KNOWPIA
WELCOME TO KNOWPIA

In mathematics, more specifically functional analysis and operator theory, the notion of **unbounded operator** provides an abstract framework for dealing with differential operators, unbounded observables in quantum mechanics, and other cases.

The term "unbounded operator" can be misleading, since

- "unbounded" should sometimes be understood as "not necessarily bounded";
- "operator" should be understood as "linear operator" (as in the case of "bounded operator");
- the domain of the operator is a linear subspace, not necessarily the whole space;
- this linear subspace is not necessarily closed; often (but not always) it is assumed to be dense;
- in the special case of a bounded operator, still, the domain is usually assumed to be the whole space.

In contrast to bounded operators, unbounded operators on a given space do not form an algebra, nor even a linear space, because each one is defined on its own domain.

The term "operator" often means "bounded linear operator", but in the context of this article it means "unbounded operator", with the reservations made above.

The theory of unbounded operators developed in the late 1920s and early 1930s as part of developing a rigorous mathematical framework for quantum mechanics.^{[1]} The theory's development is due to John von Neumann^{[2]} and Marshall Stone.^{[3]} Von Neumann introduced using graphs to analyze unbounded operators in 1932.^{[4]}

Let *X*, *Y* be Banach spaces. An **unbounded operator** (or simply *operator*) *T* : *D*(*T*) → *Y* is a linear map T from a linear subspace *D*(*T*) ⊆ *X*—the domain of T—to the space *Y*.^{[5]} Contrary to the usual convention, T may not be defined on the whole space X.

An operator T is said to be **closed** if its graph Γ(*T*) is a closed set.^{[6]} (Here, the graph Γ(*T*) is a linear subspace of the direct sum *X* ⊕ *Y*, defined as the set of all pairs (*x*, *Tx*), where x runs over the domain of T .) Explicitly, this means that for every sequence {*x _{n}*} of points from the domain of T such that

An operator T is said to be **densely defined** if its domain is dense in X.^{[5]} This also includes operators defined on the entire space X, since the whole space is dense in itself. The denseness of the domain is necessary and sufficient for the existence of the adjoint (if X and Y are Hilbert spaces) and the transpose; see the sections below.

If *T* : *D*(*T*) → *Y* is closed, densely defined and continuous on its domain, then its domain is all of X.^{[nb 1]}

A densely defined symmetric^{[clarification needed]} operator T on a Hilbert space H is called **bounded from below** if *T* + *a* is a positive operator for some real number a. That is, ⟨*Tx*|*x*⟩ ≥ −*a* ||*x*||^{2} for all x in the domain of T (or alternatively ⟨*Tx*|*x*⟩ ≥ *a* ||*x*||^{2} since *a* is arbitrary).^{[8]} If both T and −*T* are bounded from below then T is bounded.^{[8]}

Let *C*([0, 1]) denote the space of continuous functions on the unit interval, and let *C*^{1}([0, 1]) denote the space of continuously differentiable functions. We equip with the supremum norm, , making it a Banach space. Define the classical differentiation operator *d*/*dx* : *C*^{1}([0, 1]) → *C*([0, 1]) by the usual formula:

Every differentiable function is continuous, so *C*^{1}([0, 1]) ⊆ *C*([0, 1]). We claim that *d*/*dx* : *C*([0, 1]) → *C*([0, 1]) is a well-defined unbounded operator, with domain *C*^{1}([0, 1]). For this, we need to show that is linear and then, for example, exhibit some such that and .

This is a linear operator, since a linear combination *a f * + *bg* of two continuously differentiable functions *f* , *g* is also continuously differentiable, and

The operator is not bounded. For example,

satisfy

but

as .

The operator is densely defined, and closed.

The same operator can be treated as an operator *Z* → *Z* for many choices of Banach space Z and not be bounded between any of them. At the same time, it can be bounded as an operator *X* → *Y* for other pairs of Banach spaces *X*, *Y*, and also as operator *Z* → *Z* for some topological vector spaces Z.^{[clarification needed]} As an example let *I* ⊂ **R** be an open interval and consider

where:

The adjoint of an unbounded operator can be defined in two equivalent ways. Let be an unbounded operator between Hilbert spaces.

First, it can be defined in a way analogous to how one defines the adjoint of a bounded operator. Namely, the adjoint of T is defined as an operator with the property: More precisely, is defined in the following way. If is such that is a continuous linear functional on the domain of T, then is declared to be an element of and after extending the linear functional to the whole space via the Hahn–Banach theorem, it is possible to find some in such that since Riesz representation theorem allows the continuous dual of the Hilbert space to be identified with the set of linear functionals given by the inner product. This vector is uniquely determined by if and only if the linear functional is densely defined; or equivalently, if T is densely defined. Finally, letting completes the construction of which is necessarily a linear map. The adjoint exists if and only if T is densely defined.

By definition, the domain of consists of elements in such that is continuous on the domain of T. Consequently, the domain of could be anything; it could be trivial (that is, contains only zero).^{[9]} It may happen that the domain of is a closed hyperplane and vanishes everywhere on the domain.^{[10]}^{[11]} Thus, boundedness of on its domain does not imply boundedness of T. On the other hand, if is defined on the whole space then T is bounded on its domain and therefore can be extended by continuity to a bounded operator on the whole space.^{[nb 2]} If the domain of is dense, then it has its adjoint ^{[12]} A closed densely defined operator T is bounded if and only if is bounded.^{[nb 3]}

The other equivalent definition of the adjoint can be obtained by noticing a general fact. Define a linear operator as follows:^{[12]}
Since is an isometric surjection, it is unitary. Hence: is the graph of some operator if and only if T is densely defined.^{[13]} A simple calculation shows that this "some" satisfies:
for every x in the domain of T. Thus is the adjoint of T.

It follows immediately from the above definition that the adjoint is closed.^{[12]} In particular, a self-adjoint operator (meaning ) is closed. An operator T is closed and densely defined if and only if ^{[nb 4]}

Some well-known properties for bounded operators generalize to closed densely defined operators. The kernel of a closed operator is closed. Moreover, the kernel of a closed densely defined operator coincides with the orthogonal complement of the range of the adjoint. That is,^{[14]}
von Neumann's theorem states that and are self-adjoint, and that and both have bounded inverses.^{[15]} If has trivial kernel, T has dense range (by the above identity.) Moreover:

- T is surjective if and only if there is a such that for all in
^{[nb 5]}(This is essentially a variant of the so-called closed range theorem.) In particular, T has closed range if and only if has closed range.

In contrast to the bounded case, it is not necessary that since, for example, it is even possible that does not exist.^{[citation needed]} This is, however, the case if, for example, T is bounded.^{[16]}

A densely defined, closed operator T is called *normal* if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:^{[17]}

- ;
- the domain of T is equal to the domain of and for every x in this domain;
- there exist self-adjoint operators such that and for every x in the domain of T.

Every self-adjoint operator is normal.

Let be an operator between Banach spaces. Then the *transpose* (or *dual*) of is the linear operator satisfying:
for all and Here, we used the notation: ^{[18]}

The necessary and sufficient condition for the transpose of to exist is that is densely defined (for essentially the same reason as to adjoints, as discussed above.)

For any Hilbert space there is the anti-linear isomorphism:
given by where
Through this isomorphism, the transpose relates to the adjoint in the following way:^{[19]}
where . (For the finite-dimensional case, this corresponds to the fact that the adjoint of a matrix is its conjugate transpose.) Note that this gives the definition of adjoint in terms of a transpose.

Closed linear operators are a class of linear operators on Banach spaces. They are more general than bounded operators, and therefore not necessarily continuous, but they still retain nice enough properties that one can define the spectrum and (with certain assumptions) functional calculus for such operators. Many important linear operators which fail to be bounded turn out to be closed, such as the derivative and a large class of differential operators.

Let *X*, *Y* be two Banach spaces. A linear operator *A* : *D*(*A*) ⊆ *X* → *Y* is **closed** if for every sequence {*x*_{n}} in *D*(*A*) converging to x in X such that *Ax _{n}* →

Given a linear operator A, not necessarily closed, if the closure of its graph in *X* ⊕ *Y* happens to be the graph of some operator, that operator is called the **closure** of A, and we say that A is **closable**. Denote the closure of A by *A*. It follows that A is the restriction of *A* to *D*(*A*).

A **core** (or **essential domain**) of a closable operator is a subset C of *D*(*A*) such that the closure of the restriction of A to C is *A*.

Consider the derivative operator *A* = *d*/*dx* where *X* = *Y* = *C*([*a*, *b*]) is the Banach space of all continuous functions on an interval [*a*, *b*].
If one takes its domain *D*(*A*) to be *C*^{1}([*a*, *b*]), then A is a closed operator which is not bounded.^{[20]}
On the other hand if *D*(*A*) = *C*^{∞}([*a*, *b*]), then A will no longer be closed, but it will be closable, with the closure being its extension defined on *C*^{1}([*a*, *b*]).

An operator *T* on a Hilbert space is *symmetric* if and only if for each *x* and *y* in the domain of T we have . A densely defined operator T is symmetric if and only if it agrees with its adjoint *T*^{∗} restricted to the domain of *T*, in other words when *T*^{∗} is an extension of T.^{[21]}

In general, if *T* is densely defined and symmetric, the domain of the adjoint *T*^{∗} need not equal the domain of *T*. If *T* is symmetric and the domain of *T* and the domain of the adjoint coincide, then we say that *T* is *self-adjoint*.^{[22]} Note that, when *T* is self-adjoint, the existence of the adjoint implies that *T* is densely defined and since *T*^{∗} is necessarily closed, *T* is closed.

A densely defined operator *T* is *symmetric*, if the subspace Γ(*T*) (defined in a previous section) is orthogonal to its image *J*(Γ(*T*)) under *J* (where *J*(*x*,*y*):=(*y*,-*x*)).^{[nb 6]}

Equivalently, an operator *T* is *self-adjoint* if it is densely defined, closed, symmetric, and satisfies the fourth condition: both operators *T* – *i*, *T* + *i* are surjective, that is, map the domain of *T* onto the whole space *H*. In other words: for every *x* in *H* there exist *y* and *z* in the domain of *T* such that *Ty* – *iy* = *x* and *Tz* + *iz* = *x*.^{[23]}

An operator *T* is *self-adjoint*, if the two subspaces Γ(*T*), *J*(Γ(*T*)) are orthogonal and their sum is the whole space ^{[12]}

This approach does not cover non-densely defined closed operators. Non-densely defined symmetric operators can be defined directly or via graphs, but not via adjoint operators.

A symmetric operator is often studied via its Cayley transform.

An operator *T* on a complex Hilbert space is symmetric if and only if the number is real for all *x* in the domain of *T*.^{[21]}

A densely defined closed symmetric operator *T* is self-adjoint if and only if *T*^{∗} is symmetric.^{[24]} It may happen that it is not.^{[25]}^{[26]}

A densely defined operator *T* is called *positive*^{[8]} (or *nonnegative*^{[27]}) if its quadratic form is nonnegative, that is, for all *x* in the domain of *T*. Such operator is necessarily symmetric.

The operator *T*^{∗}*T* is self-adjoint^{[28]} and positive^{[8]} for every densely defined, closed *T*.

The spectral theorem applies to self-adjoint operators ^{[29]} and moreover, to normal operators,^{[30]}^{[31]} but not to densely defined, closed operators in general, since in this case the spectrum can be empty.^{[32]}^{[33]}

A symmetric operator defined everywhere is closed, therefore bounded,^{[6]} which is the Hellinger–Toeplitz theorem.^{[34]}

By definition, an operator *T* is an *extension* of an operator *S* if Γ(*S*) ⊆ Γ(*T*).^{[35]} An equivalent direct definition: for every *x* in the domain of *S*, *x* belongs to the domain of *T* and *Sx* = *Tx*.^{[5]}^{[35]}

Note that an everywhere defined extension exists for every operator, which is a purely algebraic fact explained at Discontinuous linear map § General existence theorem and based on the axiom of choice. If the given operator is not bounded then the extension is a discontinuous linear map. It is of little use since it cannot preserve important properties of the given operator (see below), and usually is highly non-unique.

An operator *T* is called *closable* if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:^{[6]}^{[35]}^{[36]}

*T*has a closed extension;- the closure of the graph of
*T*is the graph of some operator; - for every sequence (
*x*) of points from the domain of_{n}*T*such that*x*→ 0 and also_{n}*Tx*→_{n}*y*it holds that*y*= 0.

Not all operators are closable.^{[37]}

A closable operator *T* has the least closed extension called the *closure* of *T*. The closure of the graph of *T* is equal to the graph of ^{[6]}^{[35]} Other, non-minimal closed extensions may exist.^{[25]}^{[26]}

A densely defined operator *T* is closable if and only if *T*^{∗} is densely defined. In this case and ^{[12]}^{[38]}

If *S* is densely defined and *T* is an extension of *S* then *S*^{∗} is an extension of *T*^{∗}.^{[39]}

Every symmetric operator is closable.^{[40]}

A symmetric operator is called *maximal symmetric* if it has no symmetric extensions, except for itself.^{[21]} Every self-adjoint operator is maximal symmetric.^{[21]} The converse is wrong.^{[41]}

An operator is called *essentially self-adjoint* if its closure is self-adjoint.^{[40]} An operator is essentially self-adjoint if and only if it has one and only one self-adjoint extension.^{[24]}

A symmetric operator may have more than one self-adjoint extension, and even a continuum of them.^{[26]}

A densely defined, symmetric operator *T* is essentially self-adjoint if and only if both operators *T* – *i*, *T* + *i* have dense range.^{[42]}

Let *T* be a densely defined operator. Denoting the relation "*T* is an extension of *S*" by *S* ⊂ *T* (a conventional abbreviation for Γ(*S*) ⊆ Γ(*T*)) one has the following.^{[43]}

- If
*T*is symmetric then*T*⊂*T*^{∗∗}⊂*T*^{∗}. - If
*T*is closed and symmetric then*T*=*T*^{∗∗}⊂*T*^{∗}. - If
*T*is self-adjoint then*T*=*T*^{∗∗}=*T*^{∗}. - If
*T*is essentially self-adjoint then*T*⊂*T*^{∗∗}=*T*^{∗}.

The class of **self-adjoint operators** is especially important in mathematical physics. Every self-adjoint operator is densely defined, closed and symmetric. The converse holds for bounded operators but fails in general. Self-adjointness is substantially more restricting than these three properties. The famous spectral theorem holds for self-adjoint operators. In combination with Stone's theorem on one-parameter unitary groups it shows that self-adjoint operators are precisely the infinitesimal generators of strongly continuous one-parameter unitary groups, see Self-adjoint operator § Self-adjoint extensions in quantum mechanics. Such unitary groups are especially important for describing time evolution in classical and quantum mechanics.

**^**Suppose*f*is a sequence in the domain of T that converges to_{j}*g*∈*X*. Since T is uniformly continuous on its domain,*Tf*is Cauchy in Y. Thus, (_{j}*f*,_{j}*T f*) is Cauchy and so converges to some (_{j}*f*,*T f*) since the graph of T is closed. Hence,*f*=*g*, and the domain of T is closed.**^**Proof: being closed, the everywhere defined is bounded, which implies boundedness of the latter being the closure of T. See also (Pedersen 1989, 2.3.11) for the case of everywhere defined T.**^**Proof: So if is bounded then its adjoint T is bounded.**^**Proof: If T is closed densely defined then exists and is densely defined. Thus exists. The graph of T is dense in the graph of hence Conversely, since the existence of implies that that of which in turn implies T is densely defined. Since is closed, T is densely defined and closed.**^**If is surjective then has bounded inverse, denoted by The estimate then follows since Conversely, suppose the estimate holds. Since has closed range, it is the case that Since is dense, it suffices to show that has closed range. If is convergent then is convergent by the estimate since Say, Since is self-adjoint; thus, closed, (von Neumann's theorem), QED**^**Follows from (Pedersen 1989, 5.1.5) and the definition via adjoint operators.

**^**Reed & Simon 1980, Notes to Chapter VIII, page 305**^**von Neumann 1930, pp. 49–131**^**Stone 1932**^**von Neumann 1932, pp. 294–310- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Pedersen 1989, 5.1.1 - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}^{e}Pedersen 1989, 5.1.4 **^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, page 5- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}Pedersen 1989, 5.1.12 **^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, Example 3.2 on page 16**^**Reed & Simon 1980, page 252**^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, Example 3.1 on page 15- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}^{e}Pedersen 1989, 5.1.5 **^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, page 12**^**Brezis 1983, p. 28**^**Yoshida 1980, p. 200**^**Yoshida 1980, p. 195.**^**Pedersen 1989, 5.1.11**^**Yoshida 1980, p. 193**^**Yoshida 1980, p. 196**^**Kreyszig 1978, p. 294- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}Pedersen 1989, 5.1.3 **^**Kato 1995, 5.3.3**^**Pedersen 1989, 5.2.5- ^
^{a}^{b}Reed & Simon 1980, page 256 - ^
^{a}^{b}Pedersen 1989, 5.1.16 - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Reed & Simon 1980, Example on pages 257-259 **^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, page 25**^**Pedersen 1989, 5.1.9**^**Pedersen 1989, 5.3.8**^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, page 89**^**Pedersen 1989, 5.3.19**^**Reed & Simon 1980, Example 5 on page 254**^**Pedersen 1989, 5.2.12**^**Reed & Simon 1980, page 84- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}Reed & Simon 1980, page 250 **^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, pages 6,7**^**Berezansky, Sheftel & Us 1996, page 7**^**Reed & Simon 1980, page 253**^**Pedersen 1989, 5.1.2- ^
^{a}^{b}Pedersen 1989, 5.1.6 **^**Pedersen 1989, 5.2.6**^**Reed & Simon 1980, page 257**^**Reed & Simon 1980, pages 255, 256

- Berezansky, Y.M.; Sheftel, Z.G.; Us, G.F. (1996),
*Functional analysis*, vol. II, Birkhäuser (see Chapter 12 "General theory of unbounded operators in Hilbert spaces"). - Brezis, Haïm (1983),
*Analyse fonctionnelle — Théorie et applications*(in French), Paris: Mason - "Unbounded operator",
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*, EMS Press, 2001 [1994] - Hall, B.C. (2013), "Chapter 9. Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators",
*Quantum Theory for Mathematicians*, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 267, Springer, ISBN 978-1461471158 - Kato, Tosio (1995), "Chapter 5. Operators in Hilbert Space",
*Perturbation theory for linear operators*, Classics in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-58661-X - Kreyszig, Erwin (1978).
*Introductory Functional Analysis With Applications*. USA: John Wiley & Sons. Inc. ISBN 0-471-50731-8. - Pedersen, Gert K. (1989),
*Analysis now*, Springer (see Chapter 5 "Unbounded operators"). - Reed, Michael; Simon, Barry (1980),
*Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics*, vol. 1: Functional Analysis (revised and enlarged ed.), Academic Press (see Chapter 8 "Unbounded operators"). - Stone, Marshall Harvey (1932).
*Linear Transformations in Hilbert Space and Their Applications to Analysis. Reprint of the 1932 Ed*. American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-7452-3. - Teschl, Gerald (2009).
*Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics; With Applications to Schrödinger Operators*. Providence: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-4660-5. - von Neumann, J. (1930), "Allgemeine Eigenwerttheorie Hermitescher Functionaloperatoren (General Eigenvalue Theory of Hermitian Functional Operators)",
*Mathematische Annalen*,**102**(1), doi:10.1007/BF01782338, S2CID 121249803 - von Neumann, J. (1932), "Über Adjungierte Funktionaloperatore (On Adjoint Functional Operators)",
*Annals of Mathematics*, Second Series,**33**(2), doi:10.2307/1968331, JSTOR 1968331 - Yoshida, Kôsaku (1980),
*Functional Analysis*(sixth ed.), Springer

*This article incorporates material from Closed operator on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.*