Summary

Launch vehicle capable of lifting more than 50 tonnes of payload into low earth orbit

Comparison of Energia, Falcon Heavy, Yenisei, Long March 9, SLS, N1, Saturn V, and Starship. Masses listed are the maximum payload to low Earth orbit in metric tons.

A super heavy-lift launch vehicle (SHLLV) is a launch vehicle capable of lifting more than 50 tonnes (110,000 lb) of payload into low Earth orbit (LEO).^[1][2]

Flown vehicles

Never made it to orbit

• N1, Soviet Moon rocket. Developed in late 1960s and early 1970s. Made 4 orbital launch attempts but did not reach orbit on any one of those flights. After the 4 failed launches, the project was cancelled in 1976.

Retired

• Saturn V, with an Apollo program payload of a command module, service module, and Lunar Module. The three had a total mass of 45 t (99,000 lb).^[3][4] When the third stage and Earth-orbit departure fuel was included, Saturn V actually placed 155 t (342,000 lb) into low Earth orbit.^[5] The final launch of Saturn V placed Skylab, a 77,111 kg (170,001 lb) payload, into LEO.
• The Space Shuttle orbited a combined^[a] shuttle and cargo mass of 122,534 kg (270,142 lb) when launching the Chandra X-ray Observatory on STS-93.^[6] Chandra and its two-stage Inertial Upper Stage booster rocket weighed 22,753 kg (50,162 lb).^[7]
• The Energia system was designed to launch up to 105 t (231,000 lb) to low Earth orbit.^[8] Energia launched twice before the program was cancelled, but only one flight reached orbit. On the first flight, launching the Polyus weapons platform (approximately 80 t (180,000 lb)), the vehicle failed to enter orbit due to a software error on the kick-stage.^[8] The second flight successfully launched the Buran orbiter. ^[9]

The Space Shuttle and Buran differed from traditional rockets in that both launched what was essentially a reusable stage that carried cargo internally.

Operational, but unproven as super heavy-lift

• Falcon Heavy is rated to launch 63.8 t (141,000 lb) to low Earth orbit (LEO) in a fully expendable configuration and an estimated 57 t (126,000 lb) in a partially reusable configuration, in which only two of its three boosters are recovered.^[10][11][b] One of these super-heavy lift configurations is planned to fly as of September 2020^[update]. The first test flight occurred on 6 February 2018, in a configuration in which recovery of all three boosters was attempted, with a small payload of 1,250 kg (2,760 lb) sent to an orbit beyond Mars.^[13][14] A second and third flight have launched a 6,465 kg (14,253 lb)^[15] and 3,700 kg (8,200 lb)^[16] payload. Since the vehicle is operational but has not yet been demonstrated to launch payloads over 50 tonnes (110,000 lb) to orbit, it is as yet unproven as a super heavy-lift capable launch vehicle.

Comparison

Rocket	Configuration	Organization	Nationality	LEO payload	Maiden flight	First >50t payload	Operational	Reusable	Launch Cost
Saturn V	Apollo	NASA	United States	140 t (310,000 lb)A	1967	1967	Retired	No	US$1.23 billion (2019)
N1	L3	Energia	Soviet Union	95 t (209,000 lb)	1969 (failed)	N/A	Cancelled	No	3.0 billion rubles (1971)
Space Shuttle		NASA	United States	122.5 t (270,142 lb)B	1981	1981G	Retired	Partially	US$576 million (2012) to US$1.64 billion (2012)
Energia		Energia	Soviet Union	100 t (220,000 lb)C	1987	1987	Retired	No	US$764 million (1985)
Falcon Heavy	ExpendedD	SpaceX	United States (private)	63.8 t (141,000 lb)[17]	Not YetD	Not Yet	UnprovenD	No	US$150 million (2018)
	Recoverable side boostersE			57 t (126,000 lb)[10]	2020 (planned)[18]D	Not Yet	UnprovenD	PartiallyE	US$130 million (2018)
Starship		SpaceX	United States (private)	150 t (330,000 lb)[19]F	2021 (planned)[20]	N/A	Development	Fully	US$2 million (2019)
SLS	Block 1	NASA	United States	95 t (209,000 lb)[21]	2021 (planned)[22]	N/A	Development	No	US$500 million (2019) to US$2 billion (2019)
	Block 1B			105 t (231,000 lb)[23]	TBA	N/A	Development	No	Unknown
	Block 2			130 t (290,000 lb)[24]	TBA	N/A	Development	No	Unknown
Long March 9		CALT	China	140 t (310,000 lb)[25]	2028 (planned)[26]	N/A	Development	No	Unknown
Yenisei	Yenisei	JSC SRC Progress	Russia	103 t (227,000 lb)	2028 (planned)[27]	N/A	Development	No	Unknown
	Don			130 t (290,000 lb)	2030 (planned)	N/A	Development	No	Unknown

^A Includes mass of Apollo command and service modules, Apollo Lunar Module, Spacecraft/LM Adapter, Saturn V Instrument Unit, S-IVB stage, and propellant for translunar injection; payload mass to LEO is about 122.4 t (270,000 lb)^[28]
^B Includes mass of orbiter and payload during STS-93; deployable payload is 27.5 t (61,000 lb)
^C Required upper stage or payload to perform final orbital insertion
^D Falcon Heavy has only flown in a fully recoverable configuration, which has a theoretical payload limit of around 45 tonnes; the first planned flight in a partially expendable configuration is planned for early 2021.
^E Side booster cores recoverable and centre core intentionally expended. First re-use of the side boosters was demonstrated in 2019 when the ones used on the Arabsat-6A launch were reused on the STP-2 launch.
^F Does not include dry mass of spaceship
^G Since payload mass of all flights includes mass of orbiter, the maiden flight had a greater than 50 tonne payload despite no deployable payload.

Proposed designs

The Space Launch System (SLS) is a US super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle, which has been under development by NASA in a well-funded program for nearly a decade, and is currently slated to make its first flight in November 2021.^[29] As of 2020^[update], it is slated to be the primary launch vehicle for NASA's deep space exploration plans,^[30][31] including the planned crewed lunar flights of the Artemis program and a possible follow-on human mission to Mars in the 2030s.^[32][33][34]

The SpaceX Starship is both the second stage of a reusable launch vehicle and a spacecraft that is being developed by SpaceX, as a private spaceflight project.^[35] It is being designed to be a long-duration cargo and passenger-carrying spacecraft.^[36] While it will be tested on its own initially, it will be used on orbital launches with an additional booster stage, the Super Heavy, where Starship would serve as the second stage on a two-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle.^[37] The combination of spacecraft and booster is called Starship as well.^[38]

Long March 9, a 140 t (310,000 lb) to LEO capable rocket has been proposed^[when?] by China, with plans to launch the rocket by 2028. The length of the Long March-9 will exceed 90 meters, and the rocket would have a core stage with a diameter of 10 meters. Long March 9 is expected to carry a payload of 140 tonnes into low-Earth orbit, with a capacity of 50 tonnes for Earth-Moon transfer orbit. ^[39]

Yenisei,^[40] a super heavy-lift launch vehicle using existing components instead of pushing the less-powerful Angara A5V project, was proposed by Russia's RSC Energia in August 2016.^[41] If developed, this vehicle could allow Russia to launch missions towards establishing a permanent Moon base with simpler logistics, launching just one or two 80-to-160-tonne super-heavy rockets instead of four 40-tonne Angara A5Vs implying quick-sequence launches and multiple in-orbit rendezvous. In February 2018, the КРК СТК (space rocket complex of the super-heavy class) design was updated to lift at least 90 tonnes to LEO and 20 tonnes to lunar polar orbit, and to be launched from Vostochny Cosmodrome.^[42] The first flight is scheduled for 2028, with Moon landings starting in 2030.^{[27][needs update]}

ISRO is conducting preliminary research for the development of a super heavy-lift launch vehicle which is planned to have a lifting capacity of over 50-60 tonnes (presumably into LEO).^[43] Contrary to its designation, the "super heavy-lift" variant of the Unified Launch Vehicle^{[clarification needed]}, called SHLV, has a planned payload capacity of 41,300 kg which, being less than 50 tonnes, means it does not qualify as a super heavy-lift launch vehicle as per the definition on this page, but it does qualify as a heavy-lift launch vehicle.^{[citation needed]}

Cancelled designs

Comparison of Saturn V, Sea Dragon and Interplanetary Transport System

Comparison of Space Shuttle, Ares I, Saturn V and Ares V

Numerous super-heavy lift vehicles have been proposed and received various levels of development prior to their cancellation.

As part of the Soviet Lunar Project four N1 rockets with a payload capacity of 95 t (209,000 lb), were launched but all failed shortly after lift-off (1969-1972).^[44] The program was suspended in May 1974 and formally cancelled in March 1976.^[45][46] The Soviet UR-700 rocket design concept was competed against the N1, however the UR-700 was never developed. In the concept, it was to have had a payload capacity of up to 151 t (333,000 lb)^[47] to low earth orbit.

During project Aelita (1969-1972), the Soviets were developing a way to beat the Americans to Mars. They designed the UR-700m, a nuclear powered variant of the UR-700, to assemble the 1400 t (3,000,000 lb) MK-700 spacecraft in earth orbit in two launches. The rocket would have a payload capacity of 750 t (1,650,000 lb) and is the most capable rocket ever designed. It is often overlooked^{[by whom?]} due to little information being known about the design. The only Universal Rocket to make it past the design phase was the UR-500 while the N1 was selected to be the Soviets' HLV for lunar and Martian missions.^[48]

The UR-900 would have had a payload capacity of 240 tons to low earth orbit. It never left the drawing board.^{[citation needed]}

The American Saturn MLV was proposed^[when?] as a successor to the Saturn V rocket. It would have been able to carry up to 160,880 kg to Low earth orbit. The Nova designs were also studied alongside the Saturn MLV.^{[citation needed]}

Based on of the recommendations of the Stafford Synthesis report, First Lunar Outpost would have relied on a massive Saturn-derived launch vehicle known as the Comet HLLV. The Comet would have been capable of injecting 254.4 tons into low earth orbit and 97.6 tons on a TLI making it one of the most capable vehicles ever designed. FLO was cancelled during the design process along with the rest of the Space Exploration Initiative.^{[citation needed]}

The U.S. Ares V for the Constellation program was intended to reuse many elements of the Space Shuttle program, both on the ground and flight hardware, to save costs. The Ares V was designed to carry 188 t (414,000 lb) and was cancelled in 2010, though much of the work has been carried forward into the Artemis program.^{[citation needed]}

A 1962 design proposal, Sea Dragon, called for an enormous 150 m (490 ft) tall, sea-launched rocket capable of lifting 550 t (1,210,000 lb) to low Earth orbit. Although preliminary engineering of the design was done by TRW, the project never moved forward due to the closing of NASA's Future Projects Branch.^[49][50]

The Rus-M was a proposed Russian family of launchers.^[when?] It would have had two super heavy variants: one able to lift 50-60 tons, and another able to lift 130-150 tons.^{[citation needed]}

SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System was a 12 m (39 ft)-diameter launch vehicle concept unveiled in 2016. The payload capability was to be 550 t (1,210,000 lb) in an expendable configuration or 300 t (660,000 lb) in a reusable configuration.^[51] In 2017, the large 12-meter design was succeeded at SpaceX by a 9 m (30 ft)-diameter concept Big Falcon Rocket which, since 2018, was renamed to as SpaceX Starship.^[52]

See also

• Comparison of orbital launch systems
• List of orbital launch systems
• Sounding rocket, suborbital launch vehicle
• Small-lift launch vehicle, capable of lifting up to 2,000 kg (4,400 lb) to low Earth orbit
• Medium-lift launch vehicle, capable of lifting 2,000 to 20,000 kg (4,400 to 44,000 lb) of payload into low Earth orbit
• Heavy-lift launch vehicle, capable of lifting 20,000 to 50,000 kg (44,000 to 110,000 lb) of payload into low Earth orbit

Notes

References

Further reading