A sphaleron (Greek: σφαλερός "slippery") is a static (time-independent) solution to the electroweak field equations of the Standard Model of particle physics, and is involved in certain hypothetical processes that violate baryon and lepton numbers. Such processes cannot be represented by perturbative methods such as Feynman diagrams, and are therefore called non-perturbative. Geometrically, a sphaleron is a saddle point of the electroweak potential (in infinite-dimensional field space).[1][2][3][4]

CompositionRoughly, a high-energy composite of 3 leptons or of 3 baryons
Mass~10 TeV
An example of a saddle point (in red) on a simple function.

This saddle point rests at the top of a barrier between two different low-energy equilibria of a given system; the two equilibria are labeled with two different baryon numbers. One of the equilibria might consist of three baryons; the other, alternative, equilibrium for the same system might consist of three antileptons. In order to cross this barrier and change the baryon number, a system must either tunnel through the barrier (in which case the transition is an instanton-like[note 1] process) or must for a reasonable period of time be brought up to a high enough energy that it can classically cross over the barrier (in which case the process is termed a "sphaleron" process and can be modeled with an eponymous sphaleron particle).[6][7]

In both the instanton and sphaleron cases, the process can only convert groups of three baryons into three antileptons (or three antibaryons into three leptons) and vice versa. This violates conservation of baryon number and lepton number, but the difference B − L is conserved. The minimum energy required to trigger the sphaleron process is believed to be around 10 TeV; however, sphalerons cannot be produced in existing LHC collisions, because although the LHC can create collisions of energy 10 TeV and greater, the generated energy cannot be concentrated in a manner that would create sphalerons.[8]

A sphaleron is similar[how?] to the midpoint ( τ = 0 ) of the instanton, so it is non-perturbative. This means that under normal conditions sphalerons are unobservably rare. However, they would have been more common at the higher temperatures of the early universe.

Baryogenesis edit

Since a sphaleron may convert baryons to antileptons and antibaryons to leptons and thus change the baryon number, if the density of sphalerons was at some stage high enough, they could wipe out any net excess of baryons or anti-baryons. This has two important implications in any theory of baryogenesis within the Standard Model:[9][10]

  • Any baryon net excess arising before the electroweak symmetry breaking would be wiped out due to abundant sphalerons caused by high temperatures existing in the early universe.
  • While a baryon net excess can be created during the electroweak symmetry breaking, it can be preserved only if this phase transition was first-order. This is because in a second-order phase transition, sphalerons would wipe out any baryon asymmetry as it is created, while in a first-order phase transition, sphalerons would wipe out baryon asymmetry only in the unbroken phase.

In absence of processes which violate B − L it is possible for an initial baryon asymmetry to be protected if it has a non-zero projection onto B − L. In this case the sphaleron processes would impose an equilibrium which distributes the initial B asymmetry between both B and L numbers.[11] In some theories of baryogenesis, an imbalance of the number of leptons and antileptons is formed first by leptogenesis and sphaleron transitions then convert this to an imbalance in the numbers of baryons and antibaryons.

Details edit

For an SU(2) gauge theory, neglecting  , we have the following equations for the gauge field and the Higgs field in the gauge   [12]


where  ,  , the symbols   represent the generators of SU(2),   is the electroweak coupling constant, and   is the Higgs VEV absolute value. The functions   and  , which must be determined numerically, go from 0 to 1 in value as their argument,  , goes from 0 to  .

For a sphaleron in the background of a non-broken phase, the Higgs field must obviously fall off eventually to zero as   goes to infinity.

Note that in the limit  , the gauge sector approaches one of the pure-gauge transformation  , which is the same as the pure gauge transformation to which the BPST instanton approaches as   at  , hence establishing the connection between the sphaleron and the instanton.

Baryon number violation is caused by the "winding" of the fields from one equilibrium to another. Each time the weak gauge fields wind, the count for each of the quark families and each of the lepton families is raised (or lowered, depending on the winding direction) by one; as there are three quark families, baryon number can only change in multiples of three.[13] The baryon number violation can alternatively be visualized in terms of a kind of Dirac sea: in the course of the winding, a baryon originally considered to be part of the vacuum is now considered a real baryon, or vice versa, and all the other baryons stacked inside the sea are accordingly shifted by one energy level.[14]

Energy release edit

According to physicist Max Tegmark, the theoretical energy efficiency from conversion of baryons to antileptons would be orders of magnitude higher than the energy efficiency of existing power-generation technology such as nuclear fusion. Tegmark speculates that an extremely advanced civilization might use a "sphalerizer" to generate energy from ordinary baryonic matter.[15]

See also edit

References and notes edit

  1. ^ There is no true instanton in electroweak theory; instead, the tunneling rate is determined by constrained instantons.[5]
  1. ^ Phong, Vo Quoc; Khiem, Phan Hong; Loc, Ngo Phuc Duc; Long, Hoang Ngoc (2020). "Sphaleron in the first-order electroweak phase transition with the dimension-six Higgs field operator". Physical Review D. 101 (11): 116010. arXiv:2003.09625. Bibcode:2020PhRvD.101k6010P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.116010. S2CID 214612257.
  2. ^ Papaefstathiou, Andreas; Plätzer, Simon; Sakurai, Kazuki (2019). "On the phenomenology of sphaleron-induced processes at the LHC and beyond". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2019 (12): 17. arXiv:1910.04761. Bibcode:2019JHEP...12..017P. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)017. S2CID 204401729.
  3. ^ Zhou, Ruiyu; Bian, Ligong; Guo, Huai-Ke (2020). "Connecting the electroweak sphaleron with gravitational waves". Physical Review D. 101 (9): 091903. arXiv:1910.00234. Bibcode:2020PhRvD.101i1903Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.091903. S2CID 203610139.
  4. ^ Ho, David L.-J.; Rajantie, Arttu (2020). "Electroweak sphaleron in a strong magnetic field". Physical Review D. 102 (5): 053002. arXiv:2005.03125. Bibcode:2020PhRvD.102e3002H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.053002. S2CID 218538382.
  5. ^ Rubakov, Valery A.; Shaposhnikov, Mikhail E. (1996). "Electroweak baryon number nonconservation in the early universe and in high-energy collisions". Physics-Uspekhi. 32 (5): 461–502. arXiv:hep-ph/9603208. doi:10.1070/PU1996v039n05ABEH000145. S2CID 250852429.
  6. ^ White, Graham Albert (2016). "Section 3.5: The sphaleron". A Pedagogical Introduction to Electroweak Baryogenesis. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. ISBN 9781681744582.
  7. ^ Klinkhamer, F.R.; Manton, N.S. (1984). "A saddle-point solution in the Weinberg-Salam theory". Physical Review D. 30 (10): 2212–2220. Bibcode:1984PhRvD..30.2212K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.30.2212.
  8. ^ Butterworth, Jon (8 November 2016). "Think of the universe as a skateboard park: Supernovas and sphalerons". Science. The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 1 December 2017.
  9. ^ Shaposhnikov, M.E.; Farrar, G.R. (1993). "Baryon asymmetry of the universe in the minimal standard model". Physical Review Letters. 70 (19): 2833–2836. arXiv:hep-ph/9305274. Bibcode:1993PhRvL..70.2833F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2833. PMID 10053665. S2CID 15937666.
  10. ^ Kuzmin, V.A.; Rubakov, V.A.; Shaposhnikov, M.E. (1985). "On anomalous electroweak baryon-number non-conservation in the early universe". Physics Letters B. 155 (1–2): 36–42. Bibcode:1985PhLB..155...36K. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91028-7.
  11. ^ Harvey, J.; Turner, M. (1990). "Cosmological baryon and lepton number in the presence of electroweak fermion-number violation". Physical Review D. 42 (10): 3344–3349. Bibcode:1990PhRvD..42.3344H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3344. hdl:2060/19900014807. PMID 10012733. S2CID 28823418.
  12. ^ Arnold, P.; McLerran, L. (1987). "Sphalerons, small fluctuations, and baryon-number violation in electroweak theory". Physical Review D. 36 (2): 581–596. Bibcode:1987PhRvD..36..581A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.36.581. PMID 9958202.
  13. ^ Arnold, Peter; McLerran, Larry (15 February 1988). "The sphaleron strikes back: A response to objections to the sphaleron approximation". Physical Review D. 37 (4). American Physical Society (APS): 1020–1029. Bibcode:1988PhRvD..37.1020A. doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.1020. ISSN 0556-2821. PMID 9958773.
  14. ^ Diakonov, Dmitri; Polyakov, Maxim; Sieber, Peter; Schaldach, Jörg; Goeke, Klaus (15 June 1994). "Fermion sea along the sphaleron barrier". Physical Review D. 49 (12). American Physical Society (APS): 6864–6882. arXiv:hep-ph/9311374. Bibcode:1994PhRvD..49.6864D. doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.6864. ISSN 0556-2821. PMID 10017008. S2CID 18303496.
  15. ^ Tegmark, Max (2017). "Chapter 6: Our cosmic endowment". Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Kindle 3839 ed.). ISBN 9780451485090.