The Social Dilemma is a 2020 American docudrama film directed by Jeff Orlowski and written by Orlowski, Davis Coombe, and Vickie Curtis about the negative social effects of social media.
The Social Dilemma | |
---|---|
Directed by | Jeff Orlowski |
Written by |
|
Produced by | Larissa Rhodes |
Starring | |
Cinematography |
|
Edited by | Davis Coombe |
Music by | Mark A. Crawford |
Production companies |
|
Distributed by | Netflix |
Release dates |
|
Running time | 94 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
This documentary dives into the psychological underpinnings and the manipulation techniques by which, it claims, social media and technology companies addict users. People's online activity is watched, tracked, and measured by these companies, who then use this data to build artificial intelligence models that predict the actions of their users. Tristan Harris, former Google design ethicist and co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology, explains in the documentary that there are three main goals of tech companies:
Harris summed this up with the warning: "If you're not paying for the product, you are the product", paraphrasing earlier insights from Television Delivers People, Tom Johnson and Andrew Lewis.[1]
Another interviewee, Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at NYU Stern School of Business, brings up the concerns of mental health in relation to social media. Along with mentioning the concerns with mental health, they also discuss the dangers of fake news in the documentary. Harris argues that this is a "disinformation-for-profit business model" and that companies make more money by allowing "unregulated messages to reach anyone for the best price".
Orlowski uses a cast of actors to portray this in the dramatization of the issues covered in the film. The narrative features a family of five, portraying various perspectives of social media usage and its influence on their daily lives. The main character, Ben, is a teenager who falls deeper into social media addiction under the manipulation of the Engagement, Growth, and Advertisement AIs. Cassandra, Ben's sister, believes that one can stay connected to the Internet without a cellphone and she represents individuals free from the manipulation of social media and technology, unlike other members of her family. Isla, the youngest daughter in the family, represents how teenage girls fall into depression and lose their sense of identity due to social media.[2]
One scene in the narrative shows the family at the dinner table. The mother proposes that everyone keep their cell phones locked in a Kitchen Safe prior to eating dinner but when a notification buzzes on someone's phone, Isla gets up from the table and tries to open the Kitchen Safe. She resorts to shattering the Kitchen Safe with a tool after a few failed attempts, retrieving her own phone but damaging Ben's phone screen in the process. In return for a new phone screen, Ben promises his mother that he will refrain from using the phone for a week. Halfway through the agreed time period, Ben breaks his promise, and progressively becomes addicted to social media. The AIs behind the screen push "Extreme Center" political content to keep Ben engaged. Once Ben starts watching one video recommended by the AIs, he becomes so immersed in the content containing propaganda and conspiracy theories that it affects his daily life, leading him to skip soccer practice and disregard friends and family. Ultimately, towards the end of the film, Ben gets involved in an "Extreme Center" rally that escalates and becomes violent.
In the ending credits of the documentary, the interviewees propose ways the audience can take action to fight back, such as turning off notifications, never accepting recommended videos on YouTube, using search engines that do not retain search history, and establishing rules in the house on cell phone usage.
The Social Dilemma centers on the social and cultural impact of social media usage on regular users. It has a with a focus on algorithmically enabled forms of behavior modification and psychological manipulation. Additionally, the film depicts an array of related themes including technological addiction, fake news, depression and anxiety.[3]
Technological addiction was a theme in the documentary. One interviewee, Tim Kendall, the former director of Facebook, spoke up on the alarming goal of Facebook: updating the app with increased addictiveness for a consistent boost in engagement.[4] Another interviewee, Tristan Harris, former Google designer, compares the addiction level to a "Vegas slot machine" as users "check their phones hoping that they have a notification, as it's like they are pulling the lever of a slot machine hoping they hit the jackpot."[5] As the goal of social media changes and gains more popularity in our society, social media, as Harris describes it, is no longer considered a tool.[5] Unlike tools used exclusively when needed by society, social media platforms strive to gravitate users to click on the apps for additional content.
Misinformation and fake news are commonly spread on social media, and users are unable to distinguish between fake and real news resulting in differences in ideology and societal division.The immersion of users in this app exposed to countless information, according to Kendall, could potentially lead to tension within society.[4]
The Social Dilemma also talks about how social media can cause depression and give users anxiety. Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist and author, highlighted the influence of social media on depression and anxiety, especially in younger adolescents. The documentary reported statistics on depression, self-harm, and suicide leading to hospitalization, specifically in American teen girls resulting from social media use. The number of hospitalizations remained stable until around 2011 and rose a significant 62 percent in older teen girls (ages 15–19) and up 189 percent in younger teen girls (ages 10–14) since 2009 in the United States. The same pattern is shown in the rates of suicide, which had increased 70 percent in older teen girls and 151 percent in younger teen girls compared to 2001–2010. According to Haidt's interview, people born after 1996 have grown up in a society where social media usage is the norm, thus resulting in consistent exposure to overwhelming content from a young age.
Jeff Orlowski, who is mostly known for his work in Chasing Coral and Chasing Ice, began production for this documentary in 2018 and concluded it in 2019. When asked where his inspiration came from during the film's panel at Deadline's Contenders Documentary event, Orlowski says that he has "always been curious about big systemic and societal challenges."[6] He came to believe that "invisibly, a handful of designers in Silicon Valley are writing code that is shaping the lives of billions of people around the planet."[7]
Orlowski, in the film's FAQ page, states:[8]
We were drawn to tell the stories of our changing glaciers and changing coral reefs because they were powerful signs of a huge global issue facing humanity: climate change. When we started talking with Tristan Harris and the Center for Humane Technology, we saw a direct parallel between the threat posed by the fossil fuel industry and the threat posed by our technology platforms. Harris calls this "the climate change of culture," an invisible force that is shaping how the world gets its information and understands truth. Our hope has always been to work on big issues, and we now see the "social dilemma" as a problem beneath all our other problems.
The film's graphics, animation, & visual effects were made by Mass FX Media and produced by Netflix.[9]
The film's genre is science & natural docs.
Narrative casting by Jenny Jue[47]
All music is composed by Mark Crawford, “a Primetime Emmy-nominated composer and filmmaker”. He was also nominated for an “ASCAP Composer's Choice Award for the critically-acclaimed film”, The Social Dilemma. [48]
Through the use of "human-produced" and mechanical sounds, as Mark Crawford described in The Social Dilemma interview, he displayed the alarming impacts of social media through this soundtrack.[49] There was an overall emphasis on the concept of "dilemma" pertaining to the documentary throughout each song.[49]
No. | Title | Length |
---|---|---|
1. | "Logos" | 0:34 |
2. | "A Totally Normal World" | 2:31 |
3. | "Am I Really That Bad" | 0:49 |
4. | "Server Room" | 3:45 |
5. | "A Call to Arms" | 2:00 |
6. | "Manipulated" | 2:28 |
7. | "Magic Tricks" | 1:49 |
8. | "Hooked in the Classroom" | 1:09 |
9. | "Growth Hacking" | 1:44 |
10. | "Programmed at a Deeper Level" | 1:29 |
11. | "Addicted" | 1:44 |
12. | "Kitchen Safe" | 0:53 |
13. | "Family Dinner" | 0:57 |
14. | "The Kids are Not Alright" | 0:34 |
15. | "The Bet" | 1:12 |
16. | "Perceptions of Beauty" | 2:22 |
17. | "Theremin Lullaby" | 1:30 |
18. | "Time Offline" | 0:53 |
19. | "Hominid Brains" | 2:12 |
20. | "The AI's Are Losing" | 0:39 |
21. | "Machine Learning" | 1:33 |
22. | "Late Night Snack" | 0:52 |
23. | "Checkmate Humanity" | 1:49 |
24. | "The Sliding Scale" | 2:51 |
25. | "Exponential Hearsay" | 3:54 |
26. | "Myanmar" | 3:09 |
27. | "Caught in the Crowd" | 4:37 |
28. | "Rapid Degration of Society" | 3:16 |
29. | "Senate Hearing" | 5:00 |
30. | "Justin Drops the Mic" | 4:02 |
31. | "Shut it Down" | 3:09 |
32. | "Welcome to the Drum Machine" | 2:02 |
33. | "I Put a Spell on You" | 2:53 |
Total length: | 60:10 |
The Social Dilemma premiered at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival on January 26, 2020, and was released worldwide on Netflix on September 9, 2020.[50] The documentary went on to be viewed in 38,000,000 homes within the first 28 days of release.[51] It won two awards out of seven nominations at the 73rd Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards in 2021.[52]
The film is approximately 94 minutes long and can only be accessed through having a Netflix subscription. However, a free 40 minute version of the film can be accessed by requesting it through the official page of The Social Dilemma.[53]
The Social Dilemma received generally positive reviews. On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 85% based on 66 reviews, with an average rating of 7.2/10. The website's critics consensus reads, "Clear-eyed and comprehensive, The Social Dilemma presents a sobering analysis of our data-mined present."[54] On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 78 out of 100, based on nine critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[55]
The film is commonly praised for its portrayal of how severe the addictive effects of social media can be, and, by featuring industry insiders, exposing to a wide audience the strategies to increase usage and data extraction at play by tech companies. ABC News's Mark Kennedy called the film "an eye-opening look into the way social media is designed to create addiction and manipulate our behaviour, told by some of the very people who supervised the systems at places like Facebook, Google, and Twitter".[56] Nell Minow of RogerEbert.com noted that the film "asks fundamental and existential questions" of humanity's potential self-destruction through its own use of computer technology, and praised its "exceptional" use of confessions from leaders and key players in the social media industry.[57]
Other critics pointed out the shocking piece of information that the film brings forth about how strategic social media companies are in terms of keeping its users on their apps for as long as possible. Devika Girish from The New York Times, states that “The Social Dilemma” is remarkably effective in sounding the alarm about the incursion of data mining and manipulative technology into our social lives and beyond.[58]” In a rare defense of the film’s oft-denounced dramatizations, John Naughton of The Guardian comments on the fictional side of the movie which shows a “normal” American family being dragged down the rabbit hole that is the internet and our phones. Naughton states that “the fictional strand is necessary because the biggest difficulty facing critics of an industry that treats users as lab rats is that of explaining to the rats what’s happening to them while they are continually diverted by the treats (in this case dopamine highs) being delivered by the smartphones that the experimenters control.” [59]
Elizabeth Pankova adds a new insight to the reviews, she mentions that "none of the information in the film is particularly new" but in her opinion what makes The Social Dilemma remarkable and distinguishable is "the purveyors of this information: the remorseful, self-aware warriors turned conscientious objectors of Silicon Valley."[60]
However, most critics often cite the dramatic reenactments featured in the film as the main source of discontent. Girish Devika from The New York Times points out that the fictional narrative Orlowski implemented to illustrate the documentary's main points about social media's influence on one's mental health.
Nell Minow of RogerEbert.com stated that "even the wonderfully talented Skyler Gisondo cannot make a sequence work where he plays a teenager seduced by extremist disinformation, and the scenes with Vincent Kartheiser embodying the formulas that fight our efforts to pay attention to anything outside of the online world are just silly."[61] Casey Newton of The Verge argued that the dramatized segments of the film are "ridiculous[.] And the ominous piano score that persuades every scene, rather than ratcheting up the tension, gives it all the feeling of camp."[62] The film was also criticized for being simplistic, and not including longstanding assessments of social media. Pranav Malhotra of Slate stated that the film "plays up well-worn dystopian narratives surrounding technology," and "depend[s] on tired (and not helpful) tropes about technology as the sole cause of harm, especially to children." He also criticized the film for failing to acknowledge activists and commentators who have long-criticized social media, saying that "it could have also given space to critical internet and media scholars like Safiya Noble, Sarah T. Roberts, and Siva Vaidhyanathan, just to name a few, who continue to write about how broader structural inequalities are reflected in and often amplified the practices of big technology companies."[63] The review concludes by admonishing the "uncritical" presentation of another dystopian narrative lacking nuance.
In response to the reviews and criticisms that Social Dilemma received, Jeff Orlowski the director of the documentary mentioned that his documentary was “an insider’s perspective” of Silicon Valley as a Stanford University graduate.
Facebook released a statement on its about page that the film "gives a distorted view of how social media platforms work to create a convenient scapegoat for what are difficult and complex societal problems".[64]
CNBC reported that social media users are doubting if they should continue using Facebook or Instagram, after watching The Social Dilemma. However, when Facebook was asked about the possibility of decline in its users, Facebook refused to answer or give any comments on the subject.[65]
Mozilla employees Ashley Boyd and Audrey Hingle note that while the "making, release and popularity of The Social Dilemma represents a major milestone towards [the goal of] building a movement of internet users who understand social media's impact and who demand better from platforms", the film would have benefited from featuring more diverse voices.[66]
Award | Date of ceremony | Category | Recipient(s) | Result | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE Eddie Awards | April 17, 2021 | Best Edited Documentary (Feature) | Davis Coombe | Nominated | [67] |
ASCAP Screen Music Awards | May 17, 2021 | TV documentary Score of the Year | Mark A. Crawford | Nominated | [68] |
British Academy Film Awards | April 11, 2021 | Best Documentary | Jeff Orlowski and Larissa Rhodes | Nominated | [69] |
BFE Cut Above Awards | March 5, 2021 | Best Edited Single Documentary or Non-Fiction Programme | Davis Coombe | Won | [70] |
Boulder International Film Festival | March 8, 2020 | Best Social Impact Film | The Social Dilemma | Won | [71][72] |
Chicago Film Critics Association Awards | December 21, 2020 | Best Documentary | The Social Dilemma | Nominated | [73] |
Cinema Audio Society Awards | April 17, 2021 | Outstanding Achievement in Sound Mixing for a Motion Picture – Documentary | Mark A. Crawford, Scott R. Lewis, Mark Venezia, and Jason Butler | Nominated | [74] |
Cinema Eye Honors Awards | March 9, 2021 | Audience Choice Prize | The Social Dilemma | Nominated | [75] |
Outstanding Achievement in Graphic Design or Animation | Simon Barker, Matthew Poliquin, Matt Schultz, and Shawna Schultz | Nominated | |||
Critics' Choice Documentary Awards | November 16, 2020 | Best Documentary Feature | The Social Dilemma | Nominated | [76] |
Best Political Documentary | The Social Dilemma | Nominated | |||
Motion Picture Sound Editors Golden Reel Awards | April 16, 2021 | Outstanding Achievement in Sound Editing – Feature Documentary | Richard Gould, James Spencer, and Andrea Gard | Nominated | [77] |
Primetime Emmy Awards | September 12, 2021 | Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special | Larissa Rhodes, Daniel Wright, and Stacey Piculell | Nominated | [52] |
Outstanding Directing for a Documentary/Nonfiction Program | Jeff Orlowski | Nominated | |||
Outstanding Writing for a Nonfiction Program | Vickie Curtis, Davis Coombe, and Jeff Orlowski | Won | |||
Outstanding Cinematography for a Nonfiction Program | John Behrens and Jonathan Pope | Nominated | |||
Outstanding Music Composition for a Documentary Series or Special (Original Dramatic Score) | Mark A. Crawford | Nominated | |||
Outstanding Picture Editing for a Nonfiction Program | Davis Coombe | Won | |||
Outstanding Sound Editing for a Nonfiction or Reality Program (Single or Multi-Camera) | Richard Gould, James Spencer, and Andrea Gard | Nominated | |||
San Diego Film Critics Society Awards | January 11, 2021 | Best Documentary | The Social Dilemma | Runner-up | [78] |
St. Louis Film Critics Association Awards | January 18, 2021 | Best Documentary Film | The Social Dilemma | Nominated | [79] |
Webby Awards | May 18, 2021 | Advertising, Media & PR – Branded Content – Politics & Advocacy | Exposure Labs | Won | [80] |