Ulmus 'Patriot'

Summary

Ulmus 'Patriot' [2] is a hybrid cultivar raised by the United States National Arboretum in 1980. Derived from a crossing of the American hybrid 'Urban' (female parent) with the Wilson's Elm (now treated as Japanese Elm U. davidiana var. japonica) cultivar 'Prospector', 'Patriot' was released to commerce, free of patent restrictions, in 1993. [3] Tested in the US National Elm Trial coordinated by Colorado State University, [4] 'Patriot' averaged a survival rate of 85% after 10 years.[1]

Ulmus 'Patriot'
Ulmus 'Patriot' at the USDA Plant Introduction Station, Glenn Dale, MD.
GenusUlmus
Hybrid parentage'Urban' × 'Prospector'
Cultivar'Patriot'
OriginUS

Description edit

The tree develops an upsweeping crown, ultimately adopting a narrow vase-shape. The leaves are slightly obovate, with doubly serrate margins and typically acuminate apices; they are of an average size for the genus, < 10 cm long by 7.5 cm broad, glossy dark green turning yellow in autumn.[2] The perfect, apetalous wind-pollinated flowers appear in March. Flowering usually begins when the tree is aged six years.

Growth is vigorous; specimens in the USDA trials reaching a height of over 13 m (43 ft) and a spread of nearly 8 m (25 ft) after only 13 years. In an assessment at U C Davis as part of the National Elm Trial, 'Patriot' increased in height by almost 1.5 m and d.b.h. by 2.5 cm per annum.[3] [5]

Pests and diseases edit

'Patriot' was found to have a very high resistance to Dutch elm disease (DED) in the United States, exhibiting 100% survival seven years after inoculation with the causal pathogen. Tolerance of the elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola is generally regarded as only moderate, although specimens grown at the aforementioned trials at U C Davis were among those cultivars least affected;[3] resistance to Japanese Beetle is poor.[4] When grown for 11 years among hundreds of infected American Elms in Delaware, Ohio, the clone showed no signs of susceptibility to Elm Yellows;[6][5] however when tested by deliberate infection, tolerance was found to be poor.[6]

Cultivation edit

The tree performs best in moist but well-drained soils, but will tolerate alkaline ground and salts [7]. In trials by Northern Arizona University in the hot and arid climate of Holbrook, eastern Arizona [8], it did not perform as well as 'Frontier' and 'Regal', but not as badly as others such as 'New Horizon' and 'Sapporo Autumn Gold'. In the cooler climes of Minnesota, it was recommended for every forester's 'Top Ten' list of urban trees.[7] 'Patriot' is extremely cold hardy; in artificial freezing tests at the Morton Arboretum [8] the LT50 (temp. at which 50% of tissues die) was found to be - 38 °C.

Propagation from softwood cuttings is reputedly easy; taken in mid-May, treated with a 3000 ppm IBA rooting hormone and placed under mist, < 95% should root in less than four weeks. However, commercial propagation is commonly by grafting onto a Siberian Elm Ulmus pumila rootstock. As height increase can rapidly outstrip stem width, lopping the stem above a leaf node at breast height and vertically training the new leader is recommended to create a more stable structure.

The tree is currently being evaluated in the National Elm Trial [9] coordinated by Colorado State University. 'Patriot' was introduced to the Netherlands and the UK in 2008,[9] and to Italy in 2011 by the Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, Florence.

Accessions edit

North America edit

Europe edit

Nurseries edit

North America edit

References edit

  1. ^ Griffin, J.; et al. (2017). "Ten-Year Performance of the United States National Elm Trial" (PDF). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 43(3):107–120. International Society of Arboriculture, Atlanta, US.
  2. ^ Santamour, J., Frank, S. & Bentz, S. (1995). Updated checklist of elm (Ulmus) cultivars for use in North America. Journal of Arboriculture, 21:3 (May 1995), 121–131. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, US. [1]
  3. ^ a b McPherson, G. et al. (2008). National elm trial: Initial report from Northern California. Western Arborist, Fall 2009, pp 32-36.
  4. ^ Brady, C., Condra, J., & Potter, D. (2008) Resistance of Landscape-suitable Elm (Ulmus spp.) Cultivars to Japanese Beetle, Leaf Miners, and Gall Makers. 2008 Research Report, Nursery & Landscape Program, 15–16. University of Kentucky.
  5. ^ Townsend, A. M. & Douglass, L. W. (2004). Evaluation of elm clones for tolerance of Dutch elm disease. Journal of Arboriculture 21(3). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
  6. ^ Sinclair, W. A., Townend, A. M., Griffiths, H. M., & Whitlow, T. H. (2000). Responses of six Eurasian Ulmus cultivars to a North American elm yellows phytoplasma. Plant disease, Vol. 84, No.12, 1266–1270. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN
  7. ^ Giblin, C. P. & Gillman, J. H. (2006). Elms for the Twin Cities: A Guide for Selection and Maintenance. University of Minnesota.
  8. ^ Shirazi, A. M. & Ware, G. H. (2004). Evaluation of New Elms from China for Cold Hardiness in Northern Latitudes. International Symposium on Asian Plant Diversity & Systematics 2004, Sakura, Japan.
  9. ^ Brookes, A. H. (2020). Great Fontley Elm Trial, 2020 Report. Butterfly Conservation, Lulworth, England.

External links edit

  • http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/SUL4.pdf Summary, inc. photographs, of elm cultivars resistant to Dutch elm disease available in the United States.
  • https://web.archive.org/web/20030413074605/http://fletcher.ces.state.nc.us/programs/nursery/metria/metria11/warren/elm.htm Warren, K., J. Frank Schmidt & Son Co. (2002). The Status of Elms in the Nursery Industry in 2000.