Summary
The Sciences of the Artificial (1969)[1] is a book by Herbert A. Simon in the domain of the learning sciences and artificial intelligence; it is especially influential in design theory.[2] The book is themed around how artificial phenomena ought to be categorized, discussing as to whether such phenomena belong within the domain of 'science'.[3]
 | |
| Author | Herbert A. Simon |
|---|---|
| Subjects | science, philosophy |
| Genres | non-fiction |
| Published | 1969 (hbk); 1970 (pbk) |
| Publisher | The MIT Press |
| ISBN | 9780262190510 |
It has been reviewed many times in scientific literature[4][5][6][7][8]—including as a special column in The Journal of the Learning Sciences.[9][10][11][12][13]
The book was followed by two later editions—in 1981 and in 1996[1]—in which Simon broadened the scope of his discussions.[2]
Background edit
During the 1950s and 1960s, an expanse of literature was published that demonstrated broad interest in treating design as a rigorous and systematic discipline in hopes of establishing design as a science. Primarily through the fields of operational research and Organisation & Methods, these academics purposed to make design compatible with the related disciplines of management science and operations management.[2]
This trend would bring about the “design methods movement" of the 1960s,[2] serving as the backdrop under which Simon wrote the article "Architecture of Complexity" (1962), which would later become The Sciences of the Artificial (1969).[9][10] In his work, Simon had the broader intention of unifying the social sciences.[2]
Overview edit
The theme of the book is how ought artificial phenomena be categorized, discussing as to whether such phenomena belong within the domain of 'science'.[3]
Intending to demonstrate that it is possible for there to be an empirical science of 'artificial' phenomena in addition to that of 'natural' phenomena, Simon argues that designed systems are a valid field of study. The distinction Simon provides between the 'artificial' and the 'natural' is that artificial things are synthetic, and characterized in terms of functions, goals, and adaptation.[3][14]
Simon characterizes an artificial system as an interface that links two environments—inner and outer. Therefore, artificial systems are susceptible to change because they are contingent upon their environment, i.e. the circumstances in which they are in. Moreover, these environments exist in the realm of 'natural science', while the interface is the realm of 'artificial science'.[14]
To Simon, science of the 'artificial' is the science of 'design'; the sciences of the artificial are relevant to "all fields that create designs to perform tasks or fulfill goals and functions."[14] Moreover:
Engineering, medicine, business, architecture, and painting are concerned not with the necessary but with the contingent -- not with how things are but with how they might be -- in short, with design.[15]: xi
Such fields also include those of cognitive psychology, linguistics, economics, management/administration, and education. As such, Simon explores the commonalities of artificial systems including economic systems, business firms, artificial intelligence, complex engineering projects, and social plans.[14]
The book ultimately provides an information-processing theory of humanity's thinking processes as an operational, empirically based alternative to behaviorism.[14]
References edit
- ^ a b Simon, Herbert A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262193740.
- ^ a b c d e Xinya You and David Hands. 2019. "A Reflection upon Herbert Simon’s Vision of Design in 'The Sciences of the Artificial'." The Design Journal 22(sup1):1345-56. doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1594961.
- ^ a b c Dawson, Michael R. W. n.d. "Notes on 'The Sciences of the Artificial'." Cognitive Science at the University of Alberta.
- ^ Arbib, M. (1970). "Review of 'The Sciences of the Artificial' (Simon, H. A.; 1969)". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 16 (6): 803–804. doi:10.1109/tit.1970.1054543. ISSN 0018-9448.
- ^ Edwards, Keith J. (1971). "Book Review : Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1969, 123 pp". Simulation & Games. 2 (1): 89–92. doi:10.1177/104687817100200105. ISSN 0037-5500. S2CID 59229857.
- ^ Komoski, P. Kenneth (1972). "Review of The Sciences of the Artificial". AV Communication Review. 20 (4): 459–463. JSTOR 30217713.
- ^ Charness, Neil (1982). "How artificial is psychology?". Canadian Journal of Psychology. 36 (3): 537–539. doi:10.1037/h0080902. ISSN 0008-4255.
- ^ Stefik, Mark (1984). "The sciences of the artificial". Artificial Intelligence. 22 (1): 95–97. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(84)90029-8. ISSN 0004-3702.
- ^ a b Koschmann, Timothy (2003). "Sciences of the Artificial: A Retro-Review". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 409–411. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_3. JSTOR 1466923. S2CID 62772723.
- ^ a b Agre, Philip E. (2003). "Hierarchy and History in Simon's "Architecture of Complexity" - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 413–426. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_4. JSTOR 1466924. S2CID 62539315.
- ^ Shaw, Robert; Shockley, Kevin (2003). "An Ecological Science of the Artificial? - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 427–435. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_5. JSTOR 1466925. S2CID 62232753.
- ^ Coulter, Jeff (2003). "Projection Errors and Cognitive Models - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 437–443. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_6. JSTOR 1466926. S2CID 62715930.
- ^ Eisenberg, Mike (2003). "A Classic Problem - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 445–450. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_7. JSTOR 1466927. S2CID 62582050.
- ^ a b c d e "The Sciences of the Artificial, Third Edition". The MIT Press. Retrieved 2021-03-15.
- ^ Simon, Herbert A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial.