperature rises, so will the rate of soil respiration across the globe thereby leading to a higher concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, again leading to higher global temperatures. This is an example of a positive feedback loop. It is estimated that a rise in temperature by 2 °C will lead to an additional release of 10 Pg carbon per year to the atmosphere from soil respiration.[32] This is a larger amount than current anthropogenic carbon emissions. There also exists a possibility that this increase in temperature will release carbon stored in permanently frozen soils, which are now melting. Climate models have suggested that this positive feedback between soil respiration and temperature will lead to a decrease in soil stored carbon by the middle of the 21st century.[33]

Summary edit

Soil respiration is a key ecosystem process that releases carbon from the soil in the form of carbon dioxide. Carbon is stored in the soil as organic matter and is respired by plants, bacteria, fungi and animals. When this respiration occurs below ground, it is considered soil respiration. Temperature, soil moisture and nitrogen all regulate the rate of this conversion from carbon in soil organic compounds to CO2. Many methods are used to measure soil respiration; however, the closed dynamic chamber and use of stable isotope ratios are two of the most prevalent techniques. Humans have altered atmospheric CO2 levels, precipitation patterns and fertilization rates, all of which have had a significant role on soil respiration rates. The changes in these rates can alter the global carbon and nutrient cycles as well as play a significant role in climate change.

References edit

  1. ^ Berg J, Tymoczko J, Stryer L. (2002). Biochemistry. WH Freeman and Company.
  2. ^ Klein D, Prescott L, Harley J. (2005). Microbiology. McGraw-Hill.
  3. ^ Shibistova, Olga; Lloyd, Jon; Evgrafova, Svetlana; Savushkina, Nadja; Zrazhevskaya, Galina; Arneth, Almut; Knohl, Alexander; Kolle, Olaf; Schulze, E.-Detlef (November 2002). "Seasonal and spatial variability in soil CO2 efflux rates for a central Siberian Pinus sylvestris forest". Tellus B. 54 (5): 552–567. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.2002.01348.x.
  4. ^ Hutsch B, Augustin J, Merbach W. (2002) Plant rhizodeposition – an important source for carbon turnover in soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 165, 4, 397–407.
  5. ^ a b Vance E, Chapin III F. (2001) Substrate limitations to microbial activity in taiga forest floors. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 33, 2, 173–188.
  6. ^ Harrison M. (2005) Peace Talks and Trade Deals. Keys to Long-Term Harmony in Legume-Microbe Symbioses. Plant Physiology. 137, 4, 1205–1210.
  7. ^ Chapin III F, Matson P, Mooney H. (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  8. ^ Atkin O, Edwards E, Loveys B. (2000) Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming. New Phytologist. 147, 141–154.
  9. ^ Mikan C, Schimel J, Doyle A. (2002) Temperature controls of microbial respiration in Arctic tundra soils above and below freezing. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 34, 1785–1795.
  10. ^ a b Xu L, Baldocchi D, Tang J. (2004) How soil moisture, rain pulses, and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration and temperature. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 18.
  11. ^ Lambers H, Chapin III F, Pons T. (1998) Plant physiological ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  12. ^ Pezeshki, S. R.; DeLaune, R. D. (26 July 2012). "Soil Oxidation-Reduction in Wetlands and Its Impact on Plant Functioning". Biology. 1 (2): 196–221. doi:10.3390/biology1020196. PMC 4009779. PMID 24832223.
  13. ^ Pate J, Layzell D. (1990) Energetics and biological costs of nitrogen assimilation. The biochemistry of plants. 1–42.
  14. ^ Sinsabaugh R, Carreiro M, Repert D. (2002) Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition, N deposition, and mass loss. Biogeochemistry. 60, 1–24.
  15. ^ Pumpanen, Jukka; Longdoz, Bernard; L. Kutsch, Werner (2010), "Field measurements of soil respiration: principles and constraints, potentials and limitations of different methods", Soil Carbon Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–33, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511711794.003, hdl:2268/211761, ISBN 978-0-511-71179-4, retrieved 7 March 2020
  16. ^ Wayson C, Randolph J, Hanson P, Grimmond P, Schmid H. (2006) Comparison of soil respiration methods in a mid-latitude deciduous forest. Biogeochemistry. 80, 173–189.
  17. ^ Field C, Ball J, Berry J. (1989) Photosynthesis, Principles and field techniques. Plant physiological ecology, field methods and instrumentation. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  18. ^ Conen F, and Smith K. (2000) An explanation of linear increases in gas concentration under closed chambers used to measure gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. European Journal of Soil Science. 51, 111–117.
  19. ^ Rochette P, Flanagan L, Gregorich E. (1999) Separating soil respiration into plant and soil components using analysis of natural abundance of carbon-13. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 63, 1207–1213.
  20. ^ Ekblad, Alf; Högberg, Peter (1 March 2000). "Analysis of δ13C of CO2 distinguishes between microbial respiration of added C4-sucrose and other soil respiration in a C3-ecosystem". Plant and Soil. 219 (1): 197–209. doi:10.1023/A:1004732430929. ISSN 1573-5036. S2CID 11240355.
  21. ^ Högberg, P.; Ekblad, A. (1 September 1996). "Substrate-induced respiration measured in situ in a C3-plant ecosystem using additions of C4-sucrose". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 28 (9): 1131–1138. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(96)00124-1. ISSN 0038-0717.
  22. ^ Menichetti, L.; Ekblad, A.; Kätterer, T. (2013). "Organic amendments affect δ13C signature of soil respiration and soil organic C accumulation in a long-term field experiment in Sweden". European Journal of Soil Science. 64 (5): 621–628. doi:10.1111/ejss.12077. ISSN 1365-2389. S2CID 93540574.
  23. ^ a b Rijk, Ingrid J. C.; Ekblad, Alf (1 April 2020). "Carbon and nitrogen cycling in a lead polluted grassland evaluated using stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) and microbial, plant and soil parameters". Plant and Soil. 449 (1): 249–266. doi:10.1007/s11104-020-04467-7. ISSN 1573-5036. S2CID 212689936.
  24. ^ Planton, Serge; Déqué, Michel; Chauvin, Fabrice; Terray, Laurent (2008). "Expected impacts of climate change on extreme climate events". Comptes Rendus Geoscience. 340 (9–10): 564–574. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2008.07.009.
  25. ^ Bérard, A; Ben Sassi, M; Kaisermann, A; Renault, P (3 December 2015). "Soil microbial community responses to heat wave components: drought and high temperature". Climate Research. 66 (3): 243–264. doi:10.3354/cr01343. ISSN 0936-577X.
  26. ^ Lipson D, Wilson R, Oechel W. (2005) Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 on Soil Microbial Biomass, Activity, and Diversity in a Chaparral Ecosystem. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71, 12, 8573–8580
  27. ^ King J, Hanson P, Bernhardt E, Deangelis P, Norby R, Pregitzer K. (2004) A multiyear synthesis of soil respiration responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 from four forest FACE experiments. Global Change Biology. 10, 1027–1042.
  28. ^ Oechel W, Vourlitis G, Hastings S. (1995) Change in Arctic CO2 flux over two decades, Effects of climate change at Barrow, Alaska. Ecological Applications. 5, 3, 846–855.
  29. ^ Lutze J, Gifford R, Adams H. (2000) Litter quality and decomposition in Danthonia richardsonii swards in response to CO2 and nitrogen supply over four years of growth. Global Change Biology. 6, 13–24.
  30. ^ Sabine C, Hemann M, Artaxo P, Bakker D, Chen C, Field C, Gruber N, Le Quere C, Prinn R, Richey J, Romero-Lankao P, Sathaye J, Valentini R. (2003) Current status and past trends of the carbon cycle. Toward CO2 Stabilization: Issues, strategies, and consequences. Island Press. Washington DC.
  31. ^ Raich J, and Potter C. (1995) Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 9, 23–36.
  32. ^ Friedlingstein P, Dufresne J, Cox P. (2003) How positive is the feedback between climate change and the global carbon cycle? Tellus. 55B, 692–700.
  33. ^ Cox P, Betts R, Jones C, Spall S, Totterdell I. (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature. 408, 184–187.
  • Wang Y, AmundsoR, Trumbore S (1999). "The impact of land use change on C turnover in soils" (PDF). Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 13 (1): 47–57. Bibcode:1999GBioC..13...47W. doi:10.1029/1998GB900005.
  • Su B. (2005) Interactions between ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and water cycles under global change: Results from field and mesocosm experiments. University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
  • Flanagan L, and Veum A. (1974) Relationships between respiration, weight loss, temperature and moisture in organic residues in tundra. Soil Organisms and decomposition in Tundra. 249–277.

External links edit

 
Scholia has a profile for soil respiration (Q889453).
  • Belowground respiration, Duke University

By using this platform, you agree to the Terms of Use ©2020 Knowpia